Esteban16
Welcome to Simple English Wikipedia
change
|
Category creation
changeThe current practice at the Simple English Wikipedia in regards to category creation is to only create categories once there are at least 3 articles to which that category applies. please do not create categories (such as Category:2009 births - we do not have a lot of articles on notable 2-3 year olds) which have less than three articles to populate that category. In most cases, as an empty category, they are subject to quick deletion. See Wikipedia:Categories#Creating new categories for more information on the subject of category creation here. --Creol(talk) 06:41, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
- Done
Quick deletion of Category:2009 births
changeSeveral of the birth-year categories you created have been selected for quick deletion. This is because they are empty. Please create these chronology categories only if there is an article to put in them. If you think this category should be kept, please add {{wait}} below the line {{QD}} and say why on the talk page. If the category is already gone, but you think this was an error, you can ask for it to be undeleted. You can find more information about the reason here. Auntof6 (talk) 17:54, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
- Hi. I see you removed the QD from Category:2009 births after it had an article in it. The person who created the page isn't allowed to remove the QD, so another editor put it back. However, I then removed it because I put it there in the first place and I can remove it. Thanks for populating the category! --Auntof6 (talk) 04:18, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
Signing posts
changePlease remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes ~~~~; this will show your username and the date.Receptie123 (talk) 18:29, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
- Something weird happened to your post - cleaned up. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 18:38, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
An editor has requested deletion of Alia De Vercelli, an article you created. We appreciate your changes, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").
Please comment on the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2013/Alia De Vercelli and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also change the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns. But you should not remove the requests for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you very much. Osiris (talk) 11:02, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Rollback
changeI have assigned the right to you. You have experience on other wikis, so I believe you will use it appropriately. Please make sure when you do revert vandalism, that you also warn the user. I saw some instances where you are not consistent with the warning of the editor involved. -- Enfcer (talk) 02:43, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you Enfcer, I'll be more careful with warnings. Esteban messages 00:00, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
An IP.
changeThis particular revert here. You warned the IP using a template that referred to it as vandalism. That edit was not blatant vandalism. For all wek know, he was going to add more information and restate it. It ws good to revert, but I just wanted to inform you that it was good faith distuptive editing as opposed to editing maliciously. Thank you, Vermont | reply here 19:44, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
lern grammer
changedates have comma in american style so y u revert my edit 2 lil weezy
Why a new QD?
changeI already requested one, why did you add another for History of chemistry? Elytrian - Talk 04:23, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
- Elytrian: I use Twinkle, when I was about to tag the article your edit hadn't been saved yet. When the tagging was complete I didn't notice you already did it. Esteban16 (talk) 16:57, 11 August 2021 (UTC)