User talk:Reception123/Archive 2

Latest comment: 10 years ago by Reception123 in topic Your post to User:Dan Blocker
← Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 →

QDs on user pages change

Hi Reception, please do not tag user pages for deletion, which do not violate our user page policy. For example, it is definitely allowed to have an empty user page, or an draft of a text, which looks like encyclopaedic material. Thanks, --@intforce 17:37, 8 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Seriously....did you not take on the final warning I gave you. You are lucky he was the one who noticed you do it or you would be blocked right now. -DJSasso (talk) 21:35, 8 October 2012 (UTC)Reply
I didn't know a empty user page does not to be deleted.Reception123 / Receptie123 (talk) 04:55, 9 October 2012 (UTC)Reply
In any case, you were advised to leave user pages alone. Did you not understand that? --Auntof6 (talk) 05:39, 9 October 2012 (UTC)Reply
Sorry for my untimely presence, but I would like to point out further that ignorance cannot be taken as a valid reason forever. I have also noticed some invalid QD tagging, please go through the deletion policy again. Chenzw  Talk  10:33, 9 October 2012 (UTC)Reply
I have reconsidered and based on this and a large number of other issues I and other admin have seen surrounding your editing. I have reciprocated the block you have on en. You might also want to read Wikipedia:Competence is required and en:Wikipedia:Guidance for younger editors. -DJSasso (talk) 17:05, 9 October 2012 (UTC)Reply
If you were talking to me i would like to tell you that i am 32 years old and not a "younger editor".Reception123 / Receptie123 (talk) 04:55, 10 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Unblock request change

I think you should unblock me because i won't do bad things like in the past.I will do helpful things for this Wikipedia.When i was blocked i read the Wikipedia Guidelines as well.Can you please unblock me?Reception123 / Receptie123 (talk) 04:59, 16 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

You were blocked for changing other peoples user pages and interfering with QD tags. Can you let me know what you have learned from the guidelines in this respect? Kennedy (talk) 11:53, 28 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
(Non-administrator observation) (talk page stalker) (late imo) But before this account got blocked, I do not see the user change other userpages (I looked through the contributions, but I don't see Reception123 change other changer's userpages). curtaintoad | chat me! 12:13, 9 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
I have learned that I have to respect other users and to be more careful when placing QD's.From now on, if I am unblocked I will be very careful with what I do.--Reception123 / Receptie123 (talk) 08:32, 1 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
 

Request reason(s):
I have learned that I have to respect other users and to be more careful when placing QD's.From now on, if I am unblocked I will be very careful with what I do.

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):
Seeing there has been no further abuse since the initial block, I am willing to grant the unblock. You are reminded to familiarise yourself with our rules and guidelines. Chenzw  Talk  17:12, 7 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thank you very much for unblocking me.I will contribute to the Wikipedia now.Reception123 / Receptie123 (talk) 17:29, 7 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Re: Misleading block change

The administrator whom you spoke to has been inactive for a month or so already. I have unblocked that account for you instead. Chenzw  Talk  18:44, 9 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Ok.Thank you very much.I talked to him because he was the one who blocked the account.I didn't know he was inactive as i wasn't on this Wikipedia for a while.Reception123 / Receptie123 (talk) 18:45, 9 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Voting change

How is my renaming unnecessary? Honestly, your vote I think should not be counted because you were blocked. So I really think you should not vote. --Aaqib Hola! 20:09, 9 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

I will take it of.Not because of your reason but because an admin told me that it's not the Rfa.Reception123 / Receptie123 (talk) 04:54, 10 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
Yes that page is pretty much just for people to ask Bureaucrats to change there name. There is no discussion that takes place unless there is aproblem with the rename. Not much there that would be relevant for you. -DJSasso (talk) 13:41, 10 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
Chenzw told me that it isn't a Rfa.I removed the comment by using <S>.Reception123 / Receptie123 (talk) 14:28, 10 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Don't see? change

You said you will remove what you commented on WP:CU. What happened? --Aaqib Hola! 00:10, 11 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

I did! Look at the history : (cur | last) 14:26, 10 June 2013‎ Chenzw (talk | changes)‎ . . (44,743 bytes) (-7)‎ . . (Undid revision 4450242 by Reception123 (talk): CHU req is completed, please stop modifying completed requests) (undo).Chezw put it back.--Reception123 / Receptie123 (talk) 04:52, 11 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thanks change

The cookies were great. Thanks. You appear to be the only user to thank me. Thanks again this really made my day.--TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 21:02, 11 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your welcome! More users should thank you for your contributions to this Wikipedia.Reception123 / Receptie123 (talk) 04:45, 12 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
 
Just 4 U, TDKR! Oregonian2012 (talk) 19:07, 20 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for your contributions to this Wikipedia. Oregonian2012 (talk) 18:59, 20 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

IRC change

Your failed and utter ridiculous attempt to have me kicked from IRC looks more like trolling than anything else, and I can't possibly imagine why it was directed at me. In any case, I kindly ask you not to repeat this behaviour in the future. Impersonating other users can't possibly be justified as incompetence, and is a clear attempt of abuse. Please refrain from doing so as well. Savh Talk 20:23, 12 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to Wikiproject Anti-Vandalism change

Hi, Reception123, Welcome to Wikiproject Anti-Vandalism! Thank you for joining to help make a difference. If you need help, check out the Talk page of our Wikiproject, or leave a message on my talk page. Anyway, Welcome! -- Aaqib Talk!| Hola! 20:41, 14 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for the welcome Aaqib! I was formally a rollback so I know most of the Anti-Vandalism rules.Reception123 / Receptie123 (talk) 06:21, 15 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Post change

  Done I have deleted the comment that you had aggravating problems with! --Aaqib Hola! 17:23, 18 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Ok, thank you for taking time for minor things.Reception123 / Receptie123 (talk) 17:29, 18 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Talkback change

 
Hello, Reception123. You have new messages at Macdonald-ross's talk page.
Message added 18:50, 18 June 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

Aaqib Hola! 18:50, 18 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Talkback change

 
Hello, Reception123. You have new messages at Macdonald-ross's talk page.
Message added 18:56, 18 June 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

Answered the question, asked you to do a favor. Aaqib Hola! 18:56, 18 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Talkback change

 
Hello, Reception123. You have new messages at User talk:Aaqib/The Amazing World of Gumball.
Message added 17:45, 19 June 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I have answered your question Aaqib Hola! 17:45, 19 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Something? change

Hello Reception123, I do not want to be perplexing but what has been going on? Oregonian2012 has been complaining that you have been harassing him? Is this true? Can you please join the discussion. Love to see you! Oh! And I am on the discussion to! --Aaqib Hola! 21:02, 19 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Vistlip change

I undid your changes to this article. The band spells its name in all lower case, so it is OK for the article to be that way. --Auntof6 (talk) 01:12, 20 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Ok! No problem!Reception123 / Receptie123 (talk) 04:58, 20 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thanks change

  TDKR Chicago 101 has given you some cookies! Now enjoy them!

Thanks for the cookies. I know that this is late, but thanks for being kind to other users. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 00:36, 21 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your welcome! Thanks for your contributions! Reception123 / Receptie123 (talk) 14:34, 21 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for the Barnstar!!!! --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 05:36, 22 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
Your welcome.You deserve it!Reception123 / Receptie123 (talk) 05:37, 22 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Smile change

Hello Reception123 (please give me a talkback if you replied on this page), do you think I should move it to an article? Please say here. Thank you! --Aaqib ♥ Hola! 19:28, 21 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for smiling, Aaqib! I think it could be an article now that you worked so hard on it.Move it when your ready!Reception123 / Receptie123 (talk) 05:11, 22 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thanks change

  The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
This may sound cheesy, but You're so kind to so many users for recognizing them for the smallest to biggest accomplishments. You deserve this Barnstar for your kindness to other users and to this Wikipedia. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 06:41, 22 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
Thank you!Reception123 / Receptie123 (talk) 07:36, 22 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Kennedy change

I'll talk to Kennedy, but do you have any illustration we should add? I have only 1 image on the page. But I'll still inform Kennedy. --Aaqib Hola! 20:17, 22 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

He has problems with the page, he says it needs links (agree) and remove info (disagree), can you help me out? --Aaqib Hola! 20:58, 22 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
Yes, Kennedy is right it needs to be wikified. It would need more images but i don't know where to find a picture that we are aloud to upload on commons.I will check the article and try to fix something if possible.Reception123 / Receptie123 (talk) 05:56, 23 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Good Article change

Hello! I'm wondering if my article James Gandolfini can be a good article. It has good reliable sources in every sentence in the article. I know it's a long shot, but can you write suggestions on what to fix on the article, so that it can be a good one. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 21:40, 22 June 2013 (UTC)Reply


Yeah! It looks very good to me. You built it up really well.I think it could be a good article.Reception123 / Receptie123 (talk) 05:57, 23 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Punctuation change

Hi, please remember to leave a space after most punctuation (eg. periods, commas, colons, semicolons) when typing. You may also want to look at WP:PUNCTUATION. Chenzw  Talk  11:16, 23 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Sorry. I will from now on. I was just in a hurry to finish creating all the articles.Reception123 / Receptie123 (talk) 11:17, 23 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
...including the above sentence. You should be signing your posts like this: message. ~~~~ Chenzw  Talk  11:20, 23 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
Ok. Reception123 / Receptie123 (talk) 11:29, 23 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Non sense change

People creating the same meaningless page twice are just playing and are not going to be of any use. They can come back later if they wish and in the meantime, read the help pages. --M7 (talk) 15:50, 23 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Ok. It's just that I never saw a block like that. Reception123/Receptie123 (talk) 15:51, 23 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

RFA change

Hi Receptie! You are an awesome contributor to Wikipedia looking you as experienced, well kind and earning a lot of awards. Do you want me to nominate you as an admin? --Aaqib Hola! 20:15, 23 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Slow down Aaqib. I am not even rollback or patroller. Wait a bit. Maybe in 2 months when I am more experienced. I will see if I can get rollback back. Reception123/Receptie123 (talk) 04:58, 24 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for being so kind.Reception123/Receptie123 (talk) 14:30, 24 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hotel stubs: not an approved stub type change

Maybe you didn't know, but stub types here need to be discussed and approved at Wikipedia talk:Simple Stub Project before they are created. That's one of the ways we keep things simple. For that reason, I have requested deletion of the hotel stub template and category you created. Feel free to let me know if you have any questions. --Auntof6 (talk) 20:02, 26 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Ok. I will request QD G7 and propose the stubs later. Reception123/Receptie123 (talk) 04:47, 27 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thanks change

Thank you so much. This really made my day. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 16:20, 2 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your welcome. You deserved the barnstar! Reception123/Receptie123 (talk) 16:21, 2 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback change

Thank you for wanting to help keep this page clean by removing Aaqib's failed request. However, I have reverted your change for a couple of reasons. One is that I think that maintenance on that kind of page should be done by admins. The other is that, since Aaqib's contributions are currently being discussed, that information should remain available, at least in an archive. As far as I can tell, you didn't archive the section, you deleted it. --Auntof6 (talk) 21:32, 5 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Sorry but, that was because BlueGoblin said once on a change summary "I believe archiving is just removal...". So that's why I thought that archiving is just removing. Chenzw took care of it and placed it in an archive. Anyway, from now on I will leave this to admins. Reception123/Receptie123 (talk) 04:43, 6 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your post to User:Dan Blocker change

Hi Reception, thanks for trying to notify the troublemaker, but your block template edit to the user violated our rule in our WP:WN. Down at the blocks section, thanks! --Aaqib 16:49, 7 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Ok! I understand what I did wrong. Thanks for notifying me, Aaqib. Reception123/Receptie123 (talk) 16:54, 7 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
Return to the user page of "Reception123/Archive 2".