Welcome!

change
 
Some cookies to welcome you!  

Welcome to Wikipedia, Desertborn! I'm Rubbish computer and an active editor here. Thank you for your changes. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions check out Wikipedia:Questions, or send me a message on my talk page. I like to help new people, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like Wikipedia and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 18:00, 31 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Rubbish computer: Thank you! I appreciate the welcome. Desertborn (talk) 18:11, 31 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Thanks

change

for creating this week TOW. I was about to translate tmr and was beaten to it. Nice work. :)--Cohaf (talk) 14:06, 2 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your welcome :) Desertborn (talk) 19:38, 2 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Tab

change

Just saw your note in recent changes. I have an equivalent tab on en.wiki to come back to simple. (en:User:Djsasso/SimpleWPTab.js) But you are right, not really any different than an IW. Just makes it quicker to get to. -DJSasso (talk) 17:16, 6 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Djsasso: Thanks, I'll give it a try. Desertborn (talk) 17:19, 6 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Community Insights Survey

change

RMaung (WMF) 16:20, 9 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

A Barnstar for you!

change
  The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
Thank you for giving me your Ideas for getting better at simple wikipedia. Thank you! Wyatt2049 | (Talk) or (Stalk) 15:33, 10 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

IU (singer)

change

Hi Desertborn. With regards to the redirect you created (Yi Ji-eun), I believe that hangul romanization of 이 (Lee, I, her surname) is just the letter I. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:40, 12 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

@大诺史: Ah, good catch! Thank you!! Desertborn (talk) 14:43, 12 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

change

RMaung (WMF) 19:49, 20 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Help!

change

@Desertborn: I've got a situation in RC. Someone keeps vandalizing the same pages. I know it's the same person, and he's most likely using a VPN. Derpdart56 (talk) 15:08, 23 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Derpdart56: At this point (vandal is repeating their vandalism several time after you revert) I would suggest you make a report at WP:VIP and let an admin take care of it. When vandals keep vandalizing the same page even after you undo it, that is the better course instead of getting into an edit war. Another thing I sometimes do is wait a little while before reverting...usually the vandals move on in real life and then you can clean up after. Desertborn (talk) 15:11, 23 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Move

change

OK, move done. Macdonald-ross (talk) 14:23, 22 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Thank you! Desertborn (talk) 15:53, 22 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Copy-paste editing

change

What do you think about copying datas from english wikipedia and pasting it on simple english? I don't consider it a right thing to do because simple english wikipedia does not have as many pages as english and so it leaves a lot of unnecessary red links. And thats i why fact check from myself and then add it with a simple formatting style with few red links to provide a good interface for readers. But a guy seems to disagree. I will name him after you respond. Please make sure to tag me. ClumsyMind (talk) 18:22, 29 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

@ClumsyMind: I appreciate your concern for the readers and wanting to make it a good experience for them. However, copying data is not the same as copying text. When we copy written text, we need to re-write or change it to make it simpler. That is of course very important. But data is very different. And I think that is what you refer to, things like infoboxes and others like that. In this case, it is just data so there is nothing much to make simpler. So copying without change is usually fine. And having red links is not a problem since it shows what we need to create. As Auntof6 says, "The more times a term is redlinked, the higher it appears at Special:WantedPages." So red links are not a problem either. As a side note, may I give you a piece of advice? If you are going to comment on a disagreement you have with another person, it is best to name them so they can give their side of things. That is better for all involved, and certainly more fair. In this case I am notifying Djsasso since it seems he is the one you are referring to. Desertborn (talk) 09:09, 3 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
Just butting in! IMO the same conditions apply to infoboxes as applies to written text. In science they have far too much data for a beginner and so are out of sync with the text. Usually they are copies of En wiki, which makes them easy to update. But they are usually way beyond undergraduate level in the sciences, where many of our readers are still at school. Naturally, this does not apply to many topics, but in science it matters a great deal. Look at Saturn for an example of what Osiris and myself did to make the infobox comprehensible to non-experts. Unfortunately, the effort to do this was huge, and not to be repeated lightly. Also it makes the job of updating not so easy. But the infobox as was (and still is for other planets) was made for professionals with little regard for the schoolchildren who often get interested in the subject. Macdonald-ross (talk) 13:39, 15 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
That's a fair point. And certainly one to bear in mind and that I will consider more closely in future when copying infoboxes. I have noticed some do seem to complex. Desertborn (talk) 14:29, 15 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

New Wikipedia Library Collections Now Available (September 2020)

change


Hello Wikimedians!

 
The TWL owl says sign up today!

The Wikipedia Library is announcing new free, full-access, accounts to reliable sources as part of our research access program. You can sign up for new accounts and research materials on the Library Card platform:

Many other partnerships are listed on our partners page, including Adam Matthew, EBSCO, Gale and JSTOR.

A significant portion of our collection now no longer requires individual applications to access! Read more in our recent blog post.

Do better research and help expand the use of high quality references across Wikipedia projects!
--The Wikipedia Library Team 09:49, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

This message was delivered via the Global Mass Message tool to The Wikipedia Library Global Delivery List.

New Wikipedia Library Collections Available Now (February 2021)

change

Hello Wikimedians!

 
The TWL owl says sign up today!

The Wikipedia Library is announcing new free, full-access, accounts to reliable sources as part of our research access program. You can sign up to access research materials on the Library Card platform:

  • Taxmann – Taxation and law database
  • PNAS – Official journal of the National Academy of Sciences
  • EBSCO – New Arabic and Spanish language databases added

We have a wide array of other collections available, and a significant number now no longer require individual applications to access! Read more in our blog post.

Do better research and help expand the use of high quality references across Wikipedia projects!

This message was delivered via the Global Mass Message tool to The Wikipedia Library Global Delivery List.

--12:57, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Showing gratitude

change

I recently received a notification of my newly created articles being connected to other wiki equivalent articles through wikidata by you. Thank you for that! Haoreima (talk) 12:45, 13 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

You are welcome! Desertborn (talk) 12:47, 13 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

New Wikipedia Library collections and design update (August 2021)

change

Hello Wikimedians!

 
The TWL OWL says log in today!

The Wikipedia Library is pleased to announce the addition of new collections, alongside a new interface design. New collections include:

Additionally, De Gruyter and Nomos have been centralised from their previous on-wiki signup location on the German Wikipedia. Many other collections are freely available by simply logging in to The Wikipedia Library with your Wikimedia login!

We are also excited to announce that the first version of a new design for My Library was deployed this week. We will be iterating on this design with more features over the coming weeks. Read more on the project page on Meta.

Lastly, an Echo notification will begin rolling out soon to notify eligible editors about the library (T132084). If you can translate the notification please do so at TranslateWiki!

--The Wikipedia Library Team 13:23, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

This message was delivered via the Global Mass Message tool to The Wikipedia Library Global Delivery List.

DYK for Salyut 3

change

--Ferien (talk) 20:11, 22 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

New Wikipedia Library Collections Available Now - April 2022

change

Hello Wikimedians!

 
The TWL owl says sign up today!

The Wikipedia Library has free access to new paywalled reliable sources. You can these and dozens more collections at https://wikipedialibrary.wmflabs.org/:

  • Wiley – journals, books, and research resources, covering life, health, social, and physical sciences
  • OECD – OECD iLibrary, Data, and Multimedia​​ published by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development
  • SPIE Digital Library – journals and eBooks on optics and photonics applied research

Many other sources are freely available for experienced editors, including collections which recently became accessible to all eligible editors: Cambridge University Press, BMJ, AAAS, Érudit and more.

Do better research and help expand the use of high quality references across Wikipedia projects: log in today!
--The Wikipedia Library Team 13:17, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

This message was delivered via the Global Mass Message tool to The Wikipedia Library Global Delivery List.

RfD nomination of Template:CRH color

change

An editor has requested deletion of Template:CRH color, an article you created. We appreciate your changes, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Please comment on the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2022/Template:CRH color and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also change the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns. But you should not remove the requests for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you very much. Auntof6 (talk) 05:05, 20 October 2022 (UTC)Reply