User talk:Razorflame/Archive 16

RE:

"Please remember to add interwiki links to articles that you create. This is important because it helps editors from other Wikipedias navigate to our version of the article and vice versa."

What is a interwiki?

(are you able to give an example?)

Runningblader 01:52, 1 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I am most certainly able to give you an example. An interwiki is a link that allows a user that is viewing an article to check and read other articles from other language Wikipedias quickly without having to type it into their address bar.
They are usually placed at the very bottom of an article, and they use the language code to identify which Wikipedia it comes from. The language code is what you type in before the wikipedia.org in the address bar. For example, this Wikipedia's language code is simple. If I wanted to add an interwiki link from this Wikipedia on another Wikipedia, say, for example, the English Wikipedia, I would load the English Wikipedia's version of said article and add this to the bottom of the article (make sure to alphabatize them): [[simple:<insert article name here>]] You would replace the <insert article name here> with the name of the article.
For example, if I wanted to add an interwiki to the article Magnetism for the English Wikipedia, I would add this to the bottom of the article Magnetism: [[en:Magnetism]]
It's that simple. If you need more help, please let me know on my talk page. Cheers, Razorflame 01:58, 1 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
If i get info on OGame off of English Wikipedia. Do do I add [[en:OGame]] at the bottom?

Runningblader 02:02, 1 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yes, that's exactly right, however, you need not get information from that Wikipedia's article in order to put it onto an article. In fact, you can just put in onto an article if that article exists on that Wikipedia. Cheers, Razorflame 02:05, 1 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Very well, but isn't there bots that do the ones that are in a differnt language?

--Runningblader 02:09, 1 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

There is. The only one that you should worry about is the English interwiki. So long as an article has at least 1 interwiki, the bot will be able to add the others to it. Cheers, Razorflame 02:11, 1 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Mission

What did I mess up for the article mission?

Runningblader 02:11, 1 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

You didn't mess anything up. In fact, you did everything right! The only thing that you didn't do correctly was the interwiki link. You got the basic idea down, but interwiki links (as far as I know), are case-sensitive. If an article exists on another Wikipedia, you need to make sure that you type in the name of the article the same way that it does at the top of the page. Also, when dealing with articles like Mission, it is a good idea to first check the English Wikipedia to see if it is a disambiguation page. A disambiguation page is a type of article that says all the different meanings for that word, and/or all of its different uses. The article that exists currently at Mission is closest to the English article en:Mission statement. Mission is a disambiguation page on the English Wikipedia, so it should also be a disambiguation page here. Cheers, Razorflame 02:17, 1 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the welcome

Hi, thanks for the welcome message. Interesting that I've been editing since 2006 and it's the first time I've been welcomed. :) ONUnicorn (talk) 02:25, 1 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

I'll give you the standard welcome that I give to any new user now. Cheers, Razorflame 02:25, 1 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

You Notice?

Have you noticed my editing at all? It's mostly QDs. Due to vandalism. Speaking of vandalism. I was wondering if you would like to join Wikiproject Anti-Vandalism.

Runningblader 02:49, 1 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Not to contradict what you just said, but most of your articles have not been helping to revert vandalism. Most of them, in fact, have been to improving articles. As for the WikiProject Vandalism, as much as I would like to join it, I am already the creator of a WikiProject, and that takes most of the time that I spend on this site. Otherwise, I wouldn't mind joining it. Cheers, Razorflame 02:51, 1 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

RE: To-do list

I think that I can do some. But I know so little about Greece or the Flag of Romania (I mean, what does this mean?) I'll try to do some things to expand them a bit, but I wont be on much tomorrow (church). Both look very complicated to me. Did you see the sig? (I think you may know what I am talking about, without going further) Cheers --  AmericanEagle  03:53, 1 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I saw the signature. Just let it be...it will eventually get changed. Cheers, Razorflame 03:55, 1 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

RE:

I'd be happy to help you with Romania. I'll add the government section later or tomorrow, as I don't have enough time right now. I've looked at the section on enWP, some of the words are hard for me to comprehend it also, but I'll use wiktionary and enWP articles. I think that the Romania article has the potential to be a good article or even a very good article in the future.

I'll review you and the other editors in a minute. It is a good idea to add the WP:ER link on the main page, to make it more accesable to all editors.

I got a little bored with creating asteroid articles a while ago, so I've been taking a break. Don't worry, I'll be creating more articles (see below).

The guy who was creating all the sockpuppets was definately trying to test our patience. He/she seems to have stopped for now.

Wow that's a lot of articles to create on rivers of Romania! If you like I could help you on rivers, and you could ask editors you think would be willing to help. It would probably take several months to create all the 8,000+ articles alone.

While I do think it would be a good idea to try to write articles, I'd say stick to creating stubs if you want, just as long as they aren't short enough to meet QD criteria, but I think that you should expand some articles too. There is no problem with stubs; some of our best articles started out as stubs.

Thank you for notifying me about the WikiProject, I will join. I'd be happy to help. After I'm finished the islands, I'll probably start creating articles on cities and counties in Canada (I know a lot of the cities in Ontario and British Colombia, and a lot of the counties in southwestern Ontario). Then I'll be creating lots of articles with you again :-)

Cheers and happy editing,--  Lights  talk  22:01, 1 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

I would like to point out to you that I didn't really ask for you to review me, I was just trying to increase your awareness in the page because it seems as though you've turned a deaf ear to it. I read the rest of your message and it all looks good! Cheers, Razorflame 22:41, 1 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Barnstar!

  The Original Barnstar
For being almost omnipresent on the Simple English Wikipedia and for all your recent article creations, I award you this barnstar! TheWolf 23:03, 1 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Cheers, and thanks! Razorflame 23:13, 1 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Re: "Govindaharaj"

Thanks for reverting that. I don't think "wth" is nearly as apropos, though, as "patent nonsense". ;-) Zephyrad (talk) 21:59, 2 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

I realize that I don't use the most common of techniques, but doesn't it pay to have an oddball in the group? Doesn't that make life more interesting for the rest of you? Cheers, Razorflame 23:39, 2 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Re: Wikiproject Geography

Hi there! I notice that you like Scotland, so I would like to invite you to join the WikiProject Geography, which has an offshoot called WikiProject Scotland. Cheers, Razorflame 14:26, 3 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi, thanks for letting me know about that. I was actually looking to find a project like it. Have added my name to the members list and will add the userbox. ← κεηηε∂γ (talk) 15:25, 3 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
It's not necessary to add the userbox to your userpage, but if you feel like you need to, feel free to add it to your userpage. I'm glad that I was able to help you find the WikiProject that you were looking for! Cheers, Razorflame 16:37, 3 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

RfA...

Oh really Razorflame? - per email. Cheers --  AmericanEagle  02:00, 4 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

I don't understand what you are trying to say...? Maybe a little enlightenment? Cheers, Razorflame 02:03, 4 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Barnstars!!! Thank you so much! I haven't gotten any in over a month. I sent you an Email regarding the above. Cheers --  AmericanEagle  03:06, 4 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Sure thing. I'll go check my email now. Cheers, Razorflame 14:20, 4 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks!

Thanks for the barnstar! Sorry for snapping at you earlier. But everytime I logged on here to edit it seemed like you were pointing out another thing I was doing not to your liking. I am not used to have someone constantly watching my every move and its a bit freaky when you are a new user to a wiki. -Djsasso (talk) 21:51, 4 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

I understand completely. I was just trying to help you get acclimatized to this Wikipedia more easily. When you make a new page, please remember to change External links to Other websites, as that is the norm on this Wikipedia. Thanks, Razorflame 21:56, 4 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Yeah that one I agree with you, its just a really big habbit to break. -Djsasso (talk) 22:05, 4 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Not a problem! If I see any, I'll change them for you :). Cheers, Razorflame 22:06, 4 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks

Thank you for the compliment and the cookies. Have a good day/night, I don't know where you live! Thanks>> Mattkenn3 talk 01:53, 5 June 2008 (UTC) Reply

I live in the Midwestern United States, so it is night here. Cheers, Razorflame 02:19, 5 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Oh,

I have read tens of RfA's, and I never saw that. I have changed it. Thanks --  AmericanEagle  02:41, 5 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Not a problem! Cheers, Razorflame 02:57, 5 June 2008 (UTC)Reply


How small

This is a small wiki. Every time I go somewhere I see you, Gwib, American Eagle, Running blader, Microchip18, or Archer7. It is small huh?Mattkenn3 talk 19:58, 5 June 2008 (UTC) Reply

We like to say: Growing... :) It is pretty small, but of our top twenty or so editors, we're very active. I fixed a few names above, unless he wanted to be called "Running-Bladder." But we have more active editors then the above 6. It's more like 25-30+. Oh wait, make that 31.... :) Cheers --  AmericanEagle  20:18, 5 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
We have around 25-30 active editors on this site. Therefore, we are pretty small in comparison to other Wikipedias :) Razorflame 21:06, 5 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Well, it's nice to know I'm well known... Microchip 17:24, Friday, June 6 2008 Utc

RfA

Would you be interested in being nommed for a RfA? I think you could pass, and that the objections in RfA 6 have been addressed. --  Da Punk '95  talk  01:20, 6 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yes Razor, would you? Let me check that e-mail... :) --  AmericanEagle  01:32, 6 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
I am sorry, but I am not yet ready. It's only been a month since my last Request for Adminship, so I do not think that it is a good idea to run one right now. I was planning on waiting at least another month to a month and a half before running for administrator again here. Thanks anyways for your offers :). Cheers, Razorflame 01:35, 6 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

RE: Conflicts

Very good job on your message to Djsasso. It sounded very sincere and sorry. You're welcome for the review. You mean the RfA joke, is it not true? lol. I will be on/off today. Cheers --  AmericanEagle  17:12, 6 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

What do you mean by RfA joke? Razorflame 19:00, 6 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
"I haven't seen your name on any RfA's this week." What, was that not what was humorous? --  AmericanEagle  19:02, 6 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
To tell you the truth, I didn't really get it...Razorflame 19:04, 6 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Than what "got you laughing a little bit"? What I meant was that you've had an RfA about every week since I've been here. This was your first review (since I've been here) that wasn't right after a failed RfA. Cheers --  AmericanEagle  19:09, 6 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
The part about, without tripping up is what got me laughing. And I do realize that that was the first time that you have ever reviewed me since you actually became a member of this site. Cheers, Razorflame 19:11, 6 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Oh, I see. Now that I think about that, that would either be really mean, or sarcastically funny. When I wrote it I really wasn't trying to be funny, but now that I think about it, I see. I had never reviewed you before? Hmm. I didn't know that. Cheers --  AmericanEagle  19:21, 6 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
I assure you that I was not trying to be mean towards you :). Yes, as far as I am concerned, you hadn't reviewed me before the review you gave me earlier this week. Cheers, Razorflame 23:49, 6 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
No, no. It thought that my saying that could be thought to be mean, not you! Just clearing that up. You've always been nice (at least, to me. lol). I've been working more on Charles Spurgeon. I have now worked it out, but even after it became a GA, the whole church situation I couldn't figure out. But I got that. I have just searched so many things related to him. I just got rid of some wrong references, added several, not to bore you further... :) I'm not sure what is happening in my family tomorrow and Sunday, I may or may not be editing. Probably will. Cheers --  AmericanEagle  00:25, 7 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Hope to see you on sometime this weekend, then :). I will not be on on the 8th of June for personal reasons. Cheers, Razorflame 02:32, 7 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Also, since you put something my my To-Do List, would you go through Charles Spurgeon and put {{fact}} template where it is needed (I can find any reference on him, I just want to know what needs it, I have found so much information on him). Or anybody else who reads it and wants to. Cheers --  AmericanEagle  00:37, 7 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Done. I've tagged the whole article with fact templates. As a special gift, I have even copyedited the whole article for you. Cheers, Razorflame 02:32, 7 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for copyediting it. I have added several (all you put) references. It's getting there... Cheers --  AmericanEagle  03:47, 7 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Not a problem. Glad I could help you make Charles Spurgeon a better article :) Razorflame 03:50, 7 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

RE:

Yes it is but it's not on simple and theres no reason to leave it blank unless your moving a copy here.--   ChristianMan16  03:38, 7 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Done. Page created and your page moved back to where it was when I moved it. Cheers, Razorflame 03:53, 7 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

That was out of spite you know that don't you? That was also kinda cocky.--   ChristianMan16  04:14, 7 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
No, it was done out of a genuine want to help the community. Cheers, Razorflame 19:00, 7 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Documents vs. Manuscripts.

Hello Razorflame, A document can be anything, such as the bill of your last shopping, a shopping list, a contract, a payment notice. A manuscript is something else. I don't know if you had (or even enjoyed) Latin at school, but manuscript comes from 'manu scribere (that is to say, write with the hand. Therefore, a manuscript was originally something handwritten. Later, when there was printing the word also got other meaninings. Looking at all the languages I know they either have Manuscript (in some form: Spanish and Portugue: manuscrito, French: manuscrit, Russian (no, I don't know that one, I can read Cyrillic though: Manuscript (trasliterated), Romanian (I don't know that one either): manuscris, German: Manuskript or Handschrift, Dutch Handschrift, Danish: Manuskript).

English (350 million native speakers, about the same number of second language people) Spanish (About 500 million native speakers, about 300 million second-language) and French (100 million native speakers) are among the languages most often learnt as a second language. They have words very similar to Manuscript.

So please don't tell me that manuscript is harder to understand than Document.--Eptalon (talk) 10:51, 7 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

I'm sorry. I didn't know that. Since I haven't taken any formal Latin classes, I had no idea about the origins of the word manuscript. I just wanted to let you know that the last thing that you said in this message was not very nice. There were other ways that you could have said that to make it sound nicer. Is that what everyone on here does when someone makes a mistake? If that is, then I don't see any reason why I should want to edit this site anymore. Razorflame 19:02, 7 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
I am sorry, I might definitely missed the tone in my post above. The basic message is: Manuscript is a Latin word. Many Romance languages have the word as such. Many of the non-Romance languages (at least those I know) have either taken it directly, or translated it, rather directly, in the case of German and Dutch. --Eptalon (talk) 19:12, 7 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
It's all right. I understand that we all have our times when we act a little odd, so it is alright :). Thanks for clarifying this for me :) Cheers, Razorflame 19:15, 7 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

EN SUL

I have already SUL'd all my accounts. I actually want NOT to merge en:User:Punk Boi 8, as I want to start a fresh once my ban elapses. My question was actually if I needed to have my SUL login blocked. --  Da Punk '95  talk  20:57, 7 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, I can't help you with that as I am not very knowledgable in that area. Cheers, Razorflame 20:58, 7 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Interesting...

See #97 :) --  AmericanEagle  02:43, 8 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yep, that was back when I had a ton of messages from other users :). My archives should attest to that. Speaking of archives, I have to move them from User: to User talk:...Cheers, Razorflame 02:52, 8 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
15 archives? That's a lot. Cheers --  AmericanEagle  02:54, 8 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
How do you like my new sig? I did it my self. -- ApEtSIG 03:46, 8 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
It is very interesting. Cheers, Razorflame 23:41, 8 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

thank you for the welcome!

The only reason I have an account here is because of the unified log-in, but thank you anyways! J.delanoy (talk) 02:59, 8 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Not a problem! Cheers, Razorflame 03:00, 8 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
I have never made any changes on the Simple English Wikipedia before now. It is strange to still see changes that I made a few minutes ago when I click on Recent Changes. I am more used to my changes quickly disappearing. It is also very difficult to write with these simple words. J.delanoy (talk) 03:13, 8 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Anything you say on User talk pages or User pages don't have to be simple...only the edits in the mainspace do. Cheers, Razorflame 03:16, 8 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. I "translated" Eli Manning. Can you tell me how well I did? J.delanoy (talk) 04:52, 8 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
From first look, it appears as though you did a fine job with the simplification of the article. Good job so far! Cheers, Razorflame 23:41, 8 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

QD: Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty

Hi Razorflame, I see you put a quick deletion on the article on the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. I agree, it was pretty bad - just nonsense. However, I think this is a big treaty that should have an article here. I've written a short stub for it. Tell me what you think. Thanks! Staeiou (talk) 02:39, 9 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

I also agree with you that it is a big treaty. I did not know such when I put the QD tag on it. I meant to remove it about 35 minutes ago, but my electricity went out, so I couldn't remove the QD tag. If you already removed the QD tag for me, thanks for the help. If not, then not a problem. Cheers, Razorflame 03:16, 9 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

IRC

If you are here, click here please. Thanks. SwirlBoy39 00:39, 13 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi Razorflame! I'd like to talk to you on IRC, I'm waiting in SwirlBoy39's channel above, if you're available :) Archer7 - talk 21:22, 13 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
I am available and I have already joined the IRC. Cheers, Razorflame 21:29, 13 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Barnstars!

  American Eagle's Barnstar of Excellence
For being thoughtful enough to give me some, I award you this Barnstar! -- America alk 21:25, 13 June 2008 (UTC) Reply
  The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
For all the articles you've created, I award you this Barnstar! -- America alk 21:25, 13 June 2008 (UTC) Reply

Thanks for the stars! Cheers, Razorflame 23:23, 13 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Forgot about them. You're welcome -- America alk 23:32, 13 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Vandal warnings

I was wondering where and if there is a list of vandal warnings I can use to warn users who vandalize. --Ryan Cross (talk) 03:51, 14 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Perfect! Thanks. And yes, I'll create my user page now. --Ryan Cross (talk) 03:54, 14 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Not a problem. And I wasn't worried about you not making your userpage :) Cheers, Razorflame 03:55, 14 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
I know, but still. Oh, and is there a page where it shows different kinds of userboxes? --Ryan Cross (talk) 03:56, 14 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Unfortunately, we do not allow userboxes in the template or mainspace currently. We do not believe that we are a big enough Wikipedia to have userboxes, so they can be scattered around many people's userspaces. I will try to get you a list of some of the most used. Cheers, Razorflame 03:57, 14 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Irc -- again

If you could join ##SB39 and ping me that would be awesome. Thanks, SwirlBoy39 00:00, 15 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Done Razorflame 00:02, 15 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

RE: Admin Coaching

After wanting it before my EN ban was imposed, I would be extremely happy to have admin coaching!!! --  Da Punk '95  talk  00:51, 15 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Alright. I would be very willing to help mentor you in the ways of administration. Even though I am not an administrator, I believe that I can at least help others prepare for the most daunting of all tasks here on the Simple English Wikipedia, and that is the RfA. How would you like me to coach you: Over the wiki, over email, or over IRC? Cheers, Razorflame 01:05, 15 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
I prefer on-wiki, on this page, if possible. --  Da Punk '95  talk  04:22, 15 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Sure thing. I will start to coach you officially tomorrow, as right now, I'm not in the most comfortable of positions. Cheers, Razorflame 05:42, 15 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
  Done --  Da Punk '95  talk  08:19, 15 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
I've given you some advice on the answers that you provided. Please read more there. Cheers, Razorflame 08:25, 15 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
  Done --  Da Punk '95  talk  20:22, 15 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
I've added some more questions to your coaching page. Cheers, Razorflame 20:31, 15 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
  Done --  Da Punk '95  talk  20:37, 15 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
I've both told you how well your answers were, as well as give you a huge post chuck full of good advice. To tell you the truth, I think that that edit I just made there was the biggest post I have ever made (in terms of bytes). Cheers, Razorflame 21:01, 15 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

RE: E-mail

Oh ya, I was going to put something here to tell you about it. I will do that. Cheers -- America alk 02:46, 15 June 2008 (UTC) Reply

No need to do that anymore. I am checking my email up to 30 times a day, so you don't need to let me know anymore. Cheers, Razorflame 02:47, 15 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Myself also. Could you Review me? Thanks -- America alk 03:30, 15 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Will do tomorrow morning. It's on my To do list of things to do tomorrow. Cheers, Razorflame 04:04, 15 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Alright Razor. -- America alk 04:06, 15 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Reviewed. Cheers, Razorflame 05:40, 15 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
So good for tomorrow. I didn't think that I was a good simplifier, and I doubt that I really am. But I thank you for your review, even though it was flattery :) I probably won't be on much tomorrow. Cheers -- America alk 05:52, 15 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
It wasn't flattery on my part. It was the cold and solid truth. I see you and rank you as one of the best simplifiers because of the massive amounts of work that I have seen you do on here in the simplifcation department. You definitely deserve that title. Cheers, Razorflame 05:53, 15 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Well I thank you your kind words, I just hope I can do it better. That is, by the way, the main purpose of this project. Just a note, as my Safari, I will have re-written an article, or in recent times, E-mailed you or written an ER, and had it say "Safari needs to close, we are sorry for the inconvenience." And it doesn't even let you copy what you've written. That gets annoying. I am about to go the bed. Good night to you all -- America alk 06:17, 15 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
I use Internet Explorer, so I almost never get that kind of error message. Let's wait and see if it continues and if it does after a few more days of waiting, then let us discuss your options of new internet browsers then. Cheers, Razorflame 06:34, 15 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yo.

The problem is that I don't know how to "speak" simple English - I don't know the right middleground for text that both is not insultingly simple, and also not confusing. - 75.17.223.114 (talk) 04:53, 15 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

It isn't a problem if you don't know how to "speak" simple English. You can always try and then if you make any mistakes, we can help you fix them for you :). Cheers, Razorflame 05:35, 15 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Well, I created an article for Zack & Wiki: Quest for Barbaros' Treasure and tried cleaning up Mario (Nintendo). - 75.17.223.114 (talk) 05:38, 15 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Both of which you have succeeded at. I would like to suggest that you create an account here because I know that you will become a great contributor to this site in the future. Cheers, Razorflame 05:40, 15 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
I wiped the page which I felt was not notable, and was planning on nominating if there were objections. - A Link to the Past (talk) 01:01, 16 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
If you feel that a page is not notable, please place this on the page instead of just deleting it: {{qd|A4}}. That will tag the page for quick deletion under the non-notable section of the Wikipedia:Deletion policy. Cheers, Razorflame 01:04, 16 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Review

Can you review me also? Thanks, RyanCross (talk) 05:42, 15 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I think I can fit that into my schedule. Cheers, Razorflame 05:52, 15 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

I was wondering what you taught about this. --RyanCross (talk) 08:33, 15 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

I will write what I think about the idea now. Just a note, but you should take a look at the response I gave you on your review page. Cheers, Razorflame 08:50, 15 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
I was wondering if there was a rollback-like tool here. If you look at this user's contributions, you should see some rollback-like edit summaries. --RyanCross (talk) 09:23, 15 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
The reason why that user has the rollback function is because he is an administrator on this site. He is inactive, though.
As to the rollback question, there is no non-administrator rollback function on this Wikipedia because of the fact that we don't have enough vandalism to warrant it like the English Wikipedia does. Cheers, Razorflame 09:25, 15 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

IRC

Head to ##SB39 :) SwirlBoy39 22:56, 17 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

I'm sorry, but I am a little busy at the moment. I will come there as soon as I am able to, but it might not be for a while. Sorry! Cheers, Razorflame 23:02, 17 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

E-mail

You may have read it, but I sent you one. Cheers -- America alk 06:13, 18 June 2008 (UTC) Reply

Nope, I had not read it until just now. I've taken the liberty of replying to your message. Cheers, Razorflame 06:18, 18 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Replied. Cheers and good night -- America alk 06:29, 18 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Aww, you added me to your friends list. I had always wanted to be on one. Thanks -- America alk 19:32, 18 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
I added you about 2 weeks ago 0_o :). Cheers, Razorflame 20:29, 18 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Oh, hadn't noticed. Cheers -- America alk 20:34, 18 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Not a problem! Cheers, Razorflame 20:36, 18 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Recent edit

Hi Razorflame - in this edit you changed the headings of the sections but not the words in the sections themselves. Could you take another look at it to make sure it's all correct? Cheers. The Rambling Man (talk) 09:03, 18 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Done Razorflame 20:35, 18 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

RE: Your message

Well I'm not that kind of a novice I'm an administrator at Commons, I know how to edit and all that the issue was about some shortcuts. Best regards, --Kanonkas(talk) 16:09, 18 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Well, if you still need any help, feel free to ask me on here. Cheers, Razorflame 20:30, 18 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Your revert

This is a nonsense edit. "Talky talky'? Try reading it carefully again. Thanks, Ryan†Cross (talk) 01:26, 19 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

However, while some of it was nonsense, some of the edit was correct. I've already changed the edit to make it sound better than the IP's edit. The main reason why I reverted it was so that I could change the edit that the IP made to make it more suitable for this website. Cheers, Razorflame 01:28, 19 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

RfA spam

Cheers, Razorflame 21:37, 19 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

A belated thanks...

...for the welcome. Of course, I really had no choice in registering (that accursed SUL!...) but I guess I can spend some time here. Now, if only I could find the anti-vandal tools (then of course, simplewiki doesn't get that much vandalism, does it?)... 21655 (talk) 18:36, 19 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Actually it does get some vandalism here and there. If you go to Special:Preferences ---> Gadgets, you'll see navigation popups and Vandal warner at the bottom. Those are really the only tools here. There's no rollback here, by the way. -- Ryan†Cross (talk) 19:01, 19 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Correction, there is no non-administrator rollback like on the English Wikipedia, but administrators still have access to the tool. Cheers, Razorflame 21:37, 19 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Your RfA

Sorry about your RfA. I would have supported you, but policies state that new users cannot !vote on RfAs that were being help when you created an account. I heard you'll try around September? Personally, I think you should wait longer than 4 months. If you wait longer, you'll have a better change at having a successful RfA. I running probably around August or September, or whenever I'll be ready basically. -- Ryan†Cross (talk) 22:22, 19 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Whenever you run your RfA, I will run my RfA at the same time :). Cheers, Razorflame 02:04, 20 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
The exact same time? Well, okay... it's your RfA. Cheers, Ryan†Cross (talk) 03:19, 20 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Not the exact same time, but relatively close to yours. Cheers, Razorflame 00:37, 21 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Ah, well, I'll tell you when I feel I should run. Cheers, Ryan†Cross (talk) 00:42, 21 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Didn't you already say that you were going to run in September? Cheers, Razorflame 00:45, 21 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Well, I don't want to planan RfA. It's better to say that you will run when your ready, not what others say. -- Ryan†Cross (talk) 00:47, 21 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
I know. I'm just pulling your leg :) Cheers, Razorflame 00:48, 21 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

The Resilient Barnstar!

  The Resilient Barnstar
For being the only user ever to (1) have an RfA, (2) SNOW you RfA, (3) retire, (4) reinstate yourself, (5) resume your RfA, and finally, (6) take your defeat with understanding and grace. Thanks for keeping your cool just now. You see, God had this all worked out: he didn't want you to win your 9th, it's an odd number. So he chose your 10th. May it be that way in your next, and final RfA. Cheers -- America alk 00:29, 20 June 2008 (UTC) Reply
Unfortunately, that was my 8th nomination, or 7th, if you don't count IuseRosary's malicious nomination. Thanks anyways for the shiny :). Cheers, Razorflame 02:06, 20 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Oops, I guess you will have to fail a few more first :) Anyway, my point still was the same. I'll beat you to level 7 on answers, well, probably not. Cheers -- America alk 02:57, 20 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
My head hurts. How come he gets a barnstar for simply changing his mind? (joke) Microchip 18:15, Friday, June 20 2008 Utc
Lol. Cheers, Razorflame 19:23, 20 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Heads up

Thought you might want to know about Template:Autostrike (for your lists for article creation), Template:Greylink (for archives and things) and Template:User sandbox. Microchip 09:02, Saturday, June 21 2008 Utc

Thanks for the heads-up, but the only one that I think I would use would be the first one, and even then, probably not, because I haven't really been making the pages very often recently. Cheers, Razorflame 00:13, 22 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Oh yes!

Mr. 5,000? Wasn't there a movie about that? Oh no, that was 3,000. Anyway, thanks -- America alk 00:45, 22 June 2008 (UTC) Reply

Not a problem! Cheers, Razorflame 04:13, 22 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Level 2! -- America alk 04:15, 22 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
I know. I just sent you an email through the Simple English Wikipedia system because I'm outta emails over at Y!A. Cheers, Razorflame 04:16, 22 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

List of created articles

Do you remember when you asked me if I could retrieve a list of articles you have created? While browsing through someone's talk page (thanks Gwib!), I found a tool that can do that. It is located here. Do note that it will count page moves. Chenzw  Talk  11:57, 22 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Oh, wait. Looks like it won't... Chenzw  Talk  11:59, 22 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Look under the article section of my userpage. I have found a way to calculate the number of articles that I have created. Thanks for the effort that you used to find this one, though. Cheers, Razorflame 20:23, 22 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

RFA

I'm sure you haven't missed it, but just in case, you should know about this. Good faith I'm sure, but I just wanted to make sure you were aware of it. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:29, 22 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Of course :) Cheers, Razorflame 00:06, 23 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Oh my,

You're a little weasel. I voted and will try to check them for you. Cheers -- America alk 23:43, 23 June 2008 (UTC) Reply

You voted on every one of those that I sent you already? Cheers, Razorflame 23:45, 23 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Oops, didn't see the second email. Now I did them all. Have a great ten days of vacation and we'll see you when you get back. Cheers :) -- America alk 00:44, 24 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Cheers and thanks for the help, it was very appreciative. Cheers, Razorflame 17:37, 5 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Shoulder Pork And Ham

File:Spam 4 types.jpg
Yummy "Something Posing As Meat"

Hello, just thought I would SPAM your page :) Enjoy! ← κεηηε∂γ (talk) 09:38, 24 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

I've just realised my title doesn't have SPAM in it, Instead its spelt SPAH. But you understand what I meant ;) - Its supposed to be Shoulder Pork And Meat, i think... Silly me. ← κεηηε∂γ (talk) 13:13, 30 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Actually, it could be Shoulder Pork And haM? :P ← κεηηε∂γ (talk) 13:33, 2 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
Ow, how cute. :) -- America †alk 18:34, 2 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
Cute? Im not cute. Im tough. Im hard. Im not cute ;) ← κεηηε∂γ (talk) 20:22, 2 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
Is that so? Well, tough people can spell "I'm" jk :) -- America †alk 20:32, 2 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
I'm so tough I don't need to spell correctly ;) ← κεηηε∂γ (talk) 08:08, 3 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
You can actually punch grammar in the face? :O --Gwib -(talk)- 08:49, 3 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
No, grammar doesn't have a face, the font does though <font face="arial"> for example :) ← κεηηε∂γ (talk) 08:53, 3 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
Cheers, and thanks for a great funny post on my talk page :) Definitely needed something like this on my page :) Razorflame 17:43, 5 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Your "Other Wikis" section of your userpage

Just a quick heads up - 'Commons Wikimedia' is more commonly known as 'Wikimedia Commons' and 'Meta Wikimedia' is normally simply 'Meta'. Microchip 16:16, Thursday, June 26 2008 Utc

Yes, but he's gone for about 9 days. Cheers -- America alk 16:23, 26 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
So... I thought I'd say now before I forget. If he was online, I would simply change it straight away. But he is not. Microchip 16:45, Thursday, June 26 2008 Utc
If you would like to change it, you are free to do so, just make sure that you leave a message here that explains why you changed my userpag. Cheers, Razorflame 17:42, 5 July 2008 (UTC)Reply


thankx

thankx dear.. --Mehran Mangrio (talk) 17:02, 27 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

For what? Cheers, Razorflame 17:41, 5 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
For the welcome. I'd say. -- America †alk 19:32, 5 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
Not a problem! Cheers Razorflame 23:53, 5 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

HELP

I know this might sound annoying and I don't want to waste your time but can you help me write simple english? Baseball16 Talk to me My Edits 03:20, 1 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

The easiest way to write in Simple English is to shorten the sentences that you use, simplify the wording that you use, and make sure to keep the fluidity of the sentence that you were using as the basis of what you were trying to write. Cheers, Razorflame 00:09, 6 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
OK Thanks.The Page Changer 01:34, 7 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
Not a problem! Cheers, Razorflame 22:11, 7 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hallo

Guten tag! Ich sehen ihre babelbox. Ich keine spreche Deutsch in einem langen zeit. Es ist nicht so gut, Ja? Ich komme aus Schottland. Ich erlernte Deutsches in der Schule, vor zwei Jahre.

Sorry if I have confused you, just wanted to have a convo in basic German, as I noticed you speak a small amount too! Mine is not so good, and I admit I used a translator for some words as I couldn't remember some of them. I need to get used to it again... ← κεηηε∂γ (talk) 13:27, 2 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

I speak very, very little German. The only things that I know how to say are Guten tag, Guten morgen, Hallo, and that it about it. I figured that that would qualify for basic German speech, but now I am not too sure. Cheers, Razorflame 17:40, 5 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
Ah, I see. No worries. Maybe I can bump up my babel number for German then :P ← κεηηε∂γ (talk) 09:05, 8 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
I would have to agree with you there :) It is far too low for your sophistication :) Cheers, Razorflame 00:07, 9 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Welcome back

Hope you had a good break. The Rambling Man (talk) 17:46, 5 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the consideration :) I had a great break and I will be getting pictures of my trip uploaded onto Photobucket or some other site as soon as possible. Cheers, Razorflame 17:47, 5 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
Great. Looking forward to seeing them! Take it easy. The Rambling Man (talk) 17:51, 5 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
I have been taking it easy for the past few weeks :) Thanks for the considerations, Razorflame 17:54, 5 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

You came back!

Welcome! Happenings, eh? Well, both Charles Spurgeon and Ana Ivanović became VGA's (Daniela Hantuchová should soon). And we had our 4th of July without you ;) And if you look over Simple talk there were some discussions. But nothing huge has really happened.

Hmm, an RfA. If you would like to nominate me, I would except. So I am willing to run. Welcome back from the Amazon! -- America †alk 18:06, 5 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I did come back! I have nominated you now. Feel free to accept or decline as you see fit. Cheers, Razorflame 00:08, 6 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
I accepted. Very good explanation, by the way. Thanks Razor -- America †alk 00:32, 6 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
Not a problem! I was just thinking that it might be a little too long of an explanation, but I guess not. Cheers, Razorflame 01:51, 6 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
Sadly, my computer is all messed up and I can't get on most sites. With Yahoo! Answers being the site, and with my parents putting Yahoo! parental controls on the computer to limit my little siblings access, I have to sign in to Yahoo! with another user name and therefore can only be on it sometimes - very long story, made short. So at the moment, I can't get on to Answers, sadly. Cheers -- America †alk 04:08, 6 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
Oh well! I will make sure that you get a copy of the question, though. It's up to 470 answers now :) Cheers, Razorflame 07:04, 6 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Nomination

Hello. I was wondering if it was okay to squeeze in my nomination of American Eagle. Is that possible at this time? -- RyanCross (talk) 01:53, 6 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Oh, nevermind. I guess I will have to make my nomination shorter than yours. Thanks, RyanCross (talk) 01:54, 6 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
Yes, it is possible to squeeze in your nomination, however, I think that you will have to be the co-nominator because of the size of my nomination. Sorry, but I completely forgot about you wanting to be the nominator! Cheers, Razorflame 01:55, 6 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Nice work!

Nice work that you've given so far to this site! Keep up the good work! Cheers, Razorflame 17:46, 5 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, I'm going away on holiday quite a bit over the summer, but will be back fully in September, I hope! - tholly --Turnip-- 08:08, 6 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
I hope to see you back on here in September :) Cheers, Razorflame 01:04, 7 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
I will be :). I will also be editing now and again when I can access a computer. Off for a week tomorrow though :-(, (but :-) on holiday). - tholly --Turnip-- 16:17, 16 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

o, hai

will do =). I've done some work here as Special:Contributions/Xeno, trying to lay claim to the global account. heh. Xenocidic (talk) 01:10, 7 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

That's good to hear :) I hope you remember me from EN:WP quite a whiles ago :) Cheers, Razorflame 01:11, 7 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
Sure do... Xenocidic (talk) 01:12, 7 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
Am glad that at least someone over there appreciated my work :) I will probably be back to editing the English Wikipedia soon, but probably not within the next few months because of all the time that I have been spending on Yahoo Answers. I haven't even been on here much lately because of all the time that I have been spending over on Yahoo Answers. Cheers, Razorflame 01:13, 7 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

U haz

e-mail. Maxim (talk | editor review) 00:51, 9 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

You haz a response :) Cheers, Razorflame 17:40, 9 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Answers E-Mail

You have email to ur answers address. --  Da Punk '95  talk  10:16, 10 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

I haz yet to give you a response :) Cheers, Razorflame 18:35, 10 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

My Request for Adminship

wikibreak + you can check I'm rated #17 (only #43 here on Simple) on another wikipedia wiki where I never applied as admin

On http://stats.wikimedia.org/wikiquote/HE/TablesWikipediaFR.htm you can check I'm rated #17 (only #43 here on Simple) on another wikipedia wiki where I never applied as admin. Therefore, you made a wrong guess saying in Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/ONaNcle that I "have shown no need for the tools" especially the UWP one. BTW, could you manage to protect my talk page since I'm taking a long wikibreak because exhausted after fighting all those people against me. ONaNcle (talk) 07:03, 14 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Razor was saying that you have not demonstrated a need for the tools here. That is something you have not fully rebutted. Also, Razor is not an admin; ask AE to protect the page. Cassandra 07:08, 14 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
My previous queries were told nonsense :-))) by AE. ONaNcle (talk) 13:24, 14 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
I just said to ask Creol, for he was the one that deleted it. Here was what was in the page I deleted, "04:28, 19 May 2007 Creol (Talk | changes) deleted "Planets in discovery order" ‎ (Merged to solar system)" - that was it. If you would like to have your previous work restored, ask Creol. Cheers -- AmericanEagle (talk) 16:34, 16 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

WP:PVGA

Hi Razorflame,

I know you haven't been around for about a week, but if you get back in the next couple of days could you have a look at Anna Kournikova - it is another Rambling Man PVGA and needs two more votes to bring it to the required six. Thanks, - tholly --Turnip-- 16:45, 16 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Done as it fits all of the requirements to become a Very Good Article. Cheers, Razorflame 20:46, 17 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

[[1]]

Your 10th nomination - I hope you will accept, as I know you will succeed this time. --Electronixfreex (talk) 09:39, 17 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hello Razor. This RfA has been deleted as he did not get your permission for a RfA. No harm done. We hope. Hows things anyway? Try to get back into editing again mate, we need you here! You are a good editor, and it shows. I would have no problems with nominating and/or supporting you next time, when you think you are ready. Give it a wee while though? Come back to editing soon though! We miss you! (hmm... that sounded manly...) ← κεηηε∂γ (talk) (wikiproject collaboration) 10:32, 17 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for telling me of this. I am very happy that it has been deleted. I have been very well lately, and I do have plans for becoming more active on this site in the future, but for now, I am going to have to be on another site. I should be back to editing on this site more in a few weeks :) Hope you having been doing well! Sorry for worrying you! Cheers, Razorflame 20:48, 17 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
Brilliant! Nice to see you back anyway! :) ← κεηηε∂γ (talk) (wikiproject collaboration) 08:03, 18 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
I've come back and am editing fully :) Cheers, Razorflame 06:12, 23 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

How do i lock some of my user pages?

Erm, I want to semi-lock my User Page and another page of mine.

How do i do it?

Thanks a lot.

Sq (talk) 12:27, 19 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

You can't. However, an admin can, but only will if there is a good reason to do so. If there is, ask here. Hope this helps, mC8 12:29, 19 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Why did you call me "TRM"?

Why did you call me "TRM"?

Do not confuse me with the Rambling Man. Use User talk:The Rambling Man to communicate with TRM.

Instead of being bold, Creol chose to drive TRM off Simple English Wikipedia by voting Strong Oppose and describing the article as "a thousand paper cuts". I think TRM was a good editor, though. 68.96.213.118 (talk) 05:56, 23 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Are you saying that you aren't TRM? Razorflame 05:59, 23 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
Yes, I am saying that I am not TRM. 68.96.213.118 (talk) 06:10, 23 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
If you aren't, then how do you explain the fact that you know about why he left, in addition to continuing to work on Jessica Alba? Cheers, Razorflame 06:11, 23 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
I was reading the Recent Changes, as I do frequently, and I saw WP:PVGA. I saw that Creol was complaining about the article's problems. It just happened to be the current one on review. I have edits here prior to the ones about Jessica Alba. I can't explain why TRM's status says Online on en.wikipedia; it is purely coincidental. 68.96.213.118 (talk) 06:16, 23 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
This IP was editing before TRM departed. I hightly doubt TRM would edit with his real account and under an IP simultaneously. Even more is the fact that TRM lives in GMT +0 (based on the fact that he started this rfd at 13:50 my time and marked an end date of 20:50), and this IP resolves to Atlanta, Georgia, GMT -5. Geographically, it's an ocean apart. Cassandra 06:17, 23 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
Sorry for grilling you like this :P It's just that I really want him to come back, and when I saw you, an IP address, editing Jessica Alba, I thought you might've been TRM using an IP Address to edit here. Sorry for the confusion and I hope that I didn't offend you. Cheers, Razorflame 06:18, 23 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
(edit conflict) I am nowhere near Atlanta, I am on the other side of the US. But Cassandra is right; it is highly improbable that TRM would do this. Thank you for apologising. 68.96.213.118 (talk) 06:20, 23 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

(Unindenting) In addition, I believe that you checked the WHOIS for my ISP (instead of where it geolocates to), Cox, whose headquarters are in Georgia. But I live in the western US. 68.96.213.118 (talk) 06:23, 23 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Do you want to create an account here on the Simple English Wikipedia? If you were to create an account, you would be able to have access to more things, as well as gain credit for your hard work and edits that you put onto this Wikipedia. If you would like to create an account, let me know, and I can help you do it :) Cheers, Razorflame 06:24, 23 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
I waas comtemplating creating an account in the future, but not now. 68.96.213.118 (talk) 06:27, 23 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
I was lazy and used the WHOIS down at the bottom of your [[68.96.213.118|contributions page]], which is indeed the ISP and resolved to their headquarters. Some more wrangling around has led me to the new location of Las Vegas, Nevada – is that correct, or is the geolocator inaccurate in this case? Cassandra 06:29, 23 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
Cox user from Las Vegas.. That sounds familiar. -- Creol(talk) 11:52, 23 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
Eh? Cheers, Razorflame 11:53, 23 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, Creol is right. Cox Communications Inc. Chenzw  Talk  11:56, 23 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
What about it? Cheers, Razorflame 11:57, 23 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
I forgot about it as well :P Will continue searching for it. Chenzw  Talk  12:08, 23 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
Cassandra's comment about this IP user being a Cox user from Las Vegas reminded me of a certain person. One of our blocked users who tends to pop in from time to time when Cox changes his IP. -- Creol(talk) 12:11, 23 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
Ah, this was the IP that had major issues with my user page. I wondered where they'd end up... - tholly --Turnip-- 17:34, 24 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks

Thanks for the tip on naming conventions, cheers. --Mars (talk) 06:48, 23 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Not a problem! If you need anything else, you are always welcome to ask me a question on my talk page, which is open 24 hours a day :) Cheers, Razorflame 06:51, 23 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

PGA

Hello Razor,

I was wondering if I could ask you to vote (or comment) on the SPL article in WP:PGA? Its been proposed as a GA, so as many people voting would be great :) Thanks, Grant ← κεηηε∂γ (talk) (wikiproject collaboration) 10:57, 23 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

I'll take a look at it as soon as I am done with the tributaries for the current river that I am on. Cheers, Razorflame 10:58, 23 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks

Thank you for your compliment. I am this guy, and i like it here because it gives me a little more article writing experience.
BTW, could you help me expand Scranton?
Once again, thanks. Sebb Talk 12:47, 23 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
Scranton, Pennsylvania? Yep, I can help you expand that a bit. And not a problem for giving you the compliment. Sorry, but I have never heard of that other username before, because I don't edit the English Wikipedia much anymore. Cheers, Razorflame 13:25, 23 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Lol

I will if you join ##SB39 stat. Also, ping me. SwirlBoy39 21:48, 23 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Return to the user page of "Razorflame/Archive 16".