Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Current issues and requests archive 74

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Rename Category:Jewish people

Would it be okay to rename Category:Jewish people to Category:Jews? Kk.urban (talk) 02:51, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Kk.urban: Possibly. Why? -- Auntof6 (talk) 07:10, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Auntof6@Kk.urban My thought on this (I looked up some articles) calling Jewish people “jews” can be seen as anti-semantic. Specifically if you look at what Hitler did and said because he thought (not posting this to upset anyone) race-tuberculosis of the peoples and The “ultimate goal must definitely be the removal of the Jews altogether. If you pull up the reference, you will see the tags “antisemitism” and “racism.”

The ultimate goal must definitely be the removal of the Jews altogether. … race-tuberculosis of the peoples…
— Adolf Hitler Issues Comment on the "Jewish Question", https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/timeline-event/holocaust/before-1933/adolf-hitler-issues-comment-on-the-jewish-question

Thanks - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 09:25, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(Nac)The only reason why you might want to do this is to be more simple. I don't think the term is all that simple anyway, at least "Jewish people" gives a little context if you don't know what Jewish meant (that it's a type of person). Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 11:14, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We need to be careful here, it would also be interesting what the exact wording in German was. Before 1933, the nazi party was one of several parties with similar ideas. If you say 'Jewish people' a religion is implied. If you say, for example 'Spanish people' or 'French people' there is no such implication Eptalon (talk) 14:59, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Eptalon Good to see you. So it is my thought. Say a black person calls another black person the N word. It is fine that way. If any other race calls them that (at least in my neck of the woods) I’ll see a gun pointed at me and poof there it. I think there is a finite line here we may not want to cross. It’s obvious Hitler and the Nazis hated Jewish people and homosexuality. Let’s jump to something more current. The on-set of COVID-19, a lot of people were attacking Asian people because they were told by Mr Spray Tan they brought it over and something needed to be done. So what happens, his followers attacked and killed numerous Asians, even if they looked like it but were actually Americans. They called them some choice names. Think back to WWII I believe it was where the names came up. I’m not implying anyone here is racist, just speaking from my long time on this planet and the whole picture. Thanks - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 15:07, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And also, calling someone 'Jewish' may also be as a sign of distinction, and in itself is not anti-Semitic. Not Buddhist, not Christian... Eptalon (talk) 15:25, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My reason was what Eptalon said (that people might assume "Jewish people" refers to the religion, not the ethnicity, and that even for religions, we use "Christians", "Muslims", "Hindus", and so forth, so "Jews" would be similar. (It would also match enwiki and our other categories like "American Jews"). I didn't really know that "Jews" could be considered offensive - I thought that some people avoided it because they had a misconception that it's offensive - but in that case it might be better not to change it and only use a category redirect. Kk.urban (talk) 15:25, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Kk.urban In this day and age someone looks at you wrong they will sue you. Call someone even calling you Mr. Spray Tan could get me sued (if he had the money.) lol. I would say it could be the parent category and then the rest fall under it? Thanks - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 15:29, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@PotsdamLamb Right now the parent category is Category:Jewish people. Are you suggesting we keep it that way? Or rename it? Kk.urban (talk) 15:32, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@PotsdamLamb: For future reference, I'm pretty sure you meant antisemitic. -- Auntof6 (talk) 21:22, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Auntof6 yes and autocorrect again. My apologies. @Kk.urban My thought would be leave the parent as is and anything under it be Jewish breads, Jewish holidays, etc. That’s my thought on it. Thanks - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 21:27, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I guess we won't change this. Thanks everyone for your input. Kk.urban (talk) 00:05, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Christian Bautista‎

QD G5 case (Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Archive22#Christian_Joy_Lorenzo_Bautista), but QD tag removal is being repeated. Please take care of this page, the talk page, and the author. MathXplore (talk) 13:30, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please import w:Template:User admin Wikiversity

Reason: I want to use this on my user page, please see en:v:Wikiversity:Candidates for Custodianship/MathXplore for details. MathXplore (talk) 15:01, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@MathXplore I’ll bring it over right now. Thanks - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 15:07, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@MathXplore

Done I left the link on your TP. If it’s missing a thing let me know and I’ll dive into it for you. Thanks - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 15:18, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@MathXplore Is it okay if we remove the user categories for these templates (like Category:Wikiversity administrators, Category:Wiktionary administrators, etc.). The reason is that these won't include all administrators of these projects, so it could be misleading. We deleted other categories for the same reason here: Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2012/Category:Wikipedians by Wikipedia status. Kk.urban (talk) 15:28, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK, go ahead and I will follow you. MathXplore (talk) 15:30, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The cat was removed already so it is only under user templates Thanks - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 15:46, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ISIS flag on user page

Hello SimpWiki administrators,

I'm writing to you after seeing a complaint made on the English Wikipedia about a user page on the Simple English Wikipedia. Obviously we cannot handle that sort of complaint there (where I am an administrator), but I think it warrants some consideration here, and so I'm cross-posting this.

The user page, User:MCGAMER YOUTUBE, has an ISIS flag on it, and it was tagged for deletion by Larrymhardy. After MCGAMER YOUTUBE's user page was tagged for deletion, the user initially proceeded to place a tag on their user page disclaiming any support for ISIS (claiming that they only put the flag there for aesthetic reasons), but then removed the tag and the deletion template from their own user page.

According to Wikipedia:User page, There is broad agreement that you may not include in your user space material that is likely to bring the project into disrepute, or which is likely to give widespread offense. I would posit that the inclusion of the ISIS flag on an editor's user page in the manner that MCGAMER YOUTUBE has chosen to do is the sort of thing that would be likely to bring the project into disrepute, or at least to give widespread offense.

In light of this, I am asking that administrators look into this and take appropriate action.

Yours sincerely,

Red-tailed hawk (talk) 21:12, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: An admin may want to update that page as there are quite a few redlinks that are supposed to show users what they can and cannot do and red link policies and guidelines. Thanks - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 21:33, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't see anything glaring missing from the page. There are some fake categories or etc but nothing gutting the policy. If you feel so inclined, you can fix build out the redlinks.

@Red-tailed hawk: I've deleted the user page. Hate, regardless of the source, is inconsistent with the Pillars. Operator873 ^connect 06:27, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Operator873 There are few more accounts I am concerned about, I will send you a message regarding those. Thanks,-- BRP^ever 12:59, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Will talk with you on IRC. Operator873 ^connect 15:54, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Operator873: I will also note this user page on the English Wikipedia, which has a similar combo of templates as MCGAMER YOUTUBE did at the time that their user page was deleted. That account happens to be globally locked and also indefinitely blocked here. Not sure if they are related, as socks sometimes copy user pages wholesale, but I figure it is worth sharing with you. Red-tailed hawk (talk) 02:01, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that's correct as of now. Although the flag has been changed, I have noticed the editing pattern of User:MCGAMER YOUTUBE, which I feel is promoting banned organizations or related groups. The edits form a series where it seems they are promoting these organizations, and I feel this is not good for the community. Larrymhardy (talk) 19:04, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

They seem to be more in good-faith, i've seen their edits, it's only been redirect creations (to pretty questionable stuff), unless i'm wrong. They're focusing on stuff like software and hardware for computers. RiggedMint 19:11, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

LTA user is here

Special:Contributions/148.103.119.67, see w:en:WP:LTA/GRP. Please revdel his gross edit summaries and note that he will hop IPs some. I recommend checking https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:RecentChanges?userExpLevel=unregistered&hidebots=1&hideWikibase=1&limit=1000&days=30&urlversion=2 —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:47, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note:It's best to report the LTA at WP:VIP rather than WP:AN.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 08:50, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done Thanks. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:56, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Odd editing

We seem to have an IP jumper who is just plopping paragraphs on pages with no cats, references, wikilinks, etc. so far it is Special:Contributions/27.252.54.233 and Special:Contributions/2600:1700:3EC0:C46F:C2D:226D:72E7:C724. Comments made appear to be an LTA. Thanks - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 04:12, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Atikur Rahman Mahi (Musician)

QD G4/G5 case (Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2023/Atikur Rahman Mahi), but since an IP editor is repeating QD tag removal, I forward the request here. MathXplore (talk) 08:49, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Auntof6, user blocked by me for block evasion, and also attempting impersonation. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 12:29, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Protection request for Alessia Cara

Can Alessia Cara be protected indefinitely, at least for anons or brand-new accounts? There is nothing other than vandalism since 2022 on this page, that Tyler guy who keeps adding himself as the husband is pretty persistent. Tehonk (talk) 20:04, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

still needed. Tehonk (talk) 04:24, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The vandalism seems to have stopped for now, but I'll keep an eye on it. --Ferien (talk) 13:18, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Protected template needs editing

One of the child templates at Template:Infobox settlement and causing an error. If someone can find it and remove the line I would appreciate. it If you would like me to do it, please unprotect all of them and let me know ,and I will find it and fix it.

Preview warning: Page using Template:Infobox settlement with unknown parameter "short_description" - I also noticed this has started popping up in a lot of infobox templates lately, and I am not sure why, as the actual articles do not have short descriptions. Thanks - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 02:49, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done I was able to figure this out with the help of Djsasso. Thanks - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 12:57, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Ferret

Please unprotect this talk page after 2 years without any discussion. 2001:4452:16B:1900:9DBF:381D:27DD:7C64 (talk) 13:52, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

IP User if the user wants to have their page unprotected, they can request it. Thanks - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 20:51, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done User talk pages are generally not protected for anywhere near that long. -- Auntof6 (talk) 21:13, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Auntof6: When the user who owns the talk page requests it for that long, yes we do. Please replace the protection. Operator873 ^connect 22:07, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Especially since the requesting IP is likely the LTA responsible for the protection in the first place. Operator873 ^connect 22:11, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Operator873: Sorry, I didn't see this before. I've put the protection back for 2 years. If another admin thinks it should be a different amount of time, I have no objection to them changing it. -- Auntof6 (talk) 02:58, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The user isn't active here, so I say leave it protected for a few more years. Protections should be reviewed every now and then, so indef is probably excessive. --Ferien (talk) 22:59, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Operator873@Ferien@Auntof6 - FYI, the page is still not protected. Thanks - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 12:59, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@PotsdamLamb; It is now. Did you have a particular interest in this protection being restored? -- Auntof6 (talk) 02:59, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Auntof6 No I just wanted to send a reminder to everyone since it’s been a couple of days. Thanks - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 03:01, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@PotsdamLamb: Maybe you could avoid sending reminders for things that don't affect you. It's not your job to police things like this. -- Auntof6 (talk) 03:05, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please check

I find this highly suspicious. WP:BEAN if an admin wants to email or IRC as to why, please let me know. Wikipedia:Simple_talk#Page_Request Thanks - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 04:29, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@PotsdamLamb what part?-- BRP^ever 05:05, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@BRPever Are you on IRC? I just logged on. Thanks - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 05:06, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done Spoke with BRP IRC, this is done. Thanks - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 05:18, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Page protection request for SonoftheMessiah

Can an admin please semi-protect the article SonoftheMessiah? Jsbaafo keeps creating the article after it was deleted and is now removing QD tags put up by other editors. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 07:44, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done - @Shoot for the Stars The page has been deleted and salted as of midnightish this morning.. Thanks - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 11:52, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I suspect they were also thinking of WP:SALTing the page name. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 12:39, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Lee Vilenski It has it as well :)

Jpg on simple

I was researching to see if an article would be notable and this popped up. Last time I did this with an image I was told it was on commons but this has a url for simple.

File:J Merlin.jpg Thanks - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 03:34, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@PotsdamLamb: As long as it has the "View on Commons" link at the top, I think we're OK. -- Auntof6 (talk) 03:51, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Auntof6 Ok. I just thought no files other than audio files were to be on simple? This picture also comes up pretty high (like the 5th or 6th entry) when you search his name on google so we are hosting a pic of a non-notable person. Thanks - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 03:58, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@PotsdamLamb: We can have a few kinds of files other than audio, but not this kind. This one isn't actually on Simple, which you can tell by the Commons link at the top. (I've gotten confused by that in the past as well.) Look in the list of files, and you'll see that it doesn't appear. -- Auntof6 (talk) 04:03, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Auntof6 Why do they have to make it so confusing? lol. Thanks! Thanks - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 04:26, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Page protection request for Audit

Cross-wiki spam, needs semiprotection SurferSquall (talk) 03:25, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

~~@SurgerSquall:~~ We don't use protection in that way on this project. While I have your attention, do not edit in other users' userspace please. I noticed you editing within Immanuelle userspace and their user page itself which is not allowed at all. Operator873 ^connect 03:34, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fixing my broken ping... @SurferSquall: Operator873 ^connect 03:34, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why wouldn't you use protection for that? That's what protection is for! SurferSquall (talk) 03:35, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@SurferSquall: Have you read WP:SEMI on this project yet? You could answer your own question. Operator873 ^connect 03:38, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I believe I'm correct then, because the spam was repeated on simplewiki and was done before on engwiki SurferSquall (talk) 03:39, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection should only be used if it is the only option left available to solve the problem of vandalism of the page. is the important part you didn't read. This project has different rules from the English Wikipedia. Operator873 ^connect 03:42, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I edited that userpage to tell them I moved their pages, because they aren't allowed to move pages. SurferSquall (talk) 03:36, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is it allowed if I give permission to them? Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (please tag me) 03:37, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Immanuelle: @SurferSquall: If there is an arrangement between you both, then that's fine. You might want to link to the diff of the talk page message requesting those things be done for you in the edit summary. Operator873 ^connect 03:39, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Operator873 immanuelle is not allowed to edit in mainspace, so I was helping them to edit their article in their userspace rather than them not be able to edit it. SurferSquall (talk) 03:41, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@SurferSquall I give you permission to edit my userspace drafts here. Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (please tag me) 03:44, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am asking the admin if it's fine that I moved your pages. SurferSquall (talk) 03:46, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh wait they are moving the pages into mainspace. That is premature. @SurferSquall please do not do that. Since I have a mainspace block this might count as a form of block evasion. While I am happy that you think these pages are good enough, I have not appealed this block yet so can you refrain from it? Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (please tag me) 03:42, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I did that because you listed them as completed. Block evasion would be if you made another account or used your ip address to move them. SurferSquall (talk) 03:43, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My intention was to make some more "completed" drafts and then get enough together to appeal my block, try to establish that I am competent to work here. Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (please tag me) 03:47, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The two pages I published are good enough to be articles, which will help when you ask to be unblocked. SurferSquall (talk) 03:49, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Operator873 It is not block evasion for me to publish their completed drafts because they cannot right? SurferSquall (talk) 03:44, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@SurferSquall: It is a very fine line that I'll allow, on my own judgement. Other admins may well override that judgement. However, when you move the article into mainspace, you are assuming responsibility for the content of that article. If it's determined to be inadequate, inappropriate, or has content violations, you may be held responsible and not Immanuelle. Operator873 ^connect 03:47, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I only moved it. Also I moved it because it appears after I read it that it's fine for an article. SurferSquall (talk) 03:50, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@SurferSquall: as I said, you assume responsibility once you move it into mainspace. You'll have to decided if that's something you want to do or not. Also, you should indicate if you understand the part of WP:SEMI that I quoted above. Operator873 ^connect 03:51, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I do understand it. However, Audit does not receive many edits; protecting it would be an easy way to insure it is not vandalized again. [[WP:SEMI}} mentions links from high-traffic websites, which is what happened on Audit. SurferSquall (talk) 03:55, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

does not receive many edits is exactly why, on this project, it will not be protected. In addition, I don't think there are many high traffic websites that are linking to the Simple English Wikipedia page on Audit. The answer is no. Operator873 ^connect 03:57, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It was actually @Operator873 who blocked me over the article Izumo clan. I figured I won't want to move anything from my userspace into mainspace without having anyone else review them. Doing a proper appeal is somewhat stressful for me. But thank you for permitting this. I hope to get around to doing an appeal in the coming weeks. Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (please tag me) 04:03, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mutia ti La Union 2024 & Miss La Union 2023

A4 but user keeps removing QD tags so I will forward the request here MCGAMER YOUTUBE (talk) 03:40, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

and Miss La Union 2021 MCGAMER YOUTUBE (talk) 03:56, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

also Cj Bautista MCGAMER YOUTUBE (talk) 04:00, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

all of these also qualify for G5 due to Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Archive22#Christian_Joy_Lorenzo_Bautista MCGAMER YOUTUBE (talk) 04:03, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And see the section two up about Miss La Union that needs protection to stop this dumb vandalism. Ravensfire (talk) 04:31, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done: Deleted by Fehufanga. – Cyber.Eyes2005^Talk 08:56, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cj Bautista

A QD G5 case; moving deletion request here as some editors keep on removing the QD templates, Excessive spamming (See logs). – Cyber.Eyes2005^Talk 06:10, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why to delete? ITS hepta gone (talk) 06:21, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(Note) The user is locked. MathXplore (talk) 07:20, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Cyber.Eyes.2005: QD declined. User doesn't appear to have been blocked or banned at the time the article was created. If I'm missing something, please let me know. -- Auntof6 (talk) 06:58, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Auntof6: Please see Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Archive22#Christian_Joy_Lorenzo_Bautista. MathXplore (talk) 07:07, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The initial contributor of the page is also globally locked. I've reported IPs and users that were block evading to WP:VIP, and Math has already linked to the CU archive. – Cyber.Eyes2005^Talk 08:02, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done: Deleted by Fehufanga. – Cyber.Eyes2005^Talk 08:55, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Page creation edit notice

A user has just brought a problem to my attention on my talk page. The edit notice for creating a user page is almost the same as that for creating an article. It includes the line "If you want to make test changes, please use the sandbox." This is evidently confusing because it can lead a new user to think they're making test changes in the wrong place.

Would it be possible to make a new edit notice for userspace pages and remove this line? Kk.urban (talk) 18:46, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, it's not an edit notice, it's MediaWiki:Newarticletext. Kk.urban (talk) 18:54, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Administrators Any thoughts on this? I too find it confusing, but I am wondering if we can make a duplicate and eliminate the sandbox portion and apply it to only pages that have Sandbox in the title (i.e. User:PotsdamLamb/Sandbox or User:PotsdamLamb/sandbox). Thanks - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 18:17, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stale drafts

What is the policy on stale drafts? I came across this Category:Pages created with the Article Wizard from 2018 in which there are pages not touched in over 4-5 years and the editors are no longer active? Thanks - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 04:00, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@admins Does anyone have an answer to this as I cannot find any policy on it. Perhaps we need to make one if we do not have one. Thanks - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 18:14, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Page protection request for Miss La Union

Can an admin protect Miss La Union? Multiple sockpuppets are getting created and adding unsourced information despite the reverts from many editors. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 04:36, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

More nonsense from the Christian Joy Lorenzo Bautista sockfarm, really need semi-protection at a minimum to slow them down. They went away/slowed down for a bit, but they have certainly returned with a vengeance. Ravensfire (talk) 04:56, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Continued vandalism from the Bautista farm, please consider this. Ravensfire (talk) 12:30, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ravensfire is right, these people are unrelenting and continue to add the same unsourced info. Protection is really needed. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 04:43, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Page protection request for Talk:Clyde Bruckman

Constant vandalism at Talk:Clyde Bruckman by random IPs. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 05:17, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Shoot for the Stars

Not done FYI see Semi-Protect - Talk:Clyde Bruckman Thanks - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 18:13, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism of @Shoot for the Stars Hare sweet (talk) 11:57, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cj Bautista

G5 Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Archive22#Christian_Joy_Lorenzo_Bautista MCGAMER YOUTUBE (talk) 03:07, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

also should be salted

Santol Dear

is another G5 and user keeps removing QD tag MCGAMER YOUTUBE (talk) 06:00, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

also recreated again - Hare sweet. WP:SALTING would be suitable here. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 11:54, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User also reported at WP:VIP for block evasion. – Cyber.Eyes2005^Talk 11:58, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted it 3 or 4 times in the last week or so, I also salted it for 3 months... Eptalon (talk) 12:44, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ja:LTA:HEATHROW targeting User_talk:郊外生活 again

As same as Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Current_issues_and_requests_archive_66#Request_for_Protection_for_User_talk:郊外生活, the user talk page is targeted again. Please reactivate the semi-protection. MathXplore (talk) 13:56, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Vandalism" label

Established user is lashing out with "vandalism" label. See simple.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mechanical_advantage&diff=9456403&oldid=9456399. 2001:2020:31B:E8E9:E88E:A87C:7562:D4E8 (talk) 21:28, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Talkpage undeletion request

Hi, Could someone ever so kindly undelete Talk:Pyramids FC TV please? RFD is going towards a snowball keep but my main reason is wanting to see whether the first RFD was left on the talkpage, Had it not been for that I would've just recreated it again, Many thanks, Warm Regards, –Davey2010^Talk 23:05, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done by Ferien - Thanks Ferien much appreciated, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 00:37, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Protection request

Talk:Joshua Wong - long term pattern of continued vandalism kleshkreikne. T 02:10, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Puppy Bowl

We have consensus to have this undeleted. Can an admin please restore it per Wikipedia:Deletion_review#Puppy_Bowl? Thanks and edit well! - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 10:29, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting RevDel

Requesting revision deletion under the WP:RD2 criteria (Grossly insulting, degrading, or offensive material); Revision: Special:Diff/9459921. – Cyber.Eyes2005^Talk 14:39, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Clearest RD2/3 revdel I may have ever seen. Though, for RevDel, it's generally faster (and more private) to use IRC. Justarandomamerican (t • c) 19:01, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Revdel request

Hi, Could someone revdel the IPs edit summary at [1] per RD2 please?, the summaries here and here may also need revdelling, Many thanks, Warm Regards, –Davey2010^Talk 15:13, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Did the first but other two are fairly tame as these things go. Thx fr33k man 20:21, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Fr33kman, Just a heads up you've not revdelled the edit summary ?, Agree with the other 2 I only threw them in just case an admin thought they were revdel-worthy, Many thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 21:03, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed fr33k man 21:28, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you freekman much appreciated, Thanks –Davey2010^Talk 23:39, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Constant Vinay K Srivastava creation

I brought this up a few days ago but removed it from ANI because I thought it stopped but the article Vinay K Srivastava has been consistently created by multiple different sockpuppets and IPs. Is it possible to salt it, because its just getting really disruptive at this point. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 18:58, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Shoot for the Stars That exact title is protected indefinitely, but has it been created under a different title? Kk.urban (talk) 19:01, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

SEO articles

Hi, I am not at home in this Wikipedia, so I am not quite sure if this is the right place to bring this to your attention.

There is an article that has been added to the German, the Spanish, and the Simple English Wikipedia today, about a singer named Praise Ukachukwu Mba. The Spanish Wikipedia has already put a big tag "self-promotion" over the article, and I assume the German one will follow.

Now on the Simple English Wikipedia, the user has also added an article about this guy's company named Brandskon which was founded just now in March of 2024. I don't see the slightest chance that this company is notable.

What I don't like about the whole thing is this: Why don't they even try to put these articles in the English Wikipedia? Because they know they wouldn't stand a chance. But having an article on Simple English Wikipedia I am sure is just as good for SEO.

Just wanted to point this out to you, so now you can act upon it as you think is right. Thanks, --2003:C0:8F32:2A00:8915:53D8:8370:12AE (talk) 20:04, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dealt with, thx. You can use {{delete}} to get an article tagged for quick deletion in the future. Thx! fr33k man 20:16, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please lock my talk page

Hi. My talk page has been vandalized, please lock it. kleshkreikne. T 22:50, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries for review

Hi! Could someone take a look at Dersim and revdel the LTAs edit summaries? I don't think it's Oversight material, but you may disagree. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 06:03, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection for User talk:MathXplore/Archive 1

Please semi-protect the talk page archive. MathXplore (talk) 13:25, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@MathXplore:

Done -- Auntof6 (talk) 21:18, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nileshpatelxyz

A4 and G11 but user keeps removing QD tags MCGAMER YOUTUBE (talk) 01:16, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also G4 and G5, please see Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2023/Nileshpatelxyz (musical artist). MathXplore (talk) 03:45, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please move Musharaf Hussain Keen to Patnazi without redirect

As seen in the intro, the title does not match the context, please move the article without redirecting. Thank you for your attention. MathXplore (talk) 06:31, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already

Done. MathXplore (talk) 07:39, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Gerda Arendt

Semi-protect pls, LTA target. A few days will be fine. - XXBlackburnXx (talk) 17:01, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Would add, needs a revdel. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 17:30, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Does G5 apply, or does that not work for user talk pages? Kk.urban (talk) 17:55, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Kk.urban A G5 could apply, however, the user is not blocked. So a rev del of all the changes should be performed. I do not believe we typically delete a user page or talk page unless asked for by the editor themselves or it is a banned/evader account. Thanks, and be well! - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 17:59, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Free French

The article is not English, but the author is repeating QD tag removal. Please delete this page. MathXplore (talk) 13:04, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already

Done. MathXplore (talk) 13:53, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Revdel/block request

Hi, Could someone revdel <removed> and block the self-admitted vandal[2] please, Thanks –Davey2010^Talk 19:42, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done by Bsadowski1 - Many thanks Bsadowski1 your swift help and actions are greatly appreciated, Many Thanks, Warmest Regards, –Davey2010^Talk 19:55, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RfD

I think we have reached a delete consensus on Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2024/Social news#Social news as 5 vd's 2 vsd's plus the nomination of delete, so I think it is safe to close out as a SNOWBALL even though it has 4 days left. Thanks and edit well! - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 10:18, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@PotsdamLamb: We don't really need this kind of reminder, especially for an RFD that isn't even past its date yet. -- Auntof6 (talk) 20:51, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Auntof6 It can be closed early when it is evident of the results. Nothing has to run a full course of 7 days. I am also allowed to ask to have it closed. It’s not any kind of “reminder.” Thanks and edit well! - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 23:53, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@PotsdamLamb: It can make it harder for the admins to do their job when people keep pointing out the things they want done right now! There's such a thing as a flow of work, and if that gets interrupted things can get dropped.

Earlier today you thanked me for closing a bunch of RFDs. The reason I could do that is that 1) I had a chunk of time before I had to be in a meeting and 2) no one interrupted me to ask me to do something else just because they saw that I was online. If I had gotten interrupted, I wouldn't have been able to close as many as I did at the time.

If something is really urgent, then ask directly if you need to. Otherwise, please use the processes and let them work even if things aren't getting done as soon as you -- or any of us -- would like. Thanks. -- Auntof6 (talk) 10:29, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

O. J. Simpson

Due to his death, we have IP editors removing and adding things. Can we get semi for a month please? Thanks, and be well! - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 18:48, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@PotsdamLamb: I don't think there's enough activity to protect at this time, but I'll add it to my watchlist for a month. -- Auntof6 (talk) 21:27, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Auntof6 Thank you. Thanks, and be well! - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 21:28, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mentors

Hi per this conversation with a WMF staffer 250k pages, can an admin turn on the mentor features please? I think it will be a great help to all the newcomers plus it will alert us to all of their changes so we can monitor to ensure articles are being created correctly and not just toss up a little sentence and call it a day.

PS The instructions are included in that conversation. Thanks, and be well! - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 18:57, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@PotsdamLamb: We would need consensus to implement these features here first. As someone who registered as a mentor, I had assumed it was already enabled as people had started registering. Regarding the mentor dashboard itself, speaking as an enwiki mentor, it is helpful in looking through users who you have mentored, but mentors don't get alerted to all changes newcomers make. --Ferien (talk) 13:11, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ferien We have the consensus running on simple talk :) Thanks, and be well! - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 19:04, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

PotsdamLamb, it should have a dedicated section on simple talk, to give the chance for it to be discussed properly. --Ferien (talk) 19:16, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ferien Please see Wikipedia:Simple talk#RfC - Turn on mentoring system Thanks, and be well! - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 19:20, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ferien Also to comment on the other part when I had a mentee, every change they made appeared in my dashboard. Then if I wanted more details I clicked the button to view it. Side note: They ended up being CU blocked lol. Thanks, and be well! - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 19:22, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please restore this page

Luis Vasquez Kk.urban (talk) 15:13, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Fr33kman pinging.--BRP^ever 15:17, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Kk.urban This has been done by Fr33kman. -- Auntof6 (talk) 23:16, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Issues with User:BigKrow

The user is creating a lot of short (and I mean short) articles and not creating them correctly. Instead of references they just add an external link. This is one such article out of many. Some I have moved to their userspace (and notified them of such) that I moved them so they can work on the articles and complete them to more than a one - two sentence article. I have also posted on their talk page about the issue. They have also received messages from other users on their talk page. This is not the first time this has happened. We have also had a lot of edit conflicts as they follow me around and when I am working on an article, they edit it right after my first edit and I have asked them to wait about 5 minutes to see if I make any other changes as I am tidying up articles and making sure they are formatted correctly, have the appropriate headings, everything I typically do. I will post a notice on the users talk page about this discussion. I am not quite sure what I can do, but perhaps admins can do something or say something that will work and get the editor back on track. Thanks, and be well! - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 04:27, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a list of everything they created and all the articles are the same. One to two sentences, not linked to wikidata, no cats, one external link, (possibly to be used as a ref). This started back in December of 2023. Thanks, and be well! - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 05:12, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Update: Now I need to bring up a few other things that have developed:

User talk:Cyber.Eyes.2005/Archive 5#PotsdamLamb - Editor posted I “need to stop interfering” and was told to post on my talk page.
Talk:1999 Sydney hailstorm#PotsdamLamb telling me I "stop adding things to my drafts vybereyes helping me not you..." - Showing ownership and I’ve never touched the article which is in the main space. It was an article I moved to their user space due to the issues they are having with the creation of the articles (of which I moved the original to their user space so they could work on it) but they made a new article instead of moving it. Plus the article is just very basic (as I listed above 1999 Sydney hailstorm. They have received numerous warnings and conversations about the issues since they joined. I’m beginning to feel that they don’t quite yet understand how to create articles and the layout making them perhaps incompatible with our project. Thanks, and be well! - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 19:14, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I improved the hailstorm article mentioned above by simplifying part of the enwiki article. I agree that these stubs are not acceptable, and should be improved or deleted. However, please do not mass delete every article this user made, since I will improve a few myself. QuicoleJR (talk) 19:38, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@QuicoleJR I am not asking for the articles to be delete, just to be clear. This is about the editor themselves. Thanks, and be well! - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 19:40, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@BigKrow: Are you going to respond to these accusations? QuicoleJR (talk) 20:20, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@QuicoleJR @PotsdamLamb

Iam just frustrated about life sorry u2.... BigKrow (talk) 20:37, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@BigKrow: It is OK, you just need to stop making articles that are too small. QuicoleJR (talk) 20:47, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Understood @QuicoleJR BigKrow (talk) 20:48, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@QuicoleJR They have been told this numerous times and it was even brought up again just a few minutes ago on their TP. Thanks, and be well! - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 20:50, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@PotsdamLamb don't have to curse me out ok BigKrow (talk) 20:50, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

He did not say any curse words. QuicoleJR (talk) 20:52, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@PotsdamLamb they have been up my behind since I started editing here.... BigKrow (talk) 20:53, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

They have just been trying to get you to stop making the really small pages. They are not trying to harass you or anything. QuicoleJR (talk) 20:56, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@QuicoleJR ok BigKrow (talk) 20:57, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@PotsdamLamb: They deserve another chance. We can always come back here if they keep causing problems. QuicoleJR (talk) 20:51, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@QuicoleJR thank you BigKrow (talk) 20:52, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@QuicoleJR im not causing problems BigKrow (talk) 20:53, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@BigKrow: The really small pages were a problem. However, since you agreed to stop, everything is taken care of. QuicoleJR (talk) 20:55, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@QuicoleJR @PotsdamLamb thank you both BigKrow (talk) 20:56, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@BigKrow I have done no such thing. I’ve never cursed at you, you mass created a lot of articles that are improperly formatted. You have been asked, not only by me, but even by admins to do certain things in which you replied OK but yet continued to do them. Now with these comments, I’ve come to the conclusion that I am asking admins to block you for an amount of time they feel is necessary. I am also done participating in this discussion as I’ve made my point clear and you helped clarify it. Thanks, and be well! - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 20:59, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@PotsdamLamb I've done nothing wrong you ain't going block me k BigKrow (talk) 21:01, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@BigKrow: The really short articles are something that you did wrong, but that is taken care of now. @PotsdamLamb: They deserve one more chance. If they continue to make the really short pages, then we can discuss blocking them. QuicoleJR (talk) 21:04, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@QuicoleJR thank you BigKrow (talk) 21:05, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@QuicoleJR It is going to be up to an admin at this point.

Creating inappropriate pages
Stating I am cursing at them and up their butt
Being asked and warned numerous times by editors and admins about how to create articles and stating ok then continuing to do so
Their statement of "I've done nothing wrong you ain't going block me k"

Then add the two conversation I posted above in the update. This all amounts to not being able to collaborate and not mature enough to understand the basic concepts needed.

Like I said, this is up to an admin now. Thanks, and be well! - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 21:18, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Adding this for admin review as well. Special:Diff/9480735/9480736 Thanks, and be well! - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 00:47, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Im defending myself as much as possible people ganging up on me at this wiki.... BigKrow (talk) 00:51, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@BigKrow I did not add it as a "gang up" on you. Just when a thread is started somewhere, that is where it needs to stay. That is why I posted it here since it is part of this topic. Thanks, and be well! - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 01:18, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ok thank you @PotsdamLamb BigKrow (talk) 01:19, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe I should just edit already started pages????? BigKrow (talk) 01:19, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And now I need to add this was just posted to my TP "@PotsdamLamb I tried to apologize to you guess it didn't work so go ahead and try to get me blocked, Thanks again! 😊 BigKrow (talk) 00:49, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply"

Special:Diff/9480736/9480743 *sigh* Thanks, and be well! - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 01:23, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@PotsdamLamb Just a heads up, your being investigated into on a noticeboard.... BigKrow (talk) 01:25, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@BigKrow No I am not. Admins are very well aware and I have been editing here for years. Thanks, and be well! - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 01:27, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I know so have I, your suspicious.... BigKrow (talk) 01:29, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So I was looking at some declined QDs to see if any were mine and I came across this rather rude comment made to a sysop User talk:Fr33kman#Sarah Thanks, and be well! - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 03:36, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

David Errigo Jr.

QD A4 case, but an IP editor is repeating QD tag removal. Please take care of the page. MathXplore (talk) 07:11, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already

Done. MathXplore (talk) 01:36, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A10

Please revdel [3] Thanks, and be well! - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 00:05, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And probably all of their other edits as they are tagged as vandalism/libel. Thanks, and be well! - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 00:06, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Miss La Union protection request

Miss La Union (change · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)

The Bautista sock has been aggressively hitting this article over the past 10 days or so, editing it at least once a day. Could this be semi-protected (at least) to slow them down somewhat? Thanks. Ravensfire (talk) 16:16, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ravensfire - I would actually request a full-admin only protection as they are also creating mass accounts and it is not hard to get autoconfirmed. Thanks, and be well! - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 16:18, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The page was semi-protected on March 30 through April 6 and it did pretty much stop them. I would love a full lock as this is one of the more determined petty/self-promotional LTA's I've seen. I mean, a /20 range globally locked and a pretty substantial user list also glocked, and for just trivial self-promotional. Crazy. Ravensfire (talk) 16:31, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2 IPs keep hitting filters

192.8.127.12 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
84.110.183.68 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

These 2 IPs has been systematically hitting blanking filers for a few months, and the 192.8.-IP in particular has more than 700 log entries without having a single edit. Should we block/warn them? - XXBlackburnXx (talk) 07:46, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons

I just noticed this. It is linked when an article is in the category of living people. It is showing pretty much incomplete and in process of being updated [4]. Due to the importance of this, I feel it should be completed as soon as possible so we have it simplified for our readers. The last substantial edit was in 2021. Thanks, and be well! - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 22:24, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Protection indef on my pages

Please adjust all of my pages to be indef semi due to vandalism (including my archives please) Thanks, and be well! - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 01:20, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done @PotsdamLamb: you don't have to add "AWAITING ADMIN ATTENTION" to requests here. We will get to requests when we get to them. Thanks, --Ferien (talk) 13:00, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ferien this has been up for 13 days and admins have been on and we have a lot of requests on here. Just like on our VIP board with over 30 requests and by the time someone got to them (you actually) they were all stale. Hard to prevent vandalism when no admin is on and when they get pinged they get upset. Thanks, and be well! - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 13:02, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This request took about 10 minutes or so to fulfill due to the number of pages that needed to be protected. It is possible another admin may have left it to do later because there was other work that was of a higher priority. Many of the requests on this board aren't urgent, and someone will usually come and review the whole board once in a while to ensure nothing was missed. --Ferien (talk) 13:10, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Revdel please

Red Dead Thanks, and be well! - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 01:52, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@PotsdamLamb Don't see anything to justify a revdel. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 03:51, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Fehufanga I can’t see it now but it had some to do with f**** my dad. Thanks, and be well! - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 03:58, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The page is deleted now anyway, but the content for that page wasn't offensive, and didn't mention that. --Ferien (talk) 13:01, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection request

Please protect /Current issues and requests archive 62: Vandalism. --Leonidlednev (talk) 15:22, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved --Ferien (talk) 12:52, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reduce protection

Hello. Can someone please remove the protection from Yandere Simulator so that I can move Yandere simulator to it? It is a video game that exists on ENWP and was created here but with a lowercase "s". Please ping me when done so I can move it. Thanks, and be well! - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 01:39, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done by Fehufanga --Ferien (talk) 13:01, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Duggee: Vip Help Desk

QD A4 was requested here, but IPs are repeating QD tag removal. Please decide what to do with the page. MathXplore (talk) 06:10, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To add on to what MathXplore said, these IPs are STILL creating the article and removing QD tags. An admin really needs to protect the page because it’s just becoming really disruptive and annoying to deal with. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 17:39, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done by Auntof6 --Ferien (talk) 13:11, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Import template please

Since the template is fully protected, can an admin import the updated w:Template:Infobox person from enwiki please (including the doc page)? It fixes a few issues that need to be applied here. Thanks, and be well! - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 00:40, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Ferien (talk) 13:13, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ferien Thank you. I just kicked off the null transclusion edit to see how many have errors. Start count was 62. I am sure it will go up now. Thanks, and be well! - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 13:20, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Futurolog21 canvassing

This user created an article that was put up for RfD and was successful. During the RfD, I noticed a couple of things that were off. Upon investigation, I found this user was canvassing to get people from their home wiki to come onto SEWP and vote to keep an article that had no notability. I know canvassing is not tolerated on ENWP. The RfD are is now closed as deleted. I would expect the article to be recreated based on how passionate this editor was about keeping it and even quoting relative parts of policy (but not quoting ones against what they were doing. The RfD is at Wikipedia:Requests_for_deletion/Requests/2024/Lady_Slim for an admin to look and see the log I posted.. Thanks, and be well! - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 08:11, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please see User talk:PotsdamLamb#Hello Thanks, and be well! - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 20:40, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Futurolog21: Asking other users to join a discussion on your side is unacceptable. If you do it again, you may be blocked. QuicoleJR (talk) 21:06, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've never done that, you can be sure. If there is any mechanism to check this, please check it, I am not related to any user. Futurolog21 (talk) 15:46, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Futurolog21 This has nothing to do with being related to any user. This has to do with you posting to others talk pages alerting to the come to the RfD and vote. Only one person actually did from your home wiki. That is called Canvassing. Thanks, and be well! - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 15:49, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved.

Thanks, and be well! - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 13:06, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Module deletion needed please

Hello - Can someone delete Module:Flex columns. It is no longer used and nothing links to it.

Reason: It is for an ENWP template only that is not used on SEWP. Thanks, and be well! - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 02:31, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Ferien (talk) 13:27, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please remove the edit summary of special:diff/9483236

This is an uncivil edit summary, please take care of this description. MathXplore (talk) 06:47, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly that article just needs to be nuked and admin protected. Thanks, and be well! - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 06:55, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This summary is uncivil, but doesn't meet the criteria for either RD2 or RD3. --Ferien (talk) 13:20, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please protect Ice Spice

Ice Spice - constant vandalism. Kk.urban (talk) 04:38, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Ferien (talk) 13:23, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template refresh needed

Can an admin pull in the newest version to refresh our version of Template:Infobox movie please? Also, let me know when it is done as I need to fix an article. Thanks, and be well! - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 00:00, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Issues with DIVINE

Besides a big edit notice that says they are not allowed to post on my talk page, they ignored it and decided to do so anyway. It clearly states: "NOTICE: BigKrow and Divine are prohibited from posting anything on my talk page. Any violations will be reported to WP:AN." in bold letters clear across any typing area of my page. I am holding to it. Admins, please enforce this. This is due to their inability to once again follow instructions on SEWP and requests from an editor who they have had unhealthy conversations with and I distancing myself from both of these editors based on their aspirations and slander towards me. See my edit notice here. It was last updated on April 14, 2024, but both added on April 13, 2024 and while typing this out, the editor added yet another post to my talk page. Diff one then they edited it so here is diff two. Amazing how the changed the words around to better suit them going from You are not supposed to blame another editor who wasn't even informed by them to You are not supposed to blame another editor with wrong information. Thanks, and be well! - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 04:41, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@PotsdamLamb accused me with a false comment of calling another admin an ass on enwiki while my request was about rollback, and they clearly mentioned many things there which i have already addressed with. Just a few days back, they called Lee Velnski " you might be an admin on enwiki and warned not to act as an admin here" while lee was doing their own work. This user is clearly not having a healthy conversation with another editor and always involves in conflict with bad faith editing and WP:Biting another editor. While I was trying to communicate regarding their concern on their talk page, they bring me here, which is not that concerning, as I can see it's not the first time they are doing this. But I just want to ignore this, and their comment on the rollback request was blaming, hatred, false accusations with falsifying evidence. DIV IN E 04:56, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@DIVINE

The evidence is provided in the links. Let me address what you wrote on your debate (again and using the same information I supplied before since you are accusing me (wrongfully) of not providing evidence):

This user has been absent from this wiki for two years. Upon coming back to SEWP, the editor immediately took me to WP:RFCU (See Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser#PotsdamLamb) for absolutely no reason or even researching anything. - Is this not true for some reason? I would like to see the evidence where this did not happen days after you returned without YOU or I even communicating?
Slew of issues on ENWP, involving legal threats (for which they were blocked on April 6, 2024 ENWP block log)

05:17, April 6, 2024 Ivanvector talk contribs changed block settings for DIVINE talk contribs with an expiration time of indefinite (account creation blocked) (legal threats and disruptive editing. Restoring talk access to address block appeal.)
11:01, April 3, 2024 Ivanvector talk contribs changed block settings for DIVINE talk contribs with an expiration time of indefinite (account creation blocked, email disabled, cannot edit own talk page) (Not compromised, but now blocked for legal threats, and disruptive editing in general. Talk page acces revoked for threatening to post personal information about other users.) Tag: Twinkle
10:55, April 3, 2024 Rosguill talk contribs blocked DIVINE talk contribs with an expiration time of indefinite (account creation blocked) (Either a compromised account, or a longterm self-promoter with possible sockpuppetry and possibly UPE thrown in as well, per Special:Diff/1217072039 and the revision histories of Prakash Neupane. Either way, indef block is appropriate.) Tag: Twinkle (Note: I missed this on my intial review.)

Yet you are denying this by your response of "Thirdly, legal threats issues arose from doxing and have already been resolved. I am following WP:STANDARD offer and haven't violated WP:SOCK policy." So if resolved, why are you still blocked? If you took the standard offer, why are you still blocked?

"In addition to the CU request placement, you could have pointed it out to me on my talk page or fixed it instead of complaining." - I was not complaining, I told you it had already been way resolved and my original unblock was declined LAST year due to it and others have brought me up for it and they ended up being globally locked for evading their block. Then on top of this, another editor started making aspirations about me, who has had a lot of issues on this Wiki and after I and others have tried to help them for a very long time, they decide to continue to do what they were asked not to do and to continue to go against policy. So that was the 2nd rollback, but yet you turn around then and state "Secondly, your CU request was valid, and anyone can request CU. You were about to commit 3RR violations while removing that notice from the CU page." - One you cannot assume what I was about to do. I was actually having an IRC conversation with admins about it to get it addressed quickly before it got out of hand.
You state "Fighting against vandalism or patrolling new pages always involves automated edits while putting warning templates on users' talk pages with the help of Twinkle." and "Lastly, about contributing, I have created more than 61 pages and 14 pages recently without copying anything, but writing by myself. My motto is to create at least one page per day here on SWEP while being free."

Since you have been back, you have created 14 pages of which a few are stubs. Plus two more which were deleted as non-notable. I personally asked for QD on one of them. I am not sure where you get 61 pages from unless you are counting user pages when you placed original templates on it. I see 52 talk pages created and 6 categories. So let's not inflate your numbers to try to look good.

You state Also, I don't understand why you bring enwiki issues here, while this is a completely different WikiProject, and I haven't done anything wrong here while volunteering with a positive attitude and positive manners - Not all of your interactions have been positive, and due to the amount of posts you make, I can not search through every single one of. I can think of a few of hand where you were not, which also includes the comments you made when you requested my CU. Any issues you have on one wiki affects all wikis. You, seeming to know all about how things operate, should know this. That is why there is the one-strike rule.
To address your comment about you didn't call an admin an "ass" I will just post that link here too for others to evaluate (along with your demanding nature, which is taken into account by the admin saying they are getting tired of it) w:/User_talk:Primefac/Archive_40#Hi.

Now, to address what you just stated above about me:

Lee and I have since worked it out as adults and explained his reasoning, which is valid and I have no problem with that. 99% of the time, we get along just fine. Disputes are bound to happen, it is how we deal with it that matters.
Yes, some editors and I will not get along. The funny part is, they end up going to CU for some reason and they are found out to be sock puppets. There are actually two other users I did not get along with at one time, they are now resolved and we work great together. It is called talking things out and not everything will be on wiki. As we have IRC, discord and email.

That is all I have to say. The proof is in the pudding as evidence (once again) is shown (since obviously at [[5]] I did not provide evidence, then there you go. I am now disengaging any further contact with you. Thanks, and be well! - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 05:35, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing

Please protect. Lots of continuous vandalism of being blanked. Thanks, and be well! - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 14:29, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Page protection

Please protect the following pages as an editor keeps removing the redirects (one was already protected) and now they are doing the others which all go under one company.

Entertainment One Films needs to be redirected to Entertainment One
Entertainment One Canada needs to be redirected to Entertainment One

Please redirect the pages as stated (also follows ENWP as these small subsidiaries all fall under Entertainment One) and protect the redirect pages from being edited. I have attempted on multiple occasions to talk to the editor on their talk page but they have never once responded and instead just keep removing the redirects without any valid reason on the edit summary or conversation. Thanks, and be well! - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 03:37, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Admin only protection

On both my main and talk please. I’m leaving and I don’t need grave dancers or any thing else being said. Best of luck. Thanks, and be well! - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 13:34, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all subpages of mine too please. Thanks, and be well! - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 13:42, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We don't do this here. We never fully protect user talk pages.--BRP^ever 14:01, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Revdel/block request 2

Hi, Could someone revdel [6] and the edit after, and block the editor too please?, Many thanks, Kind Regards, –Davey2010^Talk 19:02, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done CU things done as well. Operator873 ^connect 19:08, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fantastic many thanks @Operator873 for your swift help and actions it's greatly appreciated, Many thanks, Warm Regards, –Davey2010^Talk 19:10, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Special:Contributions/92.40.182.234

All pages made by this user are QD A3 cases, but they are repeating QD tag removal, please take care of their creations. MathXplore (talk) 13:36, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already

Done. MathXplore (talk) 04:11, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request for semi-protection for my user talk page

Please semi-protect my user talk page User talk:郊外生活 due to excessive vandalism by cross-wiki long-term abuse w:ja:LTA:HEATHROW aka Sidowpknbihihj. My user talk page was semi-protected 2 years ago due to the same reason. ~~Though I am not an auto-confirmed user and I cannot edit semi-protected pages on this project, even my user talk page if semi-protected, but~~ I think semi-protection is necessary to deal with this vandalism. --郊外生活 (talk) 11:02, 25 April 2024 (UTC) // I was auto-confirmed now, so I got able to edit my user talk page if semi-protected. --郊外生活 (talk) 11:05, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@郊外生活 semi-protected for 2 years --DannyS712 (talk) 18:34, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Julien Amiel

The article Julien Amiel was created by Duriusgund (talk · contribs) who is now CU blocked as a sockpuppet by Fr33kman. I tagged the article for deletion as G5, it's now been removed [7] by Visitem (talk · contribs). Very interesting that a new editor shows up to a newly created article. I've got notability questions about the person, but the main issue here is the sock puppetry and probable COI/UPE editing that's happening. Amiel is the director of an AI orgnization called DAU’IA. The article on that organization was created by a now blocked sock (blocked along with Duriusgund). I suspect Visitem is just the most recent puppet of that group. Looking for admin help for deleting the Amiel article and possibly the others, plus CU on Visitem. Ravensfire (talk) 20:37, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feels like promotional editing here. The en article on Julien Amiel was deleted in January 2023 [8] with comments about SEO spam sources that led to the creator being blocked there. The creator, EdouardMont was CU blocked by Fr33kman around the same time as Duriusgund. Before being blocked here, EdouardMont created DAU'IA, an AI related organziation founded by Amiel. Please consider if this article should be deleted as well - the promotional editing / spam is pretty clear here. Ravensfire (talk) 21:02, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Are you saying DAU’IA should be deleted? If so it'd have to go RfD. fr33k man 21:35, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine, it's a not a good article. Ravensfire (talk) 21:38, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection request

Please protect Archie Moore: Persistent sockpuppetry. --Leonidlednev (talk) 05:43, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done for 3 months. MathXplore (talk) 12:30, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Revdel request

Hi, Could someone revdel [9] please, Thanks, Warm Regards, –Davey2010^Talk 12:26, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Ferien (talk) 20:32, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Could someone revdel from here to here please, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 20:28, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Ferien (talk) 20:32, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks Ferien and Freekman much appreciated, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 20:39, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quick revdel

Hi! I'm not sure if the bar is different on simplewiki, but traditionally I'd ask/perform a revdel of addresses being posted for public figures. Hope this is suitable.[10] Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 08:05, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done by Ferien. -- Auntof6 (talk) 09:14, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Was oversighted also (fyi Lee Vilenski) --Ferien (talk) 12:03, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I didn't want to speculate on that part. I've gotten a better feel that the same sorts of standards for revdel (and likely oversight) apply here, so that's good. I'll send it through the oversighter email in future for this sort of stuff. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 12:27, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Protection request

Hi, Could someone protect Drake (musician) for a few weeks please?, Random IPs keep replacing the number of children in the infobox from one to two, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 10:29, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Ferien (talk) 10:43, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fantastic many thanks for actioning this Ferien greatly appreciated, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 10:48, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Page move request

Hi, I don't believe this is controversial but could someone move E-cigarette to Electronic cigarette and then redirect E-cigarette back to Electronic cigarette please?

The lead has electronic cigarette as the first name and it's the current title at EN (en:Electronic cigarette), Many thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 12:27, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Ferien (talk) 12:31, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Brilliant thanks Ferien greatly appreciated :), Many Thanks, Warn Regards, –Davey2010^Talk 12:34, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Katyn massacre

Looks like another ip is at it: Special:Contributions/37.104.11.179. Yottie ^=talk= 16:40, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Yottie, I've deleted the edit summary he posted. It is a WMF-banned editor, so try not to warn them, as even that can sometimes cause issues. --Ferien (talk) 16:45, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Yes, I realise. It's been happening for many years now. I'll avoid warning in future, as suggested. --Yottie ^=talk= 16:48, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And another: 165.16.5.26. Yottie ^=talk= 18:45, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism after last warning

Ip Special:Contributions/209.133.24.0 - vandalism after final warning. Yottie ^=talk= 16:45, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done Yottie, please make sure to report these to VIP, thanks! --Ferien (talk) 16:48, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Sorry, I'm a bit rusty... Yottie ^=talk= 16:49, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, we do find it either way :P --Ferien (talk) 16:50, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Protection for templates

I'm requesting indefinite protection (semi- or full) for a number of highly visible templates:

Each is transcluded over 10,000 times. Thanks! Kk.urban (talk) 05:57, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done, semi-protection for most templates, semi-protection and move protection for most modules (modules don't leave redirects when moving, so these moves must be done extra carefully). For template/modules full protected in enwiki, I applied full protection here with cascading, some template/modules above are covered via cascade protection. MathXplore (talk) 07:42, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]