Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Requests for deletion

(Redirected from Wikipedia:CFD)
Shortcuts
If you think a page should be deleted, read the deletion policy to make sure.
Then follow these instructions on how to request a page for deletion. To find more information on what discussed deletions and quick deletions are:
PLEASE READ THIS

Before nominating: checks and alternatives

change
Shortcut

Prior to nominating article(s) for deletion, please be sure to:

A. Read and understand these policies and guidelines
  1. The Wikipedia deletion policy, which explains valid grounds for deletion.
  2. The main four guidelines and policies that inform deletion discussions: notability (WP:N), verifiability (WP:V), reliable sources (WP:RS), and what Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)
  3. Subject-specific notability guidelines, which can be found at Category:Wikipedia notability guidelines
B. Carry out these checks
  1. Confirm that the article does not meet the criteria for quick deletion.
  2. If there are verifiability, notability or other sourcing concerns, take reasonable steps to search for reliable sources. (See step D.)
  3. Review the article's history to check for potential vandalism or poor editing.
  4. Read the article's talk page for previous nominations and/or that your objections haven't already been dealt with.
  5. Check "What links here" in the article's sidebar, to see how the page is used and referenced within Wikipedia.
  6. Check if there are interlanguage links, also in the sidebar, which may lead to more developed and better sourced articles. Likewise, search for native-language sources if the subject has a name in a non-Latin alphabet (such as Japanese or Greek), which is often in the lead.
C. Consider whether the article could be improved rather than deleted
  1. If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate for RfD.
  2. If the article was recently created, please consider allowing the contributors more time to develop the article.
  3. If an article has issues try first raising your concerns on the article's talk page, with the main contributors, and/or adding a cleanup tag, such as {{notability}}, {{hoax}}, {{original research}}, or {{advert}}; this ensures readers are aware of the problem and may act to fix it.
  4. If the topic is not important enough to merit an article on its own, consider merging or redirecting to an existing article. This should be done particularly if the topic name is a likely search term.
D. Search for additional sources, if the main concern is notability
  1. The minimum search expected is a normal Google search, a Google Books search, a Google News search, and a Google News archive search; Google Scholar is suggested for academic subjects.
  2. If you find a lack of sources, you've completed basic due diligence before nominating. However, if a quick search does find sources, this does not always mean an RfD on a sourcing basis is unwarranted. If you spend more time examining the sources, and determine that they are insufficient, e.g., because they only contain passing mention of the topic, then an RfD nomination may still be appropriate.
  3. If you find that adequate sources do appear to exist, the fact that they are not yet present in the article is not a proper basis for a nomination. Instead, you should consider citing the sources, or at minimum apply an appropriate template to the page that flags the sourcing concern. Common templates include {{unreferenced}}, {{refimprove}}, {{third-party}}, {{primary sources}} and {{one source}}.

Discussed deletion

change
Put the deletion tag on the article.
  1. Click "Change source" at the top of the page to be deleted.
  2. In the edit box, add this tag: {{rfd|REASON}}. Put it at the top of the page, above the rest of the text. Then, replace the text "REASON" with a short reason why the page should be deleted. Do not be too specific here. You can add more details on the discussion page (see below).
    • It is a good idea to write a change summary to let others know what you are doing. You can say "nominating for deletion", "requesting deletion", or something like that.
  3. Click "Save changes" at the bottom to save the page with the deletion tag at the top.
    • You can also check the "Watch this page" check box to add the page to your watchlist. This lets you know if the page for deletion has been changed. If the deletion tag is removed any time before the discussion is closed, it should be put back.
Create a discussion page.
  1. If the deletion tag has been added to the page, a box should appear at the top of the article with a link saying "Click here to create a discussion page!" Click that link.
  2. You should be taken to a page starting with "Creating Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/..." along with the current year and the name of the article to be deleted. In the edit box, the following tag should have already been added: {{RfD/Preload/Template}} . Replace the text PLACE REASON HERE with a more detailed reason why the page should be deleted.
    • It is helpful to include links to the various policy pages about Wikipedia (that begin with Wikipedia:). Here are some examples of this: "This article is [[Wikipedia:COMPLEX|not easy to understand]]" or "Not a [[Wikipedia:notable|notable]] topic''. This will make others more aware of why the page is not acceptable under Wikipedia's policies.
  3. Click "Save changes" to save the new discussion page when you are done.
    • A change summary you can write for this page is "creating discussion page", "starting deletion discussion", or something like that.
    • As with the page for deletion, you can check the "Watch the page" box. This will let you know if someone else has replied to your discussion.
List it here
  1. Copy the title of the discussion page to the clipboard. You can do this by dragging the mouse over the text from "Wikipedia" to the end of the page title to highlight it, then right-clicking and selecting "Copy".
  2. Go to the list of deletion requests, and click "change source" beside the words "Current deletion request discussions".
  3. At the top of the list of discussions, paste the title from the clipboard (right-click and select "Paste"). Add a pair of curly brackets before and after the title to make a template that will copy the content of the discussion page onto the main deletion page, like this:
    {{Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2024/(name of page to be deleted)}}
  4. Finally, click "Save changes" to add the discussion to the list. If the page saves successfully, you should see your deletion discussion at the top of the list. And that's it!

If this is too complicated for you, there are some gadgets like Twinkle that you can use. This allows you to do it faster.

Quick deletion

change
See also: Wikipedia:Deletion policy § Quick deletion

If you think a page has nonsense content, add {{non}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page does not say why the subject is important, add {{notable}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page should be deleted per other quick deletion rules, add {{QD|reason}} to the top of the page.

Notifying the user

change

Generally, you should try to be civil and tell the user that created the page to join the discussion talking about the page. This can be done by adding {{subst:RFDNote|page to be deleted}} ~~~~ to the bottom of their talkpage.

Discussions

change
See also: Wikipedia:Deletion review
  • The discussion is not a vote. Please make suggestions on what action to take, and support your suggestion with reasons.
  • Please look at the article before you make a suggestion. Do not make an opinion using only the information given by the nominator. Looking at the history of the article may help to understand the situation.
  • Please read other comments and suggestions. They may have helpful information.
  • Start your comments or suggestions on a new line. Start with * and sign after your comment by adding ~~~~ to the end. If you are responding to another editor, put your comment directly below theirs and make sure your comment is indented (using more than one *).
  • New users can make suggestions, but their ideas may not be considered, especially if the suggestion seems to be made in bad faith. The opinion of users who had an account before the start of the request may be given more weight or importance.
  • Suggestions by users using "sock puppets" (more than one account belonging to the same person) will not be counted.
  • Please make only one suggestion. If you change your mind, change your first idea instead of adding a new one. The best way to do this is to put <s> before your old idea and </s> after it. For example, if you wanted to delete an article but now think it should be kept, you could put: "Delete keep".
  • If you would like an article to be kept, you can improve the article and try to fix the problems given in the request for deletion. If the reasons given in the nomination are fixed by changing, the nomination can be withdrawn by the nominator, and the deletion discussion will be closed by an administrator.
  • Try to avoid confusing suggestions, such as delete and merge.
  • Requests for deletion is not a war zone. You can click here for more information, although the page is not in Simple English.

Remember: You do not have to make a suggestion for every nomination. You should think about not making a suggestion if:

  1. A nomination involves a topic that you do not know much about.
  2. Everyone has made the same suggestion and you agree with that suggestion.
  • All times are in UTC.

Current deletion request discussions

change

Afghani guitar

change
Afghani guitar (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fehufanga has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I don't think that it is worth having a separate article about strung, plucked instruments from Afghanistan, especially since all three of the instruments mentioned in the article are not exclusive to Afghanistan. The name of the article, to me, is also misleading. We don't call the pipa, liuqin, ruan "Chinese guitars", nor do we call the lute, baroque guitar, and the mandolin "European guitars". The prose also looks like an LLM was used to generate it, or at least parts of it. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 22:11, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 22:11, 7 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Baby De Scarface

change
Baby De Scarface (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

FatalFit has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails GNG, I can't find any coverage online. The article has peacock phrases such as "He is still dropping songs relentlessly till date and his fanbase is extraordinarily strong". FatalFit | ✉ | ✓  15:48, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 15:48, 7 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Selsoviet

change
Selsoviet (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Raayaan9911 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: AI-Generated content, Too complex in this article, How users created their article using ChatGPT like this. Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 13:25, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 13:25, 7 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


English in the Commonwealth of Nations

change
English in the Commonwealth of Nations (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Raayaan9911 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: AI-Generated content plus unsourced. How they created their article like this using ChatGPT. Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 13:13, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 13:13, 7 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


TEFL Institute of Ireland

change
TEFL Institute of Ireland (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable school, cannot find any evidence of any notability, fails NSCHOOL and GNG –Davey2010Talk 12:26, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 12:26, 7 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Sujit Kumar Mishra

change
Sujit Kumar Mishra (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

2409:4055:4E16:A470:0:0:504B:F610 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I don't think he is notable person as I can see there is such no results of any proof of notability 2409:4055:4E16:A470:0:0:504B:F610 (talk) 19:37, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 19:37, 5 December 2024 7 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


OkGranCanaria

change
OkGranCanaria (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not a single notable source And Page is written Like a Advertisement of the Travel Agency Ksy 10:08, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 10:08, 7 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


MARIANO BUSSO

change
MARIANO BUSSO (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable at all, fake references, advertising and spam. BZPN (talk) 08:43, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 08:43, 7 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Template:Video game companies established in the year

change
Template:Video game companies established in the year (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

QuantumFoam66 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: created by Ігнат Лостюк. Simple English Wikipedia does not (at least at the moment) have dedicated category-tree to companies by year of establishment, or a template. We are Simple English Wikipedia, and we are different from English Wikipedia afterall. What's the point of saying to Keep this template? QuantumFoam66 (talk) 22:09, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 22:09, 6 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Template:YYYY in video gaming category header

change
Template:YYYY in video gaming category header (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

QuantumFoam66 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: created by Ігнат Лостюк (Ihnat Lostyuk). Simple English Wikipedia currently does not have a fully-complete category tree for "(YEAR) in video games" (i.g. Category:2012, 2009, 1999 in video games); whereas the parent would be "Video gaming by year" and the children of that category would videogames companies started in 2001, 2004, and so on. This template is currently is currently not necessary and corresponding categories that use this template may be deleted. QuantumFoam66 (talk) 21:59, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 21:59, 6 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


San Miguel Petapa

change
San Miguel Petapa (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This article has no meaning for the reader. The only information it contains is one sentence that such a village/town exists. No source whatsoever. BZPN (talk) 21:45, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 21:45, 6 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Milton, West Dunbartonshire

change
Milton, West Dunbartonshire (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This article has no meaning for the reader. The only information it contains is one sentence that such a village/town exists. No source whatsoever. BZPN (talk) 21:44, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change
  •   Delete Agree--Ksy 21:55, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Keep This article does not belong anywhere near RfD. @Kuskrey and BZPN: please review WP:BEFORE: Deletion is not cleanup. In the time you both could have commented on and made this nomination respectively, you could have improved the article to a level that no cleanup templates would be required. --Ferien (talk) 22:00, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Ferien: Well, I disagree. This article only has one sentence. No sources, nothing more, just one sentence. This is not even a basis for expanding/improving the article. There is no big difference between writing a new article and expanding it with seven (!) words. I understand cases where stubs are a bit more extensive, perhaps without references, but contain some data. But one sentence is not serious. The reader will not learn anything from this article, and inserting templates into it will result in an indefinite period of waiting for corrections. Besides, I am rather reluctant to expand articles on topics I have no idea about (geography is not my best side) :). BZPN (talk) 08:00, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @BZPN: Having a small amount of content is not a reason to delete if it has useful information. This isn't my opinion – this is the deletion policy, literally word-for-word. A sentence, particularly the ones in the West Dunbartonshire settlements you have nominated for deletion, is a basis for expanding and improving the article. There is actually nothing wrong with the article other than the fact that it's short. It's unsourced because there is nothing to source. The fact that Milton is a village in West Dunbartonshire is not controversial and what are you even going to source to prove that? Just because you are not intending to expand or source it does not mean no other editor will look at it. Special:ShortPages is watched by many editors, including myself, and often acted upon. I for one enjoy expanding geographical articles such as this, and have actually passed through this specific village during my trips to Scotland. But on the whole, we as a wiki will be realistically not be significantly better off having used a week of community discussion to delete an article, that while short, offers useful information, when we could have made minor improvements to the article that would have avoided this discussion entirely. --Ferien (talk) 13:05, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Ferien: Yes, but this information is not useful. The only information here is that there is such a village and its approximate location. This article has no value to the reader. BZPN (talk) 13:33, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @BZPN Yes, but this information is not useful. How is basic geographical information not useful? WP:SOFIXIT then. Like I have said before, not everything needs a citation. If it's uncontroversial enough then a citation is not mandatory. Sure, it's nice to have, but do you need to cite that the sky is blue? Time spent in this discussion could have been spent discussing more contentious articles currently at RfD or RfDs without any !votes. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 13:41, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 21:44, 6 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Alexandria, West Dunbartonshire

change
Alexandria, West Dunbartonshire (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This article has no meaning for the reader. The only information it contains is one sentence that such a village/town exists. No source whatsoever. BZPN (talk) 21:44, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 21:44, 6 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Bonhill

change
Bonhill (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This article has no meaning for the reader. The only information it contains is one sentence that such a village/town exists. No source whatsoever. BZPN (talk) 21:44, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 21:44, 6 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Milice

change
Milice (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This article has no meaning for the reader. The only information it contains is one sentence that such a service existed. No source whatsoever. BZPN (talk) 21:43, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 21:43, 6 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Volkspolizei

change
Volkspolizei (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This article has no meaning for the reader. The only information it contains is one sentence that such a service existed. No source whatsoever. BZPN (talk) 21:43, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 21:43, 6 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Korean People's Army

change
Korean People's Army (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This article has no meaning for the reader. The only information it contains is one sentence that such a service existed. No source whatsoever. BZPN (talk) 21:42, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 21:42, 6 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Rafael Viguera González

change
Rafael Viguera González (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unable to find any reliable sources Other please check If I am not wrong Ksy 20:33, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 20:33, 6 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Ahir-Rajput Connection

change
Ahir-Rajput Connection (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Shakib ul hassan has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The article contains a mix of unsourced or poorly sourced claims, historical inaccuracies, and original research (WP:OR). It relies heavily on religious texts and unverifiable assertions, which do not meet Wikipedia's standards for reliable, verifiable, and neutral content. Additionally, it presents conflicting interpretations of the relationship between Ahirs and Rajputs without providing scholarly consensus, making the content misleading. The topic is better covered in existing, well-sourced articles on Yaduvanshi Kshatriyas or related subjects. Shakib ul hassan 💬 talk 20:13, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 20:13, 6 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Polyphase decomposition

change
Polyphase decomposition (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Rathfelder has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Incomprehensible Rathfelder (talk) 17:49, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 17:49, 6 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Mir Muhammad Pasha of Rawanduz

change
Mir Muhammad Pasha of Rawanduz (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Rathfelder has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Clearly copied - badly Rathfelder (talk) 17:39, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 17:39, 6 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


List of awards and nominations received by Tyler, the Creator

change
List of awards and nominations received by Tyler, the Creator (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Rathfelder has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not a separate article Rathfelder (talk) 17:33, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 17:33, 6 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


List of NHL retired numbers

change
List of NHL retired numbers (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Rathfelder has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I dont know what this is about. Rathfelder (talk) 17:31, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 17:31, 6 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Emma Tremblay

change
Emma Tremblay (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Rathfelder has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable Rathfelder (talk) 17:14, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 17:14, 6 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Abhira Brahmins

change
Abhira Brahmins (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

NXcrypto has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: There is no such community called Abhira Brahmins exist. References are failing its verification. Seems like a hoax or WP:OR to me. NXcrypto Chatting 16:53, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 16:53, 6 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Owen Garitty

change
Owen Garitty (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

38.183.10.216 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not found any strong reference for notability 38.183.10.216 (talk) 16:51, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 16:51, 6 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Deji

change
Deji (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Rathfelder has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not very notable Rathfelder (talk) 16:51, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 16:51, 6 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Noman A. Said

change
Noman A. Said (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Rathfelder has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesnt seem very notable Rathfelder (talk) 16:21, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change


This request is due to close on 16:21, 6 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Imtiaz Ahmed (actor)

change
Imtiaz Ahmed (actor) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Could not find even a singly notable source for the subject other Please Check if I am not wrong. Ksy 08:31, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 08:31, 6 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Fetside

change
Fetside (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

FatalFit has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I cannot find any reliable sources using an internet search browser at all and is therefore not notable. The article is written like an advertisement and uses peacock terms such as "offering tools that support seamless interaction," "focusing instead on fostering a genuine and supportive community," and "It aims to go beyond traditional social networking by building a genuine community that values openness and respect." All of the references that are used in the article are random and completely unrelated. FatalFit | ✉ | ✓  17:33, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 17:33, 5 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Capture of Siverek (1925)

change
Capture of Siverek (1925) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

JJPMaster has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: See all of the other RfDs for "Capture of..." articles by Canoooo.4 from today. JJPMaster (she/they) 23:02, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Canoooo.4 is clearly working on the history of Kurdistan. I think they should be helped to do that. Rathfelder (talk) 17:35, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 23:02, 4 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Capture of Ergani (1925)

change
Capture of Ergani (1925) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unsourced article. Lack of proper wikitext formatting and a properly formed lead. In this form, the article does not provide readers with relevant information. Actually looks like a substub. BZPN (talk) 22:54, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 22:54, 4 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Capture of Maden (1925)

change
Capture of Maden (1925) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unsourced article. Lack of proper wikitext formatting and a properly formed lead. In this form, the article does not provide readers with relevant information. Actually looks like a substub. BZPN (talk) 22:53, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 22:53, 4 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Capture of Lice (1925)

change
Capture of Lice (1925) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unsourced article. Lack of proper wikitext formatting and a properly formed lead. In this form, the article does not provide readers with relevant information. Actually looks like a substub. BZPN (talk) 22:49, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 22:49, 4 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Badirkhan beg campaign against Ottoman

change
Badirkhan beg campaign against Ottoman (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unsourced article. Lack of proper wikitext formatting and a properly formed lead. In this form, the article does not provide readers with relevant information. Actually looks like a substub. BZPN (talk) 22:47, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 22:47, 4 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Capture of Palu (1925)

change
Capture of Palu (1925) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unsourced article. Lack of proper wikitext formatting and a properly formed lead. In this form, the article does not provide readers with relevant and informative information. Actually looks like a substub. BZPN (talk) 22:45, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 22:45, 4 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Capture of Bingöl (1925)

change
Capture of Bingöl (1925) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unsourced article. Lack of proper wikitext formatting and a properly formed lead. In this form, the article does not provide readers with relevant and informative information. Actually looks like a substub. BZPN (talk) 22:45, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 22:45, 4 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Battle of Bitlis (1835)

change
Battle of Bitlis (1835) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unsourced article. Lack of proper wikitext formatting and a properly formed lead. In this form, the article does not provide readers with relevant and informative information. Actually looks like a substub. BZPN (talk) 21:48, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 21:48, 4 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Battle of Rawandiz

change
Battle of Rawandiz (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unsourced article. Lack of proper wikitext formatting and a properly formed lead. In this form, the article does not provide readers with relevant and informative information. Actually looks like a substub. BZPN (talk) 21:47, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 21:47, 4 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Alqosh Massacre (1832)

change
Alqosh Massacre (1832) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unsourced article. Lack of proper wikitext formatting and a properly formed lead. In this form, the article does not provide readers with relevant and informative information. Actually looks like a substub. BZPN (talk) 21:47, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 21:47, 4 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Khatare Massacre (1832)

change
Khatare Massacre (1832) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unsourced article. Lack of proper wikitext formatting and a properly formed lead. In this form, the article does not provide readers with relevant and informative information. BZPN (talk) 21:46, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 21:46, 4 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Battle of Batapur

change
Battle of Batapur (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Mr.Hanes has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: "The article is relied upon 2 sources, which breaks Wikipedia's policy that an article should be having 'atleast' 3 sources. Moreover, out of those 2 sources, you cant access 1, which breaks Wikipedia:Verifiability, This leaves us to the last remaining source, that source nowhere calls this event as "Battle of batapur" nor the source specifically talks about an "X victory" or "Y victory" taking place here, this breaks the criteria of Wikipedia:Notability, Making this article WP:OR, If we go further, we can clearly see WP:SYNTH here since it is cherrypicking few relative words from the source, mixing them together and drawing a conclusion of its own" Mr.Hanes (talk) 18:59, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 18:59, 4 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Pathankot airstrike

change
Pathankot airstrike (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Mr.Hanes has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Article relies heavily on sources that do not meet Wikipedia's reliable sources policy WP:RS. These sources lack editorial oversight, established reputability, or neutrality, which undermines the verifiability of the content. Without reliable, independent sources, the subject fails to meet Wikipedia's standard for inclusion. Mr.Hanes (talk) 18:09, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 18:09, 4 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Ardalan Emirate

change
Ardalan Emirate (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This article has no sources or wikitext formatting. There is no major value for the reader, just a few minor mentions of dates. It looks more like an edit test and substub. BZPN (talk) 17:24, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change
  •   Keep The subject is notable. Lack of sources and formatting can be fixed. However, it could be deleted as a direct copy from enwiki. --Auntof6 (talk) 23:44, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Also, I'm not sure the term "emirate" applies. -- Auntof6 (talk) 23:44, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I really don't understand the purpose of leaving articles like this. If we leave it like this and do not delete it, it will remain in this for an indefinite period of time until someone decides to correct it (but we don't know when). An article like this really has no real value to the reader. The topic is notable and encyclopedic, but it is not enough to leave this article in such a state. It is actually an out-of-context fragment of unformatted and unverified information. BZPN (talk) 07:50, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 17:24, 4 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Mauryan Conquest of South

change
Mauryan Conquest of South (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

NXcrypto has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Most of the references are failing to verify. NXcrypto Chatting 10:06, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 10:06, 4 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Category:Military forces by type

change
Category:Military forces by type (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)
Category:Types of military forces (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Overcategorization, should be merged with Category:Military forces to make things easier to navigate through. Also created by a blocked or banned user. Depextual (talk) 00:46, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 00:46, 4 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Androgynous

change
Androgynous (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fr33kman has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: AI generated with little simplify fr33kman 23:32, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 23:32, 3 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Template:AI-notice

change
Template:AI-notice (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: AI-generated content can simply be addressed at RfD or other deletion methods if we decide to implement them as a community. If AI-content has been added in, it can be reverted as disruptive. I do not see a scenario in which this template would be useful. --Ferien (talk) 21:50, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change
  •   Comment: I have explained the purpose of this template here: Wikipedia:Simple talk#Baby shower. Baby shower is an example of an article where the template should be included on its talk page, if the article would not be deleted through RfD. Thank you. BZPN (talk) 21:58, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete we should be deprecating the use of AI in our articles. It goes against the pillars of Wikipedia in my eyes. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 22:38, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Keep If they're not going to be deleted (Ferien: you yourself removed the QD criterion for this), then it's useful to be able to tag them as such so they are collected together in a category and other users can look at them later. I have seen a number of these AI-generated articles and didn't really no what to do with them. AI is able to quickly generate a lot of text, which cannot be verified so quickly, may be biased, and on this project usually doesn't fit the criteria of being simple. So it's not so easy to change them into properly written articles that follow the manual of style. On the other hand, if a QD criterion is made for these, then this template won't be needed. But it seems you're putting the cart before the horse here. Depextual (talk) 22:40, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Depextual, I'm not wanting these articles to be kept - I'm wanting them to be deleted. But there are two reasons why I removed the QD criterion. Firstly, there was no discussion in the community about the QD criterion, at all. It is not normal for QD criteria to be added without discussion, nor is it fair on the community. Secondly, it was not an objective QD criterion. While there are telltale signs a page is created by AI, there is no certainty a page was created by AI, unlike A3 where you can see a page was copied from enwiki or G12 where you can see an article was a copyright violation. We don't have to use QD criteria to delete articles, that's why we have RfD for cases that might need more oversight. We already have abuse/misuse of A4, even though that is an objective criteria - QD criteria should be cut and dry cases, and that would not be the case with an AI G13. --Ferien (talk) 22:46, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    In that case I strongly support keeping this template. It's similar to other types of tags that can be used on poorly written articles, such as {{Hoax}}, {{NPOV}}, {{COI}}, {{Notability}}. We could delete all those tags and just say the pages should go to RfD instead, but I'd rather not do that. Depextual (talk) 22:49, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    That is because those issues are typically able to be fixed whereas AI articles present fundamental issues to article creation. --Ferien (talk) 22:50, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wait. Depending on how the proposed WP:AI guideline goes, this will either serve the purpose of demarcating (preferably with a tracking cat) or be useless and get deleted. Right now, I can't comment on how well the proposed guideline is going, and so can't decide whether to delete this template.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 14:19, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Delete as AI articles should be deleted not fixed/rewritten, I guess you could create a tracking category for them incase editors aren't sure, anyway delete. --–Davey2010Talk 19:04, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    That's why the template exists fr33kman 13:32, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I thought this was created so that articles in this category can be improved not deleted but if the purpose of this is to check articles to see if they're AI or human before deleting then sure id be happy to keep
    If it exists purely to improve them then then no I still say it should be deleted
    Does that make sense?
    From my reading of the simple talk baby shower section the OP wants these improved not deleted? –Davey2010Talk 14:52, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Keep, in accordance with my comment above and statements on ST, I maintain my opinion. BZPN (talk) 21:55, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Keep We now have multiple articles generated by AI and it's not going to end. It is useful to be able to tag these creations so that the community can work on them and so our readers understand that they are AI generated content fr33kman 13:30, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wait until the discussion at WP:AI concludes. FatalFit | ✉ | ✓  19:56, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I think it's quite difficult to say there is a place this is being centrally discussed. It's all good and well waiting for discussions to finish but the last comment on Wikipedia:Simple talk#AI generated content. was mine 4 days ago. If you are looking at the majority opinion and consensus on Wikipedia talk:AI generated content, it is currently to ban AI-generated content in its entirety, but it's quite difficult to determine the current consensus easily because it's all split into different sections, and it's not centralised on simple talk. --Ferien (talk) 20:37, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I agree we need to centralise the discussion somewhere. I don't think the consensus is to ban it but it's hard to say without a poll. I think everyone is leaning towards it being a problem but we're yet to decide what to do. fr33kman 20:45, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Delete Referring to the AI generated article Baby shower, and further to section/heading "Cultural Variations", it only shows results about India, Mexico, China and Africa. However, it doesnot discuss about the countries where it's a common tradition i.e Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United States. This is just an example of AI generated article which might go against the essence of Wikipedia platform being a reliable platform. --Ksy 22:04, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 21:50, 3 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Category:Primate health

change
Category:Primate health (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)
Category:Primate diseases (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)
Category:Mammal health (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)
Category:Mammal diseases (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I think this is overcategorization for now. Depextual (talk) 19:52, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change
  •   Delete This is exactly the kind of situation our 3-entry rule is designed to prevent -- a multi-level branch of the category tree where each category has only one entry. Category:Human diseases and disorders could have been included also, but I don't like to add to existing RFDs. --Auntof6 (talk) 04:38, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • I didn't include that because many more articles could be included in that category if it's kept. If we decide to use it to separate human, animal, and plant diseases. Depextual (talk) 17:30, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      The 3-entry rule is about how many things are actually in the category, not how many things could be in the category. There's only one entry in the human diseases and disorders category, and that entry isn't about a disease or disorder and isn't specifically human. -- Auntof6 (talk) 23:50, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 19:52, 3 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Toyota Century

change
Toyota Century (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The article provides no useful value to the reader. Actually, there is no specific information, only a vague context around this model. Also as the IP editor in my discussion said (whom I thank for pointing this out), the article contains a lot of NPOV and false information, e.g. "so many people liked the old one" or "had a very good look in black" '. There are no sources whatsoever. In this form, the article has no meaning for readers and it is better to delete it than to keep it for an indefinite period of time. The article has already been waiting for improvement for about a year, and it is not worth keeping it any longer. BZPN (talk) 16:34, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change
  •   Comment: Hello everyone,
I understand the concerns raised in this discussion regarding the lack of sources and neutrality in the "Toyota Century" article. I appreciate the feedback from editor BZPN and other participants. However, I would like to present the following points in favor of retaining the article:
1. Sources and Verifiability: I acknowledge that the article currently lacks reliable sources to back up some claims. I am committed to researching and adding credible, verifiable sources. While the Toyota Century may not be widely covered globally, it remains a notable vehicle in Japan, and I believe we can find reliable sources to support the content.
2. Neutrality and Objectivity: I agree that certain subjective statements, such as "many people liked the old model" or "it had a very good look in black," need to be revised for neutrality. I am happy to make revisions to ensure the article adheres to Wikipedia’s neutrality guidelines and remove non-objective language.
3. Value of the Article: Although the Toyota Century may not be as globally known, it holds significant value in the context of Japanese automotive history. The article can offer valuable insights into this unique luxury vehicle and contribute meaningfully to the encyclopedia.
4. Commitment to Improvement: Instead of deleting the article, I propose that it be retained with a commitment to improvement. I will work on enhancing the content, adding proper sources, and ensuring that it meets Wikipedia's standards.
For these reasons, I respectfully request that the article be retained. I am committed to working on it and improving it in line with Wikipedia’s guidelines.
Thank you for your consideration. 179.109.141.185 (talk) 17:17, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 16:34, 3 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Baby shower

change
Baby shower (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Generated by AI, without proper value. Only exaggerated, false and non-specific terms. Most of the information is unsourced and fake. An article like this should not be posted here. BZPN (talk) 13:58, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 13:58, 3 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Kayima Mark

change
Kayima Mark (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Asteralee has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Promotional and non-notable. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 13:42, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change
  • Keep: Kayima Mark is a notable figure in the technology sector, particularly in Uganda and on a global scale. He is the founder and CEO of Caystard Group, Inc., a multinational tech conglomerate that has been instrumental in delivering cutting-edge solutions in software development and cloud infrastructure since 2020. His company operates globally, with locations in New York and Kampala, and encompasses several successful subsidiaries, including Host44, Hostylla, and Caystard Cloud.
Mark’s contributions have been recognized in the tech industry, and his innovations have a measurable impact, especially in web hosting and cloud solutions. Wambere1070 (talk) 13:47, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please check Google his google Profile here https://g.co/kgs/ZUV4KAQ Wambere1070 (talk) 14:06, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


This request is due to close on 13:42, 3 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Muhammad Ahmad Raza

change
Muhammad Ahmad Raza (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

This person doesn't look notable, the article looks more like a short advertisement. There are not many and significant achievements. BZPN (talk) 07:20, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 07:20, 3 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Vinod Sharma

change
Vinod Sharma (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ravensfire has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Promotional article with mainly interview (primary sources) left after some pruning, not enough to show that WP:NBIO is met. Ravensfire (talk) 16:51, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 16:51, 2 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


DSP for secure communication in blockchain

change
DSP for secure communication in blockchain (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Likely AI generated; article has several issues:

  • It is little fleshed out; the information in the article is likely correct, but the different pieces of information aren't properly connected.
  • The article mixes two sets of technologies that are completely unrelated (digital signal processing and blockchain)
  • Blockchain may be a buzzword.

So if I use digiral signal processing to process a signal, I can also decrypt the signal before processing and encrypt it afterwards, I do not need specific blockchain technology. In short: I propose we delete this one, without replacement. Comments? Eptalon (talk) 21:05, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 21:05, 1 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Wikipedia:Bad articles

change
Wikipedia:Bad articles (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Useless page in Wikipedia namespace. It also said it was a policy but it's not, so I removed that claim. Depextual (talk) 16:40, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 16:40, 1 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Farsad (rapper)

change
Farsad (rapper) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I have checked in detail could not find any Notability for the subject other Please check If I am wrong Ksy 08:37, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change
  • Keep Farsad is one of the notable Persian rapper, as in Iran news don't cover the rappers because hipHop is illegal and Iranian sources are under control of Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps
But some super notable sources coverd Farsad which I added for him *Timsar* (talk) 08:44, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No offence, Lets other Editors decide, as I have already mentioned Please Check If I am Wrong. Wikipedia follow rules and regulation.
And according to wiki rules you can improve the article but your Vote don't Count. Ksy 09:08, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
We don't have any rules that article maker can't vote in Wiki! I did it a lot on farsi wiki and English wiki, Thanks for the corporation *Timsar* (talk) 09:22, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Administrator note: @Kuskrey: If you're going to tell another user that they can't !vote, you need to cite the rule that says so. I believe that the article creator is allowed to !vote. Did you have some other reason in mind? -- Auntof6 (talk) 10:48, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
ok, if you say so, it is added in my knowledge. Ksy 10:53, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Administrator note: Comments moved into the discussion section. MathXplore (talk) 09:24, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Delete The English language sources clearly are not good enough for notability. I translated the the Persian language sources using Google Translate and they seem promotional, and not really in depth coverage. Also, this musician does not seem to be particularly popular according to online metrics like the number of "fans" on the pages linked. Depextual (talk) 22:53, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Depextual in Iranian sources anyone can't promote news or something else, As I told the News source are under control of Islamic Revolutionary Guard and hipHop music is illegal so that's so clear *Timsar* (talk) 03:59, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I think Berouz and vaghte sobh are significant mentions but they seem to repeat the same content. I don't know whether they're independent of the the subject, but it's not really enough unfortunately. As for the number of fans, you're right and I probably shouldn't have said that, but what I was trying to say is that there's not really any indication outside this page that he would meet the notability standards. Depextual (talk) 18:45, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Because, Vaghte Sobh news is one of the most notable Iranian sources and other sources are getting rewrite of them sometimes and I would insure u that in Iran Farsad is notable *Timsar* (talk) 13:18, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment people can be notable with significant mentions in multiple, independent/third-party, secondary sources and Farsad is qualified enough. please check here. In addition, number of fans or pages link Are not criterion of Notability!
*Timsar* (talk) 04:30, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • keep I have also checked this page. I didn't see any voidation. I didn't come here to make a fool of myself. As an editor, I will definitely do this. This page is following a Simple English Wikipedia policy. I will say that it should be kept Mmukhas (talk) 08:16, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 08:37, 1 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


African–American Indigenous solidarity

change
African–American Indigenous solidarity (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fr33kman has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Nonsense term that doesn't exist. Not QD-able fr33kman 22:22, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change
  • I considered several synonyms and neighbor–synonyms before creating it,
but I prefered this option. The most common is Black–Indigenous intersectionality but that violates and so should be Black–Indigenous intersectionality (USA). I don't like it but perhaps we should ignore my aesthetic preferences and use Black–Indigenous intersectionality (USA). Invasive Spices (talk) 22:05, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 22:22, 28 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Bad (Bodo culture)

change
Bad (Bodo culture) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable culture, cannot find any evidence of any notability, Fails DICDEF and GNG –Davey2010Talk 18:10, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change
  • Keep: In addition to the cited source, I also found this described in a book online by B.C. Basumatary. There may also be other sources which can't be found online. As an anthropological topic, which is likely the subject of research, I believe we should allow an article about this. (Unless the article seemed to plagiarism or POV-pushing, which this doesn't seem to be.) Oholiba (talk) 20:08, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    The cited source just gives definitions, it doesn't demonstrate any notability. There may be sources offline however on the other hand there may be none at all..., "likely the subject of research" - says who?,
    Without being disrespectful your !vote is pretty much clutching at straws. You've not offered any substantial or indepth sources that demonstrate any notability, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 21:43, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    "Demonstrating notability" is an indeterminate concept here. It makes sense for a person, movie, or company, but what does it mean to say that a cultural belief demonstrates notability. It's covered in sources, which is enough for Wikipedia. WP:GNG Oholiba (talk) 22:00, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Well I mean being important enough to have an article by having coverage in a number of independent reliable sources, One source doesn't make this pass GNG unfortunately, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 22:15, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


This request is due to close on 18:10, 28 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Anglican Adam Preaching Society

change
Anglican Adam Preaching Society (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Asteralee has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-independent sources. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 02:55, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 02:55, 24 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Kamaria

change
Kamaria (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BRPever has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I wanted to improve this article but there are barely any reliable source with information that can fix or grow this page. I'd say this needs to be redirected to Yadav due to clear lack of general information. The content not written with NPOV. BRP ever 15:55, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 15:55, 16 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Recently closed deletion discussions

change
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete.  MathXplore (talk) 23:42, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Role of Fourier transform in quantum mechanics

change
Role of Fourier transform in quantum mechanics (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fehufanga has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not simple, not encyclopedic, reads like it was generated using an LLM. I'm not sure where to begin merging this with an existing article. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 12:11, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 12:11, 26 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 10:50, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ramkripalyadavg

change
Ramkripalyadavg (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Asteralee has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Only a few references in the article are independent, not very notable. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 18:30, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 18:30, 30 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 10:49, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

City of federal subject significance

change
City of federal subject significance (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Raayaan9911 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: AI-Generated content, How users like this Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 13:28, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 13:28, 30 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Keep. --Auntof6 (talk) 10:48, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kherai Puja

change
Kherai Puja (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Raayaan9911 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Article doesn't have any sources and Unreferenced. How Users Created Their New Articles Like this without references. Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 11:13, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 11:13, 30 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Keep. --Auntof6 (talk) 10:45, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Carrier-sense multiple access with collision avoidance

change
Carrier-sense multiple access with collision avoidance (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Raayaan9911 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: AI/LLM Generated Article, How users created their new articles like this. Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 03:46, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 03:46, 29 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Keep. Settlements are presumed notable. --Auntof6 (talk) 10:42, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Amteka

change
Amteka (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable village, cannot find any evidence of any notability, Fails GNG –Davey2010Talk 18:18, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 18:18, 28 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 10:37, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hapsa Hatarnai

change
Hapsa Hatarnai (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable ceremony, cannot find any evidence of any notability, Fails GNG –Davey2010Talk 18:08, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change
  •   Keep It's found in many search results in Google Books. It's a notable topic, and probably has been studied by researchers. Oholiba (talk) 20:14, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    This tells you a snippet of what it is, this and this appear to be copypastes from somewhere (or it's a huge coincidence they've included this and other ceremonies in the exact same order), this is fine, The rest of the books don't appear to even mention Hapsa Hatarnai. I'm still not seeing any evidence of any notability here, The books I've mentioned just confirms it exists but there's nothing indepth or substantial, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 21:53, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 18:08, 28 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Keep. Original content was replaced with better content. --Auntof6 (talk) 10:31, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Anti-aliasing filter

change
Anti-aliasing filter (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

FusionSub has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: WP:NOT. Essay and AI generated. - FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 08:53, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change
  •   Delete It is looking like an AI content, also it is a WP:NOT, it should delete. - Centella Gold • (Talk) 21 November 2024
  •   Delete content appears to be LLM-generated spam. Ternera (talk) 14:58, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • I replaced it with a three-sentence stub, lkely keepable now. I have to say though that the problem of this was not that it was likely generated by an LLM, but that it was just a sketch. The generated content was accurate. On a side note: we didn't have a page on aliasing, so I created that as well.--Eptalon (talk) 04:31, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 08:53, 28 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 10:29, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edward Harte

change
Edward Harte (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fehufanga has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable. No reliable sources in the article and overall reads very promotional of the subject (take Edward worked hard on improving his sightreading. As a result, Edward's sightreading is surprisingly sharp as an example). No reliable and significant sources elsewhere. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 02:45, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 02:45, 28 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 10:27, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Paolo Petrocelli

change
Paolo Petrocelli (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ethn23 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: It's probably a spam interwiki. Deleted also on itwiki and enwiki. This page is exactly the page that was cancelled on enwiki. Read also, if you want, this RdF of itwiki. Ethn23 (talk) 14:53, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change
  • Keep. No valid reason to remove the article. The article includes numerous cited sources that adhere to Simple Wiki's guidelines:
WP:GNG, if a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be notable
WP:PEOPLE, a person can be notable if they have been written about in many published secondary sources. These must be reliable, independent of each other, and independent of the subject. 46.36.115.202 (talk) 18:24, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Further comment. Just because it was removed from another wiki, cross-wiki doesn't mean it should be removed here, especially when these are two different articles (with different text and used sources). See Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not. 46.36.115.202 (talk) 18:24, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 14:53, 22 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Keep. Per the discussion below— *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 09:11, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Archives

change
Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Archives (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BRPever has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Hi, we currently have Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/archives and this template. This one is a bit hard to maintain, while the other one is much easier. I think we can simply use Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/archives on the archive page for navigation. If deleted, I think it will be best if we move the the other list of archive to this title. BRP ever 14:11, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 14:11, 22 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.



change
Retrieved from "https://simple.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_deletion&oldid=9915867"