User talk:Fr33kman/Archive 10
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Thankspam
change | I promise to do my best and justify the trust the community has placed in me! Pmlineditor Talk 10:30, 12 September 2009 (UTC) |
Kevin Guo
changeApparently you deleted my article on Kevin Guo on Simple English Wikipedia. Your reason stated was that the article did not show notability (QD A4). It is definitely a notale subject. Please revert the deletion.
~Henry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.62.10.3 (talk • contribs)
- Just a heads up, this IP just got block for making personal attacks. EVula // talk // ☯ // 02:50, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
uh...
changeThat IP (24.119.29.143) had 0 warnings, and most (if not all) the edits were in good faith. I'm not sure if you realized that. Griffinofwales (talk) 03:04, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
- You are correct, the block has been reversed; it was in error. Thanks for raising it with me. fr33kman talk 03:26, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
Back?
changeI see you've finally come back after all these weeks of absence. —Mythdon [talk] [changes] 20:02, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
- Wasn't really gone, but yes I'm more active now. I think taking breaks from wiki-life are very healthy. fr33kman talk 20:12, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
Question
changeI noticed you just blocked The Dictator (talk · contribs), is he a sock of Señor Kruzkin (talk · contribs) as well? Tiptoety talk 04:52, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
- Yes. I blocked him after I did a check user on an account, then the IP and saw an unblocked account fitting the same user agent etc... fr33kman talk 04:54, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
- Alright. The reason I ask is because of this. Cheers, Tiptoety talk 04:55, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
- That's the culprit alright! :) fr33kman talk 04:57, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for your help. Cheers, Tiptoety talk 04:58, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
- Anytime! fr33kman talk 04:58, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for your help. Cheers, Tiptoety talk 04:58, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
- That's the culprit alright! :) fr33kman talk 04:57, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
- Alright. The reason I ask is because of this. Cheers, Tiptoety talk 04:55, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
FYI
change;-) — RyanCross (talk) 19:01, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
- Umm, ... ;-) fr33kman talk 19:34, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
- Whoa! I didn't even see that! Touche... ;-) — RyanCross (talk) 19:40, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
Ping
changeYou have a moment? NonvocalScream (talk) 19:26, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
Bot task
changeCan you approve my new bot task, the test edits are in my NonvocalScream recent editing history. Thanks, NonvocalScream (talk) 17:51, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
Re:Meetup
changeHi! Thank you for the message. The meet up was great - even though it was just the three of us (I turned up half an hour late by the way). There was discussion on almost any topic that could be covered - ones that were lengthy include the Simple English Wikipedia, its relation to the larger English-language Wikipedia, the current coverage of Pakistan on the wiki (and in all Wikimedia projects in general) and of course the WikiProject Pakistan. Talking from the bottom line, it was a casual social event we looked up to.
It's nice to see the rate at which internet culture is expanding globally - and from this I include the concept of Wikipedia "meetups." I think we should promote more events like these. Once again thanks for your interest. Omparkash (talk) 01:12, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
Umm
changeThat wasn't an open proxy, it's a school IP. The IP resolves to prx4.vicdir.schools.net.au. --Bsadowski1 02:39, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
- Fr33kman might not know what you're talking about. You aren't specifying what IP address you're talking about. —Mythdon [talk] [changes] 02:40, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
- 210.11.188.14 --Griffinofwales (talk) 02:41, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
Excuse me
changeBut that was absolutely uncalled for, calling me childish because I have less edits than you, and because I made an edit you considered poor. Did you ever think about how I might feel, getting shot down at an honest attempt to constructively edit this wiki? You need to learn some self control. Serious op (talk) 05:16, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
- Firstly, I've never told anyone I am better than them for the number of edits they or I have made. Check my contribs, please, never been said, not once! But seriously and honestly? You've been on this site since 01-01-2008. Adding that a) the picture was that of a "modern" monorail, and b) that the monorail did not use technology that was used in the Death Star (a fictional creation) seems to me (a very experienced user) to be pointless and, yes, childish. If I got it wrong I apologize fully and do so without reservation. I have serious doubts however. Prove me wrong, please! :) fr33kman talk 05:27, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
QD
changeThe article already exists here. I have Qd tagged. Griffinofwales (talk) 14:31, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, I followed a typo'd link and saved before I noticed it was a typo. Cheers! :) fr33kman talk 14:37, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
Poke
changeTeh Chatz of Internetz Relayz? Goblin 15:01, 23 October 2009 (UTC) I ♥ Fr33kman!
- A little later on, I have to go out in a few minutes. Unless it is urgent? fr33kman talk 15:03, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
- Not really. Just blinds & "tomorrow" ;) Goblin 15:04, 23 October 2009 (UTC) I ♥ Kennedy!
Barnstar
change
|
The Admin's Barnstar | |
| For your administrative help as of late. I appreciate your professionalism and your ability to put past disagreements behind us. Thank you. – Katerenka (talk • contribs) 01:07, 24 October 2009 (UTC) |
- Thank you very much. You are very welcome! :) fr33kman talk 01:10, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
Re: Please
changeI've replied. —Mythdon [talk] [changes] 20:07, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
Using Bots
changeThank you for alerting me to Bots. I have been reading up about them. Not being very technical I have never quite understood what they were. It's the first time I had needed to make so many similar changes. Hikitsurisan (talk) 22:38, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
- No problems. The bot flag basically has the function of marking edits as minor and also hiding them from RC. They still show up in the user's contribution history, but at least don't flood RC. Crat's tend to gie it out in two circumstances, one is for an actual bot to use, and the second is when a real user is making lots of good, small changes. fr33kman talk 23:05, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
Simple News Issue 12
change
|
| ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Hi
changeDid you say something about stopping by? Until It Sleeps Talk • Contribs 04:35, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, I believe I did. Stick around, you never know the place might grow on you! lol :) fr33kman talk 04:41, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
Interview
changeHey Fr33kman, if you don't mind, would you be interested in doing an interview for Simple News? –Juliancolton | Talk 19:20, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
JustinFrancis says Thank you
changeFr33kman thank you for helping me and changing my name. Please my talk page I have a messige for you. I do not know if you can post it on my IP's page. Any way good lick and wish you the best.(JustinFrancis)
Recent developments
changeHi, have there been any recent developments in my ban from #wikipedia-simple? Or have they decided that I don't deserve to be in their chat channel, and that I'm not worthy of keeping? Jonas R 216.241.55.204 (talk) 16:46, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
- Probably doesn't help when you avoid your ban on here by using an IP. -DJSasso (talk) 16:53, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
WikiProject References Invitation
change
Simple News Issue 13
change|
| ||||||||
|
| |||||||
IRC
changeWould you mind coming into my IRC channel for a second please? Sorry for contacting you this way, I didn't know how else to do so.-- † CR90 11:11, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
Simple News Issue 14
change|
| ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Simple News Issue 15
change|
| ||||||
|
| |||||
Yottie =talk= 20:02, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
Welcome back
changeNice to see you around again. I hope your name popping up on recent changes will be a more common occurrence. :) Yours, ···Katerenka (討論) 03:28, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks! I've been on holiday and also have been extremely busy filling in for other docs as they take their "winter" holidays. :) fr33kman talk 03:33, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
- Hope to see more of you as well :). Cheers, Razorflame 04:04, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
- You will! Da Fr33kman will never quit; unless I'm dead, and even then I plan on editing! :) fr33kman talk 04:06, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
- At Ouijapedia, no doubt. :p ···Katerenka (討論) 04:08, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
- Indeed! Jimbo never said only the living could edit, he said "everyone" :) fr33kman talk 04:09, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
- Welcome back. —Mythdon [talk] [changes] 04:22, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
- Nearly a month, I thought you must have been in Wiki rehab :) Time for a holiday down under. --Peterdownunder (talk) 05:38, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
- Welcome back. —Mythdon [talk] [changes] 04:22, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
- Indeed! Jimbo never said only the living could edit, he said "everyone" :) fr33kman talk 04:09, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
- At Ouijapedia, no doubt. :p ···Katerenka (討論) 04:08, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
- You will! Da Fr33kman will never quit; unless I'm dead, and even then I plan on editing! :) fr33kman talk 04:06, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
- Hope to see more of you as well :). Cheers, Razorflame 04:04, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
Simple News Issue 16
change|
| ||||||
|
| |||||
IRC
changeHey fr33kman, it would be great if I could talk to you in my irc channel real quick. Thanks.-- † CR90 07:10, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
at English Wikipedia.
changeDo they have the toasters?
Service awards
changeHi Fr33kman, thanks for the input on the talk page and on IRC, it has helped me sort out a few things in my ideas. I have made a new proposal, could you have another look and leave a comment on Wikipedia talk:Service awards, thanks, Peterdownunder (talk) 12:08, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
Page
changeGratzi. Never thought about that. :) Kennedy (talk • changes). 20:06, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
- No problems dude! Hope you are well! :) fr33kman 01:36, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
Help!
changeAdmins, please help me! No-no-no!!! I not insulting! How to create the userboxes? Some userboxes like the Babel Like the en-5 Chris.Taub.M.D. (talk) 06:46, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
- {{userbox|<color on left>|<color on right>|<text on left>|<text on right>}}. Griffinofwales (talk) 12:46, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
Dear Fr33kman,
Children Safety Home is a non profit Organization.
I had taken permissions from them to use their web content.
Now you deleted the page, thats okay.
But can you say me how can i use the web content from Children Safety Home Nepal and create the page. More then 60% of the material was originally created.
"Disruptive comments"
changeI'm not disprupting anything, I'm simply having some fun with the edit summary (which I didn't know anyone ever looked at), at no-ones expense.
Saying ON A PAGE "this wikipedea is for those who are stuperbly thick" isn't very nice, i admit. But, i didn't actaully write that, I wrote something similar, & toned down, in the edit summary, which only some editors ever bother to look at, so very few people who are watching me or those articles will ever see it. & the only people who'll see it are editors, thus limiting the people who'll see it anyway.Don'tt block me for my harmless & innecent fun, as thats just plain communism. Wikipedea has a page about good faith & not 'biting' new commers, I'm new to simple wikipedea, don't bite me! BTW, here is the Uniform Resource Locator (or URL for short & to simplify), I don't know how to put a link to it so: http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Please_do_not_bite_the_newcomers. Don't look back in anger (talk) 14:49, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
- I shall reiterate. Follow the rules or you will not be editing here. Please also don't lecture people here about the rules, many of us helped write them in the first place. You have been warned multiple times about your comments. Further problems will not be tolerated. A block is close to occuring. BTW: Wikipedia is not communism, nor is it a democracy. It is an encyclopedia, not a social experiment. fr33kman 14:57, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
I am following the rules (which i have read by the way) & I missed the part where it says "if editors bite don't stand up for your self", & I didn't say wikipedea is a communism, (bt It does work like one,[hop over to my talk for a full explanation]) I said in blocking me, you would be acting like a communist. & i'm not lecturing anyone, though you have inspired me to put a lecture on my page, (though i must warn you, it won't be simplified). I won't directly lecture anyone, only those who seek one from my page. I don't mean any offence, I'm just like that, you may be teething, but please don't bite. Wikipedea has no ads either, but I may say I like something, so don't say i'm breaking rules, & don't bite me. Treat what i say as entertainment - but under no surcunstances go & buy anything I like. I know you will probably find me Irritating, but please keep those teeth away, I won't always be an irritating neiucance, I try on opinions much like i try on clothes, standing in front of the mirror wondering if they suit me. I'm not jaut being bitten it seems, I'm being eaten. so, as i don't really care about editors probems with me, i'm offering you & the others a chance to drop the subject, & forgive me for my harmless fun & let by gones be just that. comment warring solves nothing. Don't look back in anger (talk) 15:51, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
- There is no subject to drop. You have added comments that indicate that you feel this is a wikipedia for stupid people. You have made such comments in edit summaries and on individual pages. Absolutely no one is, or has, biten you. The rules are there for everyone to follow, new editors and old alike. You have merely been asked to not add comments like you have done. Please also realise that your user page is not your property and anything that is on there that is against the rules or disruptive will simply be removed. If you wish to contribute within the rules then simply get on with it. Continuing to argue will see you blocked, period. We are not here as a social tool, nor are we here for you to "try out opinions". This is a serious encyclopedia. As for you "offering" others the chance to move on, or feeling that you shall be allowed to "content war"; a) people here will not move on from people who harm the project, b) you will simply be blocked. I suggest you either start working on the building of the project or move to another web site. fr33kman 16:11, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
There is a subject to drop, i regard constant uncalled for moaning as biting, several people ganging up on me for a harmless joke is certainly biting. I have been constructing, there is just so little here, & so little of it that adding difficult as i'm not sure what level of complexity this wp's users can understand. not much it seems after the response of my harmless jest, which you would have never even seen without my contributions. To sum it up: If i hadn't been Editing/contributing, there would be no edit summary comment for you to winge at me for, i have contributed to Los Angelese & Green Day, & written a harmless comment about the lack of any sort of complexity & tehn you moan at me & tell me to contribute or I'll get blocked, do you see the paradox?(& I'm quite sure blackmail is aginst the rules). I appriciate what you are trying to do, have a wikipedea that normal people can understand as the standard wikipedea has got more complicated & full fo jargon. "serious encyclopedea"?? wikipedea is full of people like you who think they know it all, so imput thier opinions & false data into articles, I have harmlessly put my opinion in a edit summary, which does not affect the article. & as for "Continuing to argue will see you blocked", i'm the one who is offering to stop arguing, you are the one who is continuing the argument! why don't you do something usefull & block your self? "feeling that you shall be allowed to "content war"" You are the one who brought this into the argument which you won't let me finish, I am the one who said that a comment war, or put simply so you can understand: argument is not solving the problem. & I don't have a user page. & I don't claim to "own the userpage", So, Why don't you do what wikipedea doesn't & check the facts!? & stop twisting my words to suit your meaning.
I'm guessing that simple wikipedea is fine with arguments as you threw my offer to drop the topic & stop a pointless argument back in my face. Enjoy the war, you are the one continuing the fighting, not me. In the words of Gene Hunt off Ashes To Ashes "I ask for the truth & you piss in my face" well said I think. Don't look back in anger (talk) 16:41, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
Heads-up
changeA user (Chuckcreator) that you recently {{checkuserblock}}'d is asking to be unblocked. As you were the blocking admin, I thought that I would let you know. Cheers, Lauryn Ashby (d) 20:09, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
re: FYI
changeGrawp? Wow, exciting. That was basically just a big "WTF" moment for me...I'm SO out of practice, ha. Thank you for helping to deal with him/her/it. :D --Isis♠(talk) 04:44, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
- np; it's probably not "the" grawp, but they've been hitting here a lot lately; obviously thinking that we care.... :) fr33kman 04:47, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
Oops, sorry, Fr33kman.
changeI think I made a mistake... I warned her a few weeks ago and I'm so busy these days that I forgot why I warned her... But I think it was because she was vandalizing the article about "Pugs". Now that I see, maybe it's not a vandal... Anyway thankyou, Fr33kman (What should I call you?). Cheers and happy editing! Miss Tilney (talk) 04:46, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
- Fr33kman will do nicely thanks! fr33kman 04:49, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
Thank you!
changeThank you very much for welcoming me, Fr33kman! I have a tiny question. It's hard to keep on writing 'Fr33kman,' so can I just call you Freak-man? No, no, it was a joke. Don't get offended. God Bless, Mella Mouse (talk) 05:00, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
- I'd prefer fr33kman, but FM will do if you wish. The 33 is significant (inside joke). Glad you've stopped by. fr33kman 05:02, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
Just so you know
changeI have undone your edit on Death of Tina Watson, we should not return the orphan tag to that article until a discussion has been held on the issue as different user disagree.. sutch as me.. on taging of the article. Please start by joining the discussion on the articles talk page.--Sinbad (talk) 17:00, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
- A consensus is needed, basically.--Sinbad (talk) 17:02, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
- You don't seem to understand guidelines in this regard. When an editor makes a change to a page (Lauryn removing the orphan tag) and another reverses that edit (me adding it back) and then a third editor undoes the second action, this is edit-warring; it is a blockable offense. I shall leave it as it is for the moment and explain why you are wrong on the talk page. fr33kman 17:04, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
- As i said. A consensus need to be reached dont take it personally. Its so unnecessary.--Sinbad (talk) 17:05, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
- But good that you entering the discussion so an consensus is reached. This isnt a quesiton about who si wrong and right its a question about the orphan tag in question. And i dont simple believe it should have been placed there in the first place. but that is up for the consensus by editors to decide.--Sinbad (talk) 17:08, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
- Firstly, I take nothing personally; ask around! Secondly, consensus needs to stay within the rules. Orphans are about links coming INTO the article, not those going out. fr33kman 17:10, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
- But good that you entering the discussion so an consensus is reached. This isnt a quesiton about who si wrong and right its a question about the orphan tag in question. And i dont simple believe it should have been placed there in the first place. but that is up for the consensus by editors to decide.--Sinbad (talk) 17:08, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
- As i said. A consensus need to be reached dont take it personally. Its so unnecessary.--Sinbad (talk) 17:05, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
- You don't seem to understand guidelines in this regard. When an editor makes a change to a page (Lauryn removing the orphan tag) and another reverses that edit (me adding it back) and then a third editor undoes the second action, this is edit-warring; it is a blockable offense. I shall leave it as it is for the moment and explain why you are wrong on the talk page. fr33kman 17:04, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
blah
Hellothereyousuck
changeNice catch there. I thought something was a bit suspicious, but as I had no evidence otherwise, assumed good faith. Glad to know that people like you are around to clean things up when mistakes are made. Thanks, Lauryn Ashby (d) 03:18, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- Lauryn, check your email please. I sent more info on the socker(s). --Bsadowski1(Talk|Changes) 03:19, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- No worries, thank Brian, he alerted me to do a CU. fr33kman 03:21, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
Curious
changeOkay, thought I'd ask you rather than the Mouse: Why are edits categorized as vandalism removed from the edit history? Is this unique on simple?
- They are not removed from the edit history! Click history, and you'll find your edit there. fr33kman 05:15, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- Curiouser, a number of my delightful edits, which surely enriched this treasure trove of drivel yet were needlessly removed, do not appear in their respective edit histories.
- Ah, my bad. These pages were edited furiously, burying my poor reverted additions.
- I bet they do show up there, unless they were revision deleted. You gonna tell me who you are yet? Gotta be some kinda socker :P fr33kman 05:26, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- It is interesting to me that people invent theories to identify "unknowns" here that have little basis in anything factual. As for me, we've never interacted before nor have I have interacted with Lauryn. I am not a sock puppet in any sense -- just an anonymous IP user. I do not troll, stalk, or harass particular users; stalking is scary and I have no interest in scaring anyone. I just like mischief, within reason. It's that simple. I'll then get bored and go someplace else. C'est la vie. And by the way, those edits were indeed revision deleted. From the "other side," I think that's among the most effective vandal fighting mechanisms I've encountered.
- I bet they do show up there, unless they were revision deleted. You gonna tell me who you are yet? Gotta be some kinda socker :P fr33kman 05:26, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
71.22.170.68
changeYesterday you posted this [1] but I don't see a block at all. I ask because the user edited just now and had two articles deleted. I know the articles that (s)he created were continuously created by socks on En., so I assume it's related, but could you take action here if you still think it's appropriate? Thanks, Either way (talk) 16:40, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- It's continuing so I hardblocked it for a week for now. Feel free to adjust the settings as you see fit. Either way (talk) 16:47, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks very much for catching that! I got distracted by a phone call between placing the notice and forgetting to place the block. :) fr33kman 18:50, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
Oh! Please excuse me
changeI am sure I should not be using wikipedia when informing people of being on a wikibreak, but--I did not know that my little sister, Eunice, was using wikipedia too. I never knew that she was Mella Mouse, and of course since we are sisters we use the same computer and live together. One day, she had logged in simple wiki, and went away, and I came to use it--not knowing that the account I was using was accidently Eunice's. Pmlineditor had adopted me, and he wrote the note to me about rollbacking. I apologized to him, and said I would try to use it better, but I felt sad, ashamed, and guilty because I didn't use the rollback right, and so I quickly erased the note so that nobody else woud see it and think that I was a bad user. Oh, yes, and the IP adress is probably the same because we use the same computer. After having a wikibreak, I could not help but revert a few vandals because they were so annoying, so I used the IP adress to revert them. Please do not mistake Eunice as my sockpuppet. Thankyou, and best regards, Miss Tilney (talk) 03:39, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
- I am actually aware of three accounts editing from your IP address, but there is no evidence of sockpuppetry so no action needs to be taken, at this time. Thank you for your explanation. Take care! fr33kman 03:44, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, the three accounts are me, my big sister Classical Esther and my little sister Mella Mouse. Thankyou! Miss Tilney (talk) 03:51, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
Thanks
change... for the message! Amandajm (talk) 04:15, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks again! That is handy, when it comes to dealing with blatant vandalism. Amandajm (talk) 07:41, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
Where were you a minute ago! :p
changeLotta vandalism going down on recent changes. :p Lauryn☆ 17:24, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
- I was catching up on checkuser emails. I'll log into IRC so I get the cvn feed. See you around Lauryn, do remember that if you come back and wish your admin flag back, just ask a crat if it is within a year. Thanks for all your hard work! fr33kman 17:28, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
Interwiki talkback
changeI replied at en:User talk:The New Mikemoral. --Mikemoral♪♫ 23:56, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
Re: The Brothers Karamazov
change
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Thanks for writing, Classical Esther 03:05, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Sorry for spamming you with my boring messages again...;) Classical Esther 03:16, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
Thank you once again!
changeDear Fr33kman, thank you very, very much for your email. It was not only wise, but very kind. I should quite abhor myself if I really had sockpuppets, despite the amazing trust that has been lavished upon me. Will you be so very kind as to tell me where the discussion took place? I would like to read it. Well, thank you once again, both for trusting me and writing to me! you have henceforth my purest esteem, my fullest gratitude, and my deepest respect! Yours truly, Classical Esther 22:51, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
- Hi! Due to their nature checkuser discussions are not open for public viewing. However, it took place on IRC in the #wikimedia-checkuser channel (which is private only to checkusers and stewards) and in private messaging. Thanks for your kind reply. fr33kman 23:50, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
- Okay, thanks very much once again! Classical Esther 03:23, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
Talkback
changeYou can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Kitty Morland (talk) 04:43, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
Thankyou
changeThankyou for changing it (my name), kind, kind Fr33kman! You are extremely good in these things, and I am most obliged to you! Happily, Pretty Lydie (talk) 05:02, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
- Not at all, any time with pleasure. Please change you signature to reflect the change, and if I may be so bold, please keep it as Belinda. You change it too often! :) fr33kman 05:08, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
- Okay, thankyou, I'll just keep it as Belle :) unless a very important reason to change my signature again... But by the way, my rollback rights are somehow gone as my name changed! Could you give me it back? Regards, Belle (talk) 05:11, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
- Log out and then log back in as Belinda. Belinda is a rollbacker. fr33kman 05:15, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
- Okay, thankyou, I'll just keep it as Belle :) unless a very important reason to change my signature again... But by the way, my rollback rights are somehow gone as my name changed! Could you give me it back? Regards, Belle (talk) 05:11, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
Whew!
changeWhew, that's a relief! Thanks for blocking Starbuilder22. I think he's using about three sockpuppets to vandalize Wikipedia, and it was hard work fighting him! He kept on writing some annoying things about ghosts eating toast halfway up the lamppost. Regards, Classical Esther 06:01, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
- No problem, long time socker! :) If you ever see those edits again, just report to WP:VIP right away! Thx for helping! :) Hope you are feeling better! fr33kman 06:04, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for the barnstar! You're so nice...I replied on my talk page. ^^ And now, I shall indulge myself with just one more impertinent question: May I please have the honour of adding you to "users I respect" on my user page? Classical Esther 07:18, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
- Of course you may! No need to even ask! :) fr33kman 07:40, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for the barnstar! You're so nice...I replied on my talk page. ^^ And now, I shall indulge myself with just one more impertinent question: May I please have the honour of adding you to "users I respect" on my user page? Classical Esther 07:18, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
|
Happy Valentine's Day! | |
| Hello, Fr33kman! I hope you have a very happy Valentine's Day! (It's also Korean New Year here today, too.) Thanks for helping me out in many things and being very kind to me! Yours truly, Classical Esther 06:50, 14 February 2010 (UTC) |
Toolkit
changeI can haz tool, plz? PMBL is annoying. Thanks in advance, Lauryn☆ 15:34, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
Done by Barras, welcome back :) fr33kman 23:56, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
Sorry
changeO, sorry, Fr33kman... I didn't rollback it because I thought it was vandalism, but because I thought it was NPOV, like you said. That person wasn't exactly being neutral enough, I think. Was it right to rollback the edits like that? I'll be especially careful next time! Thankyou for always being helpful and kind to me and Esther. :) Have a good time on wikipedia, and God bless! Belle (talk) 08:26, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
- Don't worry about it; but do keep in mind rollback is for vandalism, undo is for everything else. Yes, it was not very NPOV at all; but it was not vandalism. You do a good job! Best regards, always yours, fr33kman 08:29, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
Re.
changeHi there. Yes, I agree with you that sometimes people nominate articles for deletion because they disagree with them, and this is fine as long as the reason that they disagree with them is due to the fact that they violate polices and so on. However, it's not okay just because they may go against ones religious beliefs which is why I felt that Christianrocker90 nominated the South Park article for deletion. Just wanted to clarify that for you before I went to bed. :) Cheers, Lauryn☆ 08:14, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
- I just want to clear the record in hopes we can put this behind us once and for all, I didn't read anything about the episode outside the name, episode number, when it aired and reception, I didn't read the plot, I simply nom'd the article base on what I just told you I read, nothing else. Now can we please put this behind us?-- † CR90 08:22, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
- I disagree with you on this, Lauryn. I've known CR90,CM16,hornetman16, (Aaron) for years. He has changed a great deal. I don't think he continues to POV push here. I really don't. The point of this is about whether or not WP-space should contain things like WikiProjects. I don't see the issue. I've seen some pure POOH left in WP-space on en, and other sites. What makes simple above all that? We are not made of paper, afterall. Who cares whether or not it is in User- or WP- space? It's only bytes. Now, that does not mean I think he's right; I just don't agree he's being pushy :) fr33kman 08:24, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
- Fair enough, thanks. I actually tend to favour the inclusion of WikiProjects/humour pages in Wikipedia space, but as the community as a whole does not, that's why I took the action(s) that I did. :) Cheers, Lauryn☆ 01:01, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah, you did the right thing. I just thought I'd say that's he's changed imo. I also, as stated have no issues with WP usage; but you are right the simplewiki community as a whole does, not that I'm really sure why? lol :) fr33kman 01:06, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
- Fair enough, thanks. I actually tend to favour the inclusion of WikiProjects/humour pages in Wikipedia space, but as the community as a whole does not, that's why I took the action(s) that I did. :) Cheers, Lauryn☆ 01:01, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
Hello, Fr33kman!
changeHi, Fr33kman! How are you getting on with The Brothers Karamazov?
I've just made a WikiProject about literature, and I thought maybe you'd like to join (I was quite impressed by your high-quality criticism of CR90's Tragic Love Story ^-^), because you're so good at things about literature. I love books, but I'm not very clever at them. If you're too busy right now, that's okay, too. Well, I wish you every felicitious end with your current request for oversightship, and God bless! Yours sincerely, Classical EstherLibrary 09:22, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
Ping
changeEmail is slow, can we realtime for a sec? :) NonvocalScream (talk) 05:25, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
- Sure, ##fr33kman fr33kman 05:26, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
Congratulations
changeCongratulations on reaching the numbers for OS - I think you will be a great asset to the team. My oppose had nothing to do with any concerns about you, so I am glad to to be the first to say congratulations. --Peterdownunder (talk) 09:15, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, same from me. You're a great asset to this Wikipedia, let alone the OS team. The Rambling Man (talk) 09:19, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
- Agree with the above. Félicitations. :) Lauryn (u • t • c) 09:20, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
(<--) No issues whatsoever! I know you guys trust me, and I agree with some of your concerns, but thanks for the comments anyway! :) fr33kman 09:22, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
- Someone said that replying to a congratulation is one of the tedious things in the world. Therefore, you don't have to reply to this if you're already busy doing OS stuff, but I just couldn't resist adding my most sincere congratulations! I'm sure you'll be a wonderful help to this community. (Even tho' you already are..
) Classical Esther♣ 11:00, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
- Someone said that replying to a congratulation is one of the tedious things in the world. Therefore, you don't have to reply to this if you're already busy doing OS stuff, but I just couldn't resist adding my most sincere congratulations! I'm sure you'll be a wonderful help to this community. (Even tho' you already are..
┌─────────────────────────────────┘
He doesn't have OS yet (though he probably will have it pretty soon). There isn't much OS work either today, it seems. ;)
- Very true! It has not been closed by a crat yet, and I suppose I could make a few enemies before it it :P. But, ... thanks all! However, it's not a hat to me, merely a chance to prevent more pointless and abusive vandalism! :) fr33kman 11:10, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
Talkback
changeYou can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
- BTW, thx so much for correcting that typo on my user page! I think, also, that you should reply to Esther on her page; she is getting nervous that you are angry at her or scornful of her or some kind of rubbish and that is why you don't reply. ^,^ Thanks! ♥ Belinda ♥ 12:55, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
- Never! I am simply so old I forgot! I shall, of course, reply to her now! :) fr33kman 12:57, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
Yay!
change
|
Welcome to WikiProject Literature! | |
| Welcome to WikiProject Literature! I hope you have a delightful time here and improve lots of articles on literature! |
Hello, dear Fr33kman! I'm so glad you joined my WikiProject; I'm sure you'll be a really big help! I'm so happy that you're enjoying The Brothers Karamazov; I finally persuaded my sister Belinda to begin reading it a few days ago, and, to her surprise, she found it addictive and read it several hours straight. I don't know why, but she says that Fyodor Karamazov is "sweet" and "cute", and feels "sorry for him". Huh. :p Well, thank you for replying! I was a bit afraid you might be annoyed at me for "advertising" my WikiProject and that you were politely restraining yourself from slapping me with a trout. ^^ Well, God bless, and happy editing! Classical Esther♣ 23:20, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
Oversight
changeCongrats. Your request was successful and Leinad granted you the permission. If you need any advice, feel free to ask me. Please subscribe the mailing list. Have fun Barras talk 22:17, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
- Congrats fr33kman! --Bsadowski1(Talk|Changes) 22:30, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
- Congrats!--Gordonrox24 | Talk 22:34, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
- Hey Fr33kman. You may want to put some extra information in here. Best Barras talk 15:54, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
Checkuser
changeAs one of our more active checkusers, there is a discussion at Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_checkuser#Justification for checks that you may be interested in participating in. Cheers, Lauryn (u • t • c) 00:09, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
Oversight mailing list
changeWhen you get a chance, please add yourself to the mailing list and email me to confirm the address. Thanks. EVula // talk // ☯ // 06:39, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
Simple News: Issue Seventeen
change|
| ||||||||
|
| |||||||
hey
changeyou will have a message waiting for you on memoserv on IRC.-- † CR90 13:00, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
Thoughts
changeYou presence is missed.. :) Basically, I've not seen you around often. Hope everything is good. Best, NonvocalScream (talk) 21:49, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
Help
changePlease get on IRC :S -- † CR90 04:23, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
Up in the sky, it's a bird, it's a plane, no, it's a barnstar!!!
change
|
CR90'sBarnstar | |
| For be an awesome person I hereby award you my barnstar! Thanks for participating in my memorial. † CR90 00:03, 12 March 2010 (UTC) |
Simple News: Issue Eighteen
change|
| ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
-_-
changewe need to talk privately.-- † CR90 02:03, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
- why? fr33kman 02:04, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
- because we do.-- † CR90 02:04, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
- I'm sure you can raise any issues here, onwiki! fr33kman 02:06, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
- No, this is personal, between me and you.-- † CR90 02:07, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
- So you don't like what I have to say on IRC?! Fine, so you then quit (like a little kid). You have some growing up to do! fr33kman 02:15, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
- I think it may relate to my candidacy, due to the timing of your request. This would probably be best on wiki, as Fr33kman stated. Jon@talk:~$ 02:09, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
- No, this is personal, between me and you.-- † CR90 02:07, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
- I'm sure you can raise any issues here, onwiki! fr33kman 02:06, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
- because we do.-- † CR90 02:04, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
Seriously? Remorse is going to clear a repeat offender? He is only remorseful that he got blocked. -DJSasso (talk) 12:35, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
- You are, of course, correct. I guess I feel that a ban discussion should take place on AN rather than me just implementing an indef block and that being the end of it. If you want to extend or reinstate the indef block, I have no issues with that. fr33kman 13:22, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
- No I don't touch other peoples blocks if possible. But I would agree with a ban discussion if that was your thinking. -DJSasso (talk) 13:24, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
Congratulations--you've received a barnstar!
change
|
What a Brilliant Idea Barnstar | |
| For wise Fr33kman, who has found a brilliant solution to the blocking of Christianrocker90. For this reasonable reason, I humbly award him a well-deserved barnstar! |
However...
changeHowever we disagree on an editorial level, know that I respect you as a fellow colleague on this project. I think you do good work here, and I appreciate what you do. Best, Jon@talk:~$ 04:45, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
- Of course you do Jon, as do I you. That's not the issue here! Come on buddy, you know I love you! :) fr33kman 04:50, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
Yo...
changeen:Wikipedia:Credo accounts. If your interested, Hurry. Just specify :simple:User... if your using simple as your eligibility. Slots are almost gone, if your a heavy content editor, you can use this. Best, Jon@talk:~$ 23:10, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
- I happened to see this and signed up. Thanks for the heads up. Kansan (talk) 23:20, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
- @Jon, thanks! Just made it at number 99 :) fr33kman 23:26, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
Simple News: Issue Nineteen
change|
| ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
PmlineditorBot (report errors) 11:24, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
Simple News Issue 20
change|
| ||||||||||
|
| |||||||||
Star Wars Trilogy
changeI have watched al three films and read all three novelizations. What is your point? The characters are credited in the movies as I left them. 190.10.0.121 (talk) 07:53, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
Simple News Issue 21
change|
| ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Thanks for the heads-up
changeThank you for telling me. I thought it was just an innocent new user getting confused by a bot error. :p Thank goodness there is someone so much cleverer than me to find those things out. Classical Esther♣ 04:25, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
- Well, it does help when you access to the right tools :). I finished the book, btw! I really liked it, and now want to read it again to try to understand more. There seems to be a LOT of symbolism in it! fr33kman 04:28, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
Award time
changeWith more than 18 months service to the Simple English Wikipedia, and more than double the required number of edits, I am happy to present this book, for you to read and enjoy. There is also a ribbon, or a medal if you prefer.Peterdownunder (talk) 04:39, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
- Congratulations! You certainly deserved it. :) I hope you continue being a bright spot on Wikipedia for all of us! —Classical Esther 04:46, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.