Wikipedia:Requests for deletion

(Redirected from Wikipedia:AFD)
If you think a page should be deleted, read the deletion policy to make sure.
Then follow these instructions on how to request a page for deletion. To find more information on what discussed deletions and quick deletions are:
PLEASE READ THIS

Before nominating: checks and alternatives Edit

Prior to nominating article(s) for deletion, please be sure to:

A. Read and understand these policies and guidelines
  1. The Wikipedia deletion policy, which explains valid grounds for deletion.
  2. The main four guidelines and policies that inform deletion discussions: notability (WP:N), verifiability (WP:V), reliable sources (WP:RS), and what Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)
  3. Subject-specific notability guidelines, which can be found at Category:Wikipedia notability guidelines
B. Carry out these checks
  1. Confirm that the article does not meet the criteria for quick deletion.
  2. If there are verifiability, notability or other sourcing concerns, take reasonable steps to search for reliable sources. (See step D.)
  3. Review the article's history to check for potential vandalism or poor editing.
  4. Read the article's talk page for previous nominations and/or that your objections haven't already been dealt with.
  5. Check "What links here" in the article's sidebar, to see how the page is used and referenced within Wikipedia.
  6. Check if there are interlanguage links, also in the sidebar, which may lead to more developed and better sourced articles. Likewise, search for native-language sources if the subject has a name in a non-Latin alphabet (such as Japanese or Greek), which is often in the lede.
C. Consider whether the article could be improved rather than deleted
  1. If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate for RfD.
  2. If the article was recently created, please consider allowing the contributors more time to develop the article.
  3. If an article has issues try first raising your concerns on the article's talk page, with the main contributors, and/or adding a cleanup tag, such as {{notability}}, {{hoax}}, {{original research}}, or {{advert}}; this ensures readers are aware of the problem and may act to fix it.
  4. If the topic is not important enough to merit an article on its own, consider merging or redirecting to an existing article. This should be done particularly if the topic name is a likely search term.
D. Search for additional sources, if the main concern is notability
  1. The minimum search expected is a normal Google search, a Google Books search, a Google News search, and a Google News archive search; Google Scholar is suggested for academic subjects.
  2. If you find a lack of sources, you've completed basic due diligence before nominating. However, if a quick search does find sources, this does not always mean an RfD on a sourcing basis is unwarranted. If you spend more time examining the sources, and determine that they are insufficient, e.g., because they only contain passing mention of the topic, then an RfD nomination may still be appropriate.
  3. If you find that adequate sources do appear to exist, the fact that they are not yet present in the article is not a proper basis for a nomination. Instead, you should consider citing the sources, or at minimum apply an appropriate template to the page that flags the sourcing concern. Common templates include {{unreferenced}}, {{refimprove}}, {{third-party}}, {{primary sources}} and {{one source}}.

Discussed deletionEdit

Put the deletion tag on the article.
  1. Click "Change source" at the top of the page to be deleted.
  2. In the edit box, add this tag: {{rfd|REASON}}. Put it at the top of the page, above the rest of the text. Then, replace the text "REASON" with a short reason why the page should be deleted. Do not be too specific here. You can add more details on the discussion page (see below).
    • It is a good idea to write a change summary to let others know what you are doing. You can say "nominating for deletion", "requesting deletion", or something like that.
  3. Click "Save changes" at the bottom to save the page with the deletion tag at the top.
    • You can also check the "Watch this page" check box to add the page to your watchlist. This lets you know if the page for deletion has been changed. If the deletion tag is removed any time before the discussion is closed, it should be put back.
Create a discussion page.
  1. If the deletion tag has been added to the page, a box should appear at the top of the article with a link saying "Click here to create a discussion page!" Click that link.
  2. You should be taken to a page starting with "Creating Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/..." along with the current year and the name of the article to be deleted. In the edit box, the following tag should have already been added: {{RfD/Preload/Template}} . Replace the text PLACE REASON HERE with a more detailed reason why the page should be deleted.
    • It is helpful to include links to the various policy pages about Wikipedia (that begin with Wikipedia:). Here are some examples of this: "This article is [[Wikipedia:COMPLEX|not easy to understand]]" or "Not a [[Wikipedia:notable|notable]] topic''. This will make others more aware of why the page is not acceptable under Wikipedia's policies.
  3. Click "Save changes" to save the new discussion page when you are done.
    • A change summary you can write for this page is "creating discussion page", "starting deletion discussion", or something like that.
    • As with the page for deletion, you can check the "Watch the page" box. This will let you know if someone else has replied to your discussion.
List it here
  1. Copy the title of the discussion page to the clipboard. You can do this by dragging the mouse over the text from "Wikipedia" to the end of the page title to highlight it, then right-clicking and selecting "Copy".
  2. Go to the list of deletion requests, and click "change source" beside the words "Current deletion request discussions".
  3. At the top of the list of discussions, paste the title from the clipboard (right-click and select "Paste"). Add a pair of curly brackets before and after the title to make a template that will copy the content of the discussion page onto the main deletion page, like this:
    {{Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2020/(name of page to be deleted)}}
  4. Finally, click "Save changes" to add the discussion to the list. If the page saves successfully, you should see your deletion discussion at the top of the list. And that's it!

Quick deletionEdit

If you think a page has nonsense content, add {{non}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page does not say why the subject is important, add {{notable}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page should be deleted per other quick deletion rules, add {{QD|reason}} to the top of the page.

Notifying the userEdit

Generally, you should try to be civil and tell the user that created the page to join the discussion talking about the page. This can be done by adding {{subst:RFDNote|page to be deleted}} ~~~~ to the bottom of their talkpage.

DiscussionsEdit

  • The discussion is not a vote. Please make suggestions on what action to take, and support your suggestion with reasons.
  • Please look at the article before you make a suggestion. Do not make an opinion using only the information given by the nominator. Looking at the history of the article may help to understand the situation.
  • Please read other comments and suggestions. They may have helpful information.
  • Start your comments or suggestions on a new line. Start with * and sign after your comment by adding ~~~~ to the end. If you are responding to another editor, put your comment directly below theirs and make sure your comment is indented (using more than one *).
  • New users can make suggestions, but their ideas may not be considered, especially if the suggestion seems to be made in bad faith. The opinion of users who had an account before the start of the request may be given more weight or importance.
  • Suggestions by users using "sock puppets" (more than one account belonging to the same person) and IP addresses will not be counted.
  • Please make only one suggestion. If you change your mind, change your first idea instead of adding a new one. The best way to do this is to put <s> before your old idea and </s> after it. For example, if you wanted to delete an article but now think it should be kept, you could put: "Delete Quick keep".
  • If you would like an article to be kept, you can improve the article and try to fix the problems given in the request for deletion. If the reasons given in the nomination are fixed by changing, the nomination can be withdrawn by the nominator, and the deletion discussion will be closed by an administrator.
  • Try to avoid confusing suggestions, such as delete and merge.

Remember: You do not have to make a suggestion for every nomination. You should think about not making a suggestion if:

  1. A nomination involves a topic that you do not know much about.
  2. Everyone has made the same suggestion and you agree with that suggestion.
  • All times are in UTC.

Current deletion request discussionsEdit

Template:Brazil squad 1917 South American ChampionshipEdit

Template:Brazil squad 1917 South American Championship (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Template:Argentina squad 1935 South American Championship (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)
Template:Argentina squad 1937 South American Championship (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)

MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Navigational boxes made by an indefinitely blocked user with only one link in main body, cannot work for navigation. MathXplore (talk) 16:51, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

This request is due to close on 16:51, 14 December 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


SkoliosexualityEdit

Skoliosexuality (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MRN2electricboogaloo has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Short, not notable. See previous deletion request. Was recreated by an IP recently. MRN2electricboogaloo (talk) 02:43, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

This request is due to close on 02:43, 14 December 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


MaveriqueEdit

Maverique (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MRN2electricboogaloo has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable, when wikis, blogs, tumblrs, and forums aren’t included, the article only has 3 sources, 2 books which don’t convey much about the identity other than its existence and basic definition, and orientando.org, which is written and Portuguese but I couldn’t find any info about their standards when translating, and I couldn’t find anything about the website as a whole when searching. Googling only brings 3 additional sources, 2 from queerintheworld.com, which looks to be similar in content to a tabloid, and the Maverique articles both seem like they were written with a strict template, possibly even auto generated. The other is a dictionary.com article which is a much better source, but again the article doesn’t say much other than that Maverique is an identity and its basic definition. There’s 3 reliable sources total, and an additional possibly reliable source (though I highly doubt it). Page should be redirected to whatever this wiki has that is closest to List of gender identities [en] MRN2electricboogaloo (talk) 00:16, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

This request is due to close on 00:16, 14 December 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Todd KauffmanEdit

Todd Kauffman (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG --Ferien (talk) 17:39, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

This request is due to close on 17:39, 13 December 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Dexter's Laboratory (End Theme)Edit

Dexter's Laboratory (End Theme) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. Declined A4 as songs aren't eligible. --Ferien (talk) 17:25, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

This request is due to close on 17:25, 13 December 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Bidhan Rebeiro (2nd nomination)Edit

Bidhan Rebeiro (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

আফতাবুজ্জামান has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I will argue the notability. Most of sources are interview (primary) and talks about someone from Bangladesh got selected. No in-depth coverage. Fails WP:GNG.

Also it was deleted from enwiki. Then user who created it here also sockpuppet of them. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/MoviegeekSouthAsia আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 13:37, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

This request is due to close on 13:37, 12 December 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Haji Imran AttariEdit

Haji Imran Attari (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Suspected copypaste article, poorly sourced. Cannot find any significant coverage for a subject with this name. The main person in the article may not pass WP:GNG. MathXplore (talk) 08:20, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  •   Delete - Agree. The organization is not notable well enough. It's citations are not according to WP:RS.--Dibyojyotilet's chat 09:30, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 08:20, 12 December 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Daniel TodorovicEdit

Daniel Todorovic (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Lights and freedom has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I don' t see significant coverage in reliable, independent sources that would meet WP:GNG. None of the references focus on him. Note, there is a draft at enwiki, en:Draft:Daniel Todorovic. Lights and freedom (talk) 08:09, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  • This source [1] may be valid for claims of notability. Lights and freedom (talk) 19:37, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
  • Not correct. Reference 1 refers to Todorovic and his boxing stable that prepared for „The Golden Contract“, a British 1 Million Dollar Pro Boxing Tournament. 2003:F9:9F02:2700:80D0:BC82:4095:284D (talk) 19:43, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 08:09, 12 December 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Camila Samara de SouzaEdit

Camila Samara de Souza (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: CV-type article, based on a draft-space article on EnWP. When searching for the person, I do ont get any meaningful hits. She seems ot have participated in a TV program, but that again could be anything. Since this is a contested QD (A4-notability, possibly A3- copied from another Wiki, little sign of simplification) I am putting it up for deletion. Comments? Eptalon (talk) 05:59, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

Dear @Eptalon, I am the developer of this post as well as the en.wikipedia.org post. I would like to clarify some points and why it should be accepted:

1 - Camila Samara de Souza is a businesswoman and philanthropist, she founded a Clinic in the city of Belo Horizonte where her notability is recognized by the community.

2 - The same text from the wikipedia draft was used because it is another project that I am still updating, for simple.wikipedia I will be editing and adding some information that is not yet in the en.wikipedia draft 187.111.28.10 (talk) 13:12, 5 December 2022 (UTC)(Moved from RFD talk page, MathXplore (talk) 13:15, 5 December 2022 (UTC))

  •   Delete Clear deletion. Does not approach GNG. --Gotanda (talk) 23:54, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
    Dear administrators, my name is Felipe, I'm Brazilian and first I would like to thank you for this space to be able to express about the exclusion of Camila Samara de Souza. I know this is a last resort that I can discuss with you to understand how relevant this person is in your community. Well, the person we are trying to register in the community, many or maybe not all of them must know her, Camila Samara de Souza or Camila Samara or just Samara as she is also known. She is a person who has some relevance in her territory, more precisely in her city, as she is a founder of an association called the camila samara clinic, where free courses are offered to needy people. She also participated in a Brazilian film as Bia in My Mother is a play. Before you can categorize this argument as a promotion, I should point out that several people surveyed for philanthropy remain on wikidata with absolute solidity. I kindly ask you to evaluate this request as it is necessary and important to the people around you. thanks 201.51.244.206 (talk) 02:37, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 05:59, 12 December 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The Goldmind Inc.Edit

The Goldmind Inc. (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Contested quick deletiion (A3 -complex article without simplification). What we have is basically the EnWP version without sectioning. Deletion is not for cleanup, and I don't know to what extent this record label is notable. So, putting it up at RfD. Comments? Eptalon (talk) 18:40, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  •   Delete Because it's a direct copy of a complex page. I don't think {{wait}} should apply here because if they want it to be kept, they should write a simpler version, so it could be QD'd. I also don't think "deletion is not cleanup" should always be followed, so delete in any case. Lights and freedom (talk) 19:38, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
  •   Delete Complex copy-pastes should not be encouraged. --Gotanda (talk) 09:52, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 18:40, 11 December 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


HelloPrintEdit

HelloPrint (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG and w:WP:NCOMPANY --Ferien (talk) 12:01, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

This request is due to close on 12:01, 11 December 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Alexander ShtankoEdit

Alexander Shtanko (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Mostly CV-Type article of a Russian lawyer in his mid-30s, born 1988. I do see some pointers that may be grounds for notability (prizes, without reference, human-rights-activist). Searching for the name, I mostly find wikipedia & linkedin on the first page of results. So, while the person may be successful, he is likely not notable in an encyclopedic sense. I propose we delete this, but since there are at least hints to possible notability, I do this through an RfD, and not a Quick-deletion. So: other opinions welcome. Eptalon (talk) 11:42, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  •   Delete Should have been a QDA4. Promotional. Does not come close to GNG or make any claims to. --Gotanda (talk) 01:30, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
    Note: UN UPF is not the United Nations. Puffed up CV with marginal "awards." --Gotanda (talk) 01:32, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 11:42, 11 December 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Nishant TanejaEdit

Nishant Taneja (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Lights and freedom has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: A well qualified doctor, but doesn't meet WP:GNG. Lights and freedom (talk) 20:07, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  •   Delete Not notable to have an article. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 23:57, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
  •   Comment: I failed to look carefully at the sources. He actually has published a lot of scientific papers, see Google Scholar [2]. This may make him notable under en:WP:ACADEMIC. Lights and freedom (talk) 03:11, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
  •   Keep — Preceding unsigned comment added by Peyton01100129 (talkcontribs) 02:58, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
      Administrator note: Not only has this user given no reason for keeping the article, but they have been indeffed. -- Auntof6 (talk) 18:56, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
  •   Keep As Lights and freedom said above, there are many papers he has written and published. If the article was improved to add these papers he's written he may be notable under en:WP:ACADEMIC. Angerxiety 13:34, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
  •   Delete - I don't consider the subject to meet en:WP:ACADEMIC. Just because somebody has plenty of academic publications doesn't mean that those publications have had meaningful impact in the academic field that the person is working in. I don't see that impact. Not notable. — *Fehufangą✉ Talk page 04:05, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 20:07, 8 December 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Timeline of the UniverseEdit

Timeline of the Universe (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Lights and freedom has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Full of absurdly specific dates (for example, the oldest star in the universe apparently formed on "International Children's Day" 13,800,227,906 BCE), and upon checking, seems to be based on en:Timeline of the early universe, but with the time after the Big Bang slightly altered for each event. Additional text provided for events is unsimplified copy. Unsourced. Speculative information such as "the heat death (102,147,483,647 years from now) ". Lights and freedom (talk) 06:06, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  •   Delete. Full of unsourced dates, borders on crackpot. Macdonald-ross (talk) 15:56, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
  •   Delete unless it can be completely rewritten, completely non-encyclopedic. Specific dates and times seem to have just been made up. Rubbish computer (Ping me or leave a message on my User talk) 17:04, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
  •   Delete Usually deletion is not cleanup but we should TNT here, considering the page has been solely created by a blocked and globally locked sockpuppet who appears to be known for writing content like this. --Ferien (talk) 17:10, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
  •   Delete Page is a mess and has been created by a sockpuppet. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 23:45, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 06:06, 8 December 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Palazzo MorassoEdit

Palazzo Morasso (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Gotanda has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: One more from the same LTA Gotanda (talk) 05:37, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

This request is due to close on 05:37, 8 December 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Cave of MoncodenoEdit

Cave of Moncodeno (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Gotanda has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: One more from the same LTA Gotanda (talk) 05:36, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

This request is due to close on 05:36, 8 December 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Troggia FallEdit

Troggia Fall (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Gotanda has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: One more non-notable form the same LTA Gotanda (talk) 05:36, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

This request is due to close on 05:36, 8 December 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

  • Delete: I've come to this article from a Wikiquote article related to the subject via the associated Wikidata item d:Q56011954. I am convinced that is a valid Wikidata item. I note the nominators claim One more non-notable form the same LTA Gotanda but while I AGF the claim has substance I'm not immediately able to verify it. However I do not the lack of citations on the article is a problem that may include potential copyright issues so on that basis I support deletion. I note that this would be a reasonable merge if there was content verified by content that could be merged into Lake Como or for example a subpage of its inflows and outflows for example. As the name should possibly/probably be Troggia Falls there is no case for conversion of the page to a redirect. While this page as stands should be deleted it might be possible an alternative very good quality page on the subject might be able to be stood up. -- User:Djm-leighpark(a)talk 22:43, 5 December 2022 (UTC)


Rocca di BaiedoEdit

Rocca di Baiedo (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Gotanda has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: One more from the blocked LTA. Gotanda (talk) 05:35, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

This request is due to close on 05:35, 8 December 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Grotta di LaorcaEdit

Grotta di Laorca (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Gotanda has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't appear to be notable. One of many by globally blocked sock. Gotanda (talk) 05:34, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

This request is due to close on 05:34, 8 December 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The City Mouse and The Country Mouse AdventuresEdit

The City Mouse and The Country Mouse Adventures (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No claim to notability (but not eligible for A4), likely hoax. --Ferien (talk) 17:24, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

This request is due to close on 17:24, 7 December 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


NickRewind Jr. (block)Edit

NickRewind Jr. (block) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Previously nominated at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2021/NickRewind Jr., but it came out as a SOFTDELETE. Likely a hoax. --Ferien (talk) 17:23, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

This request is due to close on 17:23, 7 December 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Zanam .foundationEdit

Zanam .foundation (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Nominated for A4 but not a person, group, company, product, service or website so not eligible. Fails WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk) 17:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  •   Delete - Not notable, no significant coverage, though I'd beg to differ on the validity of the A4 here, an NGO is a group.— *Fehufangą✉ Talk page 22:13, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
    That was my thought about A4. NGOs can also be companies. -- Auntof6 (talk) 08:54, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
    @Auntof6 and Fehufanga: But this isn't a company, it is just a foundation. In A4, group is "group of people" and then points out bands and clubs, which shows to me that it's probably not referring to groups of people working as a foundation. I certainly wouldn't say it's a clear case, and if pages are not clear quick deletes, then there is no harm in going to RfD for a week, particularly as if the same text is used, it can be deleted under G4 in the future. --Ferien (talk) 17:30, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
    "group is "group of people" .. probably not referring to groups of people working as a foundation." So a group of people working as a foundation is not a group of people? What the group is doing has no bearing on if it is a group or not. A group of people means.. a group of people. Also bands and clubs other reason A4 can be used, they are not given as examples of groups any more than any of the other things listed. real person, group of people, band, club, company, product, service or web content ; each are separate quantifiers not sub-quantifiers of each other. Pure Evil (talk) 18:13, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
    A group of people like a band or club is very different to a group of people like a company or foundation, and A4 mentions group and company separately showing they are not the same thing. If a company was a group then they would expand on it afterwards instead of making it one of the main points. --Ferien (talk) 09:56, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
    Actually, using just the rule and not the explaining blurb, there is no requirement for the group to be of people. The rule does not state clubs and ands, that is the explaining blurb. The "of people" is not given until it is an example of a group. In the blurb, band and club are not included in "group of people" You are grouping foundation with a company and yet saying the reasoning does not apply to it because it is not a company.. A company is not a group of people. It is an entity, The employees of a company are a group of people. (Enron = company, Enron employees = group of people) This is not the case with foundation as the foundation is the entirety of its collection of members, workers and support - the group of people, as much as the entire entity. A foundation is both an it and a they. A group of people like a club is extremely similar to a group of people like a foundation. Both are groups working together for a common goal. Foundations (say the WMF or Gates Foundtion) include both paid employees (as do many bands, WMF's Katherine Maher ) and volunteers (most clubs, all editors here). Foundations are groups (of people). Pure Evil (talk) 16:55, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
  •   Quick Delete per Fehufanga Pure Evil (talk) 18:25, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:25, 6 December 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Anthony MadutEdit

Anthony Madut (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG --Ferien (talk) 17:19, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  •   Keep WP:POLITICIAN "People can be notable if they meet any of the following guidelines ... Politicians and judges who have held international, national or sub-national (statewide/provincewide) office." This person was the governor of two states of South Sudan. South Sudan is very poorly covered on English Wikipedia. It's a new and unstable country. Lights and freedom (talk) 17:54, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:19, 6 December 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Oral copulation sexEdit

Oral copulation sex (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Rubbish computer has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Seems like an unlikely search term Rubbish computer (Ping me or leave a message on my User talk) 14:37, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  •   Keep (weakly) While not highly likely, it is not out of the realm of possibility and does not seem to cause any issue. Given the IPs love for creating talk pages with just the template, one redirect does not seem that bad. Nuking the host of talk pages they created would be more useful but that is for a different RfD. Pure Evil (talk) 16:49, 1 December 2022 (UTC)


This request is due to close on 14:37, 6 December 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Shefqet Nebih GashiEdit

Shefqet Nebih Gashi (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Translated page from Albanian Wikipedia, also exists in serbian, and Dutch Wikipedias. Conten is more or less what we have. I think it is good people translate from other languages. In the case of this person though, I am unsure if the standards for notability are met; yes, he was a freedom fighter, and yes he seems to have been part of the Yugoslav government. If I do a google search though, I find almost no sources. Again note: sources can be in offline publications, and they don't need to be in English.So, dear community, is this person notable? Eptalon (talk) 11:23, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

as former president of Kosovo he is. 202.84.42.187 (talk) 08:28, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  • it is cause he doesnt have an article on actual wiki- only on simple wiki and not many people (id say 1 out of 5,000,000,000 have met or know about him) 202.84.42.187 (talk) 12:33, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
    That person was born in the 1920, and died recently. All we need is reliable source. This can be an article in a newspapers, about Gashi doing something, or Gashi getting an award. The newspaper can be in Albanian or Serbian (or Croat, or any language really). Perhaps someone wrote a book about him? Eptalon (talk) 15:39, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
    There is a ref on the Serbian wiki. Not a great ref, but cites a book. Search shows the book exists. So, for now a keep I would say. There will be very little online for that time and place, so requiring that could be biased. --Gotanda (talk) 21:47, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
    not 1920- yes 1927 202.84.42.187 (talk) 08:29, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
  • Delete. Not even remotely notable. Macdonald-ross (talk) 12:25, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
    Wouldn't "Chairman of the Presidency of the Autonomous Socialist Province of Kosovo" pass GNG for politicians? --Gotanda (talk) 01:40, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 11:23, 4 December 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Category:Human issuesEdit

Category:Human issues (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Lights and freedom has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Seems to be the same concept as Category:Social issues, should be merged into Social issues (and deleted if necessary). Lights and freedom (talk) 06:21, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  • Merge Category:Human issues into Category:Social issues and delete the former. I notice that Category:Human issues is linked in Wikidata to categories called "Human activities" in other Wikipedias, but the entries in our human issues category do not seem to be activities. When this RFD is resolved, if the human issues categories is kept then the Wikidata situation should be addressed. --Auntof6 (talk) 06:47, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
  • To me, the divission looks somewhat arbitrary. Feminism, mind control, hippie, street children are in Human issues; child marriage, survival sex and war widow are in Social issues. Why? - So, yes; merging them into one single category would probably be good. In addition, each entry needs to be reviewed if it fits that category...--Eptalon (talk) 09:18, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 06:21, 27 November 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Recently closed deletion discussionsEdit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete. — *Fehufangą✉ Talk page 10:56, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

Anurag DixitEdit

Anurag Dixit (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Poorly sourced musician BLP, needs more inline citations, missing description of discography or recent works. Seems to be an award winner but no explanation for how he got it. Some of the given links seem to be passing mentions (or no mentions), may not meet WP:RS. Top search results are filled up with primary sources etc., cannot find any better sources. MathXplore (talk) 14:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  •   Delete First of all, poor quality is rarely a valid reason for deletion so part of the noms reasons have little bearing here. This article as writen is certainly of very poor quality and would need a ton of work to even get to the standards of an elementary student.. but that can b fixed so not grounds for deletion. The main issue here is notability and existence of reliable references. This is where deletion is valid outcome and the article fails in this regard. There are a couple references here but they are of limited usage or reliability. One of the inline refs is of no use.. the subject themself does not seem to be notable enough for inclusion. There is a peprson with the same name who is notable but this is certainly not him. Pure Evil (talk) 15:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
  •   Keep This Article need more Link But no need to delete this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adfromindia (talkcontribs)
      Administrator note: CheckUser strike Operator873 connect 06:53, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
  •   Keep Yes Article Need's Some Correction's No need to Remove/Deleted the Page This Page is in Fair Use — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rahul757643 (talkcontribs) }}
      Administrator note: CheckUser strike Operator873 connect 06:53, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
  • All the Things is Clear now — Preceding unsigned comment added by Akhilkumarwiki (talkcontribs)
      Administrator note: CheckUser strike Operator873 connect 06:53, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
  • Yes, I fully understand that you may have good intentions, but this is the 2nd project you've actively worked on that you want to make your own rules and do your own thing. That's not how any Wikipedia works. This is a cooperatively created encyclopedia. The only content here should be opinions that are peer reviewed or otherwise subject to outside scrutiny. This is why we require sources for information and disallow original research. Your comment about being angry that 3 edits that took you 12 hours to make being reverted further advances evidence you may not understand how Wikipedia works. To that point, I did review your edits and reverted them for the reasons provided. I don't know you from any other editor because you are an anonymous editor, which is great. But that also means I have no idea who you are and no one here has any reason to try and "save face" in respect to your activities. As a digression, yes I saw your talk page and it also furthers the concern about WP:CIR. On any Wikipedia, kindness is an important part of the community. You're welcome to disagree with other editors, but you should focus on being kind to people. If you think the page needs to be fixed, then fix it. Be nice to editors and don't troll them on the talk page. Lastly, if someone reverts your edits, try engaging in conversation before engaging in a revert war. Competence is required on this project which means you understand and follow our rules.   Keep — Preceding unsigned comment added by Raju6078 (talkcontribs)
      Administrator note: CheckUser strike Operator873 connect 09:58, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
  • Close the Request because The Article is Correct now.  Keep — Preceding unsigned comment added by 42.111.11.116 (talkcontribs) 15:51, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
  •   Delete Fails GNG. While he has won some awards, all sources are either promotional/not independent, or only brief mentions. Lights and freedom (talk) 17:07, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
  •   Delete Fails notabilty and with all these sockpuppet IP accounts voting keep, this article definitely needs to go. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 00:03, 2 December 2022 (UTC)


This request is due to close on 14:21, 6 December 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete. — *Fehufangą✉ Talk page 11:00, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

The ScavengersEdit

The Scavengers (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unsourced British rock group article. Web search results just lead to TV series or other groups with same name, cannot find reliable sources or significant coverage about this group from England. MathXplore (talk) 07:05, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  •   Delete per nom. Can't find anything to prove this group ever existed let alone is connected to Dexter's Lab. The addition of this group tends to be a part of adding information that is either false or unsourced to the article by IPs so there is a high likelihood of it being a hoax. Pure Evil (talk) 05:38, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 07:05, 6 December 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete.  An alternative exists, and this is not used anywhere.— *Fehufangą✉ Talk page 10:58, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

Template:Heavily used templateEdit

Template:Heavily used template (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Lights and freedom has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unused and broken. Lights and freedom (talk) 21:16, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  •   Comment: Isn't there a template that does this function? Can we redirect this one there? --Auntof6 (talk) 18:53, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
    @Auntof6 I think you're talking about {{High-use}}. Lights and freedom (talk) 04:25, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
    @Lights and freedom: Yep, that looks like it. I guess, though, since nothing links to this one, we probably don't need to make it a redirect. -- Auntof6 (talk) 05:09, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 21:16, 5 December 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 19:09, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

Little ButterfliesEdit

Little Butterflies (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Pure Evil has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notable? Pure Evil (talk) 22:52, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit


This request is due to close on 22:52, 3 December 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 18:45, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Reinis TumovsEdit

Reinis Tumovs (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fehufanga has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: BLP which reads more like a resume to me. The refrences are neither significant, beyond mere passing mention, nor reliable. Elsewhere I can't find any significant coverage independent from the subject. Not notable. — *Fehufangą✉ Talk page 12:10, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

This request is due to close on 12:10, 3 December 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 18:45, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Prithok N NomanEdit

Prithok N Noman (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Disputed QD and a possible claim to notability "has made a big name in the digital marketing and social media world". Clearly fails WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk) 11:58, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

This request is due to close on 11:58, 3 December 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.


Related pagesEdit