Wikipedia:Requests for deletion
Then follow these instructions on how to request a page for deletion. To find more information on what discussed deletions and quick deletions are:
PLEASE READ THIS
Before nominating: checks and alternatives
changePrior to nominating article(s) for deletion, please be sure to:
- A. Read and understand these policies and guidelines
- The Wikipedia deletion policy, which explains valid grounds for deletion.
- The main four guidelines and policies that inform deletion discussions: notability (WP:N), verifiability (WP:V), reliable sources (WP:RS), and what Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)
- Subject-specific notability guidelines, which can be found at Category:Wikipedia notability guidelines
- B. Carry out these checks
- Confirm that the article does not meet the criteria for quick deletion.
- If there are verifiability, notability or other sourcing concerns, take reasonable steps to search for reliable sources. (See step D.)
- Review the article's history to check for potential vandalism or poor editing.
- Read the article's talk page for previous nominations and/or that your objections haven't already been dealt with.
- Check "What links here" in the article's sidebar, to see how the page is used and referenced within Wikipedia.
- Check if there are interlanguage links, also in the sidebar, which may lead to more developed and better sourced articles. Likewise, search for native-language sources if the subject has a name in a non-Latin alphabet (such as Japanese or Greek), which is often in the lead.
- C. Consider whether the article could be improved rather than deleted
- If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate for RfD.
- If the article was recently created, please consider allowing the contributors more time to develop the article.
- If an article has issues try first raising your concerns on the article's talk page, with the main contributors, and/or adding a cleanup tag, such as
{{notability}}
,{{hoax}}
,{{original research}}
, or{{advert}}
; this ensures readers are aware of the problem and may act to fix it. - If the topic is not important enough to merit an article on its own, consider merging or redirecting to an existing article. This should be done particularly if the topic name is a likely search term.
- D. Search for additional sources, if the main concern is notability
- The minimum search expected is a normal Google search, a Google Books search, a Google News search, and a Google News archive search; Google Scholar is suggested for academic subjects.
- If you find a lack of sources, you've completed basic due diligence before nominating. However, if a quick search does find sources, this does not always mean an RfD on a sourcing basis is unwarranted. If you spend more time examining the sources, and determine that they are insufficient, e.g., because they only contain passing mention of the topic, then an RfD nomination may still be appropriate.
- If you find that adequate sources do appear to exist, the fact that they are not yet present in the article is not a proper basis for a nomination. Instead, you should consider citing the sources, or at minimum apply an appropriate template to the page that flags the sourcing concern. Common templates include {{unreferenced}}, {{refimprove}}, {{third-party}}, {{primary sources}} and {{one source}}.
Discussed deletion
change- Click "Change source" at the top of the page to be deleted.
- In the edit box, add this tag: {{rfd|REASON}}. Put it at the top of the page, above the rest of the text. Then, replace the text "REASON" with a short reason why the page should be deleted. Do not be too specific here. You can add more details on the discussion page (see below).
- It is a good idea to write a change summary to let others know what you are doing. You can say "nominating for deletion", "requesting deletion", or something like that.
- Click "Save changes" at the bottom to save the page with the deletion tag at the top.
- If the deletion tag has been added to the page, a box should appear at the top of the article with a link saying "Click here to create a discussion page!" Click that link.
- You should be taken to a page starting with "Creating Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/..." along with the current year and the name of the article to be deleted. In the edit box, the following tag should have already been added: {{RfD/Preload/Template}} . Replace the text PLACE REASON HERE with a more detailed reason why the page should be deleted.
- It is helpful to include links to the various policy pages about Wikipedia (that begin with Wikipedia:). Here are some examples of this: "This article is [[Wikipedia:COMPLEX|not easy to understand]]" or "Not a [[Wikipedia:notable|notable]] topic''. This will make others more aware of why the page is not acceptable under Wikipedia's policies.
- Click "Save changes" to save the new discussion page when you are done.
- A change summary you can write for this page is "creating discussion page", "starting deletion discussion", or something like that.
- As with the page for deletion, you can check the "Watch the page" box. This will let you know if someone else has replied to your discussion.
- Copy the title of the discussion page to the clipboard. You can do this by dragging the mouse over the text from "Wikipedia" to the end of the page title to highlight it, then right-clicking and selecting "Copy".
- Go to the list of deletion requests, and click "change source" beside the words "Current deletion request discussions".
- At the top of the list of discussions, paste the title from the clipboard (right-click and select "Paste"). Add a pair of curly brackets before and after the title to make a template that will copy the content of the discussion page onto the main deletion page, like this:
- {{Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2024/(name of page to be deleted)}}
- Finally, click "Save changes" to add the discussion to the list. If the page saves successfully, you should see your deletion discussion at the top of the list. And that's it!
If this is too complicated for you, there are some gadgets like Twinkle that you can use. This allows you to do it faster.
Quick deletion
changeIf you think a page has nonsense content, add {{non}} to the top of the page.
If you think a page does not say why the subject is important, add {{notable}} to the top of the page.
If you think a page should be deleted per other quick deletion rules, add {{QD|reason}} to the top of the page.
Notifying the user
changeGenerally, you should try to be civil and tell the user that created the page to join the discussion talking about the page. This can be done by adding {{subst:RFDNote|page to be deleted}} ~~~~
to the bottom of their talkpage.
Discussions
change- The discussion is not a vote. Please make suggestions on what action to take, and support your suggestion with reasons.
- Please look at the article before you make a suggestion. Do not make an opinion using only the information given by the nominator. Looking at the history of the article may help to understand the situation.
- Please read other comments and suggestions. They may have helpful information.
- Start your comments or suggestions on a new line. Start with
*
and sign after your comment by adding~~~~
to the end. If you are responding to another editor, put your comment directly below theirs and make sure your comment is indented (using more than one*
). - New users can make suggestions, but their ideas may not be considered, especially if the suggestion seems to be made in bad faith. The opinion of users who had an account before the start of the request may be given more weight or importance.
- Suggestions by users using "sock puppets" (more than one account belonging to the same person) will not be counted.
- Please make only one suggestion. If you change your mind, change your first idea instead of adding a new one. The best way to do this is to put
<s>
before your old idea and</s>
after it. For example, if you wanted to delete an article but now think it should be kept, you could put: "Deletekeep". - If you would like an article to be kept, you can improve the article and try to fix the problems given in the request for deletion. If the reasons given in the nomination are fixed by changing, the nomination can be withdrawn by the nominator, and the deletion discussion will be closed by an administrator.
- Try to avoid confusing suggestions, such as delete and merge.
- Requests for deletion is not a war zone. You can click here for more information, although the page is not in Simple English.
Remember: You do not have to make a suggestion for every nomination. You should think about not making a suggestion if:
- A nomination involves a topic that you do not know much about.
- Everyone has made the same suggestion and you agree with that suggestion.
- All times are in UTC.
Current deletion request discussions
changeDSP for secure communication in blockchain
change- DSP for secure communication in blockchain (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Likely AI generated; article has several issues:
- It is little fleshed out; the information in the article is likely correct, but the different pieces of information aren't properly connected.
- The article mixes two sets of technologies that are completely unrelated (digital signal processing and blockchain)
- Blockchain may be a buzzword.
So if I use digiral signal processing to process a signal, I can also decrypt the signal before processing and encrypt it afterwards, I do not need specific blockchain technology. In short: I propose we delete this one, without replacement. Comments? Eptalon (talk) 21:05, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
changeThis request is due to close on 21:05, 1 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Wikipedia:Bad articles
change- Wikipedia:Bad articles (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Useless page in Wikipedia namespace. It also said it was a policy but it's not, so I removed that claim. Depextual (talk) 16:40, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
changeDelete adds nothing useful. Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 16:48, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Looks like a test page. There is a bunch of templates as if the person was testing them. – Angerxiety! 18:56, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete w:TNT. Whilst I think there is scope for a Wikipedia space item on what things are bad, and how articles could be written poorly (and more importantly, what to avoid and how to fix), but this simply isn't it. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 20:08, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - I agree a Bad pages list is actually a good idea but this article isn't it, delete as useless in its current form --–Davey2010Talk 21:38, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 16:40, 1 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Farsad (rapper)
change- Farsad (rapper) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I have checked in detail could not find any Notability for the subject other Please check If I am wrong Ksy 08:37, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- Keep Farsad is one of the notable Persian rapper, as in Iran news don't cover the rappers because hipHop is illegal and Iranian sources are under control of Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps
- But some super notable sources coverd Farsad which I added for him *Timsar* (talk) 08:44, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- No offence, Lets other Editors decide, as I have already mentioned Please Check If I am Wrong. Wikipedia follow rules and regulation.
- And according to wiki rules you can improve the article but your Vote don't Count. Ksy 09:08, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- We don't have any rules that article maker can't vote in Wiki! I did it a lot on farsi wiki and English wiki, Thanks for the corporation *Timsar* (talk) 09:22, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Administrator note: @Kuskrey: If you're going to tell another user that they can't !vote, you need to cite the rule that says so. I believe that the article creator is allowed to !vote. Did you have some other reason in mind? -- Auntof6 (talk) 10:48, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- ok, if you say so, it is added in my knowledge. Ksy 10:53, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Administrator note: Comments moved into the discussion section. MathXplore (talk) 09:24, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 08:37, 1 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Ramkripalyadavg
change- Ramkripalyadavg (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Asteralee has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Only a few references in the article are independent, not very notable. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 18:30, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- Delete per nom, Cannot find any evidence of any notability, Fails GNG. –Davey2010Talk 21:04, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete References error, See also and External links selection are not simple Can be difficult to understand for people who limited English Skill including non-native, children, English Learners and other people need extra clear. Non-Notable Indian YouTubers Article, Fails WP:GNG Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 03:02, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Raayaan9911 Please know that the lack of references isn't a proper reason to delete an article. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 03:04, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Asteralee Few references in Articles not lack of references. Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 03:06, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Raayaan9911 Please know that the lack of references isn't a proper reason to delete an article. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 03:04, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete This guy is a supposedly a professional YouTuber, but 3000 views in total between both of their channels in 3 years, is not an achievement by any means. Subject does not merit inclusion and fails guidelines for general notability. DaneGeld (talk) 07:45, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 18:30, 30 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
City of federal subject significance
change- City of federal subject significance (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Raayaan9911 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: AI-Generated content, How users like this Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 13:28, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
changeThis request is due to close on 13:28, 30 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Kherai Puja
change- Kherai Puja (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Raayaan9911 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Article doesn't have any sources and Unreferenced. How Users Created Their New Articles Like this without references. Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 11:13, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- Keep as notable topic - See en:Kherai, Obviously meets GNG. --–Davey2010Talk 11:45, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: @Davey2010, I see Kherai Puja in English it met but Simple English just Unreferenced Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 12:45, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Being unsourced isn't a reason to nominate an article for deletion especially if the subject is at the English Wikipedia, Also you're supposed to do a WP:BEFORE search before nominating which I'm assuming you've not done, Many thanks, –Davey2010Talk 13:25, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you, Happy editing! Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 13:43, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Being unsourced isn't a reason to nominate an article for deletion especially if the subject is at the English Wikipedia, Also you're supposed to do a WP:BEFORE search before nominating which I'm assuming you've not done, Many thanks, –Davey2010Talk 13:25, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: @Davey2010, I see Kherai Puja in English it met but Simple English just Unreferenced Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 12:45, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 11:13, 30 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Salman Malik
change- Salman Malik (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
DIVINE has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: It appears that the individual does not meet the WP:GNG criteria for notability. They have completed one comedy tour, which is mentioned in Arab News, but this alone is not enough to establish notability. DIVINE (talk) 09:13, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- Delete One good source isn't enough to show that WP:NBIO is met, right now Malik doesn't meet notability requirements. Ravensfire (talk) 05:21, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 09:13, 29 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Carrier-sense multiple access with collision avoidance
change- Carrier-sense multiple access with collision avoidance (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Raayaan9911 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: AI/LLM Generated Article, How users created their new articles like this. Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 03:46, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- This is a page with a long history. There are versions of this page before the most recent, that we can revert to (look at this version: here). So no need for deletion.--Eptalon (talk) 04:12, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Eptalon, Whoops i didn't look at history Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 04:44, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: I have reverted back to the last known good version fr33kman 10:24, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Keep since history has been reverted. Ternera (talk) 21:53, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 03:46, 29 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Koreapas
changeDavey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable homepage to a uni, cannot find any evidence of any notability, Fails GNG –Davey2010Talk 22:56, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
changeThis request is due to close on 22:56, 28 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Alliebrack National School
change- Alliebrack National School (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable school, cannot find any evidence of any notability, Fails NSCHOOL and GNG –Davey2010Talk 22:53, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- Delete Non-Notable Ireland's School, How users created their new articles about school like this. Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 07:12, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 22:53, 28 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
African–American Indigenous solidarity
change- African–American Indigenous solidarity (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Fr33kman has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Nonsense term that doesn't exist. Not QD-able fr33kman 22:22, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- Sources say it does. Sources including entire books dedicated to the subject. Invasive Spices (talk) 22:27, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- I've read the sources and can find the phrase no where in them or on Google. fr33kman 10:31, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- I considered several synonyms and neighbor–synonyms before creating it,
- but I prefered this option. The most common is Black–Indigenous intersectionality but that violates and so should be Black–Indigenous intersectionality (USA). I don't like it but perhaps we should ignore my aesthetic preferences and use Black–Indigenous intersectionality (USA). Invasive Spices (talk) 22:05, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- As the source I've just added http://nativephilanthropy.org/blog/2022/02/01/intersectional-indigenous-identities-afro-indigenous-and-black-indigenous-peoples points out, the terms are not always obvious to everyone. Invasive Spices (talk)
This request is due to close on 22:22, 28 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Amteka
changeDavey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable village, cannot find any evidence of any notability, Fails GNG –Davey2010Talk 18:18, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- Delete Per nominator. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 19:07, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Keep I searched on Google Books for "Amteka" "chirang" and I found a lot of results, so probably people have written about this place. This article is actually better than most of the stubs about villages here, because it gives some information. Oholiba (talk) 20:11, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- A lot of results means nothing, from what I can gather these books are 2 bit mentions and some books don't appear to be related to this village at all, If you could provide books from that list that demonstrate notability that would be fantastic, Many Thanks –Davey2010Talk 20:34, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 18:18, 28 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
List of Garja gods
change- List of Garja gods (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable subject, cannot find any evidence of any notability, Fails GNG –Davey2010Talk 18:14, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- Delete Per nominator. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 01:22, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 18:14, 28 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Bad (Bodo culture)
change- Bad (Bodo culture) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable culture, cannot find any evidence of any notability, Fails DICDEF and GNG –Davey2010Talk 18:10, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- Keep: In addition to the cited source, I also found this described in a book online by B.C. Basumatary. There may also be other sources which can't be found online. As an anthropological topic, which is likely the subject of research, I believe we should allow an article about this. (Unless the article seemed to plagiarism or POV-pushing, which this doesn't seem to be.) Oholiba (talk) 20:08, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- The cited source just gives definitions, it doesn't demonstrate any notability. There may be sources offline however on the other hand there may be none at all..., "likely the subject of research" - says who?,
- Without being disrespectful your !vote is pretty much clutching at straws. You've not offered any substantial or indepth sources that demonstrate any notability, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 21:43, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- "Demonstrating notability" is an indeterminate concept here. It makes sense for a person, movie, or company, but what does it mean to say that a cultural belief demonstrates notability. It's covered in sources, which is enough for Wikipedia. WP:GNG Oholiba (talk) 22:00, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Well I mean being important enough to have an article by having coverage in a number of independent reliable sources, One source doesn't make this pass GNG unfortunately, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 22:15, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- "Demonstrating notability" is an indeterminate concept here. It makes sense for a person, movie, or company, but what does it mean to say that a cultural belief demonstrates notability. It's covered in sources, which is enough for Wikipedia. WP:GNG Oholiba (talk) 22:00, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 18:10, 28 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Hapsa Hatarnai
change- Hapsa Hatarnai (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable ceremony, cannot find any evidence of any notability, Fails GNG –Davey2010Talk 18:08, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- Keep It's found in many search results in Google Books. It's a notable topic, and probably has been studied by researchers. Oholiba (talk) 20:14, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- This tells you a snippet of what it is, this and this appear to be copypastes from somewhere (or it's a huge coincidence they've included this and other ceremonies in the exact same order), this is fine, The rest of the books don't appear to even mention Hapsa Hatarnai. I'm still not seeing any evidence of any notability here, The books I've mentioned just confirms it exists but there's nothing indepth or substantial, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 21:53, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 18:08, 28 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Practical High School
change- Practical High School (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable school, cannot find any evidence of any notability, Fails NSCHOOL and GNG –Davey2010Talk 17:55, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- Delete can't find any reliable sources that show notability fr33kman 18:16, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete non-notable school, probably there so somebody can point at it and say "Hey look, it's our school on Wikipedia!".- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 14:14, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 17:55, 28 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Gurudev Kalicharan Brahma Academy
change- Gurudev Kalicharan Brahma Academy (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable school, cannot find any evidence of any notability, Fails NSCHOOL and GNG. –Davey2010Talk 17:41, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- Delete can't find any reliable sources for it. fr33kman 10:41, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 17:41, 28 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Multirate signal processing
change- Multirate signal processing (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Ternera has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unsourced, LLM-generated article. Ternera (talk) 17:32, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- Delete AI-Generated Content, How users created their new articles using ChatGPT like this Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 12:10, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Clearly from an LLM, no sources, support deletion here. Ravensfire (talk) 19:12, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 17:32, 28 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
TXEX Exchange
change- TXEX Exchange (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Ternera has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Two references have nothing to do with the subject and TrustPilot suggests it's a scam website: https://www.trustpilot.com/review/txex.pro Ternera (talk) 15:15, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- Delete scam site fr33kman 18:21, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete as scam site. –Davey2010Talk 20:57, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete as a scam site. Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 17:09, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 15:15, 28 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Mohammad Zaid Khan
change- Mohammad Zaid Khan (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Ravensfire has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Full of paid/sponsored articles used as sources, highly questionable "award" (youngest entrepreneur of Uttarakhand at age 22? I highly doubt that). Even the one source left after my trimming is more of a blog post from a company than a good source. Nothing here to show WP:NBIO is met. Ravensfire (talk) 13:55, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- Delete per nominator Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 13:58, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete fails WP:GNG. Ternera (talk) 14:54, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 13:55, 28 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Pixel 9
changeRaayaan9911 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unreferenced Mobile Phone Article, Underdeveloped Article Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 13:36, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- Keep Article has a reference, and even if it's short, a stub template can be placed. Also please know that [an] Unreferenced [article] and an Underdeveloped Article are not reasons to delete an article. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 13:39, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Asteralee, Whoops i see it wrong Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 13:41, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Keep just because an article is a stub does not mean it should be deleted. Ternera (talk) 14:57, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- I agreed you, Keep i Improved Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 07:20, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- keep clearly notable subject. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 23:55, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Keep - Makes no sense to me why you'd nominate an article for deletion on the basis that it's Unreferenced Mobile Phone Article, Underdeveloped Article and then you proceed to reference and develop it?!, Nonetheless thanks for sourcing/expanding it, Keep per improvements made. –Davey2010Talk 20:55, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Davey2010 You're welcome Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 10:42, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 13:35, 28 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Ghostfuckers
change- Ghostfuckers (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Fehufanga has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable as a standalone episode. We don't have a List of Helluva Boss episodes that this article can redirect to. I don't really see the point of redirecting this article to Helluva Boss. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 11:07, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- Delete not notable on its own. fr33kman 10:36, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and Freekman, Even if the episode list existed I still would've gone with delete, Should be deleted at enwiki too. –Davey2010Talk 20:51, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete The title also contains a bad word in it and the whole page is like nonsense. thetree284 (talk) 20:55, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Thetree284 Wikipedia is not censored, having a "bad word" like "fuck" is not a reason to delete it. Fuck tha Police would have to be deleted otherwise. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 10:52, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete non-notable and wth did I just read?- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 08:58, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 11:07, 28 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
SYLBEATZ
changeTanbiruzzaman has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No significant coverage, doesn’t pass WP:GNG, Page creator blocked in enwiki for sock. –TANBIRUZZAMAN (💬) 10:28, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
changeThis request is due to close on 10:28, 28 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Anti-aliasing filter
change- Anti-aliasing filter (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
FusionSub has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: WP:NOT. Essay and AI generated. - FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 08:53, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- Delete It is looking like an AI content, also it is a WP:NOT, it should delete. - Centella Gold • (Talk) 21 November 2024
- Delete content appears to be LLM-generated spam. Ternera (talk) 14:58, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- I replaced it with a three-sentence stub, lkely keepable now. I have to say though that the problem of this was not that it was likely generated by an LLM, but that it was just a sketch. The generated content was accurate. On a side note: we didn't have a page on aliasing, so I created that as well.--Eptalon (talk) 04:31, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 08:53, 28 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Edward Harte
change- Edward Harte (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Fehufanga has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable. No reliable sources in the article and overall reads very promotional of the subject (take Edward worked hard on improving his sightreading. As a result, Edward's sightreading is surprisingly sharp
as an example). No reliable and significant sources elsewhere. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 02:45, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- Keep this page. Edward is someone worthy of note who appears to have achieved many things. A simple google of his name or asking around in the organ community in Ireland will back up what is stated on this Wikipedia page. It should not be deleted. —MaitiuODonnell11 (talk • contribs) 19:52, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - A4 in my eyes. This article makes no credible attempt to suggest why they would be notable. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 20:20, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 02:45, 28 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Oceanic International Yoga School Goa (2nd nomination)
change- Oceanic International Yoga School Goa (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable, cannot find any evidence of any notability, Sources in the article are all SELFPUBLISHED, Fails NCORP and GNG, (Just noting NSCHOOL would be irrelevant as it's a yoga place not a high school)
Article was previously deleted per G11 and it was also A4'd at Yoga International School Goa, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 15:42, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Nom in previous RFD withdrew and I had closed it without looking at the article. –Davey2010Talk 15:43, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- Delete clear UPE advertising. Before trimming, article had a lot of sources that didn't mention the company and a lot of promotional fluff. Afterwards, it's primary sources and nothing to show that NCORP is met here. Ravensfire (talk) 15:53, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete No Notability and written as promotional --Ksy 15:58, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete entirely promotional. Sources are self-serving fr33kman 16:13, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete fails WP:GNG. Ternera (talk) 17:32, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Non-Notable School Article, How users created their new articles like this Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 16:29, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 15:42, 27 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Category:Thomas and Friends movies
change- Category:Thomas and Friends movies (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
QuantumFoam66 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Only one article. content should be moved to Category:Thomas and Friends QuantumFoam66 (talk) 23:44, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- Keep - Created a redirect which has added another entry to the category, Someone will create a Thomas and friends movie soon enough. –Davey2010Talk 20:48, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 23:44, 26 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Ryan T. White
change- Ryan T. White (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
BRPever has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable. Lacks significant coverage in reliable sources. BRP ever 20:27, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- Delete Per nominator. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 22:21, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Not Notable at all --Ksy 16:58, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Not notable - sources are garbage, two different obituaries for different people were used as sources for socalled awards. No. Ravensfire (talk) 16:37, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 20:27, 26 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Raja Usmani
change- Raja Usmani (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
BRPever has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable. Lacks significant coverage in reliable sources. BRP ever 20:26, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- Delete clear promotional article with fake awards, paid articles as sources and nothing to support notability. Ravensfire (talk) 16:41, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 20:26, 26 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Abdulwahab Office
change- Abdulwahab Office (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
BRPever has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable. Promotional. BRP ever 20:25, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- Delete Not Notable Delete as per Nominator--Ksy 17:06, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 20:25, 26 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Manigandan Manjunathan
change- Manigandan Manjunathan (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
BRPever has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: There are Guinness World Record for almost everything these days. This alone can not make the page notable. BRP ever 20:16, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
changeThis request is due to close on 20:16, 26 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Deer Jade
changeBRPever has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Lacks significant coverage in reliable sources. Not notable. BRP ever 20:10, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- Delete Did a Quick research and could not find any notable sources for the subject --Ksy 17:13, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 20:10, 26 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Amit Chakraborty
change- Amit Chakraborty (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable person, Cannot find any evidence of any notability, I believe the sources that are on a Amit Chakraborty is a completely different person, Fails NPERSON and GNG. –Davey2010Talk 19:59, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- Delete Sources are bio blurbs on connected websites or press-releases. No indepenent reliable source with significant coverage about Chakraborty. Ravensfire (talk) 21:43, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 19:59, 26 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Kislay Panday
change- Kislay Panday (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
BRPever has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The source look unreliable and quite promotional. The article on times of India looks like it's there for his promotion and nothing else. Fails notability criteria. BRP ever 19:58, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- Delete This was pretty obviously created as a promotional article by a paid editor. Highly promotional in tone, full of paid/sponsored articles, unsourced/fake awards and a lot of unsupported content. From the sources, there's a few less than complimentary things that could be added to the article. I've removed the obviously bad sources but question some of the rest. The overall tone of this is just terrible. I don't think this is worth saving, the notability is questionable. Combine everything and I'm in favor of deleting. Ravensfire (talk) 04:47, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 19:58, 26 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Chirag Bhandari
change- Chirag Bhandari (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable person, Cannot find any evidence of any notability, Fails NPERSON and GNG. –Davey2010Talk 19:58, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
changeThis request is due to close on 19:58, 26 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Apt Pay
changeDavey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable company, Cannot find any evidence of any notability, Fails NCORP and GNG. –Davey2010Talk 19:56, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- Delete Sources are a mix of AI generated and paid/sponsored articles, with maybe one iffy-to-good source hiding in there. Not enough to show NCORP is met. Ravensfire (talk) 14:30, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:GNG. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 14:33, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- delete non-notable.Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:04, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 19:56, 26 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Sahil Luthra
change- Sahil Luthra (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable person, Cannot find any evidence of any notability, Fails NPERSON and GNG. –Davey2010Talk 19:56, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- Delete Sources lack significant in depth coverage of the person. Article was over-the-top promotional in tone, suggesting there's some UPE here. Not enough to show they are notable. Ravensfire (talk) 04:56, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 19:56, 26 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Abdul Wahab Al Maimani
change- Abdul Wahab Al Maimani (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable person, Found [1] and [2] and that's it, No evidence of any notability, Fials NPERSON and GNG. –Davey2010Talk 19:55, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- Delete Delete as per Nom, Not at all Notable subject.—This unsigned comment was added by Kuskrey (talk • changes) 17:17, November 20, 2024 (UTC) (UTC)
- Delete Several paid/sponsored articles, not enough good sources to show notability. Ravensfire (talk) 16:23, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Non-Notable Omani People, How users created new article like this Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 03:58, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 19:55, 26 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
R. Edward Grant
change- R. Edward Grant (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Promotional article with no valid sources that would meet WP:NBIO. I see four sources in this article and at least two of them don't even mention this person. Depextual (talk) 17:03, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- Delete Obit that doesn't match the DOB in the article? And the sources get worse from there. Delete this promotional garbage. Ravensfire (talk) 21:21, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 17:03, 26 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Harrison Gwinnett
change- Harrison Gwinnett (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Promotional article. No reliable sources that would meet WP:NBIO. In fact, all the sources are either promotional, or don't mention the subject at all. Depextual (talk) 16:57, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- Delete Sources don't mention this person or aren't reliable. This is clearly a promotional article created by someone paid to create it who just made up sources as needed. Ravensfire (talk) 21:19, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 16:57, 26 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Role of Fourier transform in quantum mechanics
change- Role of Fourier transform in quantum mechanics (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Fehufanga has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not simple, not encyclopedic, reads like it was generated using an LLM. I'm not sure where to begin merging this with an existing article. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 12:11, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- QD - for any of the reasons above. 2001:2020:321:C7DB:38C5:F86B:7404:2754 (talk) 16:33, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- None of the reasons given fit any of the QD criteria. -- Auntof6 (talk) 10:54, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 12:11, 26 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Chirag Gajera
change- Chirag Gajera (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The nominator's reason for doing this is: I do not see this person's name in any of the sources. Non-notable person and promotional article. Depextual (talk) 19:54, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- Delete Sources that don't mention the person or have at best a passing mention, award list with no sources that actually support it - this is promotional UPE. Ravensfire (talk) 21:28, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 19:54, 25 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Vedic Legal
change- Vedic Legal (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Promotional article, but QD was declined. All of these references are either some kind of press release or otherwise promotional, so they don't qualify for WP:NORG. Depextual (talk) 19:18, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- Comment: I wouldn't say the QD was declined. The IP who removed the QD template didn't give a reason, and I think they just didn't want the page deleted. That's not the same as declining a QD. A decline is an admin saying the reason given isn't valid. I'll leave it for another admin to QD if they want to. --Auntof6 (talk) 19:39, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- I am also agree with Auntof6 because QD removed by an IP user so RFD is not required QD is the better option. Symonds Gerother (talk) 19:46, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, but I'd support QD as G11, this is over-the-top promotional with paid/sponsored articles, promotional tone and some creative writing. Ravensfire (talk) 18:17, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 19:18, 25 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Parvez Sultan Rupani
change- Parvez Sultan Rupani (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Promotional article, QD was declined. The sources are all promotional, and I don't believe they qualify for notability according to WP:NBIO. Depextual (talk) 19:09, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- Keep The article on Parvez Sultan Rupani is supported by significant coverage from independent sources, as evidenced by the references provided. Additionally, the content does not contain any promotional language, ensuring a neutral and factual representation of his achievements and career.--Symonds Gerother (talk) 19:30, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Too many of these sources are sponsored articles, not reliable sources (and basically spam/marketing/SEO sites) or don't support the information where used. One "award" is left that is sourced, but nothing I can see about it is actually notable. Promotional article that doesn't support notability. Ravensfire (talk) 21:35, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete poorly sourced, no RS fr33kman 22:01, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Promotional sources. Non-notable. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 22:07, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 19:09, 25 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
NBC November 24, 2003 Program Lineup
change- NBC November 24, 2003 Program Lineup (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Like a directory, not relevant for Wikipedia. Depextual (talk) 18:27, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- Delete un-encyclopedic and unreferenced article, how they created their new articles like this, I found it NBC Daily list it's not allowed in Wikipedia article guidelines because readers looking a article and found it's un-encyclopedic Fails Wikipedia Guidelines Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 18:43, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete un-encyclopedic program listing.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 09:28, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete as we're not a TV guide. –Davey2010Talk 20:19, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 18:27, 25 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
STARZ! NOVEMBER 04, 2000 LINEUP
change- STARZ! NOVEMBER 04, 2000 LINEUP (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
FusionSub has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Another one of these TV listing type pages, not encyclopedic and cant be turned into anything of encyclopedic value - FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 10:08, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- Quick Delete un-encyclopedic and no references article, daily list is not allowed in Wikipedia Guidelines because readers will looking is not found information how they created new article like this Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 12:28, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- Note:There is no QD criteria for un-encyclopedic articles or unreferenced articles.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 14:06, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- I understood, i think daily list Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 18:40, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- Note:There is no QD criteria for un-encyclopedic articles or unreferenced articles.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 14:06, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete as we're not a TV guide. –Davey2010Talk 20:19, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 10:08, 25 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Grant Palmer
change- Grant Palmer (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Absolutiva has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable actor it fails WP:GNG. Absolutiva (talk) 08:59, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- Comment: @Absolutiva Is your RFD Requests that you created? I voted Delete because Non Notable Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 09:50, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete I searched Google and this actor doesn't have significant coverage in reliable sources. Depextual (talk) 05:22, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 08:59, 25 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Oludotun Akinbobola
change- Oludotun Akinbobola (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Lee Vilenski has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-notable businessman. Fails WP:GNG Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 12:47, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- Delete Unreferenced Article how IP Created Their new article like this, It's article with Un-encyclopedic and No References Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 13:43, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Per nominator. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 13:29, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete no significant coverage fr33kman 13:32, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete as no significant coverage, Fails GNG. –Davey2010Talk 20:17, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 12:47, 24 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Anglican Adam Preaching Society
change- Anglican Adam Preaching Society (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Asteralee has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-independent sources. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 02:55, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- Keep - Because several independent sources have already been added by me. 102.89.22.201 (talk) 12:51, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, you added some sources, but the text you added with them is complex and should probably be removed. -- Auntof6 (talk) 10:56, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 02:55, 24 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Alone (Marshmello song)
change- Alone (Marshmello song) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Asteralee has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Un-encyclopedic tone, non-notable. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 23:45, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- Comment: I spent 20 minutes on the page, please do not delete it. I can fix it, just tell me what I need to change. 2601:80:C67F:73D0:1593:D13B:CCF2:EB11 (talk) 23:48, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Not Notable Music Article, Unencyclopedic tone, How Users Created Their New Article like this! Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 03:35, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Non- Notable --Ksy 20:33, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect per W:WP:TNT. As this musician has other notable song, it's possible this one is too. However, the quality is far too bad, and we would be better off starting from scratch if references can be found. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 18:09, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- Either redirect to Marshmello or delete. Definitely a notable song, but the presentation here is not the best.— *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 13:32, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Keep as replaced the entire article, expanded and cited too –Davey2010Talk 19:59, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 23:45, 22 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Paolo Petrocelli
change- Paolo Petrocelli (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Ethn23 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: It's probably a spam interwiki. Deleted also on itwiki and enwiki. This page is exactly the page that was cancelled on enwiki. Read also, if you want, this RdF of itwiki. Ethn23 (talk) 14:53, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- Keep. No valid reason to remove the article. The article includes numerous cited sources that adhere to Simple Wiki's guidelines:
- WP:GNG, if a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be notable
- WP:PEOPLE, a person can be notable if they have been written about in many published secondary sources. These must be reliable, independent of each other, and independent of the subject. 46.36.115.202 (talk) 18:24, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Further comment. Just because it was removed from another wiki, cross-wiki doesn't mean it should be removed here, especially when these are two different articles (with different text and used sources). See Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not. 46.36.115.202 (talk) 18:24, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 14:53, 22 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Archives
change- Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Archives (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
BRPever has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Hi, we currently have Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/archives and this template. This one is a bit hard to maintain, while the other one is much easier. I think we can simply use Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/archives on the archive page for navigation. If deleted, I think it will be best if we move the the other list of archive to this title. BRP ever 14:11, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- Keep because everything links to it[3] but even if nothing linked to it I'd still go with keep as it was created in 21 January 2008 so imho should be marked as historical, Imho mot really causing any harm existing and it's not hosting TB of data so yeah keep, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 19:38, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Davey2010 Would it be alright if I swap the titles? Most archives now go as it's subpages and returning to a set of old archives makes it confusing. I will be replacing/adjusting the template on the old pages wherever suitable. The other template automatically adds the new archive to the list after update. BRP ever 03:29, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @BRPever, Of course, I have no objections to that :), Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 12:37, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Davey2010 Would it be alright if I swap the titles? Most archives now go as it's subpages and returning to a set of old archives makes it confusing. I will be replacing/adjusting the template on the old pages wherever suitable. The other template automatically adds the new archive to the list after update. BRP ever 03:29, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 14:11, 22 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Kamaria
changeBRPever has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I wanted to improve this article but there are barely any reliable source with information that can fix or grow this page. I'd say this needs to be redirected to Yadav due to clear lack of general information. The content not written with NPOV. BRP ever 15:55, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- Keep:@BRPever No sir/ma’am there is no need for the deletion of this page. All the sources I’ve put in are reliable and I’ve also cross checked all the sources that I’ve put in the article, on ground level. They are all a 110% correct. Also the content is written with NPOV as all the things I’ve written is either facts(with backed sources) or an assumption which is almost close to correct. Nlkyair012 (talk) 16:23, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: This article was moved to Kamariya Ahir (Yadav), with a redirect left behind. @Nlkyair012: Please do not move articles when there is an active RfD. Thanks. --Auntof6 (talk) 10:30, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Case was due to close on 16 nov 2024 i thought it was deleted already im sorry Nlkyair012 (talk) 06:55, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 15:55, 16 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Template:1925-26 NHL season by team
change- Template:1925-26 NHL season by team (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Nominating a group of navigation templates that each have either zero or only one relevant blue link. With so few relevant links, a navbox can't do its job of navigating between pages.
Templates included in this request:
- Template:1925-26 NHL season by team (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)
- Template:2000 NFL season by team (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)
- Template:2002 NFL season by team (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)
- Template:2004 NFL season by team (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)
- Template:2006 NFL season by team (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)
- Template:2010 NFL season by team (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)
- Template:2015 NFL season by team (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)
- Template:2016 NFL season by team (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)
- Template:NCAA football season navbox (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)
- Template:NFL team season lists (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)
Notes to closing admin:
- None of these templates appear to have any subpages.
- All of these templates are transcluded on at least one page.
-- Auntof6 (talk) 05:20, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- Delete per nom Yelromcc (talk) 16:41, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete the NHL and NCAA ones but Keep the NFL ones as there are 5 blue links on all of them. Remember the headers are valid navigation targets also in a navbox. That being said I feel like we have had discussions in the past that said as long as we have one bluelink in a navbox they are good to go. I can't be bothered to go look for it though thus this comment. -Djsasso (talk) 03:23, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- The purpose of the NFL templates is to navigate between pages related to different teams. The other blue links are not helpful for that. That's why I said relevant blue links. Blue links in a navbox's headers are often not helpful for its main purpose. -- Auntof6 (talk) 07:44, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 05:20, 16 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Recently closed deletion discussions
change- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Quickly deleted by Fr33kman as G5. Depextual (talk) 04:59, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Joseph Samuels
change- Joseph Samuels (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-notable musician. The claims in this article are unverifiable. This has been the subject of spam on English Wikipedia. Depextual (talk) 22:17, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
changeThis request is due to close on 22:17, 1 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete. --Auntof6 (talk) 23:23, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
Sigma male
change- Sigma male (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Asteralee has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-notable. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 13:43, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- Neutral - En-wiki has an article.--Merging into other article, is an idea.--'Nuke' is also an idea, so that one does not have to waste time, evaluating the sources. (Our sources seem to 'not have a good ring' , for now.) 2001:2020:32B:F22A:BC9D:9EA2:D8C1:9CBA (talk) 14:15, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- A couple of questions:
- What is the significance of enwiki having an article?
- What article do you think this could be merged to?
- -- Auntof6 (talk) 18:27, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- I added a 'new, first sentence/line', in the article.--I expect to 'sink in', cirka zero more 'effort' into the article (or the Delete discussion).--For now, I am neutral if the article has got to go.--Will the article get 'enough improvements' before this discussion is over? Not likely.--If this post is regarded as somewhat helpful, then fine. 2001:2020:301:DC0D:355B:BD48:51CF:E14A (talk) 22:35, 13 November 2024 (UTC) /2001:2020:32B:F22A:BC9D:9EA2:D8C1:9CBA
- A couple of questions:
- Comment: - "To become a sigma male you need to help 10 people in a maximum of 1 hour", the article says.--Time to have a closer look at 'the [[Nuclear football]'/ Nuclear Football? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:2020:32B:F22A:BC9D:9EA2:D8C1:9CBA (talk • contribs)
- Delete. Notable but not encyclopedic in its current form.— *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 22:41, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Keep I have changed the article. I did not have the motivation to continue adding more information so if others would like to contribute that is greatly appreciated. I vote keep due to its rise and use within today's culture. – Angerxiety! 14:35, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
- Keep - I've expanded and cited the article, It's not as simple as I would like but it's a start, In my humble opinion as it has its little section on enwiki it should have an article here too (I can't say "it should have its own section" because Alpha and beta male doesn't exist here) - I appreciate not everyone shares the same enwiki views but that's my view. Anyway keep as imho notable subject. –Davey2010Talk 19:26, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 13:43, 20 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. MathXplore (talk) 01:15, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
Ozhan Akcakaya
change- Ozhan Akcakaya (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Fehufanga has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable. Promotional in tone. Awards are not mentioned in the sources and given by sources whose reliability is questionable. No significant, reliable coverage elsewhere. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 14:01, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- Delete Did the quite re-search Non the sources mentioned about subject --Ksy 18:25, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- Keep The subjecy is a notable figure in the sports technology industry, recognized for founding HITNMOVE and introducing innovative training equipment widely used by professional athletes and trainers. His multiple awards, including Innovator of the Year (2022) and independent media coverage, establish his significant impact on the field, meeting Wikipedia's notability guidelines through verifiable contributions and global recognition 1.--Symonds Gerother (talk) 10:44, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: - Symonds Gerother is the article creator and has been blocked for using multiple accounts. Ravensfire (talk) 16:27, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Symonds Gerother is also globally locked for cross-wiki abuse. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 16:28, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: - Symonds Gerother is the article creator and has been blocked for using multiple accounts. Ravensfire (talk) 16:27, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Minimal coverage of article subject in the sources, several paid/sponsored articles used as sources, promotional tone in article text. Ravensfire (talk) 16:26, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 14:01, 23 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. MathXplore (talk) 01:14, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
Jay Feldman
change- Jay Feldman (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Fehufanga has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable. Sources are not independent (as clearly written at the end of source 5: This article was written in cooperation with Dr. Jay Feldman
), otherwise I found no significant coverage of this subject. Awards don't really make a case for notability either. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 13:52, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- Delete No significant coverage. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 13:42, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- Keep The subject is slightly notable. Content is need to be rewrite in neutral way. By Quick google search i found lots of article that not used in reference section. --Symonds Gerother (talk) 18:53, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete unable to find any reliable Coverage for subject.--Ksy 20:56, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Mutliple paid/sponsored sources, not enough significant coverage from decent sources to show notability. Ravensfire (talk) 21:04, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 13:52, 23 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. per discussion below, Article moved to Soap on a rope –Davey2010Talk 19:29, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
Soap on a Rope
change- Soap on a Rope (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Symonds Gerother has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Encyclopedic content on Wikipedia is expected to have a neutral and formal tone. Terms like "absolute knee-slapper" and references to sensitive topics such as "Prison rape" used for humor are inappropriate and do not align with Wikipedia’s guidelines on tone and sensitivity. Such language could make the article feel biased or trivializing rather than factual. Symonds Gerother (talk) 06:26, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- Keep The article is sourced and I have removed the offending text. The capitalization should be changed, however. --Auntof6 (talk) 07:53, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
- Keep The Article is notable.--Ksy 18:54, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 06:26, 21 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. /Withdrawn as per discussion below –Davey2010Talk 14:42, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
Burn Hall Srinagar
change- Burn Hall Srinagar (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable school, cannot find any evidence of any notability, As far as I can see en:Burn Hall School is a completely different school as that article doesn't mention Baramula. Fails NSCHOOL and GNG. –Davey2010Talk 17:45, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- If both schools are the same then I'll withdraw but I don't think they are ? –Davey2010Talk 17:51, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- I think they are both the same school. Perhaps it should be moved to the enwiki name and expanded. fr33kman 10:39, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @Fr33kman, I think so too tbh, I was comparing both articles and the Simple one omitted things the Enwiki had but both articles mention the sister schools in Abbottabad so I'm now slightly more confident this is the same school,
- I just didn't want to move these in case this was another school so thanks for your reply and confirming it's not :), Many thanks, Warmest Regards, –Davey2010Talk 14:40, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- I think they are both the same school. Perhaps it should be moved to the enwiki name and expanded. fr33kman 10:39, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
changeThis request is due to close on 17:45, 28 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
Related pages
change- All archives before July 2008 - implementation of new system made archives redundant
- Category:Requests for deletion that did not succeed
- Category:Requests for deletion that succeeded
- Wikipedia:Deletion policy
- Wikipedia:Quick deletion
- Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion
- Category:Deletion requests
- Category:Quick deletion requests