Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Requests for deletion

(Redirected from Wikipedia:AFD)
Shortcuts
If you think a page should be deleted, read the deletion policy to make sure.
Then follow these instructions on how to request a page for deletion. To find more information on what discussed deletions and quick deletions are:
PLEASE READ THIS

Before nominating: checks and alternatives

change
Shortcut

Prior to nominating article(s) for deletion, please be sure to:

A. Read and understand these policies and guidelines
  1. The Wikipedia deletion policy, which explains valid grounds for deletion.
  2. The main four guidelines and policies that inform deletion discussions: notability (WP:N), verifiability (WP:V), reliable sources (WP:RS), and what Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)
  3. Subject-specific notability guidelines, which can be found at Category:Wikipedia notability guidelines
B. Carry out these checks
  1. Confirm that the article does not meet the criteria for quick deletion.
  2. If there are verifiability, notability or other sourcing concerns, take reasonable steps to search for reliable sources. (See step D.)
  3. Review the article's history to check for potential vandalism or poor editing.
  4. Read the article's talk page for previous nominations and/or that your objections haven't already been dealt with.
  5. Check "What links here" in the article's sidebar, to see how the page is used and referenced within Wikipedia.
  6. Check if there are interlanguage links, also in the sidebar, which may lead to more developed and better sourced articles. Likewise, search for native-language sources if the subject has a name in a non-Latin alphabet (such as Japanese or Greek), which is often in the lead.
C. Consider whether the article could be improved rather than deleted
  1. If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate for RfD.
  2. If the article was recently created, please consider allowing the contributors more time to develop the article.
  3. If an article has issues try first raising your concerns on the article's talk page, with the main contributors, and/or adding a cleanup tag, such as {{notability}}, {{hoax}}, {{original research}}, or {{advert}}; this ensures readers are aware of the problem and may act to fix it.
  4. If the topic is not important enough to merit an article on its own, consider merging or redirecting to an existing article. This should be done particularly if the topic name is a likely search term.
D. Search for additional sources, if the main concern is notability
  1. The minimum search expected is a normal Google search, a Google Books search, a Google News search, and a Google News archive search; Google Scholar is suggested for academic subjects.
  2. If you find a lack of sources, you've completed basic due diligence before nominating. However, if a quick search does find sources, this does not always mean an RfD on a sourcing basis is unwarranted. If you spend more time examining the sources, and determine that they are insufficient, e.g., because they only contain passing mention of the topic, then an RfD nomination may still be appropriate.
  3. If you find that adequate sources do appear to exist, the fact that they are not yet present in the article is not a proper basis for a nomination. Instead, you should consider citing the sources, or at minimum apply an appropriate template to the page that flags the sourcing concern. Common templates include {{unreferenced}}, {{refimprove}}, {{third-party}}, {{primary sources}} and {{one source}}.

Discussed deletion

change
Put the deletion tag on the article.
  1. Click "Change source" at the top of the page to be deleted.
  2. In the edit box, add this tag: {{rfd|REASON}}. Put it at the top of the page, above the rest of the text. Then, replace the text "REASON" with a short reason why the page should be deleted. Do not be too specific here. You can add more details on the discussion page (see below).
    • It is a good idea to write a change summary to let others know what you are doing. You can say "nominating for deletion", "requesting deletion", or something like that.
  3. Click "Save changes" at the bottom to save the page with the deletion tag at the top.
    • You can also check the "Watch this page" check box to add the page to your watchlist. This lets you know if the page for deletion has been changed. If the deletion tag is removed any time before the discussion is closed, it should be put back.
Create a discussion page.
  1. If the deletion tag has been added to the page, a box should appear at the top of the article with a link saying "Click here to create a discussion page!" Click that link.
  2. You should be taken to a page starting with "Creating Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/..." along with the current year and the name of the article to be deleted. In the edit box, the following tag should have already been added: {{RfD/Preload/Template}} . Replace the text PLACE REASON HERE with a more detailed reason why the page should be deleted.
    • It is helpful to include links to the various policy pages about Wikipedia (that begin with Wikipedia:). Here are some examples of this: "This article is [[Wikipedia:COMPLEX|not easy to understand]]" or "Not a [[Wikipedia:notable|notable]] topic''. This will make others more aware of why the page is not acceptable under Wikipedia's policies.
  3. Click "Save changes" to save the new discussion page when you are done.
    • A change summary you can write for this page is "creating discussion page", "starting deletion discussion", or something like that.
    • As with the page for deletion, you can check the "Watch the page" box. This will let you know if someone else has replied to your discussion.
List it here
  1. Copy the title of the discussion page to the clipboard. You can do this by dragging the mouse over the text from "Wikipedia" to the end of the page title to highlight it, then right-clicking and selecting "Copy".
  2. Go to the list of deletion requests, and click "change source" beside the words "Current deletion request discussions".
  3. At the top of the list of discussions, paste the title from the clipboard (right-click and select "Paste"). Add a pair of curly brackets before and after the title to make a template that will copy the content of the discussion page onto the main deletion page, like this:
    {{Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2024/(name of page to be deleted)}}
  4. Finally, click "Save changes" to add the discussion to the list. If the page saves successfully, you should see your deletion discussion at the top of the list. And that's it!

If this is too complicated for you, there are some gadgets like Twinkle that you can use. This allows you to do it faster.

Quick deletion

change
See also: Wikipedia:Deletion policy § Quick deletion

If you think a page has nonsense content, add {{non}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page does not say why the subject is important, add {{notable}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page should be deleted per other quick deletion rules, add {{QD|reason}} to the top of the page.

Notifying the user

change

Generally, you should try to be civil and tell the user that created the page to join the discussion talking about the page. This can be done by adding {{subst:RFDNote|page to be deleted}} ~~~~ to the bottom of their talkpage.

Discussions

change
See also: Wikipedia:Deletion review
  • The discussion is not a vote. Please make suggestions on what action to take, and support your suggestion with reasons.
  • Please look at the article before you make a suggestion. Do not make an opinion using only the information given by the nominator. Looking at the history of the article may help to understand the situation.
  • Please read other comments and suggestions. They may have helpful information.
  • Start your comments or suggestions on a new line. Start with * and sign after your comment by adding ~~~~ to the end. If you are responding to another editor, put your comment directly below theirs and make sure your comment is indented (using more than one *).
  • New users can make suggestions, but their ideas may not be considered, especially if the suggestion seems to be made in bad faith. The opinion of users who had an account before the start of the request may be given more weight or importance.
  • Suggestions by users using "sock puppets" (more than one account belonging to the same person) will not be counted.
  • Please make only one suggestion. If you change your mind, change your first idea instead of adding a new one. The best way to do this is to put <s> before your old idea and </s> after it. For example, if you wanted to delete an article but now think it should be kept, you could put: "Delete keep".
  • If you would like an article to be kept, you can improve the article and try to fix the problems given in the request for deletion. If the reasons given in the nomination are fixed by changing, the nomination can be withdrawn by the nominator, and the deletion discussion will be closed by an administrator.
  • Try to avoid confusing suggestions, such as delete and merge.
  • Requests for deletion is not a war zone. You can click here for more information, although the page is not in Simple English.

Remember: You do not have to make a suggestion for every nomination. You should think about not making a suggestion if:

  1. A nomination involves a topic that you do not know much about.
  2. Everyone has made the same suggestion and you agree with that suggestion.
  • All times are in UTC.

Current deletion request discussions

change

Man Singh's campaigns against the Yusufzai Afghans

change
Man Singh's campaigns against the Yusufzai Afghans (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BigKrow has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No page on English Wikipedia. Possible misspelled title? BigKrow (talk) 17:09, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change
  • Keep If any article isn't created on English Wikipedia it doesn't mean that the article is fake, also the soruces mentions the Name doesn't Seems to be fabricated. Mr.Hanes   Talk 17:37, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Still we need good sources... BigKrow (talk) 17:39, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Rescope the article - The nominator should review BEFORE prior to nominating articles for RFD, as none of these reasons given are valid reasons to delete an article. As well, this article seems to cover the Battle of the Malandari Pass, which occurred in 1586 and formed an important part of the Mughal-Afghan Wars in that time period. Since the article indicates a broader scope, I recommend that the article be re-structured to cover the Mughal-Afghan wars in a more general way. Griff (talk) 19:14, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 17:09, 2 January 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Tapan Sheth

change
Tapan Sheth (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Subject do not show significant coverage Lack of Notability Other please check if I am not wrong Ksy 12:52, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 12:52, 2 January 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Gwalvanshi Ahir

change
Gwalvanshi Ahir (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Shakib ul hassan has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Lacks WP:GNG, not sufficient enough to have its own article Shakib ul hassan talk! 10:54, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 10:54, 2 January 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


JFO Star

change
JFO Star (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Asteralee has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-notable, most of the articles aren’t reliable either. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 05:05, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 05:05, 2 January 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Siege of Amadiya (1834)

change
Siege of Amadiya (1834) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BigKrow has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Hoax? BigKrow (talk) 21:34, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 21:34, 1 January 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Daniel Larson

change
Daniel Larson (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

2601:644:907E:A70:1C4E:2526:CA51:69EB has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Lots of negative content about a living person, no reliable secondary sources. 2601:644:907E:A70:1C4E:2526:CA51:69EB (talk) 18:28, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 18:28, 1 January 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Countries and regions that do not require a visa in advance for British citizens

change
Countries and regions that do not require a visa in advance for British citizens (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Countries and regions that do not require a visa in advance for Emirati citizens (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)
Countries and regions that do not require a visa in advance for United States citizens (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)
Countries and regions that do not require a visa in advance for Japanese citizens (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)
Countries and regions that do not require a visa in advance for South Korean citizens (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)
Countries and regions that do not require a visa in advance - List by country (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Wikipedia is not a how-to guide. This should probably be merged with an article like w:en:Visa requirements for British citizens, but we don't have one here yet. --Ferien (talk) 14:23, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 14:23, 1 January 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Player Select

change
Player Select (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Asteralee has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-notable. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 21:28, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 21:28, 31 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Nas Estrelas (album)

change
Nas Estrelas (album) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't meet Wikipedia:Notability (music). Depextual (talk) 19:52, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 19:52, 31 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


I Miss You (film)

change
I Miss You (film) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable enough per Wikipedia:Notability (movies). Most filmmakers display their films at festivals, that it itself doesn't make it notable. Depextual (talk) 19:47, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 19:47, 31 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Kuhlekwethu Maseko

change
Kuhlekwethu Maseko (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No Notability Other please check if I am not wrong Ksy 17:45, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 17:45, 31 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Noé Murayama

change
Noé Murayama (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No Notability Other please check if I am not wrong Ksy 17:39, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

Keep BigKrow (talk) 21:37, 25 December 2024 (UTC) https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0613669/ BigKrow (talk) 21:37, 25 December 2024 (UTC) This request is due to close on 17:39, 31 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.[reply]


Mayank Daral (3rd nomination)

change
Mayank Daral (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Article is Written like CV for the subject Please check if I am not wrong Ksy 17:06, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 17:06, 31 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Battle of Çubukova (1511)

change
Battle of Çubukova (1511) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Chenzw has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No evidence that this battle actually happened. The cited source describes a different event that occurred 400 years later, and is completely irrelevant to the contents of the article. Chenzw  Talk  09:18, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 09:18, 31 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


VidLii

change
VidLii (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-notable website. The last RFD was closed as soft deleted. Depextual (talk) 08:44, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 08:44, 31 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Bassey Edem

change
Bassey Edem (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Likely not notable Depextual (talk) 08:05, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 08:05, 31 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Dissolution of Soran Emirate

change
Dissolution of Soran Emirate (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BigKrow has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: no Wikipedia page BigKrow (talk) 12:42, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change


This request is due to close on 12:42, 28 December 2024 07:29, 31 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Sharik khan jr

change
Sharik khan jr (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Asteralee has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-notable. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 17:34, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 17:34, 30 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Battle Of Cemisgezek

change
Battle Of Cemisgezek (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not Such history found Please check if I am not wrong Ksy 10:28, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 10:28, 30 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Ahmad saed alzein

change
Ahmad saed alzein (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Page is written like a CV for the subject. Please Check if I am not wrong Ksy 10:25, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 10:25, 30 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Thabiso Rekhotso-Andrea

change
Thabiso Rekhotso-Andrea (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BigKrow has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability BigKrow (talk) 00:58, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 00:58, 30 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Battle of Tabriz

change
Battle of Tabriz (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BigKrow has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Hoax??? BigKrow (talk) 00:57, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 00:57, 30 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Turk Shahi–Arab Conflicts

change
Turk Shahi–Arab Conflicts (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BigKrow has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Seems hoax BigKrow (talk) 22:12, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change
  • Keep "Seems Hoax" is the only reason given by the nominator. The article is based on RS sources, the nominator also fails to explain how this is a Hoax. If you had a doubt of this being a Hoax please refer WP:Talkfirst. Mr.Hanes   Talk 05:53, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 22:12, 29 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Ahmed Bin Sojib

change
Ahmed Bin Sojib (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

আফতাবুজ্জামান has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable person. Most of the are either unrelated or promotional, interview or passing mentions. "Channel I Music Awards Best Entrepreneur" is not a significant award for which someone can become automatically notable. There is zero significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.

Same article was also created on enwiki, see en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahmed Bin Sojib.

Note that the article was created by an IP, i suspect LTA Md Sunnat Ali Mollik created it from IP to avoid any suspicion. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 09:37, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 09:37, 29 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Deepak Narwal

change
Deepak Narwal (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Asteralee has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I do not think that this article is notable enough. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 04:25, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change
  Administrator note: I struck out the above duplicate comment. --Auntof6 (talk) 06:15, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 04:25, 29 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Benedikt Hofer

change
Benedikt Hofer (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Page is written like advisement of his Achievements Other Please check If I am not wrong Ksy 18:55, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change
  • I am against the deletion, there are many aspects of relevance (e.g. GitHub project, trends in Germany, Bing panel), but I think that there have to be done a lot of changes when it comes to wording and style (neutrality) ZitroLike (talk) 23:09, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • I am against the deletion of the Wikipedia page about Benedikt Hofer. This page does not constitute advertising but instead documents notable achievements and contributions in the areas of gaming, programming education, and digital content creation. It is important to assess the page based on its compliance with Wikipedia’s relevance criteria and its value in providing comprehensive information about a public figure who has made a meaningful impact.
1. Alignment with Wikipedia’s Relevance Criteria
Wikipedia’s guidelines emphasize notability, measurable contributions, and lasting influence as key factors for inclusion. Benedikt Hofer meets these standards in several ways:
• Public Recognition and Influence: Through his online presence, particularly on YouTube, he has reached a substantial audience with his educational and entertainment content, attracting hundreds of thousands of viewers. His work has gained recognition within the gaming and programming communities, demonstrating his influence in these fields.
• Educational Contributions and Open-Source Impact: His programming tutorials and projects on platforms like GitHub showcase his commitment to education and innovation. By sharing tools such as AntiCheat systems and making programming concepts accessible to a broad audience, he provides tangible benefits to both the gaming and programming communities.
2. Documenting Positive Achievements, Not Advertising
The page serves to highlight Benedikt Hofer’s accomplishments and contributions, rather than promote or advertise him. Advertising implies a focus on financial gain or self-promotion, which is not the intent of this page. Instead, it documents his:
• Efforts to educate and inspire others through accessible programming tutorials.
• Open-source contributions that support innovation and collaboration.
• Influence as a creator who enhances the Minecraft experience with tools and game modes that have been widely used and appreciated by the community.
These achievements are notable and valuable, making them deserving of documentation on Wikipedia.
3. Addressing Concerns About Neutrality
While there may be room for improvement in the page’s tone or structure, these issues can be resolved through editing, not deletion. Constructive changes can address any perceived promotional language while maintaining the integrity of the content. Removing the page entirely would disregard the subject’s clear notability and impact.
4. Broader Cultural and Community Relevance
Benedikt Hofer represents a modern trend of digital creators who combine education, entertainment, and community building. His work reflects broader societal trends in content creation and online learning, particularly within the context of gaming. Ignoring contributions like his would create a gap in documenting contemporary digital culture, an area where Wikipedia plays an essential role.
Conclusion
The Wikipedia page about Benedikt Hofer fulfills the relevance criteria by showcasing measurable achievements, significant community impact, and educational contributions. Claims of advertising are unfounded, as the page documents positive contributions rather than promoting the individual. While adjustments to the page may be warranted to improve neutrality, deletion is not justified. Retaining and refining the page ensures that Wikipedia continues to provide accurate and comprehensive information about notable figures in contemporary digital culture. 2003:D6:3F1E:6C00:2DEB:B007:8FF5:B19E (talk) 14:07, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 18:55, 28 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Sadequain Foundation

change
Sadequain Foundation (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Could not find any Notability for Fondation related Other Please Check if I am not wrong Ksy 18:41, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change
  •   Delete - The sources in the article do not provide SIGCOV of the subject and as noted in INHERITORG, an organisation (or museum) is not notable simply because the individual (Sadequain) is notable. Griff (talk) 15:41, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 18:41, 28 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Pathways of African immigration to the United States of America

change
Pathways of African immigration to the United States of America (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: A pointless redirect that is a variation of the original title (African immigration to the United States). It also does not appear that such a term is widely used. BZPN (talk) 17:48, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change
  • Keep Redirects to subtopics with their own sections are standard on Wikipedia. Please review Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not for what RfD requires – none of these large number of RfDs qualify. Invasive Spices (talk) 21:29, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Keep Redirects are cheap. While I wouldn't create these redirects myself, they are more useful now they exist and deletion them would not serve a benefit, in my opinion. On the rare chance a user does happen to enter these in, they would get to what they are looking for. --Ferien (talk) 00:59, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Delete - Since we don't have a full deletion policy for redirects, I will be referencing points 1 & 8 from R#DELETE (enWP). In my opinion, this redirect will make it unreasonably difficult for users to find the correct article, and it is also a very obscure synonym for this article. While I do agree with Ferien that redirects are cheap, this editor's past history with redirects on other projects brings to the belief that we should make our position clear here. Griff (talk) 16:52, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Comment: While it may appear as though these are all very similar cases, can the closing admin please ensure each RfD on these redirects is reviewed individually, as a small handful lean keep more than delete in consensus. Thank you! --Ferien (talk) 14:03, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 17:48, 28 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Methods of African immigration to the United States of America

change
Methods of African immigration to the United States of America (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: A pointless redirect that is a variation of the original title (African immigration to the United States). It also does not appear that such a term is widely used. BZPN (talk) 17:48, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change
  • Keep Redirects to subtopics with their own sections are standard on Wikipedia. Please review Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not for what RfD requires – none of these large number of RfDs qualify. Invasive Spices (talk) 21:28, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Keep Redirects are cheap. While I wouldn't create these redirects myself, they are more useful now they exist and deletion them would not serve a benefit, in my opinion. On the rare chance a user does happen to enter these in, they would get to what they are looking for. --Ferien (talk) 01:00, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Delete - Since we don't have a full deletion policy for redirects, I will be referencing points 1 & 8 from R#DELETE (enWP). In my opinion, this redirect will make it unreasonably difficult for users to find the correct article, and it is also a very obscure synonym for this article. While I do agree with Ferien that redirects are cheap, this editor's past history with redirects on other projects brings to the belief that we should make our position clear here. Griff (talk) 16:52, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 17:48, 28 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Mexican–American deportations (1929–1939)

change
Mexican–American deportations (1929–1939) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: A pointless redirect that is a variation of the original title (Mexican Repatriation). It also does not appear that such a term is widely used. BZPN (talk) 17:46, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 17:46, 28 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Mexican–American deportations

change
Mexican–American deportations (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: A pointless redirect that is a variation of the original title (Mexican Repatriation). It also does not appear that such a term is widely used. BZPN (talk) 17:46, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 17:46, 28 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Mexican–American deportation

change
Mexican–American deportation (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: A pointless redirect that is a variation of the original title (Mexican Repatriation). It also does not appear that such a term is widely used. BZPN (talk) 17:46, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 17:46, 28 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Mexican–American deportation (1929–1939)

change
Mexican–American deportation (1929–1939) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: A pointless redirect that is a variation of the original title (Mexican Repatriation). It also does not appear that such a term is widely used. BZPN (talk) 17:45, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 17:45, 28 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Chicano ineligibility for food stamps in the United States of America

change
Chicano ineligibility for food stamps in the United States of America (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unnecessary redirect; that's not even related to Reconquista (Mexico) BZPN (talk) 17:43, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change
  • Keep Redirects to subtopics are common on Wikipedia. I've listed the discussion of this by activists in the article, with a reference. Invasive Spices (talk) 21:25, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Keep Redirects are cheap. While I wouldn't create these redirects myself, they are more useful now they exist and deletion them would not serve a benefit, in my opinion. On the rare chance a user does happen to enter these in, they would get to what they are looking for. --Ferien (talk) 01:01, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Delete - Since we don't have a full deletion policy for redirects, I will be referencing points 1 & 8 from R#DELETE (enWP). In my opinion, this redirect will make it unreasonably difficult for users to find the correct article, and it is also a very obscure synonym for this article. While I do agree with Ferien that redirects are cheap, this editor's past history with redirects on other projects brings to the belief that we should make our position clear here. Griff (talk) 16:51, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Delete This redirect is a statement that isn't really accurate. I agree that this search term is too obscure. Depextual (talk) 20:36, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 17:43, 28 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Chiafalo v. Washington, 591 U.S. 578 (2020)

change
Chiafalo v. Washington, 591 U.S. 578 (2020) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unnecessary redirect, this name is not widely used. BZPN (talk) 17:41, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change
  •   Keep Redirects are cheap. While I wouldn't create these redirects myself, they are more useful now they exist and deletion them would not serve a benefit, in my opinion. On the rare chance a user does happen to enter these in, they would get to what they are looking for. --Ferien (talk) 01:01, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    For what it's worth, I do think this is a slightly different case from all the others, where the redirect title is more complex and slightly more ambiguous – this one is simply repeating the beginning of the article, it is just the title plus the reference(?) of the case, and is probably the most feasible of all of the redirects sent here. --Ferien (talk) 10:32, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Delete - Since we don't have a full deletion policy for redirects, I will be referencing points 1 & 8 from R#DELETE (enWP). In my opinion, this redirect will make it unreasonably difficult for users to find the correct article, and it is also a very obscure synonym for this article. While I do agree with Ferien that redirects are cheap, this editor's past history with redirects on other projects brings to the belief that we should make our position clear here. Griff (talk) 16:51, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep - Unlike the other RfDs, I think this one is actually a plausible synonym, not to mention the technically (from a legal perspective) correct one. What I am a bit unsure about, however, is how a prospective reader would use the search bar and type "Chiafalo v. Washington...", and end up selecting this longer title over the shorter one. The search autocompletion lists shorter entries first. Chenzw  Talk  14:38, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      Comment: I agree with @Chenzw but I am going to vote Weak keep 𝓐𝓭𝓮𝓵𝓪𝓲𝓭𝓮 (𝓽𝓪𝓵𝓴 ♡ 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓫𝓼) 14:40, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Leaving an additional comment because I can foresee this RfD potentially setting up a future precedent: while I am personally not a fan of keeping every conceivable redirect (en:WP:CHEAP view), I am not opposed to keeping redirects that are at least plausible and/or technically correct. What I do not want to see happen, though, is future attempts at deliberately creating redirects en masse where the legal citation is expanded in full like we see here in the 591 U.S. 57 (2020) part. Chenzw  Talk  14:51, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 17:41, 28 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Motivations for mass sterilization of Native American women

change
Motivations for mass sterilization of Native American women (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This redirect seems to be more of a test or the author's own vision - I haven't found such a term for Sterilization of Native American women anywhere on the Internet, because it's basically adding an adjective to the main title. This redirect is pointless and false. BZPN (talk) 17:37, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change
  •   Delete Concur, this seems like an unlikely phrase to be used to search. Someone using this term to search would end up with the target as the first search result anyway. Ravensfire (talk) 19:30, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Redirects to subtopics with their own sections are very common on Wikipedia. Also, please review Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not for what RfD requires – none of these large number of RfDs qualify. Invasive Spices (talk) 21:21, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Keep Redirects are cheap. While I wouldn't create these redirects myself, they are more useful now they exist and deletion them would not serve a benefit, in my opinion. On the rare chance a user does happen to enter these in, they would get to what they are looking for. --Ferien (talk) 01:02, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Delete - Since we don't have a full deletion policy for redirects, I will be referencing points 1 & 8 from R#DELETE (enWP). In my opinion, this redirect will make it unreasonably difficult for users to find the correct article, and it is also a very obscure synonym for this article. While I do agree with Ferien that redirects are cheap, this editor's past history with redirects on other projects brings to the belief that we should make our position clear here. Griff (talk) 17:01, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 17:37, 28 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Methods of coercive sterilization of Hawaiian women

change
Methods of coercive sterilization of Hawaiian women (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This redirect seems to be more of a test or the author's own vision - I haven't found such a term for Sterilization of Native American women anywhere on the Internet, because it's basically adding an adjective to the main title. This redirect is pointless and false. BZPN (talk) 17:36, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change
  •   Delete Nothing about this in the target, and this redirect seems to be a highly unlikely phrase to be used. If a decent section is added to the target on this, perhaps a redirect for just "Sterilization of Hawaiian women" would be warranted, which would also turn up as probably the top search result for this unwieldy phrase. Ravensfire (talk) 19:25, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Redirects to subtopics with their own sections are commmon. Also, please review Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not for what RfD requires – none of these large number of RfDs qualify. Invasive Spices (talk) 21:20, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Keep Redirects are cheap. While I wouldn't create these redirects myself, they are more useful now they exist and deletion them would not serve a benefit, in my opinion. On the rare chance a user does happen to enter these in, they would get to what they are looking for. --Ferien (talk) 01:02, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Delete - Since we don't have a full deletion policy for redirects, I will be referencing points 1 & 8 from R#DELETE (enWP). In my opinion, this redirect will make it unreasonably difficult for users to find the correct article, and it is also a very obscure synonym for this article. While I do agree with Ferien that redirects are cheap, this editor's past history with redirects on other projects brings to the belief that we should make our position clear here. Griff (talk) 17:01, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    That's a good articulation of my thought process - if we stick with the "redirects are cheap" (which they are) so "do whatever!" we end up with redirects with text that isn't mentioned in the target (like here), or uses language that's contrary to the purpose of this Wikipedia (coercive). There needs to be some rational limits on redirects - relevant to the target, would otherwise be a viable page title, appear to be a somewhat viable search term. Ravensfire (talk) 18:06, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Delete Hawaiians not mentioned on the page. Depextual (talk) 20:32, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 17:36, 28 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Arguments for coercive sterilization of Hawaiian women

change
Arguments for coercive sterilization of Hawaiian women (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This redirect seems to be more of a test or the author's own vision - I haven't found such a term for Sterilization of Native American women anywhere on the Internet, because it's basically adding an adjective to the main title. This redirect is pointless and false. BZPN (talk) 17:36, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change
  •   Delete Nothing about this in the target, and this redirect seems to be a highly unlikely phrase to be used. If a decent section is added to the target on this, perhaps a redirect for just "Sterilization of Hawaiian women" would be warranted, which would also turn up as probably the top search result for this unwieldy phrase. Ravensfire (talk) 19:25, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Redirects to subtopics are common. Also, please review Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not for what RfD requires – none of these large number of RfDs qualify. Invasive Spices (talk) 21:19, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Keep Redirects are cheap. While I wouldn't create these redirects myself, they are more useful now they exist and deletion them would not serve a benefit, in my opinion. On the rare chance a user does happen to enter these in, they would get to what they are looking for. --Ferien (talk) 01:02, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Delete Hawaiians not mentioned on the page. Depextual (talk) 20:33, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Delete - Since we don't have a full deletion policy for redirects, I will be referencing points 1 & 8 from R#DELETE (enWP). In my opinion, this redirect will make it unreasonably difficult for users to find the correct article, and it is also a very obscure synonym for this article. In addition, anyone searching this full term for some reason would be brought to search results, which would provide a much more helpful result than the redirect, and as Depextual notes, the sterilisation of Hawaiian women is a more specific topic than what is in the redirected article. While I do agree with Ferien that redirects are cheap, this editor's past history with redirects on other projects brings me to the belief that we should make our position clear here. Griff (talk) 15:38, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 17:36, 28 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Coercive sterilization of Hawaiian women

change
Coercive sterilization of Hawaiian women (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This redirect seems to be more of a test or the author's own vision - I haven't found such a term for Sterilization of Native American women anywhere on the Internet, because it's basically adding an adjective to the main title. This redirect is pointless and false. BZPN (talk) 17:35, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change
  •   Delete Nothing about this in the target, and this redirect seems to be a highly unlikely phrase to be used. If a decent section is added to the target on this, perhaps a redirect for just "Sterilization of Hawaiian women" would be warranted, which would also turn up as probably the top search result for this unwieldy phrase. Ravensfire (talk) 19:25, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Redirects to subtopicsare common. Also, please review Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not for what RfD requires – none of these large number of RfDs qualify. Invasive Spices (talk) 21:18, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Keep Redirects are cheap. While I wouldn't create these redirects myself, they are more useful now they exist and deletion them would not serve a benefit, in my opinion. On the rare chance a user does happen to enter these in, they would get to what they are looking for. --Ferien (talk) 01:02, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Delete Hawaiians not mentioned on the page. Depextual (talk) 20:33, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Delete - Since we don't have a full deletion policy for redirects, I will be referencing points 1 & 8 from R#DELETE (enWP). In my opinion, this redirect will make it unreasonably difficult for users to find the correct article, and it is also a very obscure synonym for this article. In addition, anyone searching this full term for some reason would be brought to search results, which would provide a much more helpful result than the redirect, and as Depextual notes, the sterilisation of Hawaiian women is a more specific topic than what is in the redirected article. While I do agree with Ferien that redirects are cheap, this editor's past history with redirects on other projects brings me to the belief that we should make our position clear here. Griff (talk) 15:38, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 17:35, 28 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Mass sterilization of Hawaiian women

change
Mass sterilization of Hawaiian women (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This redirect seems to be more of a test or the author's own vision - I haven't found such a term for Sterilization of Native American women anywhere on the Internet, because it's basically adding an adjective to the main title. This redirect is pointless and false. BZPN (talk) 17:35, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change
  •   Delete Concur, this seems like an unlikely phrase to be used to search. The article has no mention of Hawaiian women nor does the same article on enwiki. Even if there was good information in the target, a simpler redirect is all that's needed. Ravensfire (talk) 18:37, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Redirects to subtopics are common. Also, please review Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not for what RfD requires – none of these large number of RfDs qualify. Invasive Spices (talk) 21:18, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Keep Redirects are cheap. While I wouldn't create these redirects myself, they are more useful now they exist and deletion them would not serve a benefit, in my opinion. On the rare chance a user does happen to enter these in, they would get to what they are looking for. --Ferien (talk) 01:02, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Delete Hawaiians not mentioned on the page. Depextual (talk) 20:34, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Delete - Since we don't have a full deletion policy for redirects, I will be referencing points 1 & 8 from R#DELETE (enWP). In my opinion, this redirect will make it unreasonably difficult for users to find the correct article, and it is also a very obscure synonym for this article. In addition, anyone searching this full term for some reason would be brought to search results, which would provide a much more helpful result than the redirect, and as Depextual notes, the sterilisation of Hawaiian women is a more specific topic than what is in the redirected article. While I do agree with Ferien that redirects are cheap, this editor's past history with redirects on other projects brings me to the belief that we should make our position clear here. Griff (talk) 15:38, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 17:35, 28 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Motivations for coercive sterilization of Native American women

change
Motivations for coercive sterilization of Native American women (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This redirect seems to be more of a test or the author's own vision - I haven't found such a term for Sterilization of Native American women anywhere on the Internet, because it's basically adding an adjective to the main title. This redirect is pointless. BZPN (talk) 17:24, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change
Anyone can visit my en: Talk: to see the real reason, so why introduce cross-wiki rancor like that? Invasive Spices (talk) 20:38, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think we'll agree to disagree on the process, but the comment about why you were blocked on en is relevant when I see the same issues here. This redirect is not something that I think belongs here. This would never be a section heading in an article here, the language is not simple. I would not expect a reader here to be using such terms for searching (and honestly I wouldn't expect it on enwiki either). Simple is good, complex is not. This is complex phrasing and thus should be deleted. Ravensfire (talk) 20:46, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Keep Redirects are cheap. While I wouldn't create these redirects myself, they are more useful now they exist and deletion them would not serve a benefit, in my opinion. On the rare chance a user does happen to enter these in, they would get to what they are looking for. --Ferien (talk) 01:02, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Template:R to section exists, unsurprisingly due to Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:R section extremely heavy usage. Invasive Spices (talk) 21:36, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Delete - Since we don't have a full deletion policy for redirects, I will be referencing points 1 & 8 from R#DELETE (enWP). In my opinion, this redirect will make it unreasonably difficult for users to find the correct article, and it is also a very obscure synonym for this article. In addition, anyone searching this full term for some reason would be brought to search results, which would provide a much more helpful result than the redirect. While I do agree with Ferien that redirects are cheap, this editor's past history with redirects on other projects brings me to the belief that we should make our position clear here. Griff (talk) 15:37, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 17:24, 28 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Mass sterilization of Native American women

change
Mass sterilization of Native American women (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This redirect seems to be more of a test or the author's own vision - I haven't found such a term for Sterilization of Native American women anywhere on the Internet, because it's basically adding an adjective to the main title. This redirect is pointless. BZPN (talk) 17:24, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change
  •   Delete Concur, this seems like an unlikely phrase to be used to search. Someone using this term to search would end up with the target as the first search result anyway. Ravensfire (talk) 18:39, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Please review Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not for what RfD requires – none of these large number of RfDs qualify. Invasive Spices (talk) 21:16, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Keep Redirects are cheap. While I wouldn't create these redirects myself, they are more useful now they exist and deletion them would not serve a benefit, in my opinion. On the rare chance a user does happen to enter these in, they would get to what they are looking for. --Ferien (talk) 01:02, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Delete - Since we don't have a full deletion policy for redirects, I will be referencing points 1 & 8 from R#DELETE (enWP). In my opinion, this redirect will make it unreasonably difficult for users to find the correct article, and it is also a very obscure synonym for this article. In addition, anyone searching this full term for some reason would be brought to search results, which would provide a much more helpful result than the redirect. While I do agree with Ferien that redirects are cheap, this editor's past history with redirects on other projects brings me to the belief that we should make our position clear here. Griff (talk) 15:37, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 17:24, 28 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Abusive sterilization of Native American women

change
Abusive sterilization of Native American women (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This redirect seems to be more of a test or the author's own vision - I haven't found such a term for Sterilization of Native American women anywhere on the Internet, because it's basically adding an adjective to the main title. This redirect is pointless. BZPN (talk) 17:24, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change
  •   Delete Concur, this seems like an unlikely phrase to be used to search. Someone using this term to search would end up with the target as the first search result anyway. Ravensfire (talk) 18:40, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Please review Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not for what RfD requires – none of these large number of RfDs qualify. Invasive Spices (talk) 21:16, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Keep Redirects are cheap. While I wouldn't create these redirects myself, they are more useful now they exist and deletion them would not serve a benefit, in my opinion. On the rare chance a user does happen to enter these in, they would get to what they are looking for. --Ferien (talk) 01:02, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Delete - Since we don't have a full deletion policy for redirects, I will be referencing points 1 & 8 from R#DELETE (enWP). In my opinion, this redirect will make it unreasonably difficult for users to find the correct article, and it is also a very obscure synonym for this article. While I do agree with Ferien that redirects are cheap, this editor's past history with redirects on other projects brings to the belief that we should make our position clear here. Griff (talk) 17:02, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 17:24, 28 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Coercive sterilization of Native American women

change
Coercive sterilization of Native American women (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This redirect seems to be more of a test or the author's own vision - I haven't found such a term for Sterilization of Native American women anywhere on the Internet, because it's basically adding an adjective to the main title. This redirect is pointless. BZPN (talk) 17:23, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change
  • Referencing EN wiki's policy is a long-standing precedent. And it is not OUTING - the edit history is a matter of public record on the wikis. The point about your past behavior on EN (and which led to you being blocked on EN) is a completely valid point to make. And I don't see how Griffinofwales is any close to disclosing oversightable information. What are you trying to insinuate here? Chenzw  Talk  03:09, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Delete - per Griffinofwales, and I just want to note that it is not correct to use WP:NOT to advance the claim that this RfD is baseless. If we do that, that makes every redirect immune from the RfD process (and thus we would reference EN's policy and the reasonableness test here, as above). Chenzw  Talk  08:50, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • You completely missed my point, especially the second half of my statement. I am afraid we will not have a productive conversation here if that point is not acknowledged. Chenzw  Talk  03:09, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Comment: While it may appear as though these are all very similar cases, can the closing admin please ensure each RfD on these redirects is reviewed individually, as a small handful lean keep more than delete in consensus. Thank you! --Ferien (talk) 14:03, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 17:23, 28 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Royal swiss auto service

change
Royal swiss auto service (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Company promotion, advertising, non-notable. BZPN (talk) 15:43, 21 December 2024 (UTC) Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.[reply]

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 15:43, 28 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Battle of Qahrawa

change
Battle of Qahrawa (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BigKrow has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability? BigKrow (talk) 12:46, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change
  • Merge any useful content into Republic of Mahabad. This battle was actually a very important battle in the establishment of the republic, and if I could find some reliable sources (even in a different language) I could even be persuaded to keep the article. However, since I can't find any that provide in-depth coverage on the battle, merging is the best solution. Griff (talk) 14:43, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 12:46, 28 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Battle of Shekar Yazi

change
Battle of Shekar Yazi (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BigKrow has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability? BigKrow (talk) 12:46, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change
  •   Delete - While I did find some mention of this battle in sources, it is certainly not enough for inclusion (referencing DEPTH), as this battle has received very little coverage in literature. Griff (talk) 02:26, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 12:46, 28 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Umar Jaum

change
Umar Jaum (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

ZI Jony has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't meet the WP:N. Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 08:18, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 08:18, 28 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


AP Companies Global Health Management

change
AP Companies Global Health Management (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-notable company, sourced only to promotional sources. Depextual (talk) 07:43, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 07:43, 28 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Archaeological sites destroyed during the Gaza genocide

change
Archaeological sites destroyed during the Gaza genocide (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BigKrow has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not found on Wikipedia BigKrow (talk) 18:50, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 18:50, 27 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Kadama

change
Kadama (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BigKrow has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No page on Wikipedia BigKrow (talk) 18:48, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change
  • Keep Subject is notable because of news coverage. Not having a Wikipedia page is not a valid deletion reason. You need to provide a valid reason. Maybe no one bothered to make them a page. I do see that the [CEO has a Wikipedia page]. Here are some of the good citations and why it qualifies:
There are more news references available, if you think these are not enough. Darrenchant (talk) 17:58, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Delete - I agree with Darren that not having an enWP article is not a reason to delete the article, however not meeting the criteria contained within the ORG notability guideline is. After review of the provided sources (in Darren's comment and on the article), the sources are either not independent, do not provide SIGCOV of the app (as they focus on the founders), or are not reliable sources. Griff (talk) 02:20, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 18:48, 27 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Battle of Suleymaniyah (1678)

change
Battle of Suleymaniyah (1678) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BigKrow has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Possible hoax BigKrow (talk) 18:36, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change
  •   Delete - I agree with the nominator here, if this battle did occur, the facts as described in the article are certainly false. Either way, I have not found any information about this battle, and without other RS, I believe deletion is the only option. Griff (talk) 02:12, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 18:36, 27 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Qajar-Wahhabi War

change
Qajar-Wahhabi War (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BigKrow has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Hoax? BigKrow (talk) 18:35, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 18:35, 27 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Qajar-Wahhabi War (1808-1811)

change
Qajar-Wahhabi War (1808-1811) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BigKrow has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Hoax? BigKrow (talk) 18:34, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 18:34, 27 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Maku Rebellion

change
Maku Rebellion (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Originally nominated as 'A6-hoax', I find an artilce about en:Ibrahim Heski. That article mentions that Heski (birth date unknown/unspecifired), died in 1931; the enwp article has a section 'Maku rebellion'. So, dear community. What we have here is not a hoax, but it may only be part of the truth. As is, it probably results in a delete. Other option is to add the missing things, to make this a keepable, sourced article? Eptalon (talk) 15:30, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change
  •   Delete - Eptalon, thanks for bringing this to RFD. However I attempted to research the subject of this article and was unable to find any information, which makes me believe that this rebellion is not be notable enough for its own article at this time. Griff (talk) 02:08, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 15:30, 27 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Rawandiz Revolt

change
Rawandiz Revolt (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BigKrow has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No page on English Wikipedia BigKrow (talk) 13:42, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change
I disagree. BigKrow (talk) 18:22, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 13:42, 27 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Hari Singh Bhangi

change
Hari Singh Bhangi (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BigKrow has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No English Wikipedia page. BigKrow (talk) 13:39, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change
i also know it's simple English Wikipedia that's why i am using basic English Jisshu (talk) 13:47, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
if you want to nominate article for deletion please give a valid reason Jisshu (talk) 13:50, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
and Hari Singh Bhangi have page in english Wikipedia with name of Hari Singh Dhillon he is ruler of Bhangi Misl that's why he also refer as Hari Singh Bhangi and his son jhanda Singh Bhangi before nominating article please read reference Jisshu (talk) 13:52, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 13:39, 27 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Simka Entertainment

change
Simka Entertainment (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BigKrow has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Possible error? BigKrow (talk) 13:38, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

Possible error for Wikipedia page? BigKrow (talk) 13:38, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •   Delete - I'm not sure what the nominator's reason was for deleting but after review, I found that nearly all of the sources referenced in the article did not include a reference to this company, nor did I find SIGCOV for this company anywhere else. Griff (talk) 02:05, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 13:38, 27 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Zilan Operation

change
Zilan Operation (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BigKrow has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Zilan massacre exists BigKrow (talk) 13:08, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

Zilan massacre on English Wikipedia exists. BigKrow (talk) 13:09, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •   Delete - I can't find any sources or SIGCOV for the subject of this article. The Zilan Massacre occurred several years after this "operation". @BigKrow - please, review BEFORE before nominating articles for deletion. This RFD could be speedy declined for that reason, and it takes RFD reviewers much longer to complete their review if valid reasons are not selected. -Griff (talk) 02:00, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 13:08, 27 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Massacre of Salmas (1930)

change
Massacre of Salmas (1930) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BigKrow has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No Wikipedia page BigKrow (talk) 13:06, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change
Why notability... BigKrow (talk) 19:33, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Delete - Although I agree with FusionSub that the nominator's reason for deletion was not appropriate, I have reviewed the article and after additional research, have not found any sources that refer to this event. I am also not clear as to when this event is supposed to have occurred, is it 1918 (as in the infobox) or 1930 (as in the article title)? -Griff (talk) 01:54, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 13:06, 27 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Tasneem Khalil

change
Tasneem Khalil (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BigKrow has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Copied from English Wikipedia BigKrow (talk) 12:51, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

Seems copied mostly from English Wikipedia BigKrow (talk) 12:52, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 12:51, 27 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Paulo Leao

change
Paulo Leao (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BigKrow has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable BigKrow (talk) 02:58, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change
  • no Wikipedia page BigKrow (talk) 02:59, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    •   Keep - As I said previously 'Paulo Leão' is as important or more important than countless other non-superstar artists present on Wikipedia. I could mention them, but I believe that would be unethical. So, by comparison, it is incoherent to exclude this page and keep those of other, much less important artists. Furthermore, yes, 'Paulo Leão' made a 'unique, prolific and innovative contribution' in the artistic field: in 1985 he created the 'Teatro dos Sentidos' - a method by which the public can watch a show with all their senses (and not just with vision and hearing). The artist is also included in the most important Brazilian cultural encyclopedia - the Enciclopedia Itaú Cultural - mentioned in one of the citations. And in these internet times, it's also good to remember that not all important artists (present and past) have a large fan base as that doesn't measure anything. This is just a recent invention of History. --Katzin-Kohen (talk) 06:49, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • @BigKrow   Keep Hello friends! Regarding the page deletion request, I would like to say that the artist Paulo Leão may not be as famous as a super star but he is as important as many other non-famous artists that are heard on Wikipedia. And he is important in Brazil. He has won so many awards in his country and around the world. He worked at TV Globo and in feature films. He produced and directed other internationally award-winning films. So I will continue to make updates to increase his page with more content in the hope that the page remains active. Thank you very much. Thank you very much.--Katzin-Kohen (talk) 03:19, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Delete - I have reviewed the article and the criteria contained in the appropriate notability guideline for this article and made the following findings:
  • Of the roles Paulo has held, none of them have been important roles in notable films
  • The article does not show that Paulo has a large fan base
  • The article does not indicate that Paulo has made unique, prolific or innovative contributions in his field
Although this article is well-written and detailed, I believe that the subject of the article does not meet our inclusion criteria at this time. -Griff (talk) 01:44, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 02:58, 27 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Farabi Shafiur Rahman

change
Farabi Shafiur Rahman (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BigKrow has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No English Wikipedia page, non notable? BigKrow (talk) 02:55, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change
  • Seems suspicious. BigKrow (talk) 02:56, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Notable as WP:CRIME says that, A person who is known only in connection with a criminal event or trial should not normally be the subject of a separate Wikipedia article if there is an existing article that could incorporate the available encyclopedic material relating to that person.
Where there is such an existing article, it may be appropriate to create a sub-article, but only if this is necessitated by considerations of article size.
Where there are no appropriate existing articles, the criminal or victim in question should be the subject of a Wikipedia article only if one of the following applies:
For victims, and those wrongly accused or wrongly convicted of a crime (or crimes),
For perpetrators,
The victim of the crime is a renowned national or international figure, including, but not limited to, politicians or celebrities; or
The motivation for the crime or the execution of the crime is unusual—or has otherwise been considered noteworthy—such that it is a well-documented historic event. Generally, historic significance is indicated by sustained coverage of the event in reliable secondary sources which persists beyond contemporaneous news coverage and devotes significant attention to the individual's role.
Note: A living person accused of a crime is presumed not guilty unless and until the contrary is decided by a court of law. Editors must give serious consideration to not creating an article on an alleged perpetrator when no conviction is yet secured. 103.230.106.16 (talk) 03:29, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 02:55, 27 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Recently closed deletion discussions

change
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete. I deleted this one, for now; note however, there's a Wikidata item Q67912161, which lists that there are arrticles in Turkish, Azerbajani and Arabic Wikipedias. So, as always, I am not opposed, if this gets re-created with proper sourcing--Eptalon (talk) 10:15, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Kerh (1516)

change
Battle of Kerh (1516) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BigKrow has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Hoax? No English Wikipedia page? Thanks. BigKrow (talk) 02:53, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 02:53, 27 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 06:41, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2024 Kwango province disease outbreak

change
2024 Kwango province disease outbreak (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The content is vague and practically useless. On English Wikipedia this redirects to a page about a malaria outbreak in Kwango province. But the reference here is related to COVID-19. Depextual (talk) 22:19, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 22:19, 26 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 06:40, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ToFro Exchange

change
ToFro Exchange (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No significant coverage in reliable sources. I also can't find evidence that they have offices in over 130 countries. Depextual (talk) 20:56, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.


Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 20:56, 26 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 06:39, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rashaad Joseph

change
Rashaad Joseph (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable rapper Depextual (talk) 20:42, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 20:42, 26 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 06:37, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Eric Horwitz

change
Eric Horwitz (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Page is written like a CV of the subject Please other Check Ksy 06:40, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 06:40, 26 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 06:36, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jimmy-D

change
Jimmy-D (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ternera has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Youtube URLs are the only sources. Seems to fail GNG. Ternera (talk) 20:19, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 20:19, 25 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 06:35, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bananaphobia

change
Bananaphobia (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Complex, written by LLM, but most importantly, it's a hoax. Nothing like "bananophobia" has ever been scientifically or medically described (not counting the pseudo-medical inventions of newspapers and portals, which of course cannot be the basis for describing the disease). It's more of an AI creation. BZPN (talk) 19:44, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change
  • There are numerous links to bananaphobia, and many cases are reported and widely available to read online. Whilst I agree this is not a common phobia, simply stating this is a hoax and AI created diminishes the actual issues that are felt by suffers. A simple online search will a show people who auffer from this. I suggest you watch the ITV news reader Charlene White talk about this on Loose Women. It is not for those who do not suffer from this to decide if it exists or not, that decision rests solely with those who do suffer from it. Those who do suffer describe their feelings in detail and these wholly align with the feeling of other phobia sufferers. I am not aware of any articles referencing pseudo-medical inventions in relation to this. 46.183.109.221 (talk) 20:05, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Just stop lying. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and the diseases described here must be medically and scientifically confirmed. We do not describe Internet inventions as real diseases, and interviews on pseudomedical portals or joke reports in newspapers have no significance here. BZPN (talk) 20:14, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
P.S. there is no entry with this title in any other wiki and it is not mentioned in any of the medical/scientific articles, and enwiki in two biographies only mentions this word as an invention of people. BZPN (talk) 20:21, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
A phobia is not a disease, it is classes as an anxiety disorder. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phobia
A phobia is by definition an irrational fear, how is this less legitimate than coulrophobia the fear of clowns.
It is not for you to decide what does or does not cause a person anxiety. Neither you nor I can deny anyone their irrational fear, whether is it of a clowns, confined spaces or bananas. You do not get to decide. Medical or scientific confirmation of a phobia can only be acheived by exposure to the item and observing the reaction. If exposure to bananas illicits the same response in the sufferer as an arachnophobe would have reacting to a spider then the criteria for a phobia is met. As for this word being an invention of people, that is exactly how all words are formed. This is the basis of how all language evolves. M1tpx (talk) 09:06, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And it's also not up to you to decide whether this phobia is real. Before you even want to start any discussion here, I recommend that you read the policies and guidelines, especially WP:VER and WP:NOT. I will repeat for the last time - an encyclopedia is not the place to describe scientifically unconfirmed diseases invented by people without medical basis. Phobias/other mental disorders must be confirmed by scientific/medical sources and studies. BZPN (talk) 09:13, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
P.S. according to the enwiki article (en:Phobia), which you mentioned, a phobia must be medically classified, most often under the ICD-11 or DSM-5 classification. The banana-pseudophobia discussed here has never been included in any medical classification. BZPN (talk) 09:18, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Delete - While there are sources describing people with this "phobia", I do not believe it meets the significant coverage requirement for an article until articles of a medical nature are written describing this phobia. Many people are scared of many things, but a fear alone does not warrant its own article. Griff (talk) 01:08, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 19:44, 25 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 06:34, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Llyrio

change
Llyrio (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ravensfire has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Copied from declined draft on enwiki - after removing the significant exaggerations, there's not enough to show how this person meets WP:NACTOR - background roles, minor particpation, but nothing significant. Ravensfire (talk) 17:48, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 17:48, 25 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 06:31, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hoop Dogz

change
Hoop Dogz (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ravensfire has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Copied from a declined draft on enwiki - sources are mainly primary, with one secondary source that lacks significant coverage of the videos. Ravensfire (talk) 17:19, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 17:19, 25 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 06:30, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Power of Zhu

change
The Power of Zhu (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ravensfire has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unreleased film, sources are mainly primary or in-universe. A trailer was released, but apparently this didn't see (wide) distribution. There's one decent source that's about a lawsuit tied to this film (among others), but there's no significant coverage of the film. Article is a direct copy of a declined draft on enwiki. Ravensfire (talk) 17:14, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 17:14, 25 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 06:29, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Misha Williams

change
Misha Williams (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ravensfire has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Sources are primary, nothing to show that WP:NMUSIC or WP:GNG. Merely be associated with notable companies or acts is not enough. Ravensfire (talk) 15:39, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 15:39, 25 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 06:29, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2022–23 Al-Nassr FC season

change
2022–23 Al-Nassr FC season (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

FusionSub has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: AI article, unencyclopedic. A WP:TNT candidate in my opinion. - FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 14:15, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 14:15, 24 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 06:28, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DSJ Exchange

change
DSJ Exchange (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No Notability and Self Publish Article Other please check If I am not wrong. Ksy 09:25, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 09:25, 24 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Keep. Redirecting to Baroque because there are incoming links. --Auntof6 (talk) 06:26, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Baroque house

change
Baroque house (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: We already have a baroque article, so this short and worthless summary is unnecessary. It does not contain any specific information and is not even related to the title itself (Baroque house). BZPN (talk) 22:30, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change
  • Baroque is the name for a time period. In this context we can talk about baroque architecture, baroque music, baroque painting, baroque furniture, baroque sculpture etc. It is clear thatunless we count art historians among us we are not going to get in-depth articles on all of them. It was me who created this page, in 2007. It is clear that what we now call 'baroque' is mostly about churches, but there are some houses in that stlye too. Examples are the Pavionn de l'horloge (part of the Louvre today), Greenwich hospital, or (parts of) many palaces. Just because a page is short doesn't mean it doesn't have a reason for existing. Like wqith Gothic Architecture, the few buildings that aren't Churches/Cathedrals, and that are built in Gothic style, this likely is of similar interest. That there's so little change in the long years its existence just tells me that the article isn't viewed often, or is not of particular interee in extenfing it. Nevertheless I'd favor keeping it... --Eptalon (talk) 14:27, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    The actual content doesn't say anything about baroque houses at all - probably the only solution to keep this article would be to change the content to redirect to baroque. BZPN (talk) 22:38, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge as an Architecture section of the Baroque article until there is enough content for an article on its own. Griff (talk) 01:22, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 22:30, 20 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.


change
Retrieved from "https://simple.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_deletion&oldid=9971429"