Wikipedia:Requests for deletion

If you think a page should be deleted, read the deletion policy to make sure.
Then follow these instructions on how to request a page for deletion. To find more information on what discussed deletions and quick deletions are:
PLEASE READ THIS

Before nominating: checks and alternatives Edit

Prior to nominating article(s) for deletion, please be sure to:

A. Read and understand these policies and guidelines
  1. The Wikipedia deletion policy, which explains valid grounds for deletion.
  2. The main four guidelines and policies that inform deletion discussions: notability (WP:N), verifiability (WP:V), reliable sources (WP:RS), and what Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)
  3. Subject-specific notability guidelines, which can be found at Category:Wikipedia notability guidelines
B. Carry out these checks
  1. Confirm that the article does not meet the criteria for quick deletion.
  2. If there are verifiability, notability or other sourcing concerns, take reasonable steps to search for reliable sources. (See step D.)
  3. Review the article's history to check for potential vandalism or poor editing.
  4. Read the article's talk page for previous nominations and/or that your objections haven't already been dealt with.
  5. Check "What links here" in the article's sidebar, to see how the page is used and referenced within Wikipedia.
  6. Check if there are interlanguage links, also in the sidebar, which may lead to more developed and better sourced articles. Likewise, search for native-language sources if the subject has a name in a non-Latin alphabet (such as Japanese or Greek), which is often in the lede.
C. Consider whether the article could be improved rather than deleted
  1. If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate for RfD.
  2. If the article was recently created, please consider allowing the contributors more time to develop the article.
  3. If an article has issues try first raising your concerns on the article's talk page, with the main contributors, and/or adding a cleanup tag, such as {{notability}}, {{hoax}}, {{original research}}, or {{advert}}; this ensures readers are aware of the problem and may act to fix it.
  4. If the topic is not important enough to merit an article on its own, consider merging or redirecting to an existing article. This should be done particularly if the topic name is a likely search term.
D. Search for additional sources, if the main concern is notability
  1. The minimum search expected is a normal Google search, a Google Books search, a Google News search, and a Google News archive search; Google Scholar is suggested for academic subjects.
  2. If you find a lack of sources, you've completed basic due diligence before nominating. However, if a quick search does find sources, this does not always mean an RfD on a sourcing basis is unwarranted. If you spend more time examining the sources, and determine that they are insufficient, e.g., because they only contain passing mention of the topic, then an RfD nomination may still be appropriate.
  3. If you find that adequate sources do appear to exist, the fact that they are not yet present in the article is not a proper basis for a nomination. Instead, you should consider citing the sources, or at minimum apply an appropriate template to the page that flags the sourcing concern. Common templates include {{unreferenced}}, {{refimprove}}, {{third-party}}, {{primary sources}} and {{one source}}.

Discussed deletionEdit

Put the deletion tag on the article.
  1. Click "Change source" at the top of the page to be deleted.
  2. In the edit box, add this tag: {{rfd|REASON}}. Put it at the top of the page, above the rest of the text. Then, replace the text "REASON" with a short reason why the page should be deleted. Do not be too specific here. You can add more details on the discussion page (see below).
    • It is a good idea to write a change summary to let others know what you are doing. You can say "nominating for deletion", "requesting deletion", or something like that.
  3. Click "Save changes" at the bottom to save the page with the deletion tag at the top.
    • You can also check the "Watch this page" check box to add the page to your watchlist. This lets you know if the page for deletion has been changed. If the deletion tag is removed any time before the discussion is closed, it should be put back.
Create a discussion page.
  1. If the deletion tag has been added to the page, a box should appear at the top of the article with a link saying "Click here to create a discussion page!" Click that link.
  2. You should be taken to a page starting with "Creating Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/..." along with the current year and the name of the article to be deleted. In the edit box, the following tag should have already been added: {{RfD/Preload/Template}} . Replace the text PLACE REASON HERE with a more detailed reason why the page should be deleted.
    • It is helpful to include links to the various policy pages about Wikipedia (that begin with Wikipedia:). Here are some examples of this: "This article is [[Wikipedia:COMPLEX|not easy to understand]]" or "Not a [[Wikipedia:notable|notable]] topic''. This will make others more aware of why the page is not acceptable under Wikipedia's policies.
  3. Click "Save changes" to save the new discussion page when you are done.
    • A change summary you can write for this page is "creating discussion page", "starting deletion discussion", or something like that.
    • As with the page for deletion, you can check the "Watch the page" box. This will let you know if someone else has replied to your discussion.
List it here
  1. Copy the title of the discussion page to the clipboard. You can do this by dragging the mouse over the text from "Wikipedia" to the end of the page title to highlight it, then right-clicking and selecting "Copy".
  2. Go to the list of deletion requests, and click "change source" beside the words "Current deletion request discussions".
  3. At the top of the list of discussions, paste the title from the clipboard (right-click and select "Paste"). Add a pair of curly brackets before and after the title to make a template that will copy the content of the discussion page onto the main deletion page, like this:
    {{Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2020/(name of page to be deleted)}}
  4. Finally, click "Save changes" to add the discussion to the list. If the page saves successfully, you should see your deletion discussion at the top of the list. And that's it!

Quick deletionEdit

If you think a page has nonsense content, add {{non}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page does not say why the subject is important, add {{notable}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page should be deleted per other quick deletion rules, add {{QD|reason}} to the top of the page.

Notifying the userEdit

Generally, you should try to be civil and tell the user that created the page to join the discussion talking about the page. This can be done by adding {{subst:RFDNote|page to be deleted}} ~~~~ to the bottom of their talkpage.

DiscussionsEdit

  • The discussion is not a vote. Please make suggestions on what action to take, and support your suggestion with reasons.
  • Please look at the article before you make a suggestion. Do not make an opinion using only the information given by the nominator. Looking at the history of the article may help to understand the situation.
  • Please read other comments and suggestions. They may have helpful information.
  • Start your comments or suggestions on a new line. Start with * and sign after your comment by adding ~~~~ to the end. If you are responding to another editor, put your comment directly below theirs and make sure your comment is indented (using more than one *).
  • New users can make suggestions, but their ideas may not be considered, especially if the suggestion seems to be made in bad faith. The opinion of users who had an account before the start of the request may be given more weight or importance.
  • Suggestions by users using "sock puppets" (more than one account belonging to the same person) and IP addresses will not be counted.
  • Please make only one suggestion. If you change your mind, change your first idea instead of adding a new one. The best way to do this is to put <s> before your old idea and </s> after it. For example, if you wanted to delete an article but now think it should be kept, you could put: "Delete Quick keep".
  • If you would like an article to be kept, you can improve the article and try to fix the problems given in the request for deletion. If the reasons given in the nomination are fixed by changing, the nomination can be withdrawn by the nominator, and the deletion discussion will be closed by an administrator.
  • Try to avoid confusing suggestions, such as delete and merge.

Remember: You do not have to make a suggestion for every nomination. You should think about not making a suggestion if:

  1. A nomination involves a topic that you do not know much about.
  2. Everyone has made the same suggestion and you agree with that suggestion.
  • All times are in UTC.

Current deletion request discussionsEdit

Andrea KossanyiovaEdit

Andrea Kossanyiova (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Djsasso has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: She doesn't meet WP:SPORTBASIC and I can't find any sources that would make me think she passes WP:GNG. If she eventually plays in the Olympics/World Championships or otherwise achieves notability it can be recreated. Djsasso (talk) 13:00, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

This request is due to close on 13:00, 1 July 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Dale DanksEdit

Dale Danks (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fixing26 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Extremely complex article, seemingly copied from the en.wikipedia article. Fixing26 (talk) 00:09, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  Delete. Actually, it's a short page, and not complex. But it does not seem to establish notability. I suppose it's implied, but I think it has to be argued openly to count. Looking at En version, I don't see any mention of what he did that would count. I don't think the mayor of a provincial city in the UK would count just by fiat. Macdonald-ross (talk) 15:47, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

  •   Comment - This RfD was made for a now-deleted version of the Dale Danks page, which was remade simpler by someone else after being QDEd. I've left a message on Eptalon's page asking for this RfD to be deleted or similar. Fixing26 (talk) 15:51, 22 June 2021 (UTC)


This request is due to close on 00:09, 18 June 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

New end date: June 28: Request wasn't listed on the RfD page.--Eptalon (talk) 20:54, 21 June 2021 (UTC)


Alaa Al-SaddiqEdit

Alaa Al-Saddiq (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Article about an activist, who was based in the UK, and who died in a car crash a few days ago. This woman was the head of a group fighting for greater freedoms in the United Arab Emirates, where her father seems to have been held. BBC and Aljazeera reports are linked in the article. Taking this to RfD to be looked at by a larger audience; originally it was flagged as A4/cross-wiki article creation. What is a bit surprising though: there's just a Turkish language interwiki; I would have expected an Arabic language article as well? Eptalon (talk) 20:04, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  • Keep First, the Arabic page was deleted without looking at the sources and without discussion! Eptalon, also she is a prominent Emirati activist. There are many news about her on Al Jazeera, Reuters, BBC and Arab sources as well. For the person who asked for deletion, I think he does not know anything. Aliaboomar (talk)
Very unlikely for a sysop to delete an article without looking at the sources. ~Styyx Talk? ^-^ 06:43, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete when I nominated it for A4, the Arabic page did exist, but it has been speedied. I think I know a lot more than you do, @Aliaboomar:. ~Styyx Talk? ^-^ 23:24, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Keep she is a prominent Emirati activist https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/06/20/campaigners-call-probe-intoat-risk-uae-dissidents-death-rule/ also i linked the page to English Page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alaa Al Zahrani (talkcontribs)

Atleast don't make the sockpuppeting obvious..... ~Styyx Talk? ^-^ 06:40, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
  •   Delete Subject seems to be only notable/well reported on for one event, breaking WP:BLP1E. Only other news sources that mention her seem to be around the arrest of another Saudi activist, and she seems to be a minor topic in the article. Fixing26 (talk) 08:38, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 20:04, 27 June 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


XenogenderEdit

Xenogender (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fixing26 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't seem to be notable by WP:GNG. I can't find coverage of it in reliable sources, and sources cited in the article are mostly papers and wikis, the latter not usually being reliable. Fixing26 (talk) 17:42, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  • Its a nice and fluffy gender-related term. But I don't see it used a lot in the more mainstream discussions. So finding a useful definition, that is also verifiable is probably difficult. In short:delete--Eptalon (talk) 18:08, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
  •   Delete. Yes, I agree. It's an invented term not used much. So not notable. Macdonald-ross (talk) 09:01, 21 June 2021 (UTC)


This request is due to close on 17:42, 27 June 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Disappearance of Amaan BalgudEdit

Disappearance of Amaan Balgud (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Darkfrog24 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I couldn't find any sources for "Amaan Balgud" in a very short search. Darkfrog24 (talk) 15:45, 20 June 2021 (UTC) Darkfrog24 (talk) 15:45, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  • Article gives no sources, searching for likely terms on google also doesn't give many hints. So: delete--Eptalon (talk) 18:06, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

  Delete. Incoherent and no sources. Macdonald-ross (talk) 15:53, 22 June 2021 (UTC)


This request is due to close on 15:45, 27 June 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


John DowieEdit

John Dowie (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Originally an EnWP copy-pase, with a qd tag. The problem is: the EnWP article itslef is labeled as needing more sources for verification. A quick search on google turns up a few entries, but none match the one we have. This brings me to the point: it may well be that this person has done stand-up comedy, and written a few books, but as I can't find much, I doubt he is in fact notable. Note: the EnWP article cannot be used, as it is outdated as well. Delete? Eptalon (talk) 14:05, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  •   Delete. Less than two lines which do not establish his notability. Not what one would call "well known".Macdonald-ross (talk) 07:25, 24 June 2021 (UTC)


This request is due to close on 14:05, 26 June 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Damon AtabayEdit

Damon Atabay (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Gbawden has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable, self promotion Gbawden (talk) 11:07, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  Delete. This is a website social media promotion. Macdonald-ross (talk) 13:55, 21 June 2021 (UTC)


This request is due to close on 11:07, 26 June 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Slasher Remakes UniverseEdit

Slasher Remakes Universe (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Darkfrog24 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: It's just a list, so WP:NOT. It might make a good category instead (which en.wiki has). Darkfrog24 (talk) 00:51, 19 June 2021 (UTC) Darkfrog24 (talk) 00:51, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

This request is due to close on 00:51, 26 June 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Badi Door Se Aaye HainEdit

Badi Door Se Aaye Hain (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Indian sitcom, airing from 2009, to 2016 or so; there are over 600 episodes, of about 20 minutes each. What we likely have is an enwp copy-paste, which was flagged as "A3-complex article from another wp", about 10 minutes after it was created. So basic questions: Is this notable, and worth simplifying? - Doing a regular RfD to give the original author a chance to simplify.. Eptalon (talk) 17:09, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  • Rfd is not for cleanup. On notability grounds it is most definitely notable so has to be a Keep. However, it is a complex copy paste. So I will be knocking it down to a small stub to eliminate that issue. -Djsasso (talk) 17:15, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
  •   Keep - a google search can find quite a few news reports on it, from sources such as The Times of India. Would've said delete if the article stayed in its previous state of using complex English, but in its current state it's just about fine to stay in my opinion. Fixing26 (talk) 20:28, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:09, 25 June 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


MultisexualityEdit

Multisexuality (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fixing26 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The article uses quite complex English and has some rather questionable and opinionated sources that I wouldn't call reliable. I don't think it's notable as a subject either? Fixing26 (talk) 16:21, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  • As to sexual orientation, either I am straight, then I am only interested in the other gender, or I am homosexual, then I am mostly interested in my own gender, or I am bisexual, then it's both of the cases. This article here has some complex language:"...the attraction towards at least more than one gender" - thats imprecise at best, and confusing. Note: I am not a gender activist, so I don't really see the difference to poli,omni-,multi-,etc sexuality. In short: delete--Eptalon (talk) 17:27, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
  • In terms of identity, as the creator of the article, I'm primarily trying to do awareness about the term. It may have controversial implications. I just simplified the best I can the article to keep it. Obviously, I formulated a generalized speech while transcripting the article with an amplex jargon. Multisexuality and monosexuality are quantifiers, while bisexual and homosexual/heterosexual are somewhat qualifiers. As a polysexual (more specifically torensexual) individual, I feel represented by multisexuality, while at in some edge I'm homosexual, in the other hand my attraction is towards multiple genders. And that's the meaning behind multisexual. I will ask my friends how can I improve the article to make it more simple the best we can. --Kautr (talk) 05:13, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
    The nomination is not due to it having controversial implications. We have plenty of such. The issue is notability. I understand you're trying to raise awareness of it, but I wouldn't say it's notable. Not every sexuality/gender/etc is notable enough for its own page, and needs coverage from reliable sources. At most, I'd say making it a redirect to bisexuality (as done on en.wp). Fixing26 (talk) 10:30, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
    I'd say it's notorious in MOGAI community and neologistic/microdemographic-centric movements (those who focus on microlabels/neolabels). It has sources. We could make it an expansion/extension in bisexuality or bring bi+ to simplewiki. Still, the item in Wikidata of it is used to describe all the bi+ terms without making it seem invalidificatory of pansexual people, for example, as bispec is problematized by some of them.--Kautr (talk) 16:54, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
    Once again, I understand you're trying to raise awareness of its difference to other sexualities, but it doesn't fit Simple Wikipedia's notability guidelines. The wikidata page on it, which was created by you, doesn't make it notable and seems to just be describing what's on the page here. It lacks coverage in reliable sources and seems to require 'expert' knowledge of bisexuality to be aware of it. Fixing26 (talk) 21:27, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
    I'm not going to speak on the subject of notability, as that is just cause of the global lack of literacy. But I'd like to add that bi.org, for example, doesn't use multisexuality's definitions for bisexuality's descriptions. For the general population, which really doesn't concern so much about these struggles, they are all the same. Multi- and bi- (or m-spec and bi-spec) overlap many times in inclusionist spaces (bisexuals of the blade), sometimes you see they have similitude with false equivalency, other times they are simply the same and other times dissimilar. Well, that's it, I discoursed a bit on this. I cited the definition from wiktionary so you could check that bisexuality at some point really encompassed multisexuality within it, but nowadays it can be the opposite and vice-verse. Then it can be its own thing. Some people come out as multisexuals for its unambiguous amplitude, you may say it's not meant to be a standalone term but it's a spectrum. Bisexuality can be a quantifier but its origins, as a sexual orientation, merge homo and hetero. Multisexuals are able to reclaim bisexual but some don't want. --8Y0 (she/ey; shey/shem) (user/tlk/ctrbs) 14:36, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

┌─────────────┘

  • I understand what multisexuality means, but I can't see how it's relevant to the RfD - especially in regards to the issue raised. In regards to putting information about it on the bisexuality page, I'm mostly suggesting that due to it's similarities to bisexuality (not to say they are the same). Fixing26 (talk) 15:04, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
  • Well, it redirects to bisexuality on En, and I suggest we do the same. Macdonald-ross (talk) 07:03, 22 June 2021 (UTC)


This request is due to close on 16:21, 25 June 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Lauren-Brooke EisenEdit

Lauren-Brooke Eisen (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Djsasso has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Can't find any references that talk in depth about her. Can only find mentions that she holds certain positions. Does not appear to meet WP:GNG. Djsasso (talk) 16:17, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  Delete. Delete on grounds of notability not established. Macdonald-ross (talk) 16:06, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

  •   Delete - can't find coverage of them online, doesn't seem to fit notability guidelines as stated in nom Fixing26 (talk) 11:23, 24 June 2021 (UTC)


This request is due to close on 16:17, 25 June 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Michael WeistEdit

Michael Weist (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Djsasso has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not seeing anything that would indicate that this fellow has any notability. Looks like it has had issues on en.wiki as being created by the subject in the past. Djsasso (talk) 15:28, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

This request is due to close on 15:28, 25 June 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Toshiki SumitaniEdit

Toshiki Sumitani (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Djsasso has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Can't find anything on this person that would indicate notability. Djsasso (talk) 15:24, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

This request is due to close on 15:24, 25 June 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


EasyEnglishEdit

EasyEnglish (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Article created in 2016, and flagged as perhaps not notable; lacks sources, on the talk page we get a listing of perhaps 1300 words. Page has less than 50 edits total. Page lacks references as to "EasyEnglish", which seems to be perhaps just there for yet another Bible translation. I propose we delete this, other opinions? Eptalon (talk) 19:34, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  •   Delete. Not a new idea but actually an old idea (vocabulary control), and lacks sources. I would say this is in effect an advert. Macdonald-ross (talk) 16:00, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 19:34, 24 June 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Redakai: Conquer the Kairu (TV series)Edit

Redakai: Conquer the Kairu (TV series) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Hockeycatcat has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No sources, not notable. Hockeycatcat (talk) 07:43, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  • Keep per "If there are verifiability, notability or other sourcing concerns, take reasonable steps to search for reliable sources." A quick search on Google News shows plenty of headline coverage in major outlets. --Gotanda (talk) 04:56, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
  •   Keep having no sources is not a reason to delete. This is a notable series. --IWI (talk) 14:27, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 07:43, 24 June 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Killing of Zohra ShahEdit

Killing of Zohra Shah (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Article about a child-abuse victim (sexual assault on children, victim vas 8 years old, and also subject to sexual violence). What we have is the 1:1 copy of EnWp, which was flagged as "complex article from another Wikipedia", 2 minutes or so after it was created; whoeber brought it over didn't have time ot sipmlify; for this reason, I cannot approve a quick deletion. Other problem: The article talks about a domestic slave. To my knowledge, slavery was abolished; child labor should be outlawed. Documents such as this PDF seem to tell a different story. So, the big question: supposing there's some truth in the article (seems to have English-llanguage refs), should we keep or delete the article? Eptalon (talk) 22:59, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  Keep I believe this to be valid. I believe we had this conversation on IRC earlier this week about categories for these types of things amongst others. So it may seem that slavery has been abolished, but in actuality it isn’t. Here in the US criminals in prison, prison camps, etc., are still considered slaves under the law as that section was never removed. It is currently being reviewed and may be amended to eliminate that which eliminates slavery in the US completely. I also came across this post from a popular and recognized organization. org here}/countries-that-still-have-slavery/ The Borgen Project. There are still 167 countries that have slaves with Pakistan being #3 on the list. The article is from 2017 but there are more recent articles out there. This can also fall under human rights abuse as well. PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? 06:25, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
  • As is,   Delete. Indeed, this is an awful event, reported here in a slovenly fashion. It's a copy of some very bad journalism about a significant event. It shocks me that events like this are so badly reported that we can't really tell where the truth lies. The problem having this in the wiki is that it says in effect, "if it's sensational enough, we'll print it, whatever". Personally, I'd never print anything on this kind of emotional hype. I would want a quote from the judge's summing-up at least. Macdonald-ross (talk) 16:42, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
  • Marc Dutroux is a Belgian criminal, who tortured at least 6 girls (aged 8-18, IIRC). Four died, two starved locked up while he was in prison. This is not about the person, or the crimes he committed: Despite these crimes, we do have a more-or-less-balanced article about him. Same case with Josef Fritzl (who locked up his daughter, and I think she has at least one child from him). Again, we managed to have a balanced article. Even if the current case got a lot of media attention in Pakistan, we need to wait until there's a judgement for the couple (at least for domestic violence, possibly for sexual assault of a minor). The authorities are under pressure to deliver a verdict (several years in prison, don't know Pakistani law). Ideally, we wait until at least the first instance published the verdict. Given, that English is an official language in Pakistan, we will be able to use that as a source. --Eptalon (talk) 20:56, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
  •   Keep It has been reported in several reliable sources, and according to this article the Pakistani legislation about child labour has been changed, "largely in response to the outrage over the killing of an eight-year-old domestic worker, Zohra Shah". Sjö (talk) 15:50, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
  •   Comment Keeping is only an option if we can create an unbiased article with references. Even though Dutroux and Frizl committed despicable crimes, they deserve an unbiased, "fair" article. Note: Fritzl committed suicide, so there's no trial/punishment for him...--Eptalon (talk) 16:02, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
    Comment: Actually Josef Fritzl is still alive but he changed his name to Josef Mayrhoff. 50.30.176.50 (talk) 07:34, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
      Comment yes, sorry, confounded with the Natascha Kampush case, Mr. Prikopil committed suicide...--Eptalon (talk) 13:14, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 22:59, 17 June 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Recently closed deletion discussionsEdit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete. We already discussed this... (deletion by Macdonald-ross)--Eptalon (talk) 01:33, 24 June 2021 (UTC).

Zeshan Khan Films (ZKF)Edit

Zeshan Khan Films (ZKF) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kunjarpunch has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Written by not a very useful contributor KUNJARPUNCH 05:22, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  • That's not a reason to delete but I'm !voting   Delete as the company does not claim notability and looking online there are no reliable sources. --Ferien (talk) 05:55, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete Just another of the many articles attempted to be created to promote Zeshan Khan. -Djsasso (talk) 11:43, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
  •   Delete another non-notable promotion. --IWI (talk) 14:24, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 05:22, 30 June 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete. --Eptalon (talk) 22:52, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

Archana Singh RajputEdit

Archana Singh Rajput (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

50.30.176.27 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: notable? 50.30.176.27 (talk) 16:14, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  Delete. Young actress, about six years' experience. This is just PR which flatters but does not prove notability. Most of the text is just fluff. Macdonald-ross (talk) 08:11, 17 June 2021 (UTC)


This request is due to close on 16:14, 23 June 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete. --Eptalon (talk) 22:51, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

Yogendra karkiEdit

Yogendra karki (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Gotanda has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No notable. Top web results IMDB followed by LinkedIn. No results in top news search. Gotanda (talk) 04:56, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  • Not notable if the sources are not better than IMDB and LinkedIn. (There are no notable sources - therefore (any possible) notability can not be shown (or demonstrated). ) 89.8.138.130 (talk) 16:06, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
    The article says: "A discussion page has not been created yet! Because of this, the page won't get deleted as no one knows it is up for deletion. Click here to create a discussion page!". 89.8.180.237 (talk) 21:13, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
    It should be showing now. Fixing26 (talk) 21:25, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
  •   Delete Not notable - can't find any sources, seems to just be an attempt at promotion. Fixing26 (talk) 21:25, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 04:56, 23 June 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete. --Eptalon (talk) 22:49, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

Rahul RitsEdit

Rahul Rits (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fixing26 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Can't find evidence of notability, what I can find from searching his name is mostly his social platforms, no media coverage. Fixing26 (talk) 10:30, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

This request is due to close on 10:30, 21 June 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete. Promotional article. Peterdownunder (talk) 08:13, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

CalmerryEdit

Calmerry (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fixing26 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Only sources in article are quite opinionated articles in a list format. Fixing26 (talk) 16:24, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  •   Delete The article seems more of an advertisement for the service. Not worth keeping, in my opinion. Etoza (?) 16:46, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
  Delete: The refs just list the various articles that have this specific platform mentioned. PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? 06:31, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
  Keep a simple article about a notable subject. it has sufficient coverage for a simple wikipedia. however some excessive details may be removed. --Sorrow3 (talk) 10:07, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
  Keep I added several sources which show the importance of the subject. I suppose the service is useful and sufficient enough to be appropriate for Wikipedia. --Palipolis (talk) 13:07, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 16:24, 17 June 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete. --Eptalon (talk) 19:20, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Wendy LiewEdit

Wendy Liew (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

50.30.176.46 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Advertising 50.30.176.46 (talk) 00:59, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  •   Delete. Very clear advert of non-notable person. Macdonald-ross (talk) 13:06, 17 June 2021 (UTC)


This request is due to close on 00:59, 22 June 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

Related pagesEdit