Wikipedia:Requests for deletion
Then follow these instructions on how to request a page for deletion. To find more information on what discussed deletions and quick deletions are:
PLEASE READ THIS
Before nominating: checks and alternatives
changePrior to nominating article(s) for deletion, please be sure to:
- A. Read and understand these policies and guidelines
- The Wikipedia deletion policy, which explains valid grounds for deletion.
- The main four guidelines and policies that inform deletion discussions: notability (WP:N), verifiability (WP:V), reliable sources (WP:RS), and what Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)
- Subject-specific notability guidelines, which can be found at Category:Wikipedia notability guidelines
- B. Carry out these checks
- Confirm that the article does not meet the criteria for quick deletion.
- If there are verifiability, notability or other sourcing concerns, take reasonable steps to search for reliable sources. (See step D.)
- Review the article's history to check for potential vandalism or poor editing.
- Read the article's talk page for previous nominations and/or that your objections haven't already been dealt with.
- Check "What links here" in the article's sidebar, to see how the page is used and referenced within Wikipedia.
- Check if there are interlanguage links, also in the sidebar, which may lead to more developed and better sourced articles. Likewise, search for native-language sources if the subject has a name in a non-Latin alphabet (such as Japanese or Greek), which is often in the lead.
- C. Consider whether the article could be improved rather than deleted
- If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate for RfD.
- If the article was recently created, please consider allowing the contributors more time to develop the article.
- If an article has issues try first raising your concerns on the article's talk page, with the main contributors, and/or adding a cleanup tag, such as
{{notability}}
,{{hoax}}
,{{original research}}
, or{{advert}}
; this ensures readers are aware of the problem and may act to fix it. - If the topic is not important enough to merit an article on its own, consider merging or redirecting to an existing article. This should be done particularly if the topic name is a likely search term.
- D. Search for additional sources, if the main concern is notability
- The minimum search expected is a normal Google search, a Google Books search, a Google News search, and a Google News archive search; Google Scholar is suggested for academic subjects.
- If you find a lack of sources, you've completed basic due diligence before nominating. However, if a quick search does find sources, this does not always mean an RfD on a sourcing basis is unwarranted. If you spend more time examining the sources, and determine that they are insufficient, e.g., because they only contain passing mention of the topic, then an RfD nomination may still be appropriate.
- If you find that adequate sources do appear to exist, the fact that they are not yet present in the article is not a proper basis for a nomination. Instead, you should consider citing the sources, or at minimum apply an appropriate template to the page that flags the sourcing concern. Common templates include {{unreferenced}}, {{refimprove}}, {{third-party}}, {{primary sources}} and {{one source}}.
Discussed deletion
change- Click "Change source" at the top of the page to be deleted.
- In the edit box, add this tag: {{rfd|REASON}}. Put it at the top of the page, above the rest of the text. Then, replace the text "REASON" with a short reason why the page should be deleted. Do not be too specific here. You can add more details on the discussion page (see below).
- It is a good idea to write a change summary to let others know what you are doing. You can say "nominating for deletion", "requesting deletion", or something like that.
- Click "Save changes" at the bottom to save the page with the deletion tag at the top.
- If the deletion tag has been added to the page, a box should appear at the top of the article with a link saying "Click here to create a discussion page!" Click that link.
- You should be taken to a page starting with "Creating Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/..." along with the current year and the name of the article to be deleted. In the edit box, the following tag should have already been added: {{RfD/Preload/Template}} . Replace the text PLACE REASON HERE with a more detailed reason why the page should be deleted.
- It is helpful to include links to the various policy pages about Wikipedia (that begin with Wikipedia:). Here are some examples of this: "This article is [[Wikipedia:COMPLEX|not easy to understand]]" or "Not a [[Wikipedia:notable|notable]] topic''. This will make others more aware of why the page is not acceptable under Wikipedia's policies.
- Click "Save changes" to save the new discussion page when you are done.
- A change summary you can write for this page is "creating discussion page", "starting deletion discussion", or something like that.
- As with the page for deletion, you can check the "Watch the page" box. This will let you know if someone else has replied to your discussion.
- Copy the title of the discussion page to the clipboard. You can do this by dragging the mouse over the text from "Wikipedia" to the end of the page title to highlight it, then right-clicking and selecting "Copy".
- Go to the list of deletion requests, and click "change source" beside the words "Current deletion request discussions".
- At the top of the list of discussions, paste the title from the clipboard (right-click and select "Paste"). Add a pair of curly brackets before and after the title to make a template that will copy the content of the discussion page onto the main deletion page, like this:
- {{Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2024/(name of page to be deleted)}}
- Finally, click "Save changes" to add the discussion to the list. If the page saves successfully, you should see your deletion discussion at the top of the list. And that's it!
If this is too complicated for you, there are some gadgets like Twinkle that you can use. This allows you to do it faster.
Quick deletion
changeIf you think a page has nonsense content, add {{non}} to the top of the page.
If you think a page does not say why the subject is important, add {{notable}} to the top of the page.
If you think a page should be deleted per other quick deletion rules, add {{QD|reason}} to the top of the page.
Notifying the user
changeGenerally, you should try to be civil and tell the user that created the page to join the discussion talking about the page. This can be done by adding {{subst:RFDNote|page to be deleted}} ~~~~
to the bottom of their talkpage.
Discussions
change- The discussion is not a vote. Please make suggestions on what action to take, and support your suggestion with reasons.
- Please look at the article before you make a suggestion. Do not make an opinion using only the information given by the nominator. Looking at the history of the article may help to understand the situation.
- Please read other comments and suggestions. They may have helpful information.
- Start your comments or suggestions on a new line. Start with
*
and sign after your comment by adding~~~~
to the end. If you are responding to another editor, put your comment directly below theirs and make sure your comment is indented (using more than one*
). - New users can make suggestions, but their ideas may not be considered, especially if the suggestion seems to be made in bad faith. The opinion of users who had an account before the start of the request may be given more weight or importance.
- Suggestions by users using "sock puppets" (more than one account belonging to the same person) will not be counted.
- Please make only one suggestion. If you change your mind, change your first idea instead of adding a new one. The best way to do this is to put
<s>
before your old idea and</s>
after it. For example, if you wanted to delete an article but now think it should be kept, you could put: "Deletekeep". - If you would like an article to be kept, you can improve the article and try to fix the problems given in the request for deletion. If the reasons given in the nomination are fixed by changing, the nomination can be withdrawn by the nominator, and the deletion discussion will be closed by an administrator.
- Try to avoid confusing suggestions, such as delete and merge.
- Requests for deletion is not a war zone. You can click here for more information, although the page is not in Simple English.
Remember: You do not have to make a suggestion for every nomination. You should think about not making a suggestion if:
- A nomination involves a topic that you do not know much about.
- Everyone has made the same suggestion and you agree with that suggestion.
- All times are in UTC.
Current deletion request discussions
changeMustapha Dassoukine
change- Mustapha Dassoukine (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
BRPever has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The page was originally deleted for A4 (No explanation of why the subject is notable). However, after a deletion review at Special:Permalink/9859867#Mustapha Dassoukine, the page is restored for a discussion. BRP ever 06:36, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- Keep Person meeting GNG. (In my opinion this afd is not needed as Auntof6 doubtfully speedy deleted the article per A4.) SportsOlympic (talk) 07:53, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 06:36, 9 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Replay Poker
change- Replay Poker (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
QuantumFoam66 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: made by ip address "176.61.68.15". I do not know what they were doing, but the subject is not notable and doesn't exist on enwiki. QuantumFoam66 (talk) 22:42, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- Delete Non-notable, however, just because it "doesn't exist on enwiki" doesn't mean it should get deleted. Asteralee 22:46, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 22:42, 8 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Jason Damata
change- Jason Damata (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Symonds Gerother has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This article may be considered for deletion due to a lack of comprehensive, reliable sources, leading to questions about its notability by Wikipedia standards. Most sources appear to be primary or promotional in nature, lacking independent third-party coverage that establishes Jason Damata's significant impact or recognition in his field. Additionally, the article lacks in-depth biographical details and context that would typically demonstrate lasting notability and contributions. The "Related pages" section appears unrelated and may further dilute the article’s focus, suggesting that it may not meet Wikipedia’s standards for encyclopedic content. Symonds Gerother (talk) 17:36, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- Delete Per nominator. Asteralee 17:37, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 17:36, 8 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Wikipedia:Article wizard/version1/Content
change- Wikipedia:Article wizard/version1/Content (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
FusionSub has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unsure if it is a test page so sending to RfD. Found this while investigating the Article Wizard template due to a problem. If kept it should be moved to proper namespace. - FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 16:45, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
changeThis request is due to close on 16:45, 8 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Cherry Hill Park
change- Cherry Hill Park (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Contributor 118,784 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This page is undeveloped, uncited, and its subject is not notable whatsoever. Contributor118,784 Let's talk 13:17, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- [[comment]] you made this page 207.161.210.19 (talk) 00:00, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- Quick Delete per G7. PRicoNMI (talk) 13:46, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Quick Delete Made by a blocked/banned user. Asteralee 22:49, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 13:17, 8 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Wookieepedia
change- Wookieepedia (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The article on our Wikipedia does not indicate notability. Research on the Internet also does not provide many good and serious sources, apart from social media and questionable websites. The current form of the article (although recently revised) is an advertisement for a fan wiki on Fandom. BZPN (talk) 12:18, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- Keep, Wookieepedia is considered one of the most popular fandom wikis, and does have a enwiki article. Overall, it is a notable wiki, and is a well-sourced wiki. Fix the article; not delete it. RiggedMint 14:32, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Keep per Mint, WP:SOFIXIT applies. Article needs expanding not deleting. No valid reason for deletion. --–Davey2010Talk 19:07, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- I've copied over 2 cites so the article is no longer unsourced, I should also point out that there may well be sources offline (ie books etc). –Davey2010Talk 20:11, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 12:18, 8 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Sentuh Hasselhoff
change- Sentuh Hasselhoff (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Asteralee has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Copy of David Hasselhoff. Aster🪻 talk edits 03:44, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- Delete Copyright violation and unreferenced. I founded it Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 11:48, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Quick Delete Hoax. PRicoNMI (talk) 12:58, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: A6'd by Fehufanga.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 11:59, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 03:44, 8 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Theory of Functional Connections
change- Theory of Functional Connections (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
PRicoNMI has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This article is way too complex. PRicoNMI (talk) 22:49, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
changeThis request is due to close on 22:49, 7 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Super delicate prime
change- Super delicate prime (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
PRicoNMI has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Should probably be deleted per en:Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day. PRicoNMI (talk) 22:44, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
changeThis request is due to close on 22:44, 7 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Death and funeral of Alex Salmond
change- Death and funeral of Alex Salmond (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
2620:6E:6000:2900:91EC:C9F1:7CB6:6116 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Useless article, which contains fake references. 2620:6E:6000:2900:91EC:C9F1:7CB6:6116 (talk) 17:58, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- Delete per nominee.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 17:05, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 17:58, 7 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
The lady Who got first two wheeler driving licence in kerala
change- The lady Who got first two wheeler driving licence in kerala (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
BRPever has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Lack of source and significance of the event. Don't see it meeting any QD criteria so here we are. BRP ever 11:41, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- Delete Unreferenced and Short Article without Stubs Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 13:01, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Not informative or useful, not verifiable. PRicoNMI (talk) 19:34, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- BRPever, I feel like this meets A1 and A4; it's actually pretty similar to the A1 example. Vermont (🐿️—🏳️🌈) 02:45, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah, it probably does. It was one of those instances where I couldn't really be decisive and decided to play for it safe. No problems with it being closed early.-- BRP ever 07:54, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete What is this page even trying to say? Even then, the title is horribly unencyclopedic.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 11:56, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Un-encyclopedic. Asteralee 11:57, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 11:41, 7 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Rubik's cube Assam Record
change- Rubik's cube Assam Record (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This article is about setting a record, but it is not sourced. The record might be notable, but we would need reliable sources for it. -- Auntof6 (talk) 16:32, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- Delete This Pages is Unsourced, Not Referenced Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 18:15, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete No context, it would not be helpful to have an article for every time someone broke a record like this. Not verifiable. PRicoNMI (talk) 19:36, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 16:32, 6 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
AboFlah
changeBRPever has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Originally nominated for QD per A4 (No explanation of why the subject is notable). There are some claims, and the user is asking us to wait so RFD seem like the best choice. High subscriber count + Guinness World Record doesn't make the page automatically notable so this one needs to meet GNG. BRP ever 10:45, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- @BRPever I will fix now Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 10:49, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete not notable, also makes no attempt to claim notability fr33kman 12:07, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep, it notable article Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 15:38, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Non notable. Aster🪻 talk edits 00:09, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Asteralee Please check a references and his youtube channel and then watch his video see if notable or not. I just work on it Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 09:13, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Raayaan9911 The references are still unreliable. Please see Wikipedia:Notability (people). Thank you. Aster🪻 talk edits 12:23, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Asteralee, Your Welcome, Please Check Two New References in Youtube Career See if still reliable or not Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 12:44, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Raayaan9911 The references are still unreliable. Also, please don’t ping me again. Aster🪻 talk edits 12:45, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oh okay i am sorry Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 12:55, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Raayaan9911 The references are still unreliable. Also, please don’t ping me again. Aster🪻 talk edits 12:45, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Asteralee, Your Welcome, Please Check Two New References in Youtube Career See if still reliable or not Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 12:44, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Raayaan9911 The references are still unreliable. Please see Wikipedia:Notability (people). Thank you. Aster🪻 talk edits 12:23, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Asteralee Please check a references and his youtube channel and then watch his video see if notable or not. I just work on it Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 09:13, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 10:45, 6 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Template:Latest NASCAR Xfinity
change- Template:Latest NASCAR Xfinity (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unused template related to racecar drivers. Enwiki doesn't have one with this name, but they have a similar one, Template:Latest NASCAR Busch. However, the enwiki one is used, but ours is not. -- Auntof6 (talk) 06:09, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
changeThis request is due to close on 06:09, 6 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Template:MA
change- Template:MA (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unused template created in 2010. I'm not sure what it was intended to do. Enwiki deleted one with the same name in 2018, but that one seems to have been for a different purpose so it's probably applicable here. -- Auntof6 (talk) 06:01, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
changeThis request is due to close on 06:01, 6 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Template:F
change- Template:F (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unused template. Its looks like it was meant to insert the letter "F" with some formatting, but that can be inserted directly where needed. For what it's worth, enwiki deleted theirs for similar reasons. -- Auntof6 (talk) 05:55, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- The purpose of this template was to easily format a table cell that would identify a person as female in lists of people articles. I think it could be useful for that purpose, but only if {{M}} was used for a similar purpose. {{M}} was edited to format a table cell that would identify a person as male, but that was reverted because it's currently used in earthquake articles for a different purpose. Unless that earthquake magnitude template is renamed, it won't work to have a {{F}} used this way. Tiles mar (talk) 12:14, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete so delete it then fr33kman 15:37, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Can delete it, I found another solution for the article where the template was needed. Instead, we'll use "Template:center+F = F, and that's it. (It is about the "Oldest people" page and the "Sex" column. Also, if it is possible to protect the page to prevent further vandalism because the back troll keeps putting false information, look at the history of the page, the troll is constantly causing trouble.) Дејан2021 (talk) 06:29, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Дејан2021: Please make any protection requests elsewhere. This page is just for discussing possible deletion of this template. Thanks. -- Auntof6 (talk) 07:33, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 05:55, 6 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
InSuggest
changeQuantumFoam66 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The subject of this article does not show notability as seen by the fact it was deleted from multiple other wikis years ago. QuantumFoam66 (talk) 02:32, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- Delete Very little coverage online; not notable. PRicoNMI (talk) 19:37, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 02:32, 6 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Template:Greece squad UEFA Euro 1980
change- Template:Greece squad UEFA Euro 1980 (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Nominating three unused sports-related navigational boxes because they each have too few blue links in the body to do the job of a navigational box.
Templates included in this request:
- Template:Greece squad UEFA Euro 1980 (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)
- Template:Italy football squad 1920 Summer Olympics (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)
- Template:Latvia squad UEFA Euro 2004 (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)
Note that the templates for UEFA Euro are linked to, but they have no transclusions and are therefore unused. -- Auntof6 (talk) 01:59, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
changeThis request is due to close on 01:59, 6 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Template:Campaignbox 1929 Palestine riots
change- Template:Campaignbox 1929 Palestine riots (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Nominating 5 unused navbox templates that each have either no blue links in the body, or only one blue link in the body. Without more blue links, a navbox can't do its job of navigating between pages.
The templates included in this request are:
- Template:Campaignbox 1929 Palestine riots (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)
- Template:Campaignbox Intercommunal conflict in Mandatory Palestine (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)
- Template:Hudson Valley Radio (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)
- Template:Kerala Film Critics Award for Best Debut Actor (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)
- Template:Konsta songs (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)
Note about Template:Hudson Valley Radio: This template has links, but no transclusions. It has links because this template and others for radio stations in the New York Metropolitan Area all link to each other. You can see that at the bottom of this template, where there are blue and red links to other radio station templates. Auntof6 (talk) 01:51, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
changeThis request is due to close on 01:51, 6 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Template:Cincinnati Bengals roster navbox
change- Template:Cincinnati Bengals roster navbox (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Nominating two unused NFL team roster navbox templates that each have too few blue links to be able to do the job of navigating. (One has one blue link in the body; the other has none.)
Templates included in this request are:
- Template:Cincinnati Bengals roster navbox (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)
- Template:Las Vegas Raiders roster navbox (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)
These templates have no transclusions. If you look at what links to them, it looks like they are used, but it's only because each NFL roster navbox template links to all the NFL roster navbox templates. In other words, if you put an NFL roster navbox template on the article about any player, that article will link to all the NFL roster navbox templates. Auntof6 (talk) 01:34, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
changeThis request is due to close on 01:34, 6 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Category:Pitfall series
change- Category:Pitfall series (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
QuantumFoam66 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not enough articles. And there cannot be more, unless you create a new article, but would I suggest not to do that. QuantumFoam66 (talk) 23:48, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- Keep Just because there aren't enough articles isn't a reason to delete. {{Popcat}} can be used, or you can see the enwiki category and create some of the articles they have. Aster🪻 talk edits 00:57, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 23:48, 5 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Henry VI of Fürstenburg-Wolfach
change- Henry VI of Fürstenburg-Wolfach (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Asteralee has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-encyclopedic tone. Aster🪻 talk edits 16:17, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- Sorry for the bad formatting but i am going to rework this page and in a few days come back if it's good enough S302921 16:37, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
- It needs improving, not deleting. Rathfelder (talk) 16:42, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- I actually just did that. It's all fixed now though. S302921 (talk) 18:11, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- It needs improving, not deleting. Rathfelder (talk) 16:42, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep It doesn't seem that bad. I'm assuming good faith that the content is accurate. PRicoNMI (talk) 19:38, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 16:17, 5 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Thu (pronoun)
change- Thu (pronoun) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
131.109.227.10 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I can't find any evidence of this pronoun being used, and the article was probably written by an LLM. If it exists, it's not notable, and the content can be added to neopronoun. 131.109.227.10 (talk) 15:35, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- Delete Because of it's non-notability, we should blow it up and start over. Aster🪻 talk edits 16:01, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 15:35, 5 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Roblox 2021 outage
change- Roblox 2021 outage (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Asteralee has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-notable, has a non-encyclopedic tone. Aster🪻 talk edits 01:38, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- Delete per nom --ginaan(T/C) 03:39, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete This type of stuff is the type which is undoubtably notable enough for a fan wiki, but not a general encyclopedia.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 10:29, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 01:38, 5 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Eric Nepute
change- Eric Nepute (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Fehufanga has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable, I cannot find significant coverage of the subject that would establish the subject's notability as a doctor. I did however find some coverage of the subject related to COVID-19 misinformation (which are weirdly used to cite the awards). Don't bother with the awards. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 22:05, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- Delete Sources don't verify the content in the article. This would need a total rewrite with totally different information if the subject were notable at all. PRicoNMI (talk) 19:38, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 22:05, 4 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Template:Asian Archery Championships
change- Template:Asian Archery Championships (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Nominating a group of navigational box templates that each have one of the following:
- No blue links in the body
- Only one blue link in the body
- Multiple blue links in the body, but they're all to the same page
Without blue links to different relevant pages, a navbox can't do its job of navigating between related pages.
The following templates are included in this request:
- Template:Asian Archery Championships (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)
- Template:Asian Fencing Championships (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)
- Template:Asian Games Handball (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)
- Template:Iranian Futsal Super League winning managers (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)
- Template:Nation at the Military World Games (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)
- Template:Nations at the World Games (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)
Note to closing admin: Each of these templates is transcluded on at least one page. -- Auntof6 (talk) 20:03, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
changeThis request is due to close on 20:03, 4 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Mahna Mohammed Al-Otaibi
change- Mahna Mohammed Al-Otaibi (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
BRPever has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Their are few claims so I am bringing this page here. The page is nominated for A4 which means the page doesn't demonstrate that the subject is notable. BRP ever 11:51, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- Delete Sources are not particularly high quality and don't show enough recognition for WP:NBIO. PRicoNMI (talk) 19:42, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 11:51, 4 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Storm Ascher
change- Storm Ascher (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Symonds Gerother has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The article on Storm Ascher might be considered for deletion if it doesn’t meet Wikipedia’s standards for notability and reliable sourcing. For an article to stay up, Wikipedia needs significant, independent coverage of the person’s work in credible sources—like news outlets or well-known publications—rather than just art galleries or personal websites. If the article feels promotional or lacks enough independent sources to show that Ascher’s impact in her field is notable, it could be removed. Strengthening the article with neutral, independent references and coverage would help it meet Wikipedia’s guidelines. Symonds Gerother (talk) 11:15, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- Delete Fails w:WP:NARTIST as none of these seem to be the case:
- The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work
- The person's work has:
- been a substantial part of a significant exhibition
- won significant critical attention
- been represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums.
This request is due to close on 11:15, 4 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Mohammad Rafique (musician)
change- Mohammad Rafique (musician) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Tanbiruzzaman has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable according to WP:MUSICBIO and WP:GNG, and no notable awards. Also, the references used appear to be press releases. Also deleted from bnwiki with the same rational. –TANBIRUZZAMAN (💬) 08:22, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- Keep : This article previously evaluated by the simple English Wikipedia administration. It is passes general simple english Wikipedia notability guidelines. The subject (Mohammad Rafique musician) of the article is match with subject of the sources. All the sources comes from prestigious news agency.I don't understand what make you think that it's the press release. Please clarify.... Lazybones2016 (talk) 02:46, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
- Administrator note: CU requested (Special:Diff/9860076). MathXplore (talk) 08:02, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per Tanbiruzzaman, Bit Confusing Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 10:20, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep, it is little bit confusing but i think , we sould keep it and help to improve.
- Md abdu rahim (talk) 16:23, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Administrator note: CU requested (Special:Diff/9860076). MathXplore (talk) 08:02, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Md abdu rahim (talk) 16:23, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete This article on Mohammad Rafique may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines for musicians, as it lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. The references primarily consist of minor local media mentions without in-depth analysis or widespread recognition of his work. The article also lacks substantial content to demonstrate his lasting impact or influence in the music industry.--Symonds Gerother (talk) 17:32, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 08:22, 4 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Kriti Dhiman
change- Kriti Dhiman (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Symonds Gerother has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The article on Kriti Dhiman may be up for deletion due to concerns over notability and insufficient reliable, independent sources that meet Wikipedia’s standards. While Kriti Dhiman gained some recognition as a semifinalist on *MasterChef India* Season 8, there isn’t enough detailed, independent coverage to establish her lasting impact or notability in the culinary field. Much of the article relies on basic biographical information and primary sources, with limited references to well-recognized publications or in-depth features about her achievements outside *MasterChef*. To meet Wikipedia’s guidelines, the article would need substantial third-party sources that highlight her broader influence or noteworthy contributions as a chef beyond her participation in the show. Symonds Gerother (talk) 07:25, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
changeThis request is due to close on 07:25, 4 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Pratibhasthali
change- Pratibhasthali (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable school, Fails NSCHOOL and GNG. –Davey2010Talk 20:01, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
changeThis request is due to close on 20:01, 3 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
City Montessori School
change- City Montessori School (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Asteralee has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-notable. Aster🪻 talk edits 18:55, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- I think we should talk about Maria Montessori, or perhaps the form of education she stated en:Montessori education (we don't have an article yet). One particular school that uses this form of education is likely not notable.So, delete--Eptalon (talk) 09:58, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 18:55, 3 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Desmond Amiegbebhor
change- Desmond Amiegbebhor (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Asteralee has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-notable. Aster🪻 talk edits 17:20, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- Delete The article on Desmond Amiegbebhor is flagged for deletion due to concerns about notability and lack of independent, reliable sources substantiating his impact beyond his roles at LAMATA and Primero Transport. Wikipedia's notability guidelines require significant coverage in reputable, independent sources, but this article relies mostly on references that discuss his organization rather than his individual contributions. Additionally, the content has several typographical errors and lacks in-depth detail, making it difficult to assess his broader influence in transport and logistics. For the article to meet Wikipedia standards, it would need substantial, third-party coverage demonstrating his recognized impact within his field. --Symonds Gerother (talk) 07:05, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- Me too Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 10:25, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Raayaan9911: If you mean that you are in favor of deleting, please say so. Otherwise, we can't tell what you're talking about when you say "me too". -- Auntof6 (talk) 19:36, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- I think is Non Notable Page Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 20:28, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Raayaan9911: If you mean that you are in favor of deleting, please say so. Otherwise, we can't tell what you're talking about when you say "me too". -- Auntof6 (talk) 19:36, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- Me too Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 10:25, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 17:20, 3 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Recently closed deletion discussions
change- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. MathXplore (talk) 07:50, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
Category:Tune Squad players
change- Category:Tune Squad players (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
QuantumFoam66 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Created by the IP address 2001:8003:4E48:4801:9CDB:7D48:DBF9:82A4 This category just contains a bunch of the Looney Tunes Characters (except LeBron James) into a category for fictional members of a fictional sports team. This trait is most likely considered to be non-defining and trivial, and better of to be located in the article for Space Jam instead. QuantumFoam66 (talk) 02:05, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- Delete as doesn't exist on enwiki and imho given it's a fictional team it's not serving any useful purpose either. –Davey2010Talk 12:27, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 02:05, 2 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. w:WP:SOFTDELETE MathXplore (talk) 07:48, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
Template:EMSworld
change- Template:EMSworld (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Nominating some navigational box templates that each have only one blue link in the body. With only one relevant blue link, a navbox can't do its job of navigating between related pages.
Templates included in this request:
- Template:EMSworld (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)
- Template:Iranian aircraft (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)
- Template:Roswell (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)
Note to closing admin: Two of the templates have transclusions. -- Auntof6 (talk) 08:47, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
changeThis request is due to close on 08:47, 27 October 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. w:WP:SOFTDELETE MathXplore (talk) 07:44, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
Category:"Part of a series on" templates
change- Category:"Part of a series on" templates (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
131.109.225.38 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The only difference between this and Category:Sidebar templates, is that these templates include the words "part of a series on" at the top. This should be merged to Category:Sidebar templates. It doesn't exist on English Wikipedia anymore (en:Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 April 27#Category:"Part of a series on" sidebar templates). 131.109.225.38 (talk) 16:01, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- Template:Christianityfooter is not a sidebar template. 131.109.225.38 (talk) 16:06, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for pointing that out, but that's not related to this discussion. I've removed it from this category. If you see any more like that, just go ahead and remove them. -- Auntof6 (talk) 19:17, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 16:01, 26 October 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Clear consensus to delete Peterdownunder (talk) 21:39, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
Wikipedia:What to do when blocked
change- Wikipedia:What to do when blocked (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I don't think it's great to have this page, at least with the location being "Wikipedia:What to do when blocked". While the page is indicated as humour, I don't think it's particularly funny (in my opinion of course), especially with the existence of genuinely harassive banned editors who claim admins and those who disagree with them have lost their minds. It could also serve as encouragement to banned/blocked editors to keep doing what they're doing and that the whole thing is just a joke. Thoughts? --Ferien (talk) 21:54, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- Delete - Humour is subjective but I concur with the nom this page only serves to give trolls/vandals/harassers more ammunition to continue and I'm pretty sure those being harassed on these projects wouldn't see the funny side of this page. I also don't see what's funny about telling people to use and abuse the block template and that they should say "that comment" to admins..... If you're blocked then you're the problem not the admins!. Anyway unfunny/childish page that serves no useful purpose. –Davey2010Talk 12:04, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete not funny, not informative and not useful fr33kman 14:49, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Per nominator and Fr33kman. Aster🪻 talk edits 14:58, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Sonar showing no funny. Repeating, no funny in the vicinity, arm the warheads.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 14:43, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Humor, Readers Looking for Page it no funny, It prank page Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 10:30, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 21:54, 1 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Peterdownunder (talk) 21:32, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
Later Mauryan dynasty
change- Later Mauryan dynasty (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
BRPever has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: A lot of the article is copied from several places, which brings the copyright concerns. Other than that, the writing sounds like original research. It is not simple at all. I think as it is, we should delete this page and create a cleaner page than trying to fix this despite all the copyright and OR concerns. BRP ever 13:10, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- Delete or Merge into Mauryan Empire. RiggedMint 13:11, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete I'm gonna say Blow it up and start over.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 13:14, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per FusionSub - Would unfortunately be better off nuked and started over again, –Davey2010Talk 12:24, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete This article could be considered for deletion as it lacks reliable sources, often relies on speculative claims, and presents unverified or ambiguous historical assertions. Much of the content does not appear to be supported by primary evidence or credible secondary sources, which raises concerns about historical accuracy and reliability. Additionally, the article seems to contain multiple points of original research, unsupported assumptions, and tenuous connections between regions and individuals, making it challenging to verify the information with recognized historical standards.--Symonds Gerother (talk) 17:34, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 13:10, 1 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. Changes since nomination have populated the category Peterdownunder (talk) 21:36, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
Category:Atari 2600
change- Category:Atari 2600 (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
QuantumFoam66 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I HOPE YOU GUYS ACTUALLY SEE THIS REQUEST THIS TIME. This category only contains the main subject and just one subcategory for the games on that system. QuantumFoam66 (talk) 01:58, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- Keep I brought over the navbox, so there are three entries now. --Auntof6 (talk) 08:20, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep - Category is now populated, I was going to say the category should stay even if it only had the subcat in it but I guess that would mean it would still be under-populated even if it was serving a purpose. –Davey2010Talk 11:19, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- QuantumFoam66, RfDs, particularly those involving categories, are often not commented on. RfD isn't a vote, so if there are no useful comments to make, people may just not make any comments at all. This can be because the nomination in question is clear-cut or perhaps more difficult to look at and make a comment. In this example, you could have simply tagged the article with {{popcat}}, to encourage the category to be populated.
If it were not fully populated within 4 days, you could have nominated the category for C1, as it has not had enough entries for four days, and this RfD would not have been necessary.--Ferien (talk) 21:58, 25 October 2024 (UTC)- @Ferien: I believe that C1 is for empty categories. In the scenario you describe, the category would not be empty. -- Auntof6 (talk) 22:05, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Auntof6: Hmm, I did have that thought for a second at the back of my head, although we do have the three-entry rule that has often been treated quite strictly. I'll just strike my comment to say that adding the popcat template should suffice, and the category can be dealt with later on. --Ferien (talk) 22:10, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Ferien: I believe that C1 is for empty categories. In the scenario you describe, the category would not be empty. -- Auntof6 (talk) 22:05, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 01:58, 31 October 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. --Auntof6 (talk) 19:31, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
Yasser ramy
change- Yasser ramy (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
CosmLearner has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This biographical article does not give any references or sources. Does not meet notability. AI generated. C⚛smLearner 💬🔬 21:00, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- not notable, Delete for the same reason as Threadles. Ternera (talk) 01:03, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete The article on Yasser Ramy may be considered for deletion due to issues with notability, verifiability, and sourcing. Although Yasser Ramy is described as a young entrepreneur and CEO of the platform Threadles, the article lacks sufficient independent, reliable sources that provide substantial coverage of his work or impact in the tech industry. Many references appear self-published or from social media profiles, which don't meet Wikipedia’s notability standards. Additionally, some information may have been generated using AI tools, which further raises concerns about authenticity. For the article to meet Wikipedia's guidelines, it would need more robust, third-party sources and verifiable details that demonstrate Ramy’s notable influence in technology beyond self-descriptions. --Symonds Gerother (talk) 07:38, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 21:00, 31 October 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. --Auntof6 (talk) 19:30, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
Threadles
changeTernera has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't seem notable. I'm unable to find coverage of the platform from independent sources. Ternera (talk) 17:58, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- Delete Per nom, no evidence of any notability, Fails SOCIAL and GNG. –Davey2010Talk 18:19, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 17:58, 31 October 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. --Auntof6 (talk) 19:29, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
Mayank Daral (2nd nomination)
change- Mayank Daral (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: fails WP:GNG. Note this is a second nomination after the first RfD (Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2024/Mayank Daral) resulted in a soft delete. --Ferien (talk) 15:58, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- Keep The Wikipedia page for Mayank Daral should be kept as it documents his significant contributions to orthopedic surgery and sports medicine, including over 3,000 successful knee surgeries. His role as a Senior Orthopedic Surgeon and Assistant Professor at the Sports Injury Center, along with multiple recognitions, underscores his impact in the field. The content is verifiable through reliable sources, meeting Wikipedia's notability guidelines. --Symonds Gerother (talk) 19:36, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, He does not seem very notable to me, unless he did something groundbreaking, but it is unlikely. RiggedMint 13:06, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 15:58, 30 October 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. --Auntof6 (talk) 19:27, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
Those who know
change- Those who know (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
192.91.235.193 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This is nonsense. 192.91.235.193 (talk) 11:55, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- Delete Non-notable. Aster🪻 talk edits 12:12, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom - Obvious nonsense and obviously fails GNG. –Davey2010Talk 12:20, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete This reads like a current event news article.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 14:45, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 11:55, 30 October 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. --Auntof6 (talk) 19:26, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
Mohammad Baydoun
change- Mohammad Baydoun (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Symonds Gerother has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The subject of the article, Mohammad Baydoun, does not appear to meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines for individuals. While Mohammad Baydoun holds a prominent position at DAMAC Properties, there is no substantial coverage from independent, reliable sources to establish his notability beyond his job title. Wikipedia requires individuals to have received significant coverage from third-party sources, such as news articles or academic publications, that are independent of the subject. Symonds Gerother (talk) 07:31, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- Comment: This is a different person which article is exist on En Wikipedia with similar name.
- Delete Sources are clear paid/sponsored articles (see w:WP:NEWSORGINDIA) and a podcast. No good independent reliable sources to support notability. Ravensfire (talk) 17:23, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 07:31, 30 October 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. --Auntof6 (talk) 19:25, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
Speak of the angel :saying
change- Speak of the angel :saying (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Asteralee has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-notable. Aster🪻 talk edits 00:53, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- Delete as made up, Never heard anyone say "speak of the angel" and there's nothing at en:Speak of the devil that mentions this. –Davey2010Talk 01:45, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 00:53, 30 October 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. No consensus to delete. --Auntof6 (talk) 19:23, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
Category:Permadeath games
change- Category:Permadeath games (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
QuantumFoam66 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This category had been deleted from English Wikipedia over concerns with it not being defining. Besides this trait is not mentioned within the content of the 5 articles. QuantumFoam66 (talk) 23:12, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- Keep enwiki have indeed deleted this cat [1] but to be honest I'm not seeing a compelling reason to delete this, I know I've said previously at RFD's "enwiki's deleted theirs so we should follow suit" but imho there's no harm with this being kept, readers/people may want to know what games have Permadeath in them. If the articles don't mention the Permadeath thing then that's a SOFIXIT problem, in short I'm not seeing a compelling reason to delete so keep. --–Davey2010Talk 16:04, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep per Davey's arguement.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 16:59, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete I'm looking at this category from a slightly different POV so don't mind the outcome either way, whichever the closing admin sees as reasonable. I do find this category reasonably defining, so I do not agree with the nominator on the reasoning of this, however, realistically is a typical BE 1500 reader going to understand what permadeath means? It is a portmanteau of "permanent" and "death", and only "death" is in BE 850/BE 1500. I'm not quite sure how this could be simplified with a rename, for someone typically navigating the categories to be able to understand, therefore I lean delete. --Ferien (talk) 22:05, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Ferien, Just throwing it out there but couldn't we rename the category to "Permanent death" ?, If you click on the category it gives a definition of what permadeath is (I would however change the link from permadeath to permanent death too),
- I understand your point but if we're giving a definition and a link to that name wouldn't that be enough ?, Thanks –Davey2010Talk 22:57, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
- I was originally going to lean towards a rename, however permanent isn't Basic English either. A definition is useful for a lot of categories, but if the reader doesn't even know what the category means before clicking on it, then I'm not sure how much of a point there is of the category in the first place. --Ferien (talk) 16:47, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 23:12, 28 October 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. --Auntof6 (talk) 19:19, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
Category:Video games about law
change- Category:Video games about law (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
QuantumFoam66 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This category only contains mostly the titles in the Ace Attorney series, which makes it not very diverse. Ironically, none of the content currently located within this category on this wiki corresponds with the content on English Wikipedia. QuantumFoam66 (talk) 22:18, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
change- Keep BEBOLD and SOFIXIT applies, Why not fix the issues you've mentioned? or better yet look on the enwiki category and create the articles?, Again not seeing a compelling reason to delete. --–Davey2010Talk 16:13, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep per Davey. ✩ Dream Indigo ✩ 13:41, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
- How come the fact that it isn't diverse and contains games from other series count? QuantumFoam66 (talk) 05:55, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 22:18, 28 October 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
Related pages
change- All archives before July 2008 - implementation of new system made archives redundant
- Category:Requests for deletion that did not succeed
- Category:Requests for deletion that succeeded
- Wikipedia:Deletion policy
- Wikipedia:Quick deletion
- Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion
- Category:Deletion requests
- Category:Quick deletion requests