Wikipedia:Requests for deletion

If you think a page should be deleted, read the deletion policy to make sure.
Then follow these instructions on how to request a page for deletion. To find more information on what discussed deletions and quick deletions are:
PLEASE READ THIS

Before nominating: checks and alternatives

Prior to nominating article(s) for deletion, please be sure to:

A. Read and understand these policies and guidelines

1. The Wikipedia deletion policy, which explains valid grounds for deletion.
2. The main four guidelines and policies that inform deletion discussions: notability (WP:N), verifiability (WP:V), reliable sources (WP:RS), and what Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)
3. Subject-specific notability guidelines, which can be found at Category:Wikipedia notability guidelines

B. Carry out these checks

1. Confirm that the article does not meet the criteria for quick deletion.
2. If there are verifiability, notability or other sourcing concerns, take reasonable steps to search for reliable sources. (See step D.)
3. Review the article's history to check for potential vandalism or poor editing.
4. Read the article's talk page for previous nominations and/or that your objections haven't already been dealt with.
5. Check "What links here" in the article's sidebar, to see how the page is used and referenced within Wikipedia.
6. Check if there are interlanguage links, also in the sidebar, which may lead to more developed and better sourced articles. Likewise, search for native-language sources if the subject has a name in a non-Latin alphabet (such as Japanese or Greek), which is often in the lead.

C. Consider whether the article could be improved rather than deleted

1. If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate for RfD.
2. If the article was recently created, please consider allowing the contributors more time to develop the article.
3. If an article has issues try first raising your concerns on the article's talk page, with the main contributors, and/or adding a cleanup tag, such as {{notability}}, {{hoax}}, {{original research}}, or {{advert}}; this ensures readers are aware of the problem and may act to fix it.
4. If the topic is not important enough to merit an article on its own, consider merging or redirecting to an existing article. This should be done particularly if the topic name is a likely search term.

D. Search for additional sources, if the main concern is notability

1. The minimum search expected is a normal Google search, a Google Books search, a Google News search, and a Google News archive search; Google Scholar is suggested for academic subjects.
2. If you find a lack of sources, you've completed basic due diligence before nominating. However, if a quick search does find sources, this does not always mean an RfD on a sourcing basis is unwarranted. If you spend more time examining the sources, and determine that they are insufficient, e.g., because they only contain passing mention of the topic, then an RfD nomination may still be appropriate.
3. If you find that adequate sources do appear to exist, the fact that they are not yet present in the article is not a proper basis for a nomination. Instead, you should consider citing the sources, or at minimum apply an appropriate template to the page that flags the sourcing concern. Common templates include {{unreferenced}}, {{refimprove}}, {{third-party}}, {{primary sources}} and {{one source}}.

Discussed deletion

Put the deletion tag on the article.

1. Click "Change source" at the top of the page to be deleted.
2. In the edit box, add this tag: {{rfd|REASON}}. Put it at the top of the page, above the rest of the text. Then, replace the text "REASON" with a short reason why the page should be deleted. Do not be too specific here. You can add more details on the discussion page (see below).
   • It is a good idea to write a change summary to let others know what you are doing. You can say "nominating for deletion", "requesting deletion", or something like that.
3. Click "Save changes" at the bottom to save the page with the deletion tag at the top.
   • You can also check the "Watch this page" check box to add the page to your watchlist. This lets you know if the page for deletion has been changed. If the deletion tag is removed any time before the discussion is closed, it should be put back.

Create a discussion page.

1. If the deletion tag has been added to the page, a box should appear at the top of the article with a link saying "Click here to create a discussion page!" Click that link.
2. You should be taken to a page starting with "Creating Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/..." along with the current year and the name of the article to be deleted. In the edit box, the following tag should have already been added: {{RfD/Preload/Template}} . Replace the text PLACE REASON HERE with a more detailed reason why the page should be deleted.
   • It is helpful to include links to the various policy pages about Wikipedia (that begin with Wikipedia:). Here are some examples of this: "This article is [[Wikipedia:COMPLEX|not easy to understand]]" or "Not a [[Wikipedia:notable|notable]] topic''. This will make others more aware of why the page is not acceptable under Wikipedia's policies.
3. Click "Save changes" to save the new discussion page when you are done.
   • A change summary you can write for this page is "creating discussion page", "starting deletion discussion", or something like that.
   • As with the page for deletion, you can check the "Watch the page" box. This will let you know if someone else has replied to your discussion.

List it here

1. Copy the title of the discussion page to the clipboard. You can do this by dragging the mouse over the text from "Wikipedia" to the end of the page title to highlight it, then right-clicking and selecting "Copy".
2. Go to the list of deletion requests, and click "change source" beside the words "Current deletion request discussions".
3. At the top of the list of discussions, paste the title from the clipboard (right-click and select "Paste"). Add a pair of curly brackets before and after the title to make a template that will copy the content of the discussion page onto the main deletion page, like this:

   {{Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2024/(name of page to be deleted)}}

4. Finally, click "Save changes" to add the discussion to the list. If the page saves successfully, you should see your deletion discussion at the top of the list. And that's it!

If this is too complicated for you, there are some gadgets like Twinkle that you can use. This allows you to do it faster.

Quick deletion

See also: Wikipedia:Deletion policy § Quick deletion

If you think a page has nonsense content, add {{non}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page does not say why the subject is important, add {{notable}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page should be deleted per other quick deletion rules, add {{QD|reason}} to the top of the page.

Notifying the user

Generally, you should try to be civil and tell the user that created the page to join the discussion talking about the page. This can be done by adding {{subst:RFDNote|page to be deleted}} ~~~~ to the bottom of their talkpage.

Discussions

See also: Wikipedia:Deletion review

• The discussion is not a vote. Please make suggestions on what action to take, and support your suggestion with reasons.
• Please look at the article before you make a suggestion. Do not make an opinion using only the information given by the nominator. Looking at the history of the article may help to understand the situation.
• Please read other comments and suggestions. They may have helpful information.
• Start your comments or suggestions on a new line. Start with * and sign after your comment by adding ~~~~ to the end. If you are responding to another editor, put your comment directly below theirs and make sure your comment is indented (using more than one *).
• New users can make suggestions, but their ideas may not be considered, especially if the suggestion seems to be made in bad faith. The opinion of users who had an account before the start of the request may be given more weight or importance.
• Suggestions by users using "sock puppets" (more than one account belonging to the same person) will not be counted.
• Please make only one suggestion. If you change your mind, change your first idea instead of adding a new one. The best way to do this is to put <s> before your old idea and </s> after it. For example, if you wanted to delete an article but now think it should be kept, you could put: "Delete keep".
• If you would like an article to be kept, you can improve the article and try to fix the problems given in the request for deletion. If the reasons given in the nomination are fixed by changing, the nomination can be withdrawn by the nominator, and the deletion discussion will be closed by an administrator.
• Try to avoid confusing suggestions, such as delete and merge.
• Requests for deletion is not a war zone. You can click here for more information, although the page is not in Simple English.

Remember: You do not have to make a suggestion for every nomination. You should think about not making a suggestion if:

1. A nomination involves a topic that you do not know much about.
2. Everyone has made the same suggestion and you agree with that suggestion.

• All times are in UTC.

Current deletion request discussions

Turk Shahi–Arab Conflicts

Turk Shahi–Arab Conflicts (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BigKrow has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Seems hoax BigKrow (talk) 22:12, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 22:12, 29 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Ahmed Bin Sojib

Ahmed Bin Sojib (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

আফতাবুজ্জামান has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable person. Most of the are either unrelated or promotional, interview or passing mentions. "Channel I Music Awards Best Entrepreneur" is not a significant award for which someone can become automatically notable. There is zero significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.

Same article was also created on enwiki, see en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahmed Bin Sojib.

Note that the article was created by an IP, i suspect LTA Md Sunnat Ali Mollik created it from IP to avoid any suspicion. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 09:37, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 09:37, 29 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Deepak Narwal

Deepak Narwal (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Asteralee has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I do not think that this article is notable enough. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 04:25, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

This article is about a Notable person, you can see the notbale reference links with high source, Deepaknarwal003 (talk) 04:29, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

This article is about a Notable person, you can see the notbale reference links with high source Deepaknarwal003 (talk) 05:12, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 04:25, 29 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Benedikt Hofer

Benedikt Hofer (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Page is written like advisement of his Achievements Other Please check If I am not wrong Ksy 18:55, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

I am against the deletion, there are many aspects of relevance (e.g. GitHub project, trends in Germany, Bing panel), but I think that there have to be done a lot of changes when it comes to wording and style (neutrality) ZitroLike (talk) 23:09, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

I am against the deletion of the Wikipedia page about Benedikt Hofer. This page does not constitute advertising but instead documents notable achievements and contributions in the areas of gaming, programming education, and digital content creation. It is important to assess the page based on its compliance with Wikipedia’s relevance criteria and its value in providing comprehensive information about a public figure who has made a meaningful impact.

1. Alignment with Wikipedia’s Relevance Criteria

Wikipedia’s guidelines emphasize notability, measurable contributions, and lasting influence as key factors for inclusion. Benedikt Hofer meets these standards in several ways:

• Public Recognition and Influence: Through his online presence, particularly on YouTube, he has reached a substantial audience with his educational and entertainment content, attracting hundreds of thousands of viewers. His work has gained recognition within the gaming and programming communities, demonstrating his influence in these fields.

• Educational Contributions and Open-Source Impact: His programming tutorials and projects on platforms like GitHub showcase his commitment to education and innovation. By sharing tools such as AntiCheat systems and making programming concepts accessible to a broad audience, he provides tangible benefits to both the gaming and programming communities.

2. Documenting Positive Achievements, Not Advertising

The page serves to highlight Benedikt Hofer’s accomplishments and contributions, rather than promote or advertise him. Advertising implies a focus on financial gain or self-promotion, which is not the intent of this page. Instead, it documents his:

• Efforts to educate and inspire others through accessible programming tutorials.

• Open-source contributions that support innovation and collaboration.

• Influence as a creator who enhances the Minecraft experience with tools and game modes that have been widely used and appreciated by the community.

These achievements are notable and valuable, making them deserving of documentation on Wikipedia.

3. Addressing Concerns About Neutrality

While there may be room for improvement in the page’s tone or structure, these issues can be resolved through editing, not deletion. Constructive changes can address any perceived promotional language while maintaining the integrity of the content. Removing the page entirely would disregard the subject’s clear notability and impact.

4. Broader Cultural and Community Relevance

Benedikt Hofer represents a modern trend of digital creators who combine education, entertainment, and community building. His work reflects broader societal trends in content creation and online learning, particularly within the context of gaming. Ignoring contributions like his would create a gap in documenting contemporary digital culture, an area where Wikipedia plays an essential role.

Conclusion

The Wikipedia page about Benedikt Hofer fulfills the relevance criteria by showcasing measurable achievements, significant community impact, and educational contributions. Claims of advertising are unfounded, as the page documents positive contributions rather than promoting the individual. While adjustments to the page may be warranted to improve neutrality, deletion is not justified. Retaining and refining the page ensures that Wikipedia continues to provide accurate and comprehensive information about notable figures in contemporary digital culture. 2003:D6:3F1E:6C00:2DEB:B007:8FF5:B19E (talk) 14:07, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 18:55, 28 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Sadequain Foundation

Sadequain Foundation (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Could not find any Notability for Fondation related Other Please Check if I am not wrong Ksy 18:41, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 18:41, 28 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Pathways of African immigration to the United States of America

Pathways of African immigration to the United States of America (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: A pointless redirect that is a variation of the original title (African immigration to the United States). It also does not appear that such a term is widely used. BZPN (talk) 17:48, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Keep Redirects to subtopics with their own sections are standard on Wikipedia. Please review Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not for what RfD requires – none of these large number of RfDs qualify. Invasive Spices (talk) 21:29, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:48, 28 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Methods of African immigration to the United States of America

Methods of African immigration to the United States of America (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: A pointless redirect that is a variation of the original title (African immigration to the United States). It also does not appear that such a term is widely used. BZPN (talk) 17:48, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Keep Redirects to subtopics with their own sections are standard on Wikipedia. Please review Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not for what RfD requires – none of these large number of RfDs qualify. Invasive Spices (talk) 21:28, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:48, 28 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Mexican–American deportations (1929–1939)

Mexican–American deportations (1929–1939) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: A pointless redirect that is a variation of the original title (Mexican Repatriation). It also does not appear that such a term is widely used. BZPN (talk) 17:46, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Keep Normal redirect. Please review Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not for what RfD requires – none of these large number of RfDs qualify. Invasive Spices (talk) 21:27, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:46, 28 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Mexican–American deportations

Mexican–American deportations (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: A pointless redirect that is a variation of the original title (Mexican Repatriation). It also does not appear that such a term is widely used. BZPN (talk) 17:46, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Keep This is a standard reason for a redirect. Please review Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not for what RfD requires – none of these large number of RfDs qualify. Invasive Spices (talk) 21:27, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:46, 28 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Mexican–American deportation

Mexican–American deportation (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: A pointless redirect that is a variation of the original title (Mexican Repatriation). It also does not appear that such a term is widely used. BZPN (talk) 17:46, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Keep This is a standard reason for a redirect. Please review Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not for what RfD requires – none of these large number of RfDs qualify. Invasive Spices (talk) 21:26, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:46, 28 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Mexican–American deportation (1929–1939)

Mexican–American deportation (1929–1939) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: A pointless redirect that is a variation of the original title (Mexican Repatriation). It also does not appear that such a term is widely used. BZPN (talk) 17:45, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Keep Please review Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not for what RfD requires – none of these large number of RfDs qualify. Invasive Spices (talk) 21:25, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:45, 28 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Chicano ineligibility for food stamps in the United States of America

Chicano ineligibility for food stamps in the United States of America (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unnecessary redirect; that's not even related to Reconquista (Mexico) BZPN (talk) 17:43, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Keep Redirects to subtopics are common on Wikipedia. I've listed the discussion of this by activists in the article, with a reference. Invasive Spices (talk) 21:25, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:43, 28 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Chiafalo v. Washington, 591 U.S. 578 (2020)

Chiafalo v. Washington, 591 U.S. 578 (2020) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unnecessary redirect, this name is not widely used. BZPN (talk) 17:41, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Concur, this seems like an unlikely phrase to be used to search. Someone using this term to search would end up with the target as the first search result anyway. Ravensfire (talk) 19:31, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
• Keep It's the standard short caption for this case. Please review Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not for what RfD requires – none of these large number of RfDs qualify. Invasive Spices (talk) 21:22, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

  Sorry if I'm missing something, what has that page got to do with deletion discussions? Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 22:00, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

• WP:RFD links to it for requirements for listing. Invasive Spices (talk) 20:27, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:41, 28 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Motivations for mass sterilization of Native American women

Motivations for mass sterilization of Native American women (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This redirect seems to be more of a test or the author's own vision - I haven't found such a term for Sterilization of Native American women anywhere on the Internet, because it's basically adding an adjective to the main title. This redirect is pointless and false. BZPN (talk) 17:37, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Concur, this seems like an unlikely phrase to be used to search. Someone using this term to search would end up with the target as the first search result anyway. Ravensfire (talk) 19:30, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
• Keep Redirects to subtopics with their own sections are very common on Wikipedia. Also, please review Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not for what RfD requires – none of these large number of RfDs qualify. Invasive Spices (talk) 21:21, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:37, 28 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Methods of coercive sterilization of Hawaiian women

Methods of coercive sterilization of Hawaiian women (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This redirect seems to be more of a test or the author's own vision - I haven't found such a term for Sterilization of Native American women anywhere on the Internet, because it's basically adding an adjective to the main title. This redirect is pointless and false. BZPN (talk) 17:36, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Nothing about this in the target, and this redirect seems to be a highly unlikely phrase to be used. If a decent section is added to the target on this, perhaps a redirect for just "Sterilization of Hawaiian women" would be warranted, which would also turn up as probably the top search result for this unwieldy phrase. Ravensfire (talk) 19:25, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
• Keep Redirects to subtopics with their own sections are commmon. Also, please review Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not for what RfD requires – none of these large number of RfDs qualify. Invasive Spices (talk) 21:20, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:36, 28 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Arguments for coercive sterilization of Hawaiian women

Arguments for coercive sterilization of Hawaiian women (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This redirect seems to be more of a test or the author's own vision - I haven't found such a term for Sterilization of Native American women anywhere on the Internet, because it's basically adding an adjective to the main title. This redirect is pointless and false. BZPN (talk) 17:36, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Nothing about this in the target, and this redirect seems to be a highly unlikely phrase to be used. If a decent section is added to the target on this, perhaps a redirect for just "Sterilization of Hawaiian women" would be warranted, which would also turn up as probably the top search result for this unwieldy phrase. Ravensfire (talk) 19:25, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
• Keep Redirects to subtopics are common. Also, please review Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not for what RfD requires – none of these large number of RfDs qualify. Invasive Spices (talk) 21:19, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:36, 28 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Coercive sterilization of Hawaiian women

Coercive sterilization of Hawaiian women (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This redirect seems to be more of a test or the author's own vision - I haven't found such a term for Sterilization of Native American women anywhere on the Internet, because it's basically adding an adjective to the main title. This redirect is pointless and false. BZPN (talk) 17:35, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Nothing about this in the target, and this redirect seems to be a highly unlikely phrase to be used. If a decent section is added to the target on this, perhaps a redirect for just "Sterilization of Hawaiian women" would be warranted, which would also turn up as probably the top search result for this unwieldy phrase. Ravensfire (talk) 19:25, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
• Keep Redirects to subtopicsare common. Also, please review Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not for what RfD requires – none of these large number of RfDs qualify. Invasive Spices (talk) 21:18, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:35, 28 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Mass sterilization of Hawaiian women

Mass sterilization of Hawaiian women (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This redirect seems to be more of a test or the author's own vision - I haven't found such a term for Sterilization of Native American women anywhere on the Internet, because it's basically adding an adjective to the main title. This redirect is pointless and false. BZPN (talk) 17:35, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Concur, this seems like an unlikely phrase to be used to search. The article has no mention of Hawaiian women nor does the same article on enwiki. Even if there was good information in the target, a simpler redirect is all that's needed. Ravensfire (talk) 18:37, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
• Keep Redirects to subtopics are common. Also, please review Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not for what RfD requires – none of these large number of RfDs qualify. Invasive Spices (talk) 21:18, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:35, 28 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Motivations for coercive sterilization of Native American women

Motivations for coercive sterilization of Native American women (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This redirect seems to be more of a test or the author's own vision - I haven't found such a term for Sterilization of Native American women anywhere on the Internet, because it's basically adding an adjective to the main title. This redirect is pointless. BZPN (talk) 17:24, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Concur, this seems like an unlikely phrase to be used to search. Someone using this term to search would end up with the target as the first search result anyway. Ravensfire (talk) 19:29, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
• Keep This is not an adjective, this is a subtopic with its own section – a common redirect type on Wikipedia. Also, please review Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not for what RfD requires – none of these large number of RfDs qualify. Invasive Spices (talk) 21:17, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

  All of these RFD's qualify - none of them are needed here when they include the main article title in them. You were blocked in part on enwiki for creating unhelpful redirects and all of these nominated recently fall into that category. Ravensfire (talk) 03:16, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

• The place to voice your disagreements with NOT and the RFD process is Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not, not here.

Anyone can visit my en: Talk: to see the real reason, so why introduce cross-wiki rancor like that? Invasive Spices (talk) 20:38, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

I think we'll agree to disagree on the process, but the comment about why you were blocked on en is relevant when I see the same issues here. This redirect is not something that I think belongs here. This would never be a section heading in an article here, the language is not simple. I would not expect a reader here to be using such terms for searching (and honestly I wouldn't expect it on enwiki either). Simple is good, complex is not. This is complex phrasing and thus should be deleted. Ravensfire (talk) 20:46, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:24, 28 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Mass sterilization of Native American women

Mass sterilization of Native American women (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This redirect seems to be more of a test or the author's own vision - I haven't found such a term for Sterilization of Native American women anywhere on the Internet, because it's basically adding an adjective to the main title. This redirect is pointless. BZPN (talk) 17:24, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Concur, this seems like an unlikely phrase to be used to search. Someone using this term to search would end up with the target as the first search result anyway. Ravensfire (talk) 18:39, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
• Keep Please review Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not for what RfD requires – none of these large number of RfDs qualify. Invasive Spices (talk) 21:16, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:24, 28 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Abusive sterilization of Native American women

Abusive sterilization of Native American women (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This redirect seems to be more of a test or the author's own vision - I haven't found such a term for Sterilization of Native American women anywhere on the Internet, because it's basically adding an adjective to the main title. This redirect is pointless. BZPN (talk) 17:24, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Concur, this seems like an unlikely phrase to be used to search. Someone using this term to search would end up with the target as the first search result anyway. Ravensfire (talk) 18:40, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
• Keep Please review Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not for what RfD requires – none of these large number of RfDs qualify. Invasive Spices (talk) 21:16, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:24, 28 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Coercive sterilization of Native American women

Coercive sterilization of Native American women (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This redirect seems to be more of a test or the author's own vision - I haven't found such a term for Sterilization of Native American women anywhere on the Internet, because it's basically adding an adjective to the main title. This redirect is pointless. BZPN (talk) 17:23, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Concur, this seems like an unlikely phrase to be used to search. Someone using this term to search would end up with the target as the first search result anyway. Ravensfire (talk) 18:39, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
• Keep Please review Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not for what RfD requires – none of these large number of RfDs qualify. Invasive Spices (talk) 21:14, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:23, 28 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Royal swiss auto service

Royal swiss auto service (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Company promotion, advertising, non-notable. BZPN (talk) 15:43, 21 December 2024 (UTC) Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Delete: Agreed with nom, no external coverage and generally promotional. Could have honestly been a G11. Garsh2 (talk) 02:23, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 15:43, 28 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Battle of Qahrawa

Battle of Qahrawa (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BigKrow has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability? BigKrow (talk) 12:46, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 12:46, 28 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Battle of Shekar Yazi

Battle of Shekar Yazi (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BigKrow has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability? BigKrow (talk) 12:46, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 12:46, 28 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Umar Jaum

Umar Jaum (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

ZI Jony has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't meet the WP:N. Regards, ZI Jony ^(Talk) 08:18, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• There are multiple reliable and independent sources are used to to claim Evey information on Umar Jaum So why you think it does not meet the notability guidelines.Please review once again. SaifFullah (talk) 08:24, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
• Note: this user is a spammer and sockpuppet, It's has been conformed in enwiki. User spamming the article on several Wikimedia projects. Regards, ZI Jony ^(Talk) 10:29, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
• Delete as hoax/vandalism - a cursory examination of external sources (including some of the cited ones) reveals this article is some strange attempt at revisionism by systematically replacing Talha Anjum's involvement (as a member of the en:Young Stunners duo) with this "Umar Jaum". Chenzw  Talk  12:24, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
• Speedy delete- LTA - cross wiki Umar Jaum promospam see file here and checkuser results here and here Hoyanova (talk) 18:14, 22 December 2024 (UTC).

This request is due to close on 08:18, 28 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

AP Companies Global Health Management

AP Companies Global Health Management (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-notable company, sourced only to promotional sources. Depextual (talk) 07:43, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 07:43, 28 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Trabzon expedetion (1510)

Trabzon expedetion (1510) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BigKrow has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Hoax??? BigKrow (talk) 20:41, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 20:41, 27 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Archaeological sites destroyed during the Gaza genocide

Archaeological sites destroyed during the Gaza genocide (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BigKrow has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not found on Wikipedia BigKrow (talk) 18:50, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Keep The topic has "received significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject" as required by WP:GNG. What policy does the nomination refer to? Richard Nevell (talk) 19:02, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
•  Keep Found on Arabic Wikipedia, Clearly notable subject article. Raayaan9911 19:50, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
•  Keep Notable Article --Ksy 19:24, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
• Keep per the above comments. An article can exist on this wiki even when it's not found anywhere else. Garsh2 (talk) 02:42, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 18:50, 27 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Kadama

Kadama (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BigKrow has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No page on Wikipedia BigKrow (talk) 18:48, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Keep Subject is notable because of news coverage. Not having a Wikipedia page is not a valid deletion reason. You need to provide a valid reason. Maybe no one bothered to make them a page. I do see that the [CEO has a Wikipedia page]. Here are some of the good citations and why it qualifies:

• Entrepreneurship: Successfully Launching New Ventures
• Featured on Tech crunch's This Week in Apps Series
• Featured on bellevuereporter
• bellevuereporter
• Foster School of Business
• EdTech Review
• Geek Wire

There are more news references available, if you think these are not enough. Darrenchant (talk) 17:58, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

Discussion

No Wikipedia BigKrow (talk) 19:04, 20 December 2024 (UTC) This request is due to close on 18:48, 27 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Hari Singh Bhangi (2nd nomination)

Hari Singh Bhangi (2nd nomination) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BigKrow has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No Wikipedia page BigKrow (talk) 18:44, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

He have Wikipedia page for god sake read my reply and refrences Jisshu (talk) 18:49, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 18:44, 27 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Battle of Suleymaniyah (1678)

Battle of Suleymaniyah (1678) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BigKrow has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Possible hoax BigKrow (talk) 18:36, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 18:36, 27 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Qajar-Wahhabi War

Qajar-Wahhabi War (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BigKrow has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Hoax? BigKrow (talk) 18:35, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete No Notability history --Ksy 19:35, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 18:35, 27 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Qajar-Wahhabi War (1808-1811)

Qajar-Wahhabi War (1808-1811) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BigKrow has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Hoax? BigKrow (talk) 18:34, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete There is no such history about Wahhabi, No idea from where you get the story--Ksy 19:32, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 18:34, 27 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

David Balondemu

David Balondemu (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

আফতাবুজ্জামান has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Cross wiki spam, Non notable. The article has some refs, but all of them are basically interview masquerading as article, WP:PRIMARY. There is no significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, fails WP:GNG. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 15:34, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Comment: G5'd by Eptalon.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 19:29, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 15:34, 27 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Maku Rebellion

Maku Rebellion (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Originally nominated as 'A6-hoax', I find an artilce about en:Ibrahim Heski. That article mentions that Heski (birth date unknown/unspecifired), died in 1931; the enwp article has a section 'Maku rebellion'. So, dear community. What we have here is not a hoax, but it may only be part of the truth. As is, it probably results in a delete. Other option is to add the missing things, to make this a keepable, sourced article? Eptalon (talk) 15:30, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 15:30, 27 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Rawandiz Revolt

Rawandiz Revolt (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BigKrow has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No page on English Wikipedia BigKrow (talk) 13:42, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

BigKrow (talk) 13:42, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

Not a good reason for deletion. Rathfelder (talk) 14:46, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

I disagree. BigKrow (talk) 18:22, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

 Keep No valid deletion reason, not being on EN is not a reason to delete a page from here.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 19:32, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 13:42, 27 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Hari Singh Bhangi

Hari Singh Bhangi (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BigKrow has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No English Wikipedia page. BigKrow (talk) 13:39, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

No English Wikipedia page. BigKrow (talk) 13:40, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

i also know it's simple English Wikipedia that's why i am using basic English Jisshu (talk) 13:47, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

if you want to nominate article for deletion please give a valid reason Jisshu (talk) 13:50, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

and Hari Singh Bhangi have page in english Wikipedia with name of Hari Singh Dhillon he is ruler of Bhangi Misl that's why he also refer as Hari Singh Bhangi and his son jhanda Singh Bhangi before nominating article please read reference Jisshu (talk) 13:52, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 13:39, 27 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Simka Entertainment

Simka Entertainment (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BigKrow has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Possible error? BigKrow (talk) 13:38, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Possible error for Wikipedia page? BigKrow (talk) 13:38, 20 December 2024 (UTC) This request is due to close on 13:38, 27 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Zilan Operation

Zilan Operation (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BigKrow has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Zilan massacre exists BigKrow (talk) 13:08, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Zilan massacre on English Wikipedia exists. BigKrow (talk) 13:09, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 13:08, 27 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Massacre of Salmas (1930)

Massacre of Salmas (1930) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BigKrow has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No Wikipedia page BigKrow (talk) 13:06, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

No wp page BigKrow (talk) 13:07, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

 Keep Not having an article on another wikipedia is not a valid deletion reason.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 19:31, 20 December 2024 (UTC) This request is due to close on 13:06, 27 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Why notability... BigKrow (talk) 19:33, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

Tasneem Khalil

Tasneem Khalil (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BigKrow has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Copied from English Wikipedia BigKrow (talk) 12:51, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Seems copied mostly from English Wikipedia BigKrow (talk) 12:52, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

 Keep Subject is Notable (Copied from ENG Wiki but simplified) --Ksy 19:46, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 12:51, 27 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Paulo Leao

Paulo Leao (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BigKrow has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable BigKrow (talk) 02:58, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

no Wikipedia page BigKrow (talk) 02:59, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

@BigKrow Hello friends! Regarding the page deletion request, I would like to say that the artist Paulo Leão may not be as famous as a super star but he is as important as many other non-famous artists that are heard on Wikipedia. And he is important in Brazil. He has won so many awards in his country and around the world. He worked at TV Globo and in feature films. He produced and directed other internationally award-winning films. So I will continue to make updates to increase his page with more content in the hope that the page remains active. Thank you very much. Thank you very much.--Katzin-Kohen (talk) 03:19, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 02:58, 27 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Farabi Shafiur Rahman

Farabi Shafiur Rahman (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BigKrow has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No English Wikipedia page, non notable? BigKrow (talk) 02:55, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Seems suspicious. BigKrow (talk) 02:56, 20 December 2024 (UTC) This request is due to close on 02:55, 27 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Notable as WP:CRIME says that, A person who is known only in connection with a criminal event or trial should not normally be the subject of a separate Wikipedia article if there is an existing article that could incorporate the available encyclopedic material relating to that person.

Where there is such an existing article, it may be appropriate to create a sub-article, but only if this is necessitated by considerations of article size.

Where there are no appropriate existing articles, the criminal or victim in question should be the subject of a Wikipedia article only if one of the following applies:

For victims, and those wrongly accused or wrongly convicted of a crime (or crimes),

For perpetrators,

The victim of the crime is a renowned national or international figure, including, but not limited to, politicians or celebrities; or

The motivation for the crime or the execution of the crime is unusual—or has otherwise been considered noteworthy—such that it is a well-documented historic event. Generally, historic significance is indicated by sustained coverage of the event in reliable secondary sources which persists beyond contemporaneous news coverage and devotes significant attention to the individual's role.

Note: A living person accused of a crime is presumed not guilty unless and until the contrary is decided by a court of law. Editors must give serious consideration to not creating an article on an alleged perpetrator when no conviction is yet secured. 103.230.106.16 (talk) 03:29, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

Battle of Kerh (1516)

Battle of Kerh (1516) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BigKrow has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Hoax? No English Wikipedia page? Thanks. BigKrow (talk) 02:53, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

hoax ? I can't find anything... BigKrow (talk) 02:54, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

Delete No information can be found.Darrenchant (talk) 19:56, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 02:53, 27 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

2024 Kwango province disease outbreak

2024 Kwango province disease outbreak (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The content is vague and practically useless. On English Wikipedia this redirects to a page about a malaria outbreak in Kwango province. But the reference here is related to COVID-19. Depextual (talk) 22:19, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete reminiscent of the original (now-deleted) version of the page COVID-19 pandemic in British Columbia, and the wording makes me believe it was made by that user, ignoring the recommendations posted to their talk page in their unblock attempts.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 10:00, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 22:19, 26 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

ToFro Exchange

ToFro Exchange (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No significant coverage in reliable sources. I also can't find evidence that they have offices in over 130 countries. Depextual (talk) 20:56, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Delete no significant coverage can be found.Darrenchant (talk) 13:42, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

Discussion

This request is due to close on 20:56, 26 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Rashaad Joseph

Rashaad Joseph (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable rapper Depextual (talk) 20:42, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 20:42, 26 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Ali Azhar D

Ali Azhar D (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable; article contains spamlinks (Instagram profile); sources are unreliable. BZPN (talk) 13:15, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Per nominator  Keep Yes it could need help, but sources are reliable. Not a reason for deletion🎄 Adelaideslement8723 🎄 13:39, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

  Excuse me, I think it has met the criteria of 'Any Biography' which is nominated for an award, especially since this is an award from the bilateral relations between the two countries Indo - Australia. MR Bang Jago (talk) 13:41, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

  I have deleted all the links that have Instagram, because maybe it includes SPAM, so I have deleted all of them. MR Bang Jago (talk) 13:43, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

  Well now it's been removed, all is resolved, and I apologize because I didn't know that links from Instagram were not allowed to be included in this Wikipedia page. 🙏😭 MR Bang Jago (talk) 14:31, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

  It may not be notable, but since you removed the link to Instagram, the sources are pretty reliable. 💜 𝙹𝚊𝚢𝚍𝚎𝚗𝙹𝚘𝚑𝚗𝚜𝚘𝚗 💜 14:40, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

•  Comment: from what I see, this IWAAF is not any significant award (but more of a local one), and the content itself shows that the film was nominated, not this actor. BZPN (talk) 14:53, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

  Ali Azhar D who made the movie MR Bang Jago (talk) 14:55, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

  more of a bilateral award between Indo-Australian countries MR Bang Jago (talk) 14:57, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

  And I also included in the external link, he is one of the officials from the ministry of communication and informatics in the Indonesian government. MR Bang Jago (talk) 15:01, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

  If in this Wikipedia, is it not allowed to make pages in the government? more precisely in the scope of the ministry? MR Bang Jago (talk) 15:04, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

  If in this Wikipedia, is it not allowed to make pages in the government? more precisely in the scope of the ministry? because Ali is one of the scope of ministry officials as well. MR Bang Jago (talk) 15:06, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

  When it comes to references, I include references to secondary sources that have been verified by the Press Council, so it is impossible that the media is not notable, articles that appear in our country's media must first be verified by the Press Council, the Press Council itself is under the auspices of the Presidency of the Republic of Indonesia and is equivalent to the Ministry of Communication and Information, and the press rules of the Indonesian state are different from the press rules in the United State and other European countries, so Ali Azhar D's page is notable regarding its references. MR Bang Jago (talk) 15:27, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

  We invited @MathXplore @Fr33kman @BRPever to have a discussion related to this page MR Bang Jago (talk) 10:29, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

  It looks like the administrator left Ali Azhar D's page, I have invited for discussion but my message was deleted by MathXplore and my message was also ignored by Fr33kman. MR Bang Jago (talk) 13:50, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

  They don't ignore you, it's just that as administrators they are often busy and don't have time to respond. Also, please stop spamming the MathXplore and Fr33kman's discussion with unnecessary messages. BZPN (talk) 16:45, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

  Administrator note: WP:EVASION, please see Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2023/Ali Azhar D for previous discussion. MathXplore (talk) 22:31, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 13:15, 25 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Eric Horwitz

Eric Horwitz (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Page is written like a CV of the subject Please other Check Ksy 06:40, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Per nominatior Raayaan9911 14:44, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 06:40, 26 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Jimmy-D

Jimmy-D (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ternera has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Youtube URLs are the only sources. Seems to fail GNG. Ternera (talk) 20:19, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Youtube Websites Sources, without any reliable or secondary sources. But Youtube are primary sources. Raayaan9911 04:29, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 20:19, 25 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Bananaphobia

Bananaphobia (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Complex, written by LLM, but most importantly, it's a hoax. Nothing like "bananophobia" has ever been scientifically or medically described (not counting the pseudo-medical inventions of newspapers and portals, which of course cannot be the basis for describing the disease). It's more of an AI creation. BZPN (talk) 19:44, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• There are numerous links to bananaphobia, and many cases are reported and widely available to read online. Whilst I agree this is not a common phobia, simply stating this is a hoax and AI created diminishes the actual issues that are felt by suffers. A simple online search will a show people who auffer from this. I suggest you watch the ITV news reader Charlene White talk about this on Loose Women. It is not for those who do not suffer from this to decide if it exists or not, that decision rests solely with those who do suffer from it. Those who do suffer describe their feelings in detail and these wholly align with the feeling of other phobia sufferers. I am not aware of any articles referencing pseudo-medical inventions in relation to this. 46.183.109.221 (talk) 20:05, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

Just stop lying. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and the diseases described here must be medically and scientifically confirmed. We do not describe Internet inventions as real diseases, and interviews on pseudomedical portals or joke reports in newspapers have no significance here. BZPN (talk) 20:14, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

P.S. there is no entry with this title in any other wiki and it is not mentioned in any of the medical/scientific articles, and enwiki in two biographies only mentions this word as an invention of people. BZPN (talk) 20:21, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

A phobia is not a disease, it is classes as an anxiety disorder. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phobia

A phobia is by definition an irrational fear, how is this less legitimate than coulrophobia the fear of clowns.

It is not for you to decide what does or does not cause a person anxiety. Neither you nor I can deny anyone their irrational fear, whether is it of a clowns, confined spaces or bananas. You do not get to decide. Medical or scientific confirmation of a phobia can only be acheived by exposure to the item and observing the reaction. If exposure to bananas illicits the same response in the sufferer as an arachnophobe would have reacting to a spider then the criteria for a phobia is met. As for this word being an invention of people, that is exactly how all words are formed. This is the basis of how all language evolves. M1tpx (talk) 09:06, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

And it's also not up to you to decide whether this phobia is real. Before you even want to start any discussion here, I recommend that you read the policies and guidelines, especially WP:VER and WP:NOT. I will repeat for the last time - an encyclopedia is not the place to describe scientifically unconfirmed diseases invented by people without medical basis. Phobias/other mental disorders must be confirmed by scientific/medical sources and studies. BZPN (talk) 09:13, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

P.S. according to the enwiki article (en:Phobia), which you mentioned, a phobia must be medically classified, most often under the ICD-11 or DSM-5 classification. The banana-pseudophobia discussed here has never been included in any medical classification. BZPN (talk) 09:18, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 19:44, 25 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Llyrio

Llyrio (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ravensfire has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Copied from declined draft on enwiki - after removing the significant exaggerations, there's not enough to show how this person meets WP:NACTOR - background roles, minor particpation, but nothing significant. Ravensfire (talk) 17:48, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 17:48, 25 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Hoop Dogz

Hoop Dogz (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ravensfire has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Copied from a declined draft on enwiki - sources are mainly primary, with one secondary source that lacks significant coverage of the videos. Ravensfire (talk) 17:19, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Per nominatior, Complex Article. Raayaan9911 07:16, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:19, 25 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The Power of Zhu

The Power of Zhu (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ravensfire has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unreleased film, sources are mainly primary or in-universe. A trailer was released, but apparently this didn't see (wide) distribution. There's one decent source that's about a lawsuit tied to this film (among others), but there's no significant coverage of the film. Article is a direct copy of a declined draft on enwiki. Ravensfire (talk) 17:14, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 17:14, 25 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Misha Williams

Misha Williams (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ravensfire has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Sources are primary, nothing to show that WP:NMUSIC or WP:GNG. Merely be associated with notable companies or acts is not enough. Ravensfire (talk) 15:39, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 15:39, 25 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

2022–23 Al-Nassr FC season

2022–23 Al-Nassr FC season (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

FusionSub has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: AI article, unencyclopedic. A WP:TNT candidate in my opinion. - FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 14:15, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete text like "The arrival of Cristiano Ronaldo in December 2022 boosted the team's profile" are AI, How users created new article like this. Raayaan9911 17:08, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

•  Delete This content is not encyclopedic.--Amina Khan12 (talk) 19:53, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 14:15, 24 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

DSJ Exchange

DSJ Exchange (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No Notability and Self Publish Article Other please check If I am not wrong. Ksy 09:25, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 09:25, 24 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Elite Rentals Dubai

Elite Rentals Dubai (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Looks like company promotion BZPN (talk) 07:37, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete No Notability Self Published. --Ksy 09:41, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete Purely promotional content.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 10:23, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete Promotional fluff. Ravensfire (talk) 14:32, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 07:37, 24 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

DigitalYoog Media

DigitalYoog Media (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Company promotion, not notable, complex language. BZPN (talk) 20:41, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Zero Notability and Promotional--Ksy 09:43, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 20:41, 23 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Lunakai

Lunakai (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Advertising (company promotion), not notable, complex language. BZPN (talk) 20:34, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 20:34, 23 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

DIDWW

DIDWW (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Raayaan9911 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-Notable Article, This Article was Spam References, Fails GNG Raayaan9911 16:51, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete As per Nominator --Ksy 09:45, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 16:51, 23 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Daniel Larze

Daniel Larze (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No Notability Other please check if I am not wrong Ksy 16:40, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete, not notable, and the only source is unreliable. BZPN (talk) 16:57, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
• Delete, that is what i am leaning toward.--Not notable.--If one is wondering: is he mentioned in En-wiki articles? No.--Other info at en-wiki: "02:38, 14 July 2022 Scottywong talk contribs protected Daniel Larze [Create=Require administrator access] (indefinite) (Repeatedly recreated)
  17:29, 13 July 2022 Lourdes talk contribs deleted page Daniel Larze (A7: Article about a real person, which does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject)
  14:24, 17 February 2022 Bbb23 talk contribs deleted page Daniel Larze (A7: Article about a band, singer, musician, or musical ensemble, which does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject)
  09:25, 17 February 2022 Shirt58 talk contribs deleted page Daniel Larze (A7: Article about a real person, which does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject. Obvious WP:AUTOBIO. WP:BEFORE done, no chance that this would pass an WP:AFD - see self-created IMDb entry https://www.imdb.com/name/nm13394251)
  06:42, 10 February 2022 Iridescent talk contribs deleted page Daniel Larze (G7: One author who has requested deletion or blanked the page – to retrieve it, see WP:REFUND)". 2001:2020:32F:E6A2:CC28:ED4F:4CA3:708C (talk) 19:20, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep Wikipedia prioritizes verifiability over truth. If the information is potentially true but lacks sources, it can remain.
• Keep- lack of source should not be the only reason for deletion. --Amina Khan12 (talk) 19:52, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

  • Keep Deleting this article would undermine Wikipedia's goal of documenting notable figures; keeping it allows for further development, promoting inclusivity and the potential for meaningful contributions, and it also shows that this article maintains a neutral tone, adhering to Wikipedia's neutrality policy.

  Lack of explicit deletion criteria no clear violation of Wikipedia's deletion policies (e.g., vandalism, copyright infringement) is evident.

  Also this article can be improved and expanded with more reliable sources. 120.28.64.81 (talk) 16:20, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

  • Keep because based on my research about this person it has notable and reliable reference although poor sourced but still reconsidering as notable person and potentially verified.

  Alexgrand22 (talk) 16:35, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

•  Comment: There have been three keep votes but two of them have no edits outside this subject, so I think they are likely to be sockpuppets. Depextual (talk) 16:53, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 16:40, 23 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Brothers Furniture

Brothers Furniture (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Looks like advertising (company promotion). Not notable at all. BZPN (talk) 12:34, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

 Keep The references provided clearly establish the subject's notability. They are not merely trivial mentions but include in-depth, independent, and reliable sources. These references are readily accessible and verifiable. Therefore, I strongly support keeping the article.Needyrude (talk) 12:53, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

•  Delete Promotional and Non Notable --Ksy 09:49, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 12:34, 23 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Store friendly

Store friendly (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Raayaan9911 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-Notable Article, How users created their articles like this. Fails GNG Raayaan9911 07:58, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

This article was advertising too Raayaan9911 08:02, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Delete: This page has references which are mostly profiles so I think so it should be deleted.--Azwarjuttone (talk) 15:10, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 07:58, 23 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Vince Maristela

Vince Maristela (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The subject has no Notability Other Please Check if I am not Wrong Ksy 07:34, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Vince Maristela is a Filipino actor & model in GMA Network in the Philippines.Ivan P. Clarin (talk) 13:57, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

Discussion

• Delete: I have checked the subject's notability and it does not fulfill the criteria for notability. So, it should be deleted.--Azwarjuttone (talk) 15:12, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete not seeing anything online to show how the article's subject is notable. Ternera (talk) 15:12, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete, not notable. BZPN (talk) 16:28, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 07:34, 23 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Jake Villamor

Jake Villamor (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Zero Notability Please Check if I am not wrong Ksy 18:20, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Delete: This article has limited information and it should be deleted.--Azwarjuttone (talk) 15:13, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 18:20, 22 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Jake Villamor is a Filipino actor and internet personality in the Philippines.Ivan P. Clarin (talk) 06:15, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

Iñaki Torres

Iñaki Torres (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No Notability Please check if I am not wrong Ksy 18:19, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Iñaki "Aki" Torres is a Filipino actor popularly known played various role in boys lovers along with Miko Gallardo.Ivan P. Clarin (talk) 06:17, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

Note: Moved above the footer.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 09:40, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

• Delete: There is no proper referencing for any of the given information.--Azwarjuttone (talk) 15:16, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 18:19, 22 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Kuldeep Sandhu

Kuldeep Sandhu (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable, no significant coverage in reliable sources. Depextual (talk) 14:47, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 14:47, 22 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Janmejay (author)

Janmejay (author) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable, no significant coverage in reliable sources. Depextual (talk) 14:45, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 14:45, 22 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

D. Kaustubh Sonalkar

D. Kaustubh Sonalkar (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable, doesn't have significant coverage in reliable sources. I noticed that Kaustubh Sonalkar was quickly deleted before, but I think this page claims notability and may not qualify for QD as advertising, so I started this RfD. Depextual (talk) 14:44, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Delete: The subject is not notable as it does not have significant coverage in third party references.--Azwarjuttone (talk) 15:37, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 14:44, 22 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Baroque house

Baroque house (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: We already have a baroque article, so this short and worthless summary is unnecessary. It does not contain any specific information and is not even related to the title itself (Baroque house). BZPN (talk) 22:30, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Baroque is the name for a time period. In this context we can talk about baroque architecture, baroque music, baroque painting, baroque furniture, baroque sculpture etc. It is clear thatunless we count art historians among us we are not going to get in-depth articles on all of them. It was me who created this page, in 2007. It is clear that what we now call 'baroque' is mostly about churches, but there are some houses in that stlye too. Examples are the Pavionn de l'horloge (part of the Louvre today), Greenwich hospital, or (parts of) many palaces. Just because a page is short doesn't mean it doesn't have a reason for existing. Like wqith Gothic Architecture, the few buildings that aren't Churches/Cathedrals, and that are built in Gothic style, this likely is of similar interest. That there's so little change in the long years its existence just tells me that the article isn't viewed often, or is not of particular interee in extenfing it. Nevertheless I'd favor keeping it... --Eptalon (talk) 14:27, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

  The actual content doesn't say anything about baroque houses at all - probably the only solution to keep this article would be to change the content to redirect to baroque. BZPN (talk) 22:38, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 22:30, 20 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Christine Chandler

Christine Chandler (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Red-tailed hawk has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: A previous deletion discussion concluded with deleting this page. However, per WP:PEOPLE:

A person can be notable if they have been written about in many published secondary sources. These must be reliable, independent of each other, and independent of the subject.

However, all the sources here (aside from an obituary of a relative, which does not contribute towards notability) are from the same publication: Business Insider. Because of this, we do not have many reliable sources that are independent of each other, and this should be deleted for lack of notability.

Red-tailed hawk (talk) 23:31, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Move to Draft:Christine_Chandler - The article is neutrally written, which is a good thing. One of the problems with the last articles is that they were written by trolls.

I agree that it isn’t ready for the main space, but Chris already has articles on several non English Wikipedias. There are plenty of other sources for the Chris page. Anyone who knows even a bit about internet culture knows about her, so she is notable for sure. The article just isn’t ready for the main space yet. Dr. Precursor (talk) 05:04, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

 Comment: On Simple English Wikipedia there is no Draft: namespace, but it could be moved to someone's userspace, such as yours. Depextual (talk) 05:07, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

That sounds like a good idea. Dr. Precursor (talk) 05:24, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 23:31, 18 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

References

Template:C.S. Marítimo squad

Template:C.S. Marítimo squad (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Nominating two sports-related navbox templates that each have only one relevant blue link. (In fact, each has only one blue link at all at this time.) Without more blue links, a navbox can't do its job of navigating between related articles.

Templates included in this request:

• Template:C.S. Marítimo squad -- transcluded by one article that isn't linked in the template; also has one redirect
• Template:SC Veendam managers -- transcluded by one article

The C.S. Marítimo template actually appears to be out of date, but updating it from enwiki's current version would result in no blue links at all. -- Auntof6 (talk) 17:12, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Per nominator. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 17:13, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete looks like, most of links are red. Raayaan9911 08:49, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete A ton of red links, not notable. 🎄 Adelaideslement8723 🎄 14:47, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

•  Comment: Edit: I meant that it is notable but a ton of red links are in the article though. 🎄 Adelaideslement8723 🎄 14:49, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:12, 18 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Shrinetra Pandey

Shrinetra Pandey (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable at all, looks like advertising BZPN (talk) 10:32, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• This is just basic info about the person. A few research articles, YouTube links of the lectures and more info will be uploaded gradually. 47.247.24.82 (talk) 10:54, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
•  Keep Could need improving, no need for deletion. ☆ Adelaideslement8723 ☆ 01:41, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete Non-notable. I don't see how a reference that contains his e-mail is a reliable source. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 15:31, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

•  Comment:Right. It doesn't but, it still has a lot of ways to go, the article itself will need improving ☆ Adelaideslement8723 ☆ 15:43, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 10:32, 18 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Battle of Mandan

Battle of Mandan (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Shakib ul hassan has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Article fails to meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. The event lacks significant coverage in reliable sources, and the existing references fail to verify its details. Much of the content appears speculative and disputed, violating guidelines on verifiability and reliable sourcing. Shakib ul hassan talk! 14:10, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep None of the above reason seems the case it's surely needs copy editing but the article seems to be reliable and it is also available on the English Wikipedia [1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr.Hanes (talk • contribs) 14:36, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

  Even though the article is available on the English Wikipedia, that alone doesn’t justify its retention. The presence of significant copy-editing issues suggests a lack of editorial oversight, which can impact credibility. Furthermore, the sources used are overly simplified and lack the depth expected for a reliable article. Reliability depends on verifiable, high-quality sources, not mere availability on another platform. If these issues persist, deletion might be the most appropriate course of action to maintain quality standards. Shakib ul hassan talk! 14:33, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

  Also the redirect link doesn’t lead directly to the article but to another page[2], showing it lacks significance. It isn’t covered substantially and doesn’t even have a separate article on English Wikipedia. Combined with poor sources and copy-editing issues, deletion is the best option. Shakib ul hassan talk! 14:43, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

•  Delete or possibly add a small amount of information to List of battles in Rajasthan. Not notable enough for its own article. --IWI (talk) 14:43, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
•  Keep Needs copyediting work, but reliable.☆ Adelaideslement8723 ☆ 08:49, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

  Lacks WP:GNG however Shakib ul hassan talk! 14:44, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

• Delete Per nom, I find the Coverage to be less than required on Wikipedia. --Malik-Al-Hind (talk) 10:07, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

• Delete : The article relies on four references, all of which are problematic:

Reference No.	Reference	Objection
1	*Sardula-vamsa-prakasa [Volume 1] By Raghunātha Siṃha Śekhāvata (1977)	Page number not provided; citation verification failed.
2	*Śarmā, Mahāvīra Prasāda (1980). History of Torawati (in Hindi). Prakāśana Samiti	Page number not provided; citation verification failed.
3	*Yadav, Kripal Chandra (1967). Ahīravāla kā itihāsa, madhyayuga se 1947 ī. taka (in Hindi). Akhila Bhāratīya Yādava Mahāsabhā, Vārāṇasī ke Nimitta Hariyāṇā Prakāśana	Page number not provided; citation verification failed.
4	*Bisāū digdarśana	Not a reliable source; page number not provided; citation verification failed.

NXcrypto Chatting 18:49, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 14:10, 17 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

MCB Bank

MCB Bank (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Mudamang has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This Article is completely advertisement for the subject and I could not find any independent sources except company's published reports. Mudamang (talk) 15:31, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• keep - enwiki article seems suitably sourced. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 18:22, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

  References on enwiki don't show notability here. The article here needs to be sourced. -- Auntof6 (talk) 19:09, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

  "Notability is a property of a subject and not of a Wikipedia article" from en:WP:Notability. Depextual (talk) 19:11, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

  @Depextual: Are you saying that if an article on one Wikipedia has sources, then no other Wikipedias need sources on the corresponding article(s)? -- Auntof6 (talk) 08:07, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

  @Auntof6 They should have sources, but I don't think it's a reason for deletion. Depextual (talk) 14:29, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep per Lee Vilenski. If the sources exist, then this would be notable even if they aren't cited. Red-tailed hawk (talk) 01:12, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
•  Keep Notable. Adelaideslement8723 (talk) 01:30, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
•  Keep Clearly, Notable Pakistani Bank. We don't need a deletion. Raayaan9911 13:25, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 15:31, 13 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Pasteur Bizimungu

Pasteur Bizimungu (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Hockeycatcat has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not simple, not adhering to Manual of Style. Hockeycatcat (talk) (changes) 05:56, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• He is clearly notable. Article needs improvement, not deletion. Rathfelder (talk) 21:46, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
•  Keep See WP:BEFORE, specifically "If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate for RfD." That is the case here. Both complexity and nonconformity to the MOS can be fixed. --Auntof6 (talk) 08:11, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
•  Keep I'd argue SOFIXIT applies to this page, since it isn't in a horrendus state where TNT would be advised and the subject looks to be notable.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 12:27, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 05:56, 14 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Fiorenzo Manganiello

Fiorenzo Manganiello (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The Article written is Purely advertisement for subject and could not find any independent sources Please check if I am not wrong Ksy 14:56, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Keep: First of all, It does fulfill the criteria for WP:GNG as majority of citations are from secondary reliable sources and do not have passing mentions only. There are complete articles on the subject and about his business. It does fulfill the criteria for WP:GNG. It specifically cover the clause titled as ""Significant coverage" addresses the topic directly and in detail, so that no original research is needed to extract the content. Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention, but it does not need to be the main topic of the source material." Also, it adhers to clause "There is no fixed number of sources required since sources vary in quality and depth of coverage, but multiple sources are generally expected." So, I think so it should not be deleted.

Also, this article has been written considering wikipedia guidelines. I would suggest that you check sources by yourself instead of simply putting tags of deletion on it.

consider it according to WP:THREE, [3], [4], [5]], [6]], [7] all qualifies as secondary sources and are following the guideline provided in WP:GNG stated as ""Significant coverage" addresses the topic directly and in detail, so that no original research is needed to extract the content. Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention, but it does not need to be the main topic of the source material." Fanalrino (talk) 15:18, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

Administrator note: CU-requested (Special:Diff/9949254). MathXplore (talk) 13:43, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

• Keep: The subject is notable and have enough coverage in reliable sources. I have also edited the article and did my research on this guy. This subject is notable and have coverage by a number of newspapers that are trusted sources. I have also checked the history of editor who have added the AFD tag. The edtitor has a history of adding tags without doing proper research and even was warned to stop adding AFD or even STUB tags on articles instead of improving it. I think so, this subject has a lot of coverage and it should have article on wikipedia. --Azwarjuttone (talk) 14:57, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

  Administrator note: CU-requested (Special:Diff/9949254). MathXplore (talk) 13:44, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

@MathXplore, I have nothing to do with this user who created this page and also nothing to do with the subject as well. According to deletion page, if there is an article that needs editing, it should be deleted instead of nominating it. So, this was the reason, I edited this article and then posted my comment on this deletion page. In the end, I will say that you can check but it is bit discouraging for new editors to face scenarios like this. --Azwarjuttone (talk) 15:46, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

• Keep: I have researched about the subject and it is notable. Therefore, i am convinced that the article must be kept as it does not appears to be promotional.--Amina Khan12 (talk) 07:29, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

 Comment: I have already mention above that Other Please Check If I am not wrong that I put the article in RFD. Any how, I have done a little more research on above Subject. The all above three editors having close relation with the subject or they have Un disclose of payment with the subject. My Proof (As you can check above subject name has been pervious tried 4 time to get it publish on Eng Wikipedia Language. And Group of new editors trying to Vote KEEP) as the group of editor trying to do on this page, again I am saying Other please check if I am not wrong on this --Ksy 16:06, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

 Comment: This is really unprofessional that you are blaming someone by simply typing check if I am not wrong. I am quite sure that you are paid by someone just to make this deletion. I told earlier I have nothing to do with the subject or even the editor who created this project. I gave my honest review on the basis of my research. From your edit history, it is quite evident that you are paid first to add the AFD tag and then just making it a personal grudge and blaming others without any proof. You are harassing so I would request that if you want to provide argument, do it on the basis of research and solid arguments just like I provided by doing research on this subject. It is not according to rules that you just add anything and then at the end type, check if I am not wrong. I have checked your deletion tags history, you have made this deletion discussion personal which is not allowed. I am sure that you are an undiclosed paid editor who just wants to sabotage without providing any strong point. If you have a reasoning backed by solid arguments, I would love to discuss this subject's page.--Azwarjuttone (talk) 18:18, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 14:56, 13 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Recently closed deletion discussions

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Keep. Article was improved since it was nominated, keepable now.--Eptalon (talk) 11:32, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

Korean People's Army

Korean People's Army (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This article has no meaning for the reader. The only information it contains is one sentence that such a service existed. No source whatsoever. BZPN (talk) 21:42, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep As Article is expended with source I change my VOTE from Delete to Keep -Ksy 21:51, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Keep WP:BEFORE point C - deletion is not cleanup --Ferien (talk) 22:07, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

  @BZPN, Auntof6, and Kuskrey: I have expanded the article, with a source. Any thoughts on the article in its current state? --Ferien (talk) 19:26, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

  @Ferien, I think it can be left in its current appearance. Thank you for expanding and improving it! BZPN (talk) 19:35, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

  Now there is no reason to Vote in Delete as page is expanded with source I Change my Vote from Delete to Keep Thank you Ksy 20:00, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep per ferien, and another point: Wouldn't a significant army during the Korean war, one of the more famous and notable wars of both the cold war and the 20th century be notable? it would be best to add to it instead of deleting it. RiggedMint 15:04, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

  The question should be is the topic notable, not is this a good article. Rathfelder (talk) 17:01, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

  In which, the article is very much notable. RiggedMint 23:47, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

•  Delete I might even have QD'd under option A2 -- the content is basically just a rephrasing of the title. --Auntof6 (talk) 08:18, 7 December 2024 (UTC)  Keep Article has been improved. --Auntof6 (talk) 22:24, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

  Why should it be deleted over to be improved though? It's clearly an important article because it's the armed forces of the DPRK. RiggedMint 18:50, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

@RiggedMint: Improvement is better, yes, but I give my opinions based on the current state of the article. We can't know that an article will be improved until it actually happens. --Auntof6 (talk) 22:24, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 21:42, 6 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Keep. C.H.Beck is a well-known German scientific publisher...--Eptalon (talk) 11:28, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

Capture of Siverek (1925)

Capture of Siverek (1925) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

JJPMaster has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: See all of the other RfDs for "Capture of..." articles by Canoooo.4 from today. JJP_Master (she/they) 23:02, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• User talk:Canoooo.4 is clearly working on the history of Kurdistan. I think they should be helped to do that. Rathfelder (talk) 17:35, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
• Userfy and encourage the editor to combine the related ones. Combining would make better articles. --Auntof6 (talk) 08:03, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 23:02, 4 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Keep. C.H:Beck is a well-known German scientific publisher. Article cleanup not what RfD is for..--Eptalon (talk) 11:26, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

Capture of Ergani (1925)

Capture of Ergani (1925) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unsourced article. Lack of proper wikitext formatting and a properly formed lead. In this form, the article does not provide readers with relevant information. Actually looks like a substub. BZPN (talk) 22:54, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep WP:BEFORE point C - deletion is not cleanup --Ferien (talk) 22:03, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
• Userfy and encourage the editor to combine the related ones. Combining would make better articles. --Auntof6 (talk) 07:26, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 22:54, 4 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Keep. Work cited by reputalbe German scientific publisher. Article needs cleanup, but that's not for RfD--Eptalon (talk) 11:24, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

Capture of Maden (1925)

Capture of Maden (1925) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unsourced article. Lack of proper wikitext formatting and a properly formed lead. In this form, the article does not provide readers with relevant information. Actually looks like a substub. BZPN (talk) 22:53, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep WP:BEFORE point C - deletion is not cleanup --Ferien (talk) 22:03, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
• Userfy and encourage the editor to combine the related ones. Combining would make better articles. --Auntof6 (talk) 07:26, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 22:53, 4 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Keep. Cited source by reputable German scientific publisher. Needs cleanup, extending, but that's not for RfD to decide.--Eptalon (talk) 11:21, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

Capture of Lice (1925)

Capture of Lice (1925) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unsourced article. Lack of proper wikitext formatting and a properly formed lead. In this form, the article does not provide readers with relevant information. Actually looks like a substub. BZPN (talk) 22:49, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete As per nom --Ksy 20:23, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Keep WP:BEFORE point C - deletion is not cleanup --Ferien (talk) 22:03, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete as per nom Mr.Hanes Talk 05:40, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
•  Keep Cleanup is Not Deletion Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 19:34, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete - I was unable to find any sources indicating that this battle was particularly notable, and as such, the article fails to meet criteria to be kept. That being said, some of the content in the article may be merged into an article about the greater war/conflict. Griff (talk) 21:20, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
• Userfy and encourage the editor to combine the related ones. Combining would make better articles. --Auntof6 (talk) 07:27, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 22:49, 4 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Keep. Long overdue, work cited is by a repubable German scientific publisher. Formatting, etc. not for RfD...--Eptalon (talk) 11:18, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

Capture of Palu (1925)

Capture of Palu (1925) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unsourced article. Lack of proper wikitext formatting and a properly formed lead. In this form, the article does not provide readers with relevant and informative information. Actually looks like a substub. BZPN (talk) 22:45, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Random Sources that redirected back to article, How users created new article like this. Both are non-notable and unreliable references Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 09:13, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Keep WP:BEFORE point C - deletion is not cleanup --Ferien (talk) 22:02, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete - I was unable to find any sources indicating that this battle was particularly notable, and as such, the article fails to meet criteria to be kept. That being said, some of the content in the article may be merged into an article about the greater war/conflict. Griff (talk) 21:18, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
• Userfy and encourage the editor to combine the related ones. Combining would make better articles. --Auntof6 (talk) 07:30, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 22:45, 4 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Keep. Works cited include one of a well-known German scientific publisher...--Eptalon (talk) 10:54, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

Capture of Bingöl (1925)

Capture of Bingöl (1925) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unsourced article. Lack of proper wikitext formatting and a properly formed lead. In this form, the article does not provide readers with relevant and informative information. Actually looks like a substub. BZPN (talk) 22:45, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep WP:BEFORE point C - deletion is not cleanup --Ferien (talk) 22:02, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete - I was unable to find any sources indicating that this battle was particularly notable, and as such, the article fails to meet criteria to be kept. That being said, some of the content in the article may be merged into an article about the greater war/conflict. Griff (talk) 21:23, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
• Userfy and encourage the editor to combine the related ones. Combining would make better articles. --Auntof6 (talk) 07:30, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 22:45, 4 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Keep. Article needs sources, though--Eptalon (talk) 10:51, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

Battle of Rawandiz

Battle of Rawandiz (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unsourced article. Lack of proper wikitext formatting and a properly formed lead. In this form, the article does not provide readers with relevant and informative information. Actually looks like a substub. BZPN (talk) 21:47, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep WP:BEFORE point C - deletion is not cleanup --Ferien (talk) 22:02, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Keep Please see WP:BEFORE Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 15:34, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete Article gives no info about the battle itself. I would suggest userfying as I did with similar ones that are currently at RfD, but this article was created by an IP. --Auntof6 (talk) 08:02, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 21:47, 4 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Keep. About three weeks overdue. Only !votes are about keeping. Whatthis article needs is better sourcing, though.--Eptalon (talk) 10:48, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

Alqosh Massacre (1832)

Alqosh Massacre (1832) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unsourced article. Lack of proper wikitext formatting and a properly formed lead. In this form, the article does not provide readers with relevant and informative information. Actually looks like a substub. BZPN (talk) 21:47, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep WP:BEFORE point C - deletion is not cleanup --Ferien (talk) 22:02, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
• Userfy and encourage the editor to combine the related ones. Combining would make better articles. --Auntof6 (talk) 07:31, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 21:47, 4 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Keep. This is about three weeks overdue. Artzicle links to an external source, which confirms there was such an event. So likely it happened, and is notable. Finding more sources or better ones, or bring the article to a state where it looks nicer is not for RfD discussions. So... this is a keep.--Eptalon (talk) 10:43, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

Khatare Massacre (1832)

Khatare Massacre (1832) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unsourced article. Lack of proper wikitext formatting and a properly formed lead. In this form, the article does not provide readers with relevant and informative information. BZPN (talk) 21:46, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep WP:BEFORE point C - deletion is not cleanup --Ferien (talk) 22:01, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
• Userfy and encourage the editor to combine the related ones. Combining would make better articles. --Auntof6 (talk) 07:31, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 21:46, 4 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  MathXplore (talk) 01:57, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

Thomas the Train and 2002

Thomas the Train and 2002 (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This article has no significance. Depextual (talk) 01:53, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete non-encyclopedic story.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 16:10, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
• Delete: non-encyclopedic story without any reference.

This request is due to close on 01:53, 22 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

Related pages

• All archives before July 2008 - implementation of new system made archives redundant
• Category:Requests for deletion that did not succeed
• Category:Requests for deletion that succeeded
• Wikipedia:Deletion policy
• Wikipedia:Quick deletion
• Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion
• Category:Deletion requests
• Category:Quick deletion requests