Wikipedia:Requests for deletion
Then follow these instructions on how to request a page for deletion. To find more information on what discussed deletions and quick deletions are:
PLEASE READ THIS
Before nominating: checks and alternatives change
Prior to nominating article(s) for deletion, please be sure to:
- A. Read and understand these policies and guidelines
- The Wikipedia deletion policy, which explains valid grounds for deletion.
- The main four guidelines and policies that inform deletion discussions: notability (WP:N), verifiability (WP:V), reliable sources (WP:RS), and what Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)
- Subject-specific notability guidelines, which can be found at Category:Wikipedia notability guidelines
- B. Carry out these checks
- Confirm that the article does not meet the criteria for quick deletion.
- If there are verifiability, notability or other sourcing concerns, take reasonable steps to search for reliable sources. (See step D.)
- Review the article's history to check for potential vandalism or poor editing.
- Read the article's talk page for previous nominations and/or that your objections haven't already been dealt with.
- Check "What links here" in the article's sidebar, to see how the page is used and referenced within Wikipedia.
- Check if there are interlanguage links, also in the sidebar, which may lead to more developed and better sourced articles. Likewise, search for native-language sources if the subject has a name in a non-Latin alphabet (such as Japanese or Greek), which is often in the lede.
- C. Consider whether the article could be improved rather than deleted
- If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate for RfD.
- If the article was recently created, please consider allowing the contributors more time to develop the article.
- If an article has issues try first raising your concerns on the article's talk page, with the main contributors, and/or adding a cleanup tag, such as
{{notability}}
,{{hoax}}
,{{original research}}
, or{{advert}}
; this ensures readers are aware of the problem and may act to fix it. - If the topic is not important enough to merit an article on its own, consider merging or redirecting to an existing article. This should be done particularly if the topic name is a likely search term.
- D. Search for additional sources, if the main concern is notability
- The minimum search expected is a normal Google search, a Google Books search, a Google News search, and a Google News archive search; Google Scholar is suggested for academic subjects.
- If you find a lack of sources, you've completed basic due diligence before nominating. However, if a quick search does find sources, this does not always mean an RfD on a sourcing basis is unwarranted. If you spend more time examining the sources, and determine that they are insufficient, e.g., because they only contain passing mention of the topic, then an RfD nomination may still be appropriate.
- If you find that adequate sources do appear to exist, the fact that they are not yet present in the article is not a proper basis for a nomination. Instead, you should consider citing the sources, or at minimum apply an appropriate template to the page that flags the sourcing concern. Common templates include {{unreferenced}}, {{refimprove}}, {{third-party}}, {{primary sources}} and {{one source}}.
Discussed deletion change
- Click "Change source" at the top of the page to be deleted.
- In the edit box, add this tag: {{rfd|REASON}}. Put it at the top of the page, above the rest of the text. Then, replace the text "REASON" with a short reason why the page should be deleted. Do not be too specific here. You can add more details on the discussion page (see below).
- It is a good idea to write a change summary to let others know what you are doing. You can say "nominating for deletion", "requesting deletion", or something like that.
- Click "Save changes" at the bottom to save the page with the deletion tag at the top.
- If the deletion tag has been added to the page, a box should appear at the top of the article with a link saying "Click here to create a discussion page!" Click that link.
- You should be taken to a page starting with "Creating Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/..." along with the current year and the name of the article to be deleted. In the edit box, the following tag should have already been added: {{RfD/Preload/Template}} . Replace the text PLACE REASON HERE with a more detailed reason why the page should be deleted.
- It is helpful to include links to the various policy pages about Wikipedia (that begin with Wikipedia:). Here are some examples of this: "This article is [[Wikipedia:COMPLEX|not easy to understand]]" or "Not a [[Wikipedia:notable|notable]] topic''. This will make others more aware of why the page is not acceptable under Wikipedia's policies.
- Click "Save changes" to save the new discussion page when you are done.
- A change summary you can write for this page is "creating discussion page", "starting deletion discussion", or something like that.
- As with the page for deletion, you can check the "Watch the page" box. This will let you know if someone else has replied to your discussion.
- Copy the title of the discussion page to the clipboard. You can do this by dragging the mouse over the text from "Wikipedia" to the end of the page title to highlight it, then right-clicking and selecting "Copy".
- Go to the list of deletion requests, and click "change source" beside the words "Current deletion request discussions".
- At the top of the list of discussions, paste the title from the clipboard (right-click and select "Paste"). Add a pair of curly brackets before and after the title to make a template that will copy the content of the discussion page onto the main deletion page, like this:
- {{Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2020/(name of page to be deleted)}}
- Finally, click "Save changes" to add the discussion to the list. If the page saves successfully, you should see your deletion discussion at the top of the list. And that's it!
If this is too complicated for you, there are some gadgets like Twinkle that you can use. This allows you to do it faster.
Quick deletion change
If you think a page has nonsense content, add {{non}} to the top of the page.
If you think a page does not say why the subject is important, add {{notable}} to the top of the page.
If you think a page should be deleted per other quick deletion rules, add {{QD|reason}} to the top of the page.
Notifying the user change
Generally, you should try to be civil and tell the user that created the page to join the discussion talking about the page. This can be done by adding {{subst:RFDNote|page to be deleted}} ~~~~
to the bottom of their talkpage.
Discussions change
- The discussion is not a vote. Please make suggestions on what action to take, and support your suggestion with reasons.
- Please look at the article before you make a suggestion. Do not make an opinion using only the information given by the nominator. Looking at the history of the article may help to understand the situation.
- Please read other comments and suggestions. They may have helpful information.
- Start your comments or suggestions on a new line. Start with
*
and sign after your comment by adding~~~~
to the end. If you are responding to another editor, put your comment directly below theirs and make sure your comment is indented (using more than one*
). - New users can make suggestions, but their ideas may not be considered, especially if the suggestion seems to be made in bad faith. The opinion of users who had an account before the start of the request may be given more weight or importance.
- Suggestions by users using "sock puppets" (more than one account belonging to the same person) will not be counted.
- Please make only one suggestion. If you change your mind, change your first idea instead of adding a new one. The best way to do this is to put
<s>
before your old idea and</s>
after it. For example, if you wanted to delete an article but now think it should be kept, you could put: "DeleteQuick keep". - If you would like an article to be kept, you can improve the article and try to fix the problems given in the request for deletion. If the reasons given in the nomination are fixed by changing, the nomination can be withdrawn by the nominator, and the deletion discussion will be closed by an administrator.
- Try to avoid confusing suggestions, such as delete and merge.
- Requests for deletion is not a war zone. You can click here for more information, although the page is not in Simple English.
Remember: You do not have to make a suggestion for every nomination. You should think about not making a suggestion if:
- A nomination involves a topic that you do not know much about.
- Everyone has made the same suggestion and you agree with that suggestion.
- All times are in UTC.
Current deletion request discussions change
Reinis Tumovs change
- Reinis Tumovs (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Кронас has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable ads. Кронас (talk) 10:30, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion change
This request is due to close on 10:30, 5 April 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Maor Ashkenazi change
- Maor Ashkenazi (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Shoot for the Stars has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not a notable rapper. Fails GNG. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 23:01, 28 March 2024 (UTC) Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion change
- Keep sources are reliable even though they are in Hebrew and there is also a Hebrew version of this article MCGAMER YOUTUBE (talk) 00:31, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep; Good evening, the Israeli rapper Maor Ashkenazi is notable, but in Israel it also has extensive media and news coverage, he wrote with a survivor of the Re'im music festival massacre a song that reached number 26 on the Israeli and Spotify Israel charts, and the last single won the award for the best video of the Las Vegas Best Film contest, I ask that the notoriety be reviewed since I take the time to translate it from Hebrew to English and then I will translate it into American English. Regards Acartonadooopo (talk) 23:10, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 23:01, 4 April 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Kalyan Srinivas Raygalla change
- Kalyan Srinivas Raygalla (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Rathfelder has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Promotional. No real evidence of notability. Rathfelder (talk) 21:34, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion change
This request is due to close on 21:34, 4 April 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
SwitchBot change
Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: fails WP:GNG --Ferien (talk) 14:59, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion change
- Comment: @Ferien Wouldn’t this be QD for advertising? That’s how I see it based on how it’s written. Thanks - PDLTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 16:40, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- PotsdamLamb, there is no unambiguous advertising in the article. It was not a page
created only to say good things about a company
, the page simply describes what the company does and its product line. If we wanted to quick delete, we could go down the road of A4 but seeing as the article has already existed for a month, allowing potential discussion doesn't hurt, and we don't have a backlog at RfD. --Ferien (talk) 01:18, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- PotsdamLamb, there is no unambiguous advertising in the article. It was not a page
- Delete Thanks - PDLTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 04:22, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 14:59, 4 April 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Candy Bleakz change
- Candy Bleakz (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
PotsdamLamb has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Does not meet GNG; WP:BEFORE doesn’t come up with much of anything outside of music players and social media. Has one mention on Grammy.com for an online program. Thanks - PDLTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 02:45, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion change
- Delete Not a notable article at all. No reliable sources were found online. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 02:48, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete I agree, no notability, delete.Tehonk (talk) 05:36, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 02:45, 4 April 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Separation of East Pakistan: The Untold Story change
- Separation of East Pakistan: The Untold Story (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
BRPever has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Contested QD. Was quick deleted, but there was an appeal, so bringing it here for proper discussion. The reason for QD was given as: 'No explanation of why the subject is notable'. Thanks, BRP ever 01:26, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion change
- Delete Not a notable film whatsoever. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 02:15, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:GNG and Wikipedia:Notability (movies). Almost all of the sources are third-party. This documentary is also part of a much wider scale topic area which has vast coverage on various Wikis.--NadirAli (talk) 07:03, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 01:26, 4 April 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Quadrature mirror filter change
- Quadrature mirror filter (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Rathfelder has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I cannot see how this can be simplified. Rathfelder (talk) 13:17, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion change
This request is due to close on 13:17, 3 April 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Template:Papua New Guinean political parties change
- Template:Papua New Guinean political parties (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Navigational box with no blue links in the body. The purpose of a navbox is to allow moving between related articles, but that can't be done if there are no blue links. Auntof6 (talk) 08:22, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion change
- Delete - pointless to have a navbox without links.Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 10:52, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- move to userspace or draft space - could this be moved to the draft space or my userspace pending more work on it and related pages? Irtapil (talk) 00:13, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 08:22, 3 April 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Igor Bondar change
- Igor Bondar (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG --Ferien (talk) 15:57, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion change
- Comment - I have asked around, if he might be wiki-notable for En-wiki.
(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Ukraine&oldid=1215868091).--Of course, the article can be Deleted for other reasons, such as "WP:GNG problems".--Keep, is what I am leaning toward, as long as he is wiki-notable. 2001:2020:345:BB19:4066:C097:7078:B2FA (talk) 16:37, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Not a notable individual in the slightest. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 02:51, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 15:57, 2 April 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Manuel de la Mata change
- Manuel de la Mata (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. Has existed since December so I'll start a discussion on this rather than deleting it for no claim to notability. --Ferien (talk) 22:51, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion change
This request is due to close on 22:51, 1 April 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
William Davenport change
- William Davenport (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Character not notable on their own. Fails what exists in w:WP:NCHARACTER. --Ferien (talk) 22:49, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion change
This request is due to close on 22:49, 1 April 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Sidney Chambers change
- Sidney Chambers (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Character not notable on their own. Fails what exists in w:WP:NCHARACTER. --Ferien (talk) 22:49, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion change
This request is due to close on 22:49, 1 April 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Geordie Keating change
- Geordie Keating (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Character not notable on their own. Fails what exists in w:WP:NCHARACTER. --Ferien (talk) 22:49, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion change
This request is due to close on 22:49, 1 April 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Bonnie Davenport change
- Bonnie Davenport (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Character not notable on their own. Fails what exists in w:WP:NCHARACTER. --Ferien (talk) 22:49, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion change
This request is due to close on 22:49, 1 April 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Alphy Kotteram change
- Alphy Kotteram (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Character not notable on their own. Fails what exists in w:WP:NCHARACTER. --Ferien (talk) 22:49, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion change
This request is due to close on 22:49, 1 April 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Catherine Keating change
- Catherine Keating (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Character not notable on their own. Fails what exists in w:WP:NCHARACTER. --Ferien (talk) 22:48, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion change
This request is due to close on 22:48, 1 April 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Simone Beasant change
- Simone Beasant (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Shoot for the Stars has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Could not find any reliable sources. This is not a notable person and it fails GNG. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 22:45, 25 March 2024 (UTC) Shoot for the Stars
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion change
This request is due to close on 22:45, 1 April 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Roclothissors change
- Roclothissors (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Rathfelder has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Indecipherable. Google has not heard of this - other than this article. I think it may be about Rock–paper–scissors. Its unreferenced and uncategorised. The only article of User:Richiezhung. Rathfelder (talk) 22:41, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion change
- Delete Same reason as nom. Also a crat may want to do something about the user name mentioned as it’s pretty obvious (I think). Thanks - PDLTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 01:11, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - seems pretty hoaxy to me. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 16:01, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 22:41, 1 April 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Ishq Subhan Allah change
- Ishq Subhan Allah (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
PotsdamLamb has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The article is a copyright violation (https://copyvios.toolforge.org/?lang=simple&project=wikipedia&title=Ishq+Subhan+Allah&oldid=&use_engine=0&use_links=0&turnitin=0&action=compare&url=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FIshq_Subhan_Allah). The only 3 short sections are exact duplicates from en wiki. Not counting infobox and refs. I would QD this but it’s been here since the beginning of time. It has notability based on the awards it received so if someone wants to work this I’ll gladly withdraw this RfD. I haven’t seen the movie and most of the en wiki version is, well, the entire story. Thanks - PDLTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 01:24, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion change
Delete as a TNT case. Copyvios should be blown up unless someone fixes it within 7 days. If the state of the article changes, Keep. JustarandomamericanALT (talk) 19:23, 25 March 2024 (UTC)- Keep Special:Diff/6569392 is a safe diff to revert to, so there is no reason to delete this article. Even beyond that, it isn't extremely complex to the point it can't be fixed. WP:BEFORE point C clearly points out that
If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate for RfD.
, and this is one of those cases, as it can be resolved simply by reverting to a previous version. All copyright concerns on this article can be resolved by adding attribution on the talk page, as this is only copied from English Wikipedia, so this is not a copyvio either. --Ferien (talk) 13:56, 26 March 2024 (UTC) - Keep as an enwiki "copyvio". JustarandomamericanALT (talk) 14:00, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
- @JustarandomamericanALT: Please clarify: why would you want to keep something that's a copyright violation? -- Auntof6 (talk) 04:13, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- I've added attribution, and as enwiki is under a free license, it is no longer. JustarandomamericanALT (talk) 13:51, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- @JustarandomamericanALT Even though it’s under that license we still have to give attribution and we cannot copy it verbatim and we have to simplify it. It’s the same for all projects. Thanks - PDLTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 14:05, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- I have already added attribution on the talk page. Simplification should be done through editing unless the article is a A3 candidate. JustarandomamericanALT (talk) 14:09, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Well like I said in the nomination if it can be fixed completely, I’ll withdraw this but I’m at work so I’ll have to check later. Thanks - PDLTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 14:11, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- I have already added attribution on the talk page. Simplification should be done through editing unless the article is a A3 candidate. JustarandomamericanALT (talk) 14:09, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- @JustarandomamericanALT Even though it’s under that license we still have to give attribution and we cannot copy it verbatim and we have to simplify it. It’s the same for all projects. Thanks - PDLTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 14:05, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- I've added attribution, and as enwiki is under a free license, it is no longer. JustarandomamericanALT (talk) 13:51, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- @JustarandomamericanALT: Please clarify: why would you want to keep something that's a copyright violation? -- Auntof6 (talk) 04:13, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 01:24, 1 April 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Unhexseptium change
- Unhexseptium (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
1234qwer1234qwer4 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No claim of notability. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 16:41, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion change
- Delete To me just looks like a dicdef with pictures. evolution.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 16:42, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect to Extended periodic table --Ferien (talk) 20:32, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 16:41, 31 March 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Category:Locked global accounts change
- Category:Locked global accounts (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I don't see a point in this category. It would be impossible for this to contain every locked global account, even if it was only those that have registered/edited on this wiki. And what do we gain from it? It just seems like categorisation for the hell of it. --Ferien (talk) 19:17, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion change
- Yeah, there is no point of having it so might as well get rid of it.-BRP ever 01:27, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- No point in keeping it really, Delete.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 11:11, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment:@Ferien - Same with this one. Just QD it as Author Request and close this out please. Thanks - PDLTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 13:55, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- PotsdamLamb, you didn't create this category. --Ferien (talk) 15:02, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 19:17, 30 March 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Sobolev space change
- Sobolev space (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Rathfelder has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This has been waiting to be simplified for 10 years. I am afraid I dont understand it, and I am not sure that it makes sense. Is it possible to simplify it? Rathfelder (talk) 16:18, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- There are quite a few mathematical articles in the backlog of Category:Complex pages. Its hard to see how they could be made simple. Rathfelder (talk) 16:27, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion change
This request is due to close on 16:18, 30 March 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Priyanka KD change
- Priyanka KD (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Shoot for the Stars has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Found some sources online, but not sure if this person is notable enough. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 06:19, 23 March 2024 (UTC) Shoot for the Stars (talk) 06:19, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion change
This request is due to close on 06:19, 30 March 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Preston Oliver change
- Preston Oliver (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
PotsdamLamb has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:BEFORE. Only has a couple of very minor roles so fails GNG as well. Thanks - PDLTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 23:08, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion change
- Delete Found [1][2][3] however cites #1 and #2 are en:WP:LOCALCOVERAGE, #3 is a mention but imho not enough. No evidence of any notability, Fails NACTOR and GNG. –Davey2010Talk 23:53, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
References
- ↑ "Young Las Vegas actor makes mark in hit Disney time travel mystery series". Las Vegas Review-Journal. 7 January 2022. Retrieved 21 March 2024.
- ↑ "Las Vegas teen stars in Disney's 'Secrets of Sulphur Springs'". Las Vegas Review-Journal. 11 January 2021. Retrieved 21 March 2024.
- ↑ "'Secrets Of Sulphur Springs' Disney Channel Review: Stream It Or Skip It?". Decider. 19 January 2021. Retrieved 21 March 2024.
- Delete Per Davey2010. This is not a notable person. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 01:16, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete I found nothing more than Davey Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 11:36, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Comment: This article was also created by an LTA IP who is blocked for creating bad pages, redirects, etc. Thanks - PDLTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 22:57, 22 March 2024 (UTC)- No, it was created by Ivan P. Clarin. Am I missing something? Kk.urban (talk) 01:27, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry it is the 2nd nomination so technically falls under QD Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2022/Preston Oliver Thanks - PDLTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 01:37, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete not notable.Tehonk (talk) 00:52, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 23:08, 28 March 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
National Space Society change
- National Space Society (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Rathfelder has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unreferenced and inaccurate. Rathfelder (talk) 21:50, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion change
- Delete only because the EN article (en:National Space Society) is imho too complex for here, Given the EN article doesn't mention 1969 or any wars imho this for me screams vandalism, Either way imho far too complex for here. –Davey2010Talk 23:59, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
- I might work on this over the next few days and I might be able to save it. --Ferien (talk) 01:37, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 21:50, 28 March 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
List of countries by income equality change
- List of countries by income equality (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Rathfelder has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Completely unreferenced and tendentious. Rathfelder (talk) 21:32, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion change
Neutral - We have an article at EN (List of countries by income equality) but are readers here going to know what income equality is or even understand the article even in simple terms?, Certainly a notable subject but I sense it would be a waste of time creating ?, niche subject for sure. –Davey2010Talk 00:02, 22 March 2024 (UTC)- I agree it justifies an article, but this isnt it. Rathfelder (talk) 12:17, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - I !voted Neutral because I wasn't sure whether it was worthy of keeping or deleting but sure I guess there's no hope in its current form so delete. –Davey2010Talk 17:33, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- I agree it justifies an article, but this isnt it. Rathfelder (talk) 12:17, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
- If we are talking about the current article, it is either add references, or delete it. The argument too complex for this wikipedia really isn't one. Income equality is a concept that likely is easy to explain, so the corresponding article from enwp could be brought over. It might turn out to be yet another list (of politicians by favorite color and pet...), and I am not a huge fan of such listings. So, in its current form, without references, this is a delete; with references and a few links to explain terms, it might be a borderline keep...--Eptalon (talk) 16:41, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- Imho our readers aren't going to understand List_of_countries_by_income_equality#UN,_World_Bank_and_CIA_list_–_income_ratios_and_Gini_indices and the rest of the tables below it - Maybe I'm over-analysing it but other than simplifying the lead I can't see how this entire article can be created in a way that makes any sort of sense to anyone? –Davey2010Talk 17:30, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep, but as stub or sub-stub, that is what i am leaning toward.--(Looks like this discussion has sort if been going in that direction, while some want to go beyond that, and Delete.) 2001:2020:301:BDDC:4845:F097:D5B5:C823 (talk) 18:47, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- I dont think it works as a stub as it is. There is no indication of what it means. The list as it stands is not the same as the English Wikipedia article. It could perhaps be a redirect to Gini coefficient. Rathfelder (talk) 20:42, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- I think this is poor at the moment, but with expansion could be ok. I'll try and work on it over the next few days. But if I don't get around to it, Delete. --Ferien (talk) 01:36, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 21:32, 28 March 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
List of bridges change
- List of bridges (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Rathfelder has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: A long red list. Pretty arbitrary selection of bridges. Doesnt seem useful. This is what categories are for. Rathfelder (talk) 11:25, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion change
- Delete per nom. Plus it also brings into question, what defines a bridge?- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 09:50, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep but this needs to be a list of lists rather than a list of bridges straight up, for almost all countries. I don't think we need to be questioning the definition of a bridge here – lists shouldn't usually have redlinks on, so if we have an article on it put it on the list, that's our inclusion criteria (and this applies to many other lists). If we don't, get rid of it. --Ferien (talk) 22:52, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep We have many lists here that link to other articles. We just need to bring them over. Thanks - PDLTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 23:16, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 11:25, 20 March 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Recently closed deletion discussions change
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. --Ferien (talk) 01:35, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Hermitage School District (Pennsylvania) change
- Hermitage School District (Pennsylvania) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Rathfelder has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No claim of notability. Rathfelder (talk) 21:13, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion change
Keep "Expanded article[1]). –Davey2010Talk 00:12, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per IP and Lee - Yeah slap on the wrist for me for not running through the article and Google prior to expanding this, Only source in the article doesn't actually confirm what's in the article, nothing better on Google, delete. –Davey2010Talk 20:19, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
- See List of school districts in California.--Schools in Pennsylvania, that are not wiki-notable, can be mentioned in List of school districts in Pennsylvania (when the article gets created).--Neutral, is what I am leaning toward (while assuming that user:Rathfelder's has significant experience in judging when an article might be falling short in regard to wiki-notability.--Please excuse, if a paradox can be found.) 2001:2020:301:D4C2:DD08:E7B3:FF5F:E2EF (talk) 20:04, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
- I make no special claim to expertise. We usually look for independent sources which recognise the subject as notable. The only reference here is the Pennsylvania Interscholastic Athletic Association directory. That doesnt suggest anything notable about the district. Rathfelder (talk) 17:25, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - whilst Davie has done a good job on updating the page, there's still nothing much in terms of sourcing that suggests they meet GNG. Please ping if anyone finds any more sourcing (the En-wiki article doesn't really suggest that we meet this either). Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 20:17, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 21:13, 28 March 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. --Ferien (talk) 01:33, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Powerschool change
- Powerschool (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Rathfelder has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Promotional Rathfelder (talk) 19:04, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion change
- Delete or Quick Delete clearly it’s just an promotional that can be deleted using G11. Uróli 2024 🧑🏻 (talk) 12:47, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - Article at EN redirects to Vista Equity Partners - Sources are only Shares[2], Stocks[3] and "Receives Consensus Rating of "Moderate Buy" from Brokerages"[4] - Nothing you can put an article together with and no notability either, Fails GNG. –Davey2010Talk 16:02, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per Davey2010. No reliable sources at all. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 02:17, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 19:04, 28 March 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. --Ferien (talk) 01:31, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Killing of Melvin Fletcher Jr change
- Killing of Melvin Fletcher Jr (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Rathfelder has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unreferenced, and not obviously notable. Rathfelder (talk) 17:02, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion change
- Delete Not a notable event. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 01:15, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - non-notable crime/court case. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 20:21, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 17:02, 28 March 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this request for deletion was to redirect to Love & Hip Hop: New York.. Not seeing a huge reason to delete here. --Ferien (talk) 01:29, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Hennessy Carolina change
- Hennessy Carolina (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Shoot for the Stars has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not a notable individual. Should be merged and redirected to Cardi B. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 06:21, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion change
- Quick Delete Just delete it as G5 and block the socks already.Tehonk (talk) 17:00, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
- redirect to Love & Hip Hop: New York like enwiki as that seems to be the only claim of individual's significance in the page.--BRP ever 07:51, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
- @BRPever it's not redirected to main show page on enwiki, it's redirected to the detailed list page because it's mentioned there. We only have the main page here and she's not mentioned there so it doesn't make that much sense to redirect. But even if redirect, it should be "delete and redirect" instead, no need to keep this vandalism filled history and it needed to be deleted as G5 anyway. Tehonk (talk) 08:03, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 06:21, 28 March 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. --Ferien (talk) 01:27, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Ayman Sadiq change
- Ayman Sadiq (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Fehufanga has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable, the sources in the article do not cover the subject in great depth. Some only barely mention the subject. Outside of this, there are few good sources. Fails GNG. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 07:17, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion change
Keep I had nominated this as a QD, but declined by the nominator asreceiving an award is a claim
Special:Diff/9421415. I looked into this further and they are correct so I’m surprised to see this here when en wiki statesThe person has received a highly prestigious academic award or honor at a national or international level.
as having to meet only one of a list of criteria. I have verified this at the website for The Queen’s Young Leaders Award. Thanks - PDLTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 07:49, 18 March 2024 (UTC)- Delete Given the fact of the link below to the draft article and from the declination on March 6 (12 days ago) this is actually a copy/paste from en wiki. Other than the cleanup I did, it violates policy. I did find a few other sites Sadiq is mentioned on like Ted Talks and such, but I’m going with delete. Thanks - PDLTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 11:06, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- @PotsdamLamb A4 only requires a claim of notability. That claim exists in the article, so A4 cannot be used. Whether or not that claim is true or not is up to RfD, and so is the subject's notability. Just because the subject has awards doesn't automatically mean that the subject is notable. It can be used as a claim of notability, but it itself cannot be used to pass the subject as being actually notable. You should also check the history of the redirect on enwiki, and perhaps see why that the page remains a redirect today. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 10:06, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete it's only a redirect even on bnwiki. There is also this discussion on enwiki and I agree with delete voters there.Tehonk (talk) 08:20, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Tehonk You should mention that the en wiki topic is 5 years old so that it’s in context for our readers. Thanks - PDLTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 08:48, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Ayman Sadiq was popped on my watchlist and saw the article in question. I am mainly Bengali wikipedia contributor, hope its ok to add my opinion. , the person doesn’t pass WP:GNG. I don't see any significant coverage in reliable sources. We (Bengali Wikipedia) redirected the article for this reason. I can see en:Draft:Ayman Sadiq (entrepreneur) was also rejected. Also agree with User:Fehufanga: "Just because the subject has awards doesn't automatically mean that the subject is notable". Also, It looks like the article creator account is one purpose account, mainly promoting this person. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 10:54, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Pure promotion and exaggeration. None of the refs for the main claim of "the largest online educational institution in Bangladesh" are any good: Forbes profiles are completely unreliable, future startup says it is a large start up, not the largest institution of any kind, and the subjects own YouTube channel is obviously out. Possible paid editing. --Gotanda (talk) 01:23, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete This article is very promotional and is not notable one bit. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 03:58, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 07:17, 25 March 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. --Ferien (talk) 01:25, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Pianist's Day change
- Pianist's Day (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Fehufanga has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Does not appear to be a notable commemoration. No sources I found appear to cover this in depth. The sources in the article are not reliable or only passing mentions that do not cover what Pianist's day itself. Personally, I have never heard of this holiday as a pianist myself. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 10:19, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion change
- Delete/merge to Pianist. There's not much here apart from it being a thing. We shouldn't have an article on every commemorative day that exists. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 12:04, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
- How do we decide which to include? Such things rarely get covered in depth. Rathfelder (talk) 13:05, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- On one hand you're right: this is not really a significant occasion.
- On the other hand: there is, for example, the article on the International Talk Like a Pirate Day. Together with the bunch of, er, other questionable observances.
- If those are allowed to exist - why shouldn't the P.D.? At least this holiday clearly calls for creativity, inspiration, learning a valuable skill and overall cultural education...
- P.S. The "opposite" holiday is also present. Maxivashyn (talk) 16:41, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- We have National Cleavage Day. Is this less significant? Rathfelder (talk) 18:35, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- As an adult male I'd say NCD deserves more commemoration! ))) 87.252.225.209 (talk) 21:21, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- These sources always seem like en:WP:ROUTINE colour Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 22:17, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- Either I can add at least 5 text or TV news bytes on how the P.D. was celebrated in various years. Mostly in Russian...
- Or you can kill the Reference section completely.
- What's your decision? Maxivashyn (talk) 11:34, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- These sources always seem like en:WP:ROUTINE colour Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 22:17, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- As an adult male I'd say NCD deserves more commemoration! ))) 87.252.225.209 (talk) 21:21, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- We have National Cleavage Day. Is this less significant? Rathfelder (talk) 18:35, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 10:19, 24 March 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. Moved to Open Directory Project --Ferien (talk) 01:22, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Curlie change
Rathfelder has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails to explain why the article is entitled Curlie. Rathfelder (talk) 14:57, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion change
- You should ask Fourmidable. Kk.urban (talk) 15:10, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
- keep - seems like a naming issue. See [5] for a possible rationale as to why it's called Curlie. I have no real thoughts on whether or not it should be called that. (Quick note that "entitled" doesn't mean the title of a work). Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 20:42, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
- Looking at the article, it should either be moved to Open Directory Project or dmoz,- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 19:05, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
- Move it back to Open Directory Project and keep the article. It is too short, but still provides enough information to be kept. - Huji reply 02:18, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 14:57, 23 March 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep.— *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 12:22, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
2002 FIFA World Cup qualification (OFC) change
:2002 FIFA World Cup qualification (OFC) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Uróli 2024 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I think an rfd is better than Qd. Page does not explain the season and just says about 31-0 result of one lonely game, the game needs an article but the season as written now, not. Uróli 2024 🧑🏻 (talk) 03:19, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
- Withdrawn after improvements. Thanks Davey! Uróli 2024 🧑🏻 (talk) 02:55, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion change
- Keep Just because the article doesn't have the information doesn't make it necessary to start a deletion request. Information and sources can easily be added to the article. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 04:10, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep - I've expanded the article[6], No valid reason for deletion, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 23:39, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
- I should add I've tried simplifying it the best I can but I certainly am not perfect with this so may need checking over, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 23:41, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 03:19, 28 March 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 12:21, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
Killing of Dolores Boschert change
- Killing of Dolores Boschert (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Kk.urban has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Someone died in a gym accident. I don't see how this is notable. Kk.urban (talk) 20:59, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion change
- Delete This poor soul was not killed, she died from a gym accident. This is not notable. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 03:41, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per Shoot for the Stars - She unfortunately died in a freak accident involving gym equipment[7], No evidence of any notability, Fails GNG. –Davey2010Talk 23:43, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
- Quick Delete can we just put a4 instead? Clearly fails GNG just because it died in gym accident does not make it notable! Uróli 2024 🧑🏻 (talk) 12:42, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - not notable. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 20:22, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 20:59, 27 March 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep.— *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 12:25, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
Pyramids FC TV change
- Pyramids FC TV (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
RiggedMint has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG RiggedMint 19:25, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion change
- Comment: There is a Arabic language version of this article: https://ar.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D9%82%D9%86%D8%A7%D8%A9_%D8%A8%D9%8A%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%85%D9%8A%D8%AF%D8%B2
- Keep - the Arabic version of the page makes a decent claim to being notable. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 20:13, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep per Lee - certainly appears to be a notable going by the sources on the Arabic article. –Davey2010Talk 20:24, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep per Lee Vilenski and Davey2010. This article looks notable. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 03:42, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 19:25, 27 March 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 21:41, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
WikiGenius change
- WikiGenius (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Lee Vilenski has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Website isn't even a particularly large Wiki, has less than 300 articles. Can't see it being notable. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:20, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion change
- Delete- No evidence of any notability, the 2 "news pieces" I've found are paid advertisements - no real news sources. Off topic but what does one achieve from mirroring Wikipedia ? .... no one's gonna waste their time and life on some 2bit Wikipedia rip off?.... Anyway non notable, Fails GNG. –Davey2010Talk 20:36, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- Wikipedia mirrors are usually quite useful websites. Not ones where you have to have everything "verified" and has no content. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 21:14, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- I was reading https://en.citizendium.org/wiki/CZ:We_aren%27t_Wikipedia as an example and now understand why mirrors exist - I thought it was same rules, same design, same everything pretty much which is why I couldn't understand mirrors, Turns out rules vary between sites so I agree not all are bad –Davey2010Talk 22:53, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- Wikipedia mirrors are usually quite useful websites. Not ones where you have to have everything "verified" and has no content. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 21:14, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- I should probably say I'm referring to en:List of online encyclopedias and not meta:Live_mirrors#List before I get raised eyebrows lol –Davey2010Talk 22:55, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Davey2010 you may wrong, here have 300+ Articles. 43.224.111.9 (talk) 11:09, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
- 1k, 289..... makes no different - still non notable, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 13:13, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per Davey2010. This article is not notable and the sources found are not reliable. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 06:23, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Only sources is not provides Notability. It should not delete.
- WikiContributor-global (talk) 07:30, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete No evidence showing that it meets the notability requirements. QuicoleJR (talk) 19:49, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 15:20, 27 March 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 21:40, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Varsity change
Kk.urban has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: [Redirect to University]: Not a useful redirect. At least in the United States, this usually refers to varsity sports, which simplewiki doesn't have an article about yet. It may have other meanings elsewhere. Kk.urban (talk) 03:01, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion change
- Delete until we get a page on Varsity Sports, the university page makes no mention of Varsity Sports so it is a bad redirect.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 09:12, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 03:01, 26 March 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Already deleted as G5 by Macdonald-ross. --Ferien (talk) 13:58, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Ramkripalyadavg (Youtuber) change
- Ramkripalyadavg (Youtuber) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Codename Noreste has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Despite having some sources, this article fails the notability guidelines as it doesn't have an explanation on why the subject is notable Codename Noreste 🤔 talk 16:27, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion change
- Please Help Wikipedia
- This page is correct. Add this page to Wikipedia. This page belongs to a small Indian YouTuber. Despite so much hard work, you are still deleting this log. Ramkripalyadavg_(Youtuber) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2409:40e4:1f:60f1:5b:b388:f40:f91b (talk)
- Delete - not notable.Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 16:51, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- What is the meaning of Wikipedia if you people let whoever you want remain, I don't think this situation is wrong. Coola012 (talk) 17:21, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- Please help us by improving this page Coola012 (talk) 17:36, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Not notable at all. Also a QD G5 case, See logs. – Cyber.Eyes2005Talk 18:00, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete No reliable sources, speedy deletion is needed as the article is indexed on Google. Grabup (talk) —Comment without a date added on 18:30, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- Grabup, a page being indexed on Google isn't a reason to use quick deletion. --Ferien (talk) 13:58, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 16:27, 30 March 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
Related pages change
- All archives before July 2008 - implementation of new system made archives redundant
- Category:Requests for deletion that did not succeed
- Category:Requests for deletion that succeeded
- Wikipedia:Deletion policy
- Wikipedia:Quick deletion
- Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion
- Category:Deletion requests
- Category:Quick deletion requests