User:Cyber.Eyes.2005/Sandbox

This page is a sandbox. It is not an encyclopedia article, and may not be accurate.

The person who created or worked on this sandbox, Cyber.Eyes.2005, may be changing this page at the moment. You are asked nicely not to change this page while it is being worked on. Thank you.

My Sandbox...

change

Achaemenid Pakistan

change
 
Provincial division of the Achaemenid empire. The region of Pakistan (Indus Valley) was formally incorporated into the empire through provincial divisions known as Satrapies: these were Gandāra, Hindush, and Sattagydia, Gedrosia and Arachosia.

Achaemenid Pakistan, or Achaemenid Indus Valley, refers to a period in the history of Pakistan from about 535 BCE to around 338 BCE when the region was part of the Achaemenid Empire. Around 535 BCE, the Persian king Cyrus the Great began a long campaign to bring parts of ancient Pakistan into his growing Achaemenid Empire.[1] In this first campaign, the Persian army took control of a large area west of the Indus River, marking the early eastern borders of their new empire. After Cyrus' death around 530 BCE, his successor, Darius the Great, continued the campaign. Darius re-conquered former provinces and expanded the empire's borders further. By around 518 BCE, the Persian army moved deeper into the subcontinent and began a second phase of conquest, reaching regions up to the Jhelum River in Punjab region of Pakistan.[2] At its height, the Persian Empire controlled most of what is now Pakistan.

 
Achaemenid coin, an imitation of an Athenian coin type.[3]

The first solid evidence of Persian rule in the region comes from the Behistun Inscription, which dates to around 518 BCE. Persian expansion into the Indus Valley happened in stages, starting in the northern parts of the Indus River and moving south.[4] According to Achaemenid-era inscriptions, Pakistan was divided into provinces called Satrapies: the satrapies were Gandāra, Hindush, Sattagydia, Gedrosia (Maka),[a] and Arachosia. The Satrapy of Hindush was the richest of all the Achaemenid Empire’s provinces and provided 32% of the annual tributes. It was unique among the Achaemenid satrapies because it paid its tribute in gold. At the time of Herodotus, the exchange rate was 1 part gold to 13 parts silver by weight.[6][7]

The Achaemenid rule over the Indus Valley slowly weakened under successive rulers and ended with the Greek conquest of Persia led by Alexander the Great. During this period, local independent kings, such as Abisares, Cleophis, Porus, and Taxiles, emerged. Many aristocratic republics, known as gaṇasaṅghas, also appeared. These local leaders and republics later faced Alexander’s army when it entered the region for his campaign, marking the beginning of the Hellenic period in Pakistan.[1] The Achaemenid Empire set a model of governance through satrapies, which was later used by Alexander’s Macedonian Empire, the Indo-Scythians, and the Kushan Empire.[8]

Background and invasion

change
 
India (Indus Valley) appears to the east of the inhabited world according to Herodotus, 500 BCE.
 
Ruins at Bhir Mound representing the city of Taxila during the Achaemenid period.

Ancient Pakistan had long maintained trade relations with the Near East. During the reign of Cyrus the Great (c. 600–530 BCE), the Achaemenid Empire expanded significantly, showing a direct interest in the Indus Valley region.[1]

Cyrus the Great

change

The conquest of the region is believed to have begun around 535 BCE during the time of Cyrus the Great.[9][10][1] Cyrus likely reached the banks of the Indus River and organized the conquered territories into the Satrapy of Gandara (Old Persian cuneiform: 𐎥𐎭𐎠𐎼, Gadāra, also written as Gandāra because the nasal "n" was not used in Old Persian script)[11] according to the Behistun Inscription.[12] The Behistun Inscription also refers to this province as Paruparaesanna (Greek: Parapamisadae) in its Babylonian and Elamite versions.[12] This province covered a larger area than Gandhara itself.[13]

Accounts from writers like Xenophon and Ctesias, who wrote Indica, suggest that Cyrus conquered parts of the Indus region.[14][1] Another Achaemenid province in Pakistan, Sattagydia (𐎰𐎫𐎦𐎢𐏁, Thataguš), mentioned in the Behistun Inscription, was likely next to Gandhara, though its exact location is unclear. Some sources, like Fleming, suggest it was situated between Arachosia and the middle Indus.[15] Fleming also mentions Maka, in the area of Gedrosia, as one of the satrapies in the Indus region.[16]

Darius I

change
 
Darius I on his tomb.

Darius I, who succeeded Cyrus the Great, began his rule around 518 BCE. This date is mentioned in the Behistun Inscription and marks the time when Gandhara in Punjab was securely under Achaemenid control.[17] Darius I also conquered another region called "Hidūš" (Old Persian cuneiform: 𐏃𐎡𐎯𐎢𐏁, H-i-du-u-š, also transliterated as Hindūš since the nasal "n" before consonants was omitted in the Old Persian script, and simplified as Hindush) in his inscriptions. This region, known as Hindush in Old Persian, is thought to correspond to the Indus Valley.[18][11][19] The Hamadan Gold and Silver Tablet inscription[20] of Darius I also mentions to his conquests in the Indus Valley.[1]

The exact boundaries of the province of Hindush are unclear. Some historians believe it covered the middle and lower Indus Valley and what is now modern Sindh.[21] However, there is no evidence of Achaemenid presence in these areas, and no gold deposits, which Herodotus says was produced in vast quantities by this Province, have been found there.[22] It is also possible that Hindush included Taxila and Western Punjab, where there are signs of Persian influence.[22] The Bhir Mound site in Taxila is considered to be the capital of Achaemenid rule in Pakistan due to the discovery of Achaemenid-style pottery.[23]

Herodotus tells us that Darius I sent the Greek explorer Scylax of Caryanda to explore the Indus River. After 30 months of travel, Scylax returned to Egypt, and the routes between the Near East and Indus were used by Darius.[24][25]

Also according to Herodotus, the Achaemenid Empire's provinces in the Indus Valley (Pakistan) for tax purposes included Gandhara, Sattagydia, Dadicae, and Aparytae as the 7th province, while Hindush (Ἰνδός, "Indos" in Greek) was the 20th tax region.

Achaemenid army

 
Greek (Ionian), Scythian (Sakas) and Persian soldiers of the Achaemenid army, as described on Achaemenid royal tombs from circa 500 to 338 BCE.

The Achaemenid Empire was always involved in wars, either conquering new lands or suppressing rebellions. To manage this, the empire maintained a professional standing army made up of personnel from its various provinces and territories that included modern-Pakistan.[26] The army also included many different ethnic groups such as Bactrians, Sakas (Scythians), Parthians, Sogdians,[27] Greeks, Egyptians, and Ethiopians.[28][27] These groups were likely part of the Achaemenid army during its campaigns in the Indus Valley (Pakistan).[27]

Inscriptions and accounts

change

The events of the Achaemenid period in the Indus Valley (ancient Pakistan) are recorded in various inscriptions and writings. Important sources include the Behistun Inscription, the Naqsh-i-Rustam Inscription, and the writings of Herodotus (483–431 BCE). Greek explorer Scylax of Caryanda, who was sent by Darius I to explore the Indus, left behind an account known as the Periplous. Fragments of this account are available from other sources. Hecataeus of Miletus (circa 500 BCE) also wrote about the Achaemenid satrapies along the Indus.

Indus satrapies
on the Statue of Darius I
𓉔𓈖𓂧𓍯𓇌
h-n-d-wꜣ-y
Hindush[29]
𓐠𓂧𓎼𓍯𓍒
sꜣ-d-g-wꜣ-ḏꜣ
Sattagydia
𓉔𓃭𓐍𓂧𓇌
h-rw-ḫ-d-y
Gandara

Behistun inscription

change

The 'DB' Behistun Inscription[30] of Darius I (circa 510 BCE) lists Gandara (𐎥𐎭𐎠𐎼, Gadāra) and Sattagydia (𐎰𐎫𐎦𐎢𐏁, Thataguš) as part of the Achaemenid Empire:

King Darius says: These are the countries which are subject unto me, and by the grace of Ahuramazda I became king of them: Persia [Pârsa], Elam [Ûvja], Babylonia [Bâbiruš], Assyria [Athurâ], Arabia [Arabâya], Egypt [Mudrâya], the countries by the Sea, Lydia [Sparda], the Greeks [Yauna (Ionia)], Media [Mâda], Armenia [Armina], Cappadocia [Katpatuka], Parthia [Parthava], Drangiana [Zraka], Aria [Haraiva], Chorasmia [Uvârazmîy], Bactria [Bâxtriš], Sogdia [Suguda], Gandara [Gadāra], Scythia [Saka], Sattagydia [Thataguš], Arachosia [Harauvatiš] and Maka [Maka]; twenty-three lands in all.

The dating of the inscription shows that the Achaemenids first conquered the regions of Gandara, Sattagydia and Arachosia in ancient Pakistan around 518 BCE.

Statue of Darius inscriptions

change

Hinduš (Sindh) is listed among 24 countries under the Achaemenid Empire. It is shown with the drawing of a kneeling person and a hieroglyphic cartridge reading 𓉔𓈖𓂧𓍯𓇌 (h-n-d-wꜣ-y) on the Egyptian Statue of Darius I, which is now in the National Museum of Iran. Sattagydia also appears (𓐠𓂧𓎼𓍯𓍒, sꜣ-d-g-wꜣ-ḏꜣ, Sattagydia), and probably Gandara (𓉔𓃭𓐍𓂧𓇌, h-rw-ḫ-d-y, although this could be Arachosia), with their own illustrations.[33][29]

Apadana Palace foundation tablets

change
 
Gold foundation plate of Darius I in the Apadana Palace with the word Hidauv (Hiduš).[34]

Four gold and silver foundation tablets (circa 515 BCE)[35] found in the Apadana Palace in Persepolis contain an inscription by Darius I. This inscription describes his empire from the Indus Valley (Pakistan) in the east to Lydia in the west, and from the Scythians in the north to the Kingdom of Kush in the south. This inscription is known as the DPh inscription.[35][36]

Darius the great king, king of kings, king of countries, son of Hystaspes, an Achaemenid. King Darius says: This is the kingdom which I hold, from the Sacae who are beyond Sogdia to Kush, and from Sind (Old Persian: 𐏃𐎡𐎭𐎢𐎺, "Hidauv", locative of "Hiduš", i.e. "Indus valley") to Lydia (Old Persian: "Spardâ") - [this is] what Ahuramazda, the greatest of gods, bestowed upon me. May Ahuramazda protect me and my royal house!

— DPh inscription of Darius I in the foundations of the Apadana Palace[37]

Naqsh-e Rustam inscription

change

The DSe[38] and DSm inscriptions[39] of Darius I in Susa mention Sattagydia, Gandara, and Hindush among the lands he ruled.[38][29]

 
The Naqsh-e Rustam DNa inscription, mentioning the three Indus territories: Sattagydia (𐎰𐎫𐎦𐎢𐏁, Thataguš), Gandara (𐎥𐎭𐎠𐎼, Gadāra) and Hindush (𐏃𐎡𐎯𐎢𐏁, Hidūš) as part of the Achaemenid Empire.[40]

Hidush (𐏃𐎡𐎯𐎢𐏁 in Old Persian cuneiform) later also appears later as a Satrapy in the Naqsh-i-Rustam inscription at the end of the reign of Darius, who died in 486 BCE.[29] The DNa inscription[19] on Darius' tomb at Naqsh-i-Rustam near Persepolis records Gadāra (Gandāra) along with Hiduš (Hindush) and Thataguš (Sattagydia) in the list of satrapies.[41]

King Darius says: By the favor of Ahuramazda these are the countries which I seized outside of Persia; I ruled over them; they bore tribute to me; they did what was said to them by me; they held my law firmly; Media, Elam, Parthia, Aria, Bactria, Sogdia, Chorasmia, Drangiana, Arachosia, Sattagydia, Gandara (Gadāra), Sindh (Hiduš), the haoma-drinking Scythians, the Scythians with pointed caps, Babylonia, Assyria, Arabia, Egypt, Armenia, Cappadocia, Lydia, the Greeks (Yauna), the Scythians across the sea (Sakâ), Thrace, the petasos-wearing Greeks [Yaunâ], the Libyans, the Nubians, the men of Maka and the Carians.

— Naqsh-e Rustam inscription of Darius I (circa 490 BCE)[42][43]

Strabo

change

The Greek geographer Strabo, in his work "Geography" (Book XV), confirms the Achaemenid control along the Indus River. He describes the region and mentions that some parts along the Indus were controlled by the Persians:[44]

The geographical position of the tribes is as follows: along the Indus are the Paropamisadae, above whom lies the Paropamisus mountain: then, towards the south, the Arachoti: then next, towards the south, the Gedroseni, with the other tribes that occupy the seaboard; and the Indus lies, latitudinally, alongside all these places; and of these places, in part, some that lie along the Indus are held by Hindush (Ἰνδῶν) [Referred to the people of the Indus (Pakistan)], although they formerly belonged to the Persians.

— The Geography of Strabo, Book XV, Chapter 2, 9.[44][45]

Achaemenid administration

change
 
Eastern territories of the Achaemenid Empire.[46][47][48]
 
The names of the three Ancient Pakistani provinces still appear in trilingual cuneiform labels above their respective figures on the tomb of Artaxerxes II (c.358 BCE).[49][50][51]

In the later period of Achaemenid rule, the administrative structure in the Indus Valley (Pakistan) under Persian control is somewhat unclear. The provinces are traditionally called "satrapies," but there is no definitive evidence that these regions were governed by satraps, as was common in other parts of the empire. When Alexander the Great invaded, he encountered local rulers known as hyparchs (Vice-Regents), who were subordinate to the Achaemenid rulers.[52]

Achaemenid List of Provinces in Pakistan

change

Darius I mentioned three Indus provinces: Sattagydia (Thataguš), Gandāra (Gandhara), and Hidūš (Sind),[29] where "Sind" is understood to mean the broader Indus Valley.[53] Gandhara encompassed the Peshawar Valley, bounded by the Swat District to the north, Afghanistan to the west, the Indus River to the southeast, and the Kohat District to the south.[54] The capital of this region was Pushkalavati. Archaeological excavations conducted by Mortimer Wheeler in 1962 at Pushkalavati (Charsadda) revealed structures and artifacts dating back to the Achaemenid period.[54]

The Satrapy of Hindush, which included the Punjab region within the Indus Valley, was bordered by the Hazara region to the north, the Indus River to the west, and the Jhelum River to the south and east. The capital of this satrapy was Bhir Mound in Takshashila (Taxila).[55] John Marshall's excavations at Bhir Mound between 1913 and 1934 uncovered fortified structures, canals, and ornamental jewelry from the Achaemenid period.[55]

These regions continued to be represented among the Achaemenid provinces on the tombs of subsequent Persian rulers after Darius, with the exception of the last ruler, Darius III, who was defeated by Alexander the Great at the Battle of Gaugamela. The last known reference to Gandhara as an Achaemenid province appears on on the list of the tomb of Artaxerxes II around 358 BCE, indicating that the Indus Valley remained under Achaemenid control until at least 338 BCE.[52][49][50][51]

Satrapy of Gedrosia (Maka)
The territory of Maka (𓅓𓂝𓎼, M-ā-g) on the Statue of Darius I.
Makan on the tomb of Artaxerxes I, c. 430 BC.
Makan with cuneiform identification label on the tomb of Artaxerxes II, c. 360 BC.
Maka soldier of the Achaemenid army, c. 338 BC. Tomb of Artaxerxes III.

Another important Satrapy (province) of Achaemenid in Pakistan was Gedrosia, modern-day Makran coast of Baluchistan, Pakistan. Maka (𐎶𐎣 Maka) is believed to be another name for Gedrosia. According to Fleming, Maka, in the area of Gedrosia, can be considered one of the Indus satrapies of the Achaemenid Empire. It was an important early eastern satrapy of Cyrus the Great, founder of the Achaemenid Empire. The Babylonians had made voyages using Maka to communicate with the Indus Valley.[56] Herodotus on several occasions mentions the contributions of the "Mykians", who inhabited the eastern portion of the Achaemenid Empire.[57] They are mentioned as "the men from Maka" in daiva inscriptions. The "Daiva inscription" is one of the most important of all Achaemenid inscriptions. The Mykians served in the army of Xerxes the Great at the battle of Thermopylae. They are also thought to be responsible for inventions such as qanats and underground drainage galleries that bring water from an aquifer on the piedmont to gardens or palm groves on the plains. These inventions were very important reasons behind the success of the empire. The Mykians of the other side of ancient Maka, the present day region of Balochistan and Sindh, are thought to have later become independent, as they are not mentioned in Arrian of Nicomedia's account of the campaigns of Alexander the Great; he mentions only the Omani side of Maka, which he calls "Maketa". The reasons for this may have been the arguably unjust rule of Xerxes.[58]

List of Herodotus

Herodotus, gives a slightly different account. In his writings (III-91 and III-94), he groups some provinces together when he described the tribute paid by each territory,[59][60] such as the Sattagydae, Gandarii, Dadicae, and Aparytae, which he together refers to as "the 7th Province."[61] In contrast, he designates Hindush "Indos"(Ἰνδός) as "the 20th province."[61] Historian A. T. Olmstead suggests that this grouping may indicate some loss of territory over time.[62]

Despite the weakening of Persian control by around 380 BCE, the region of Hindush remained loyal to the Achaemenid Empire until Alexander's invasion.[63][64] Persian influence in the region persisted until the late 4th century BCE. Circa 400 BC, Ctesias of Cnidus wrote that the Persian king was receiving numerous gifts from the kings of "Sind" (Hindūš).[29][b] Darius III, the last Achaemenid ruler, still had some Hindush units in his army, though their numbers were significantly reduced compared to earlier periods.[66][29] Ctesias also reported elephants and Hindush mahouts making demonstrations of the elephant's strength at the Achaemenid court. Notably, Darius III deployed 15 war elephants from the Indus region during the Battle of Gaugamela against Alexander the Great.[67]

Tributes from Ancient Pakistan

change

Apadana Palace

change
 
Hindush Tribute Bearers on the Apadana Staircase 8, circa 500 BCE.
 
A small but heavy load: Hindush tribute bearer at Apadana, probably carrying gold dust.[68] 1 liter of gold weighs 19.3kg.

The reliefs at the Apadana Palace in Persepolis describe tribute bearers from 23 satrapies visiting the Achaemenid court. These are located at the southern end of the Apadana Staircase. Among the foreigners the Arabs, the Thracians, the Bactrians, the Hindush (from the Indus valley area), the Parthians, the Cappadocians, the Elamites or the Medians. The people from the Indus valley are bare-chested, except for their leader, and barefooted and wear the dhoti. They bring baskets with vases inside, carry axes, and drive along a donkey.[69] One man in the procession carries a small but visibly heavy load of four jars on a yoke, suggesting that he was carrying some of the gold dust paid as tribute to the Achaemenid court.[68]

According to the Naqsh-e Rustam inscription of Darius I (circa 490 BCE), there were three Achaemenid Satrapies in the subcontinent: Sattagydia, Gandara, Hidūš.[42][70]

Tribute payments

change
 
Volume of annual tribute per district, in the Achaemenid Empire, according to Herodotus.[71][72][29]

The conquered area was the most fertile and populous region of the Achaemenid Empire. An amount of tribute was fixed according to the richness of each territory.[73][71]

Herodotus published a list of tribute-paying nations, classifying them in 20 Provinces.[74][61] The Province of Indos (Ἰνδός, the Indus valley) formed the 20th Province, and was the richest and most populous of the Achaemenid Provinces.

The Indons (Ἰνδῶν) [Referred to the people of the Indus (Pakistan)] made up the twentieth province. These are more in number than any nation known to me, and they paid a greater tribute than any other province, namely three hundred and sixty talents of gold dust.

According to Herodotus, the "Indons" ('Ινδοι, Indoi)[75]), as separate from the Gandarei and the Sattagydians, formed the 20th taxation Province, and were required to supply gold dust in tribute to the Achaemenid central government for an amount of 360 Euboean talents (equivalent to about 8300 kg or 8.3 tons of gold annually, a volume of gold that would fit in a cube of side 75 cm).[73][71] The exchange rate between gold and silver at the time of Herodotus being 13 to 1, this was equal in value to the very large amount of 4680 Euboean talents of silver, equivalent to 3600 Babylonian talents of silver (equivalent in value to about 108 tons of silver annually).[73][71] The country of the "Indons" ('Ινδοι, Indoi) was the Achaemenid district paying the largest tribute, and alone represented 32% of the total tribute revenues of the whole Achaemenid Empire.[73][71][29] It also means that Indos was the richest Achaemenid region in the subcontinent, much richer than Gandara or Sattagydia.[29] However the amount of gold in question is quite enormous, so there is a possibility that Herodotus was mistaken and that his own sources actually only meant something like the gold equivalent of 360 Babylonian talents of silver.[22]

 
Gandaran delegation at Apadana Palace.

The territories of Gandara, Sattagydia, Dadicae (north-west of the Kashmir Valley) and the Aparytae (Afridis) are named separately, and were aggregated together for taxation purposes, forming the 7th Achaemenid Province, and paying overall a much lower tribute of 170 talents together (about 5151 kg, or 5.1 tons of silver), hence only about 1.5% of the total revenues of the Achaemenid Empire:[73][71]

The Sattagydae (Σατταγύδαι), Gandarii (Γανδάριοι), Dadicae, and Aparytae (Ἀπαρύται) paid together a hundred and seventy talents; this was the seventh province

 
Ancient Pakistani soldiers of the three territories of Sattagydia, Gandhara and Hindush respectively,[76] supporting the throne of Xerxes I on his tomb at Naqsh-e Rostam.[77][78] See also complete relief. c. 480 BCE.
 
Indon soldiers of the Achaemenid army participated to the Second Persian invasion of Greece (480-479 BCE).

The Indons (Ἰνδῶν) [Refered to the people of the Indus (Pakistan)] also supplied Yaka wood (teak) for the construction of Achaemenid palaces,[79][70] as well as war elephants such as those used at Gaugamela.[70] The Susa inscriptions of Darius explain that Indian ivory and teak were sold on Persian markets, and used in the construction of his palace.[1]

Tax districts

change

Following is the order of the districts given by Herodotus, Histories, III.90–94. All five Satrapies of the Indus (Ancient Pakistan) are listed with their contribution in tax. Hindush was the richest of all Achaemenid Satrapies and contributed 32% of the entire Tax payments of the empire..[80] For comparison, it is given in the rightmost column.

Contribution to Achaemenid war efforts

change
Second Persian invasion of Greece (480-479 BCE)

Indians were employed in the Achaemenid army of Xerxes in the Second Persian invasion of Greece (480-479 BCE). All troops were stationned in Sardis, Lydia, during the winter of 481-480 BCE to prepare for the invasion.[83][84] In the spring of 480 BCE "Indons (Ἰνδῶν) troops marched with Xerxes's army across the Hellespont".[16][85] It was the "first-ever force from the Indus (Pakistan) to fight on the continent of Europe", storming Greek troops at the Battle of Thermopylae in 480 BCE, and fighting as one of the main nations until the final Battle of Platea in 479 BCE.[86][87][88]

Herodotus, in his description of the multi-ethnic Achaemenid army invading Greece, described the equipment of the Indons (Ἰνδῶν) [Refered to the people of the Indus (Pakistan)],:[85]

The Indons (Ἰνδῶν) wore garments of tree-wool, and carried bows of reed and iron-tipped arrows of the same. Such was their equipment; they were appointed to march under the command of Pharnazathres son of Artabates.

— Herodotus VII 65
 
Probable Spartan hoplite (Vix crater, c. 500 BCE),[89] and a Hindush warrior of the Achaemenid army[90][91] (tomb of Xerxes I, c. 480 BCE), at the time of the Second Persian invasion of Greece (480–479 BCE).

Herodotus also explains that the Indon cavalry under the Achaemenids had an equipment similar that of their foot soldiers:

The Indons were armed in like manner as their foot; they rode swift horses and drove chariots drawn by horses and wild asses.

— Herodotus VII 86

The Gandharis had a different equipment, akin to that of the Bactrians:

The Bactrians in the army wore a headgear most like to the Median, carrying their native bows of reed, and short spears. (...) The Parthians, Chorasmians, Sogdians, Gandarians, and Dadicae in the army had the same equipment as the Bactrians. The Parthians and Chorasmians had for their commander Artabazus son of Pharnaces, the Sogdians Azanes son of Artaeus, the Gandarians and Dadicae Artyphius son of Artabanus.

— Herodotus VII 64-66
Destruction of Athens and Battle of Plataea (479 BCE)

After the first part of the campaign directly under the orders Xerxes I, the Indon (Ἰνδῶν) [Refered to the people of the Indus (Pakistan)], troops are reported to have stayed in Greece as one of the 5 main nations among the 300,000 elite troops of General Mardonius. They fought in the last stages of the war, took part in the Destruction of Athens, but were finally vanquished at the Battle of Platea:[92]

 
Indian corps at the Battle of Plataea, 479 BCE.

Mardonius there chose out first all the Persians called Immortals, save only Hydarnes their general, who said that he would not quit the king's person; and next, the Persian cuirassiers, and the thousand horse, and the Medes and Sacae and Bactrians and Indons, alike their footmen and the rest of the horsemen. He chose these nations entire; of the rest of his allies he picked out a few from each people, the goodliest men and those that he knew to have done some good service... Thereby the whole number, with the horsemen, grew to three hundred thousand men.

— Herodotus VIII, 113.[93][92]

At the final Battle of Platea in 479 BCE, Indons formed one of the main corps of Achaemenid troops (one of "the greatest of the nations").[87][88][86][94] They were one of the main battle corps, positioned near the center of the Achaemenid battle line, between the Bactrians and the Sakae, facing against the enemy Greek troops of "Hermione and Eretria and Styra and Chalcis".[95][87] According to modern estimates, the Bactrians, Indons and Sakae probably numbered about 20,000 men altogether, whereas the Persian troops on their left amounted to about 40,000.[96] There were also Greek allies of the Persians, positioned on the right, whom Herodotus numbers at 50,000, a number which however might be "extravagant",[96] and is nowadays estimated to around 20,000.[97] Indons also supplied part of the cavalry, the total of which was about 5,000.[98][97]

Depictions

Indon soldiers of the three territories of Gandara, Sattagydia (Tathagatus) and Hindush are shown, together with soldiers of all the other nations, supporting the throne of their Achaemenid ruler, at Naqsh-e Rostam on the tombs of Darius I, Xerxes I, Artaxerxes I and Darius II, and at Persepolis on the tombs of Artaxerxes II and Artaxerxes III. The last Achaemenid ruler Darius III never had time to finish his own tomb due to his hasty defeat by Alexander the Great, and therefore does not have such depictions.[52][78] The soldiers from India are characterized by their particular clothing, only composed of a loin cloth and sandals, with bare upper body, in contrast to all the other ethnicities of the Achaemenid army, who are fully clothed, and in contrast also to the neighbouring provinces of Bactria or Arachosia, who are also fully clothed.[52]

 
The three types of Indon (Indus) soldiers still appear (upper right corner) among the soldiers of the Achaemenid Empire on the tomb of Artaxerxes III (who died in 338 BCE).[52][78][99]

The presence of the three ethnicities of Indon soldiers on all the tombs of the Achaemenid rulers after Darius, except for the last ruler Darius III who was vanquished by Alexander at Gaugamela, suggests that the Indons (Ἰνδῶν) [Refered to the people of the Indus (Pakistan)] were under Achaemenid dominion at least until 338 BCE, the date of the end of the reign of Artaxerxes III, before the accession of Darius III, that is, less than 10 years before the campaigns of Alexander in the East and his victory at Gaugamela.[52]

Indons at the Battle of Gaugamela (331 BCE)

According to Arrian, Indon troops were still deployed under Darius III at the Battle of Gaugamela (331 BCE). He explains that Darius III "obtained the help of those Indons who bordered on the Bactrians, together with the Bactrians and Sogdianians themselves, all under the command of Bessus, the Satrap of Bactria".[52] The Indons in questions were probably from the area of Gandara.[52] Indon "hill-men" are also said by Arrian to have joined the Arachotians under Satrap Barsentes, and are thought to have been either the Sattagydians or the Hindush.[52]

Fifteen war elephants were also part of the army of Darius III at Gaugamela.[67] They had specifically been brought from the Indus Valley.[100] Still, it seems they did not participate to the final battle, probably because of fatigue.[67] This was a relief for the armies of Alexander, who had no previous experience of combat against war elephants.[101] The elephants were captured with the baggage train by the Greeks after the engagement.[102]

Greek and Achaemenid coinage

change
 
Strike of an Achaemenid siglos, Kabul, Afghanistan, circa 5th century BCE. Archer king type. Coins of this type were also found in the Bhir Mound hoard in Taxila.[103]
 
Achaemenid Empire coin minted in the Kabul Valley. Circa 500-380 BCE.[104][105]
 
"Bent bar" minted under Achaemenid administration, of the type found in large quantities in the Chaman Hazouri hoard and the Bhir Mound hoard in Taxila.[106][107]

Coins found in the Chaman Hazouri hoard in Kabul, the Shaikhan Dehri hoard in Pushkalavati in Gandhara, near Charsadda, as well as in the Bhir Mound hoard in Taxila, have revealed numerous Achaemenid coins as well as many Greek coins from the 5th and 4th centuries BCE. These circulated in the area, at least as far as the Indus during the reign of the Achaemenids, who were in control of the areas as far as Gandhara.[108][109][105][110]

Kabul and Bhir Mound hoards

change

The Kabul hoard, also called the Chaman Hazouri, Chaman Hazouri or Tchamani-i Hazouri hoard,[108] is a coin hoard discovered in the vicinity of Kabul, Afghanistan. The hoard, discovered in 1933, contained numerous Achaemenid coins as well as many Greek coins from the 5th and 4th centuries BCE.[105] Approximately one thousand coins were in the hoard.[108][109] The hoard is dated to approximately 380 BCE as no coins in the hoard were later than that date.[111]

This numismatic discovery has been very important in studying and dating the history of coinage of India, since it is one of the very rare instances when punch-marked coins can actually be dated, due to their association with known and dated Greek and Achaemenid coins in the hoard.[112] The hoard supports the view that punch-marked coins existed in 360 BCE, as suggested by literary evidence.[112]

Daniel Schlumberger also considers that punch-marked bars, similar to the many punch-marked bars found in north-western India, initially originated in the Achaemenid Empire, rather than in the Indian heartland:

"The punch-marked bars were up to now considered to be Indian (...) However the weight standard is considered by some expert to be Persian, and now that we see them also being uncovered in the soil of Afghanistan, we must take into account the possibility that their country of origin should not be sought beyond the Indus, but rather in the oriental provinces of the Achaemenid Empire"

— Daniel Schlumberger, quoted from Trésors Monétaires, p.42.[110]

Modern numismatists now tend to consider the Achaemenid punch-marked coins as the precursors of the Indian punch-marked coins.[113][114]

Pushkalavati hoard

change

In 2007, a small coin hoard was discovered at the site of ancient Pushkalavati (the Shaikhan Dehri hoard) near Charsada in Pakistan. The hoard contained a tetradrachm minted in Athens circa 500/490-485/0 BCE, typically used as a currency for trade in the Achaemenid Empire, together with a number of local types as well as silver cast ingots. The Athens coin is the earliest known example of its type to be found so far to the east.[115][116]

According to Joe Cribb, these early Greek coins were at the origin of Indian punch-marked coins, the earliest coins developed in India, which used minting technology derived from Greek coinage.[105]

Influence of Achaemenid culture in the Indian subcontinent

change

Cultural exchanges: Taxila

change
Global location of Persepolis, capital of the Achaemenid Empire, and Taxila.

Taxila (site of Bhir Mound), the "most plausible candidate for the capital of Achaemenid Indus",[16] was at the crossroad of the main trade roads of Asia, was probably populated by Persians, Greeks and other people from throughout the Achaemenid Empire.[117][118][119] As reported by Strabo (XV, 1, 62),[120] when Alexander the Great was in Taxila, one of his companions named Aristobulus, noticed that in the city the dead were being fed to the vultures, a clear allusion to the presence of Zoroastrianism.[121] The renowned University of Taxila became the greatest learning centre in the region, and allowed for exchanges between people from various cultures.[122]

Followers of the Buddha

Several contemporaries, and close followers, of the Buddha are said to have studied in Achaemenid Taxila: King Pasenadi of Kosala,[123] a close friend of the Buddha, Bandhula, the commander of Pasedani's army, Aṅgulimāla, a close follower of the Buddha, and Jivaka, court doctor at Rajagriha and personal doctor of the Buddha.[124][125] According to Stephen Batchelor, the Buddha may have been influenced by the experiences and knowledge acquired by some of his closest followers in Taxila.[126]

Pāṇini

The 5th century BCE grammarian Pāṇini lived in an Achaemenid environment.[127][128][129] He is said to have been born in the north-west, in Shalatula near Attock to the north-west of Taxila, in what was then a satrapy of the Achaemenid Empire following the Achaemenid conquest of the Indus Valley, which technically made him a Persian subject.[127][128][129]

Kautilya and Chandragupta Maurya

Kautilya, the influential Prime Minister of Chandragupta Maurya, is also said to have been a professor teaching in Taxila.[130] According to Buddhist legend, Kautilya brought Chandragupta Maurya, the future founder of the Mauryan Empire to Taxila as a child, and had him educated there in "all the sciences and arts" of the period, including military sciences, for a period of 7 to 8 years.[131] These legends match Plutarch's assertion that Alexander the Great met with the young Chandragupta while campaigning in the Punjab.[131][132]

The Persians may have later participated, together with Sakas and Greeks, in the campaigns of Chandragupta Maurya to gain the throne of Magadha circa 320 BCE. The Mudrarakshasa states that after Alexander's death, an alliance of "Shaka-Yavana-Kamboja-Parasika-Bahlika" was used by Chandragupta Maurya in his campaign to take the throne in Magadha and found the Mauryan Empire.[133][134][135] The Sakas were Scythians, the Yavanas were Greeks, and the Parasikas were Persians.[134][136][133] David Brainard Spooner theorized upon Chandragupta Maurya's conquest and claimed that "it was with largely the Persian army that he won the throne of India."[135]

Scientific knowledge

change

Astronomical and astrological knowledge was also probably transmitted to the Indo-Pakistan subcontinent from Babylon during the 5th century BCE as a consequence of the Achaemenid presence in the region.[137][138] Babylonian astronomy was the first form of astronomy to fully develop and likely influenced other civilizations. The spread of knowledge may have hastened with the expansion of the Achaemenid Empire.

According to David Pingree, elements of Achaemenid scientific knowledge, particularly works on omens and astronomy, were adopted by India (the subcontinent) from the 5th century BCE:[139]

"India today is estimated to have about thirty million manuscripts, the largest body of handwritten reading material anywhere in the world. The literate culture of Indian science goes back to at least the fifth century B.C. ... as is shown by the elements of Mesopotamian omen literature and astronomy that entered India at that time."[139]

Palatial art and architecture: Pataliputra

change
 
The Masarh lion. The sculptural style is "unquestionably Achaemenid".[140]

Various artefacts tend to suggest some Perso-Hellenistic artistic influence in the subcontinent, mainly felt during the time of the Mauryan Empire.[1] The sculpture of the Masarh lion, found near the Maurya capital of Pataliputra, raises the question of the Achaemenid and Greek influence on the art of the Maurya Empire, and on the western origins of stone carving in India. The lion is carved in Chunar sandstone, like the Pillars of Ashoka, and its finish is polished, a feature of the Maurya sculpture.[140] According to S.P. Gupta, the sculptural style is unquestionably Achaemenid.[140] This is particularly the case for the well-ordered tubular representation of whiskers (vibrissas) and the geometrical representation of inflated veins flush with the entire face.[140] The mane, on the other hand, with tufts of hair represented in wavelets, is rather naturalistic.[140] Very similar examples are however known in Greece and Persepolis.[140] It is possible that this sculpture was made by an Achaemenid or Greek sculptor in India and either remained without effect, or was the Indian imitation of a Greek or Achaemenid model, somewhere between the fifth century B.C. and the first century B.C., although it is generally dated from the time of the Maurya Empire, around the 3rd century B.C.[140]

The Pataliputra palace with its pillared hall shows decorative influences of the Achaemenid palaces and Persepolis and may have used the help of foreign craftsmen.[141][1] Mauryan rulers may have even imported craftsmen from abroad to build royal monuments.[142] This may be the result of the formative influence of craftsmen employed from Persia following the disintegration of the Achaemenid Empire after the conquests of Alexander the Great.[143][144] The Pataliputra capital, or also the Hellenistic friezes of the Rampurva capitals, Sankissa, and the diamond throne of Bodh Gaya are other examples.[145]

The renowned Mauryan polish, especially used in the Pillars of Ashoka, may also have been a technique imported from the Achaemenid Empire.[1]

Rock-cut architecture

change
Lycian Tomb of Payava (dated 375-360 BCE) and Lomas Rishi cave entrance (dated circa 250 BCE).
Ajanta Cave 9 (dated 1st century BCE)

The similarity of the 4th century BCE Lycian barrel-vaulted tombs, such as the tomb of Payava, in the western part of the Achaemenid Empire, with the Indian architectural design of the Chaitya (starting at least a century later from circa 250 BCE, with the Lomas Rishi caves in the Barabar caves group), suggests that the designs of the Lycian rock-cut tombs travelled to India along the trade routes across the Achaemenid Empire.[147][148]

Early on, James Fergusson, in his Illustrated Handbook of Architecture, while describing the very progressive evolution from wooden architecture to stone architecture in various ancient civilizations, has commented that "In India, the form and construction of the older Buddhist temples resemble so singularly these examples in Lycia".[149] The structural similarities, down to many architectural details, with the Chaitya-type Indian Buddhist temple designs, such as the "same pointed form of roof, with a ridge", are further developed in The cave temples of India.[150] The Lycian tombs, dated to the 4th century BCE, are either free-standing or rock-cut barrel-vaulted sarcophagi, placed on a high base, with architectural features carved in stone to imitate wooden structures. There are numerous rock-cut equivalents to the free-standing structures and decorated with reliefs.[151][152][153] Fergusson went on to suggest an "Indian connection", and some form of cultural transfer across the Achaemenid Empire.[148] The ancient transfer of Lycian designs for rock-cut monuments to India is considered as "quite probable".[147]

Art historian David Napier has also proposed a reverse relationship, claiming that the Payava tomb was a descendant of an ancient South Asian style, and that Payava may actually have been a Graeco-Indian named "Pallava".[154]

Monumental columns: the Pillars of Ashoka

change
Highly polished Achaemenid load-bearing column with lotus capital and animals, Persepolis, c. 5th-4th BCE.

Regarding the Pillars of Ashoka, there has been much discussion of the extent of influence from Achaemenid Persia,[155] since the column capitals supporting the roofs at Persepolis have similarities, and the "rather cold, hieratic style" of the Sarnath Lion Capital of Ashoka especially shows "obvious Achaemenid and Sargonid influence".[156]

Hellenistic influence has also been suggested.[157] In particular the abaci of some of the pillars (especially the Rampurva bull, the Sankissa elephant and the Allahabad pillar capital) use bands of motifs, like the bead and reel pattern, the ovolo, the flame palmettes, lotuses, which likely originated from Greek and Near-Eastern arts.[158] Such examples can also be seen in the remains of the Mauryan capital city of Pataliputra.

Aramaic language and script

change
 
The Aramaic Inscription of Taxila, dated circa 260 BCE. Taxila Museum, Pakistan.

The Aramaic language, official language of the Achaemenid Empire, started to be used in the Indian territories.[159] Some of the Edicts of Ashoka in the north-western areas of Ashoka's territory, in modern Pakistan and Afghanistan, used Aramaic (the official language of the former Achaemenid Empire), together with Prakrit and Greek (the language of the neighbouring Greco-Bactrian kingdom and the Greek communities in Ashoka's realm).[160]

The Indian Kharosthi script shows a clear dependency on the Aramaic alphabet but with extensive modifications to support the sounds found in Indic languages.[1][161] One model is that the Aramaic script arrived with the Achaemenid Empire's conquest of the Indus River (modern Pakistan) in 500 BCE and evolved over the next 200+ years, reaching its final form by the 3rd century BCE where it appears in some of the Edicts of Ashoka.[159][1]

Edicts of Ashoka

change

The Edicts of Ashoka (circa 250 BCE) may show Achaemenid influences, including formulaic parallels with Achaemenid inscriptions, presence of Iranian loanwords (in Aramaic inscriptions), and the very act of engraving edicts on rocks and mountains (compare for example Behistun inscription).[162][163] To describe his own edicts, Ashoka used the word Lipī (𑀮𑀺𑀧𑀺), now generally simply translated as "writing" or "inscription". It is thought the word "lipi", which is also orthographed "dipi" (𐨡𐨁𐨤𐨁) in the two Kharosthi versions of the rock edicts,[c] comes from an Old Persian prototype dipî (𐎮𐎡𐎱𐎡) also meaning "inscription", which is used for example by Darius I in his Behistun inscription,[d] suggesting borrowing and diffusion.[164][165][166] There are other borrowings of Old Persian terms for writing-related words in the Edicts of Ashoka, such as nipista or nipesita (𐨣𐨁𐨤𐨁𐨯𐨿𐨟, "written" and "made to be written") in the Kharoshthi version of Major Rock Edict No.4, which can be related to the word nipištā (𐎴𐎡𐎱𐎡𐏁𐎫𐎠, "written") from the daiva inscription of Xerxes at Persepolis.[167]

Several of the Edicts of Ashoka, such as the Kandahar Bilingual Rock Inscription or the Taxila inscription were written in Aramaic, one of the official languages of the former Achaemenid Empire.[168]

Figurines of West Asian foreigners in Mathura, Sarnath and Patna (4th-2nd century BCE)

change
Figurines of foreigners in India
"Ethnic head", Mathura, c. 2nd century BCE. Mathura Museum.[170]
"Persian Nobleman clad in coat dupatta trouser and turban", Mathura, c. 2nd Century BCE. Mathura Museum.[170]
Figure of a foreigner, from Sarnath.[171][172]

Some relatively high quality terracotta statuettes have been recovered from the Mauryan Empire strata in the excavations of Mathura in northern India.[173] Most of these terracottas show what appears to be female deities or mother goddesses.[174][175] However, several figures of foreigners also appear in the terracottas from the 4th to the 2nd century BCE, which are either described simply as "foreigners" or Persian or Iranian because of their foreign features.[170][176][177] These figurines might reflect the increased contacts of Indians with Iranian people during this period.[176] Several of these seem to represent foreign soldiers who visited India during the Mauryan period and influenced modellers in Mathura with their peculiar ethnic features and uniforms.[178] One of the terracotta statuettes, a man nicknamed the "Persian nobleman" and dated to the 2nd century BCE, can be seen wearing a coat, scarf, trousers and a turban.[179][180][181][170]

S.P. Gupta also mentions the "male heads of foreigners from Patna city and Sarnath", which according to him attest to the presence of a foreign elite in the Gangetic plains during the Mauryan or late Mauryan period. This elite was West Asian, specifically related to the Pahlavas and Sakas based in Iran and Afghanistan, and their presence was a consequence of their eastern forays into India.[171][172]

Religion

change

According to Ammianus Marcellinus,[182] a 4th-century CE Roman author, Hystaspes, the father of Darius I, studied under the Brahmanas in India, thus contributing to the development of the religion of the Magi (Zoroastrianism):[183]

"Hystaspes, a very wise monarch, the father of Darius. Who while boldly penetrating into the remoter districts of upper India, came to a certain woody retreat, of which with its tranquil silence the Brahmans, men of sublime genius, were the possessors. From their teaching he learnt the principles of the motion of the world and of the stars, and the pure rites of sacrifice, as far as he could; and of what he learnt he infused some portion into the minds of the Magi, which they have handed down by tradition to later ages, each instructing his own children, and adding to it their own system of divination".

In ancient sources, Hystapes is sometimes considered as identical with Vishtaspa (the Avestan and Old Persian name for Hystapes), an early patron of Zoroaster.[183]

Historically, the life of the Buddha also coincided with the Achaemenid conquest of the Indus Valley.[185] The Achaemenid occupation of the areas of Gandara and Hinduš, which was to last for about two centuries, was accompanied by Achaemenid religions, reformed Mazdaism or early Zoroastrianism, to which Buddhism might also have in part reacted.[185] In particular, the ideas of the Buddha may have partly consisted in a rejection of the "absolutist" or "perfectionist" ideas contained in these Achaemenid religions.[185]

Still, according to Christopher I. Beckwith, commenting on the content of the Edicts of Ashoka, the early Buddhist concepts of karma, rebirth, and affirming that good deeds will be rewarded in this life and the next, in Heaven, probably find their origin in Achaemenid Mazdaism, which had been introduced in India from the time of the Achaemenid conquest of Gandara.[186]

List of satrapies

change

Several satrapies were founded by the Achaemenid empire in the Indian subcontinent, including;

Other important satrapies in South Asia (in modern day's Balochistan) include;

  1. Maka (Old Persian: 𐎶𐎣 Maka-) was a satrapy of the Achaemenid Empire and later a satrapy of the Parthian and Sassanian empires (known as Mazun), corresponding to Greek Gedrosia. According to Fleming, Maka, in the area of Gedrosia, can be considered one of the Indus satrapies of the Achaemenid Empire.[5]
  2. Ctesias: "The Indians also include this substance among their most precious gifts for the Persian king who receives it as a prize revered above all others."[65]
  3. For example, according to Hultzsch, the first line of the First Edict at Shahbazgarhi (or at Mansehra) reads: "(Ayam) Dhrama-dipi Devanapriyasa Raño likhapitu" ("This Dharma-Edicts was written by King Devanampriya" Inscriptions of Asoka. New Edition by E. Hultzsch (in Sanskrit). 1925. p. 51.
    This appears in the reading of Hultzsch's original rubbing of the Kharoshthi inscription of the first line of the First Edict at Shahbazgarhi.
  4. For example Column IV, Line 89

References

change
  1. 1.00 1.01 1.02 1.03 1.04 1.05 1.06 1.07 1.08 1.09 1.10 1.11 Sen, Ancient Indian History and Civilization 1999, pp. 116–117.
  2. André-Salvini, Béatrice (2005). Forgotten Empire: The World of Ancient Persia. University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-24731-4.
  3. Errington, Elizabeth; Trust, Ancient India and Iran; Museum, Fitzwilliam (1992). The Crossroads of Asia: transformation in image and symbol in the art of ancient Afghanistan and Pakistan. Ancient India and Iran Trust. p. 56. ISBN 9780951839911.
  4. (Fussman, 1993, p. 84). "This is inferred from the fact that Gandhara (OPers. Gandāra) is already mentioned at Bisotun, while the toponym Hinduš (Sindhu) is added only in later inscriptions."
  5. FLEMING, DAVID (1993). "Where was Achaemenid India?". Bulletin of the Asia Institute. 7: 70. JSTOR 24048427.
  6. Herodotus. "Book III: Chapters 89-95". penelope.uchicago.edu. Retrieved 2024-09-04.
  7. Archibald, Zosia; Archibald, Zosia H.; Davies, John K.; Gabrielsen, Vincent (2011-06-09). The Economies of Hellenistic Societies, Third to First Centuries BC. Oxford University Press. p. 404. ISBN 978-0-19-958792-6.
  8. Briant, Pierre (2002-07-21). From Cyrus to Alexander: A History of the Persian Empire. Penn State Press. ISBN 978-1-57506-574-8.
  9. Kerr, Gordon (2017). A Short History of India: From the Earliest Civilisations to Today's Economic Powerhouse (in German). Oldcastle Books. p. PT16. ISBN 9781843449232.
  10. Thapar, Romila (1990). A History of India. Penguin UK. p. 422. ISBN 9780141949765.
  11. 11.0 11.1 Some sounds are omitted in the writing of Old Persian, and are shown with a raised letter.Old Persian p.164Old Persian p.13. In particular Old Persian nasals such as "n" were omitted in writing before consonants Old Persian p.17Old Persian p.25
  12. 12.0 12.1 Perfrancesco Callieri, INDIA ii. Historical Geography, Encyclopaedia Iranica, 15 December 2004.
  13. Eggermont, Alexander's Campaigns in Sind and Baluchistan 1975, p. 177: "One should, therefore, be careful to distinguish the limited geographical unit of Gandhāra from the political one bearing the same name."
  14. Tauqeer Ahmad, University of the Punjab, Lahore, South Asian Studies, A Research Journal of South Asian Studies, Vol. 27, No. 1, January–June 2012, pp. 221-232 p.222
  15. FLEMING, DAVID (1993). "Where was Achaemenid India?". Bulletin of the Asia Institute. 7: 67–72. JSTOR 24048427.
  16. 16.0 16.1 16.2 FLEMING, DAVID (1993). "Where was Achaemenid India?". Bulletin of the Asia Institute. 7: 70. JSTOR 24048427.
  17. Marshall, John (1975) [1951]. Taxila: Volume I. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass. pp. 83.
  18. Waters, Matt (2014). Ancient Persia: A Concise History of the Achaemenid Empire, 550–330 BCE. Cambridge University Press. p. 82. ISBN 9781107009608.
  19. 19.0 19.1 DNa - Livius.
  20. Hamadan Gold and Silver Tablet inscription
  21. Dandamaev, A Political History of the Achaemenid Empire 1989, p. 147; Neelis, Early Buddhist Transmission and Trade Networks 2010, pp. 96–97; Sen, Sailendra Nath (1999). Ancient Indian History and Civilization. New Age International. p. 117. ISBN 9788122411980.
  22. 22.0 22.1 22.2 "The region was soon to appear as Hindūš in the Old Persian inscriptions... Transparent though the name appears at first sight, its location is not without problems. Foucher, Kent and many subsequent writers have identified Hindūš with its etymological equivalent, Sind, thereby placing it on the lower Indus towards the delta. However, (...) no material evidence of Achaemenid activity in this region is so far available. (...) There seems no evidence at present of gold production in the Indus delta, so this detail seems to weight against the location of the Hindūš province in Sind. (...) The alternative location to Sind for an Achaemenid province of Hindūš is naturally at Taxila and in the West Punjab, where there are indications that a Persian satrapy may have existed, though no clear evidence of its name." in Cambridge Ancient History. Cambridge University Press. 2002. pp. 203–204. ISBN 9780521228046.
  23. FLEMING, DAVID (1993). "Where was Achaemenid India?". Bulletin of the Asia Institute. 7: 69. JSTOR 24048427.
  24. Parker, Grant (2008). The Making of Roman India. Cambridge University Press. p. 15. ISBN 9780521858342.
  25. Olmstead, History of the Persian Empire 1948, pp. 144–145.
  26. Samad, Rafi U. (2011). The Grandeur of Gandhara: The Ancient Buddhist Civilization of the Swat, Peshawar, Kabul and Indus Valleys. Algora Publishing. ISBN 978-0-87586-859-2.
  27. 27.0 27.1 27.2 Beckwith, Christopher I. (2015). Greek Buddha: Pyrrho's Encounter with Early Buddhism in Central Asia. Princeton University Press. p. 5. ISBN 9781400866328.
  28. Herodotus VII 65
  29. 29.00 29.01 29.02 29.03 29.04 29.05 29.06 29.07 29.08 29.09 "INDIA RELATIONS: ACHAEMENID PERIOD – Encyclopaedia Iranica". www.iranicaonline.org.
  30. Behistun T 02 - Livius.
  31. King, L. W. (Leonard William); Thompson, R. Campbell (Reginald Campbell) (1907). The sculptures and inscription of Darius the Great on the Rock of Behistûn in Persia : a new collation of the Persian, Susian and Babylonian texts. London : Longmans. p. 3.
  32. Sagar, Krishna Chandra (1992). Foreign Influence on Ancient India. Northern Book Centre. p. 21. ISBN 9788172110284.
  33. "Susa, Statue of Darius - Livius". www.livius.org.
  34. Also described here Archived 2019-07-01 at the Wayback Machine
  35. 35.0 35.1 Zournatzi, Antigoni (2003). "The Apadana Coin Hoards, Darius I, and the West". American Journal of Numismatics. 15: 1–28. JSTOR 43580364.
  36. Persepolis : discovery and afterlife of a world wonder. 2012. pp. 171–181.
  37. DPh inscription, also Photographs of one of the gold plaques Archived 2019-07-01 at the Wayback Machine
  38. 38.0 38.1 DSe - Livius.
  39. DSm inscription
  40. Livius DNa inscription
  41. Sagar, Krishna Chandra (1992). Foreign Influence on Ancient India. Northern Book Centre. p. 20. ISBN 9788172110284.
  42. 42.0 42.1 "DNa - Livius". www.livius.org.
  43. Alcock, Susan E.; Alcock, John H. D'Arms Collegiate Professor of Classical Archaeology and Classics and Arthur F. Thurnau Professor Susan E.; D'Altroy, Terence N.; Morrison, Kathleen D.; Sinopoli, Carla M. (2001). Empires: Perspectives from Archaeology and History. Cambridge University Press. p. 105. ISBN 9780521770200.
  44. 44.0 44.1 Briant, Pierre (2002). From Cyrus to Alexander: A History of the Persian Empire. Eisenbrauns. p. 756. ISBN 978-1-57506-120-7.
  45. "Strabo Geography, Book XV, Chapter 2, 9". penelope.uchicago.edu.
  46. Cite error: The named reference Philip's Atlas of World History was used but no text was provided for refs named (see the help page).
  47. O'Brien, Patrick Karl (2002). Atlas of World History. Oxford University Press. p. 43. ISBN 9780195219210.
  48. Barraclough, Geoffrey (1989). The Times Atlas of World History. Times Books. p. 79. ISBN 9780723009061.
  49. 49.0 49.1 Olmstead, History of the Persian Empire 1948, pp. 291–292: "The Gandarians thus make their last appearance as Persian tribute paying subjects in the lists of Artaxerxes, though the land continued to be known under the name of Gandhara down to classic Indian times."
  50. 50.0 50.1 Inscription A2Pa of Artaxerxes II
  51. 51.0 51.1 Lecoq, Pierre. Les inscriptions de la perse achemenide (1997) (in French). pp. 271–272.
  52. 52.0 52.1 52.2 52.3 52.4 52.5 52.6 52.7 52.8 Magee et al., The Achaemenid Empire in South Asia and Recent Excavations 2005, pp. 713–714.
  53. Tola, Fernando (1986). "India and Greece before Alexander". Annals of the Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute. 67 (1/4): 159–194. JSTOR 41693244.
  54. 54.0 54.1 Samad, Rafi U. (2011). The Grandeur of Gandhara: The Ancient Buddhist Civilization of the Swat, Peshawar, Kabul and Indus Valleys. Algora Publishing. ISBN 978-0-87586-859-2.
  55. 55.0 55.1 Samad, Rafi U. (2011). The Grandeur of Gandhara: The Ancient Buddhist Civilization of the Swat, Peshawar, Kabul and Indus Valleys. Algora Publishing. ISBN 978-0-87586-859-2.
  56. "The history of antiquity". Max Duncker.
  57. "Full Text of Herodotus, Book 7,8 and 9".
  58. "The History, by Herodotus (book7)". cadelaide.edu.au. Archived from the original on September 5, 2008. Retrieved 2010-09-07.
  59. Olmstead, History of the Persian Empire 1948, pp. 291–292
  60. Herodotus III 91, Herodotus III 94
  61. 61.0 61.1 61.2 61.3 61.4 Mitchiner, The Ancient & Classical World 1978, p. 44.
  62. Olmstead, History of the Persian Empire 1948, pp. 291–292: "...the official tribute list incorporated by Herodotus shows decided administrative change. As under Cyrus, there were again twenty satrapies, but the larger number of Darius had been reduced by the union of some hitherto separate. This process, already to be detected in the army list of Xerxes, but accelerated in the tribute list of Artaxerxes, again suggests actual loss of territory. (25 lines later).... Two satrapies are united in the case of the Sattagydians, Gandarians, Dadicae, and Aparytae, whose tribute was 170 talents."
  63. Olmstead, History of the Persian Empire 1948, pp. 291–292.
  64. The hypothesis that the region had already become independent by the end of the reign of Darius I or during the reign of Artaxerxes II (Chattopadhyaya, 1974, pp. 25-26) appears to be contradicted by Ctesias's reference to gifts received from the kings of India and by the fact that even Darius III still had some Indian units in his army (Briant, 1996, pp. 699, 774). At the time of the arrival of the Alexander's Macedonian army in the Indus Valley, there is no mention of officers of the Persian kings in India; but this does not mean (Dittmann, 1984, p. 185) that the Achaemenids had no power there. Other data indicate that they still exercised control over the area, although in ways that differed from those of Darius I's time (Briant, 1996, pp. 776-78).
  65. The Complete Fragments of Ctesias of Cnidus. pp. 120–121.
  66. The Complete Fragments of Ctesias of Cnidus. p. Page 116 Fragment F45bα) and Page 219 Note F45bα).
  67. 67.0 67.1 67.2 Kistler, John M. (2007). War Elephants. U of Nebraska Press. p. 29. ISBN 978-0803260047.
  68. 68.0 68.1 "Furthermore the second member of Delegation XVIII is carrying four small but evidently heavy jars on a yoke, probably containing the gold dust which was the tribute paid by the Indians." in Iran, Délégation archéologique française en (1972). Cahiers de la Délégation archéologique française en Iran. Institut français de recherches en Iran (section archéologique). p. 146.
  69. André-Salvini, Béatrice (2005). Forgotten Empire: The World of Ancient Persia. University of California Press. ISBN 9780520247314.
  70. 70.0 70.1 70.2 Bosworth, A. B. (1996). Alexander and the East : The Tragedy of Triumph: The Tragedy of Triumph. Clarendon Press. p. 154. ISBN 9780191589454.
  71. 71.0 71.1 71.2 71.3 71.4 71.5 Herodotus Book III, 89-95
  72. Archibald, Zosia; Davies, John K.; Gabrielsen, Vincent (2011). The Economies of Hellenistic Societies, Third to First Centuries BC. Oxford University Press. p. 404. ISBN 9780199587926.
  73. 73.0 73.1 73.2 73.3 73.4 Archibald, Davies & Gabrielsen, The Economies of Hellenistic Societies 2011, p. 404.
  74. Herodotus III, 89
  75. 'Ινδοι, Greek Word Study Tool, Tufts University
  76. Nations of the soldiers on the tombs, Walser. Also [1]
  77. The Achaemenid Empire in South Asia and Recent Excavations in Akra in Northwest Pakistan Peter Magee, Cameron Petrie, Robert Knox, Farid Khan, Ken Thomas p.713
  78. 78.0 78.1 78.2 NAQŠ-E ROSTAM – Encyclopaedia Iranica.
  79. DSf inscription
  80. Hermann Bengtson, Vladimir Milojčić (ed.), Grosser Historischer Weltatlas, Erster Teil: Vorgeschichte und Altertum (München, Bayerischer Schulbuch-Verlag, 4th ed., 1963), p. 11, Map (b), "Reich der Meder und Perser".
  81. Herodotus Book III, 89-95
  82. Archibald, Zosia; Davies, John K.; Gabrielsen, Vincent (2011). The Economies of Hellenistic Societies, Third to First Centuries BC. Oxford University Press. p. 404. ISBN 9780199587926.
  83. Stoneman, Richard (2015). Xerxes: A Persian Life. Yale University Press. p. 118. ISBN 9780300180077.
  84. Herodotus. LacusCurtius • Herodotus — Book VII: Chapters 1‑56. pp. VII-26.
  85. 85.0 85.1 Beckwith, Christopher I. (2015). Greek Buddha: Pyrrho's Encounter with Early Buddhism in Central Asia. Princeton University Press. p. 7. ISBN 9781400866328.
  86. 86.0 86.1 Daniélou, Alain (2003). A Brief History of India. Simon and Schuster. p. 67. ISBN 9781594777943.
  87. 87.0 87.1 87.2 "A Sindhu contingent formed a part of his army which invaded Greece and stormed the defile at Thermopylae in 480 BC, thus becoming the first ever force from India to fight on the continent of Europe. It, apparently, distinguished itself in battle because it was followed by another contingent which formed a part of the Persian army under Mardonius which lost the battle of Platea"Sandhu, Gurcharn Singh (2000). A military history of ancient India. Vision Books. p. 179. ISBN 9788170943754.
  88. 88.0 88.1 LacusCurtius • Herodotus — Book IX: Chapters 1‑89. pp. IX-32.
  89. Freeman, Charles (2014). Egypt, Greece, and Rome: Civilizations of the Ancient Mediterranean. Oxford University Press. p. 154. ISBN 9780199651917.
  90. Naqs-e Rostam – Encyclopaedia Iranica.
  91. Naqs-e Rostam – Encyclopaedia Iranica List of nationalities of the Achaemenid military with corresponding drawings.
  92. 92.0 92.1 Tola, Fernando (1986). "India and Greece before Alexander". Annals of the Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute. 67 (1/4): 165. JSTOR 41693244.
  93. LacusCurtius • Herodotus — Book VIII: Chapters 97‑144. p. Herodotus VIII, 113.
  94. Roy, Kaushik (2015). Warfare in Pre-British India – 1500BCE to 1740CE. Routledge. p. 28. ISBN 9781317586920.
  95. LacusCurtius • Herodotus — Book IX: Chapters 1‑89. pp. IX-31.
  96. 96.0 96.1 Shepherd, William (2012). Plataea 479 BC: The most glorious victory ever seen. Bloomsbury Publishing. p. 36. ISBN 9781849085557.
  97. 97.0 97.1 Shepherd, William (2012). Plataea 479 BC: The most glorious victory ever seen. Bloomsbury Publishing. p. 51. ISBN 9781849085557.
  98. Shepherd, William (2012). Plataea 479 BC: The most glorious victory ever seen. Bloomsbury Publishing. p. 37. ISBN 9781849085557.
  99. Heckel, Waldemar; Tritle, Lawrence A. (2011). Alexander the Great: A New History. John Wiley & Sons. p. 164. ISBN 9781444360158.
  100. Yenne, Bill (2010). Alexander the Great: Lessons from History's Undefeated General. St. Martin's Press. p. 71. ISBN 9780230106406.
  101. Kistler, John M. (2007). War Elephants. U of Nebraska Press. p. 27. ISBN 978-0803260047.
  102. Holt, Frank L. (2003). Alexander the Great and the Mystery of the Elephant Medallions. University of California Press. p. 72. ISBN 9780520938786.
  103. "Coins of this type found in Chaman Hazouri (deposited c.350 BC) and Bhir Mound hoards (deposited c.300 BC)." Article by Joe Cribb and Osmund Bopearachchi in Errington, Elizabeth; Trust, Ancient India and Iran; Museum, Fitzwilliam (1992). The Crossroads of Asia: transformation in image and symbol in the art of ancient Afghanistan and Pakistan. Ancient India and Iran Trust. pp. 57–59. ISBN 9780951839911.
  104. Classical Numismatic Group, Coin page
  105. 105.0 105.1 105.2 105.3 Bopearachchi & Cribb, Coins illustrating the History of the Crossroads of Asia 1992, pp. 57–59
  106. CNG Coins
  107. "Silver bent-bar punch-marked coin of Kabul region under the Achaemenid Empire, c.350 BC: Coins of this type found in quantity in Chaman Hazouri and Bhir Mound hoards" Article by Joe Cribb and Osmund Bopearachchi in Errington, Elizabeth; Trust, Ancient India and Iran; Museum, Fitzwilliam (1992). The Crossroads of Asia: transformation in image and symbol in the art of ancient Afghanistan and Pakistan. Ancient India and Iran Trust. pp. 57–59. ISBN 9780951839911.
  108. 108.0 108.1 108.2 Bopearachchi, Coin Production and Circulation 2000, pp. 300–301.
  109. 109.0 109.1 "US Department of Defense". Archived from the original on 2020-06-10. Retrieved 2018-10-06.
  110. 110.0 110.1 Bopearachchi, Coin Production and Circulation 2000, pp. 308-.
  111. Bopearachchi, Coin Production and Circulation 2000, p. 308.
  112. 112.0 112.1 Cribb, Investigating the introduction of coinage in India 1983, pp. 85–86.
  113. "the local coins of the Achaemenid era (...) were the precursors of the bent and punch-marked bars" in Bopearachchi, Osmund. Coin Production and Circulation in Central Asia and North-West India (Before and after Alexander's Conquest). p. 311.
  114. About the hoard in Kabul: "In the same hoard there were also discovered two series of local silver coins which appear to be the product of local Achaemenid administration. One series (...) was made in a new way, which relates it to the punch-marked silver coins of India. It appears that it was these local coins, using technology adapted from Greek coins, which provided the prototypes for punch-marked coins made in India." p.57 "In the territories to the south of the Hindu Kush the punch-marked coins, descendants of the local coins of the Achaemenid administration in the same area, were issued by the Mauryan kings of India for local circulation." in Errington, Elizabeth; Trust, Ancient India and Iran; Museum, Fitzwilliam (1992). The Crossroads of Asia: transformation in image and symbol in the art of ancient Afghanistan and Pakistan. Ancient India and Iran Trust. pp. 57–59. ISBN 9780951839911.
  115. O. Bopearachchi, "Premières frappes locales de l'Inde du Nord-Ouest: nouvelles données," in Trésors d'Orient: Mélanges offerts à Rika Gyselen, Fig. 1 (this coin) CNG Coins Archived 2019-12-25 at the Wayback Machine
  116. Bopearachchi, Coin Production and Circulation 2000, p. 309.
  117. Lowe, Roy; Yasuhara, Yoshihito (2016). The Origins of Higher Learning: Knowledge networks and the early development of universities. Routledge. p. 62. ISBN 9781317543268.
  118. Le, Huu Phuoc (2010). Buddhist Architecture. Grafikol. p. 50. ISBN 9780984404308.
  119. Batchelor, Stephen (2010). Confession of a Buddhist Atheist. Random House Publishing Group. pp. 255–256. ISBN 9781588369840.
  120. "LacusCurtius • Strabo's Geography — Book XV Chapter 1 (§§ 39‑73)". penelope.uchicago.edu.
  121. Beckwith, Christopher I. (2015). Greek Buddha: Pyrrho's Encounter with Early Buddhism in Central Asia. Princeton University Press. p. 177. ISBN 9781400866328.
  122. Batchelor, Stephen (2010). Confession of a Buddhist Atheist. Random House Publishing Group. p. 125. ISBN 9781588369840.
  123. "The Dhammapada Commentary furnishes us with some interesting information regarding Kosala. We learn from this work that Pasenadi, son of Mahākosala, was educated at Taxila." in The Indian Historical Quarterly. Calcutta Oriental Press. 1925. p. 150.
  124. "One account suggests that, as a young man, Jivaka had travelled across India to Taxila, in the distant west, to study medicine under the well-known Disapamok Achariya" in Lowe, Roy; Yasuhara, Yoshihito (2016). The Origins of Higher Learning: Knowledge networks and the early development of universities. Routledge. p. 62. ISBN 978-1-317-54326-8.
  125. Batchelor, Stephen (2010). Confession of a Buddhist Atheist. Random House Publishing Group. p. 256. ISBN 9781588369840.
  126. Batchelor, Stephen (2010). Confession of a Buddhist Atheist. Random House Publishing Group. p. 255. ISBN 9781588369840.
  127. 127.0 127.1 Scharfe, Hartmut (1977). Grammatical Literature. Otto Harrassowitz Verlag. p. 89. ISBN 9783447017060.
  128. 128.0 128.1 Bakshi, S. R. (2005). Early Aryans to Swaraj. Sarup & Sons. p. 47. ISBN 9788176255370.
  129. 129.0 129.1 Ninan, M. M. (2008). The Development of Hinduism. Madathil Mammen Ninan. p. 97. ISBN 9781438228204.
  130. Schlichtmann, Klaus (2016). A Peace History of India: From Ashoka Maurya to Mahatma Gandhi. Vij Books India Pvt Ltd. p. 29. ISBN 9789385563522.
  131. 131.0 131.1 Mookerji, Radhakumud (1966). Chandragupta Maurya and His Times. Motilal Banarsidass. pp. 16–17. ISBN 9788120804050.
  132. "Sandrocottus, when he was a stripling, saw Alexander himself, and we are told that he often said in later times that Alexander narrowly missed making himself master of the country, since its king was hated and despised on account of his baseness and low birth". Plutarch 62-4 "Plutarch, Alexander, chapter 1, section 1".
  133. 133.0 133.1 Mookerji, Radhakumud (1966). Chandragupta Maurya and His Times. Motilal Banarsidass. p. 27. ISBN 9788120804050.; Mookerji, Radha Kumud (1957). "The Foundation of the Mauryan Empire". In K. A. Nilakanta Sastri (ed.). A Comprehensive History of India, Volume 2: Mauryas and Satavahanas. Orient Longmans. p. 4.: "The Mudrarakshasa further informs us that his Himalayan alliance gave Chandragupta a composite army ... Among these are mentioned the following : Sakas, Yavanas (probably Greeks), Kiratas, Kambojas, Parasikas and Bahlikas."
  134. 134.0 134.1 Shashi, Shyam Singh (1999). Encyclopaedia Indica: Mauryas. Anmol Publications. p. 134. ISBN 9788170418597.: "Among those who helped Chandragupta in his struggle against the Nandas, were the Sakas (Scythians), Yavanas (Greeks), and Parasikas (Persians)"
  135. 135.0 135.1 D. B. Spooner (1915). "The Zoroastrian Period of Indian History". Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland. 47 (3): 416–417. doi:10.1017/S0035869X00048437. JSTOR 25189338. S2CID 162867863.: "After Alexander's death, when Chandragupta marched on Magada, it was with largely the Persian army that he won the throne of India. The testimony of the Mudrarakshasa is explicit on this point, and we have no reason to doubt its accuracy in matter[s] of this kind."
  136. Mookerji, Radhakumud (1966). Chandragupta Maurya and His Times. Motilal Banarsidass. p. 210. ISBN 9788120804050.
  137. Boyce, Mary (1982). A History of Zoroastrianism: Volume II: Under the Achaemenians. BRILL. p. 41. ISBN 9789004065062.
  138. Boyce, Mary (1982). A History of Zoroastrianism: Volume II: Under the Achaemenians. BRILL. p. 278. ISBN 9789004065062.
  139. 139.0 139.1 Pingree, David (1988). "Review of The Fidelity of Oral Tradition and the Origins of Science". Journal of the American Oriental Society. 108 (4): 638. doi:10.2307/603154. ISSN 0003-0279. JSTOR 603154.
  140. 140.0 140.1 140.2 140.3 140.4 140.5 140.6 Page 88: "There is one fragmentary lion head from Masarh, Distt. Bhojpur, Bihar. It is carved out of Chunar sandstone and it also bears the typical Mauryan polish. But it is undoubtedly based on the Achaemenian idiom. The tubular or wick-like whiskers and highly decorated neck with long locks of the mane with one series arranged like sea waves is somewhat non-Indian in approach . But, to be exact, we have an example of a lion from a sculptural frieze from Persepolis of 5th century BCE in which it is overpowering a bull which may be compared with the Masarh lion."... Page 122: "This particular example of a foreign model gets added support from the male heads of foreigners from Patna city and Sarnath since they also prove beyond doubt that a section of the elite in the Gangetic Basin was of foreign origin. However, as noted earlier, this is an example of the late Mauryan period since this is not the type adopted in any Ashoka pillar. We are, therefore, visualizing a historical situation in India in which the West Asian influence on Indian art was felt more in the late Mauryan than in the early Mauryan period. The term West Asia in this context stands for Iran and Afghanistan, where the Sakas and Pahlavas had their basecamps for eastward movement. The prelude to future inroads of the Indo-Bactrians in India had after all started in the second century B.C."... in Gupta, Swarajya Prakash (1980). The Roots of Indian Art: A Detailed Study of the Formative Period of Indian Art and Architecture, Third and Second Centuries B.C., Mauryan and Late Mauryan. B.R. Publishing Corporation. pp. 88, 122. ISBN 978-0-391-02172-3.. Also Kumar, Vinay (Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi Faculty Member) (2015). "West Asian Influence on Lion Motifs in Mauryan Art". Heritage and Us (4): 14.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  141. The Analysis of Indian Muria Empire affected from Achaemenid's architecture art Archived 2 April 2015 at the Wayback Machine. In: Journal of Subcontinent Researches. Article 8, Volume 6, Issue 19, Summer 2014, Page 149-174.
  142. Monuments, Power and Poverty in India: From Ashoka to the Raj, A. S. Bhalla, I.B.Tauris, 2015 p.18 [2]
  143. "The Archaeology of South Asia: From the Indus to Asoka, c.6500 BCE-200 CE" Robin Coningham, Ruth Young Cambridge University Press, 31 aout 2015, p.414 [3]
  144. Report on the excavations at Pātaliputra (Patna); the Palibothra of the Greeks by Waddell, L. A. (Laurence Austine)
  145. The Origins of Indian Stone Architecture, 1998, John Boardman p. 13-22.
  146. "A griffin carved from milky white chalcedony represents a blend of Greek and Achaemenid Persian cultures", National Geographic, Volume 177, National Geographic Society, 1990
  147. 147.0 147.1 Ching, Francis D.K; Jarzombek, Mark M.; Prakash, Vikramaditya (2017). A Global History of Architecture. John Wiley & Sons. p. 707. ISBN 9781118981603.
  148. 148.0 148.1 Fergusson, James (1849). An historical inquiry into the true principles of beauty in art, more especially with reference to architecture. London, Longmans, Brown, Green, and Longmans. pp. 316–320.
  149. The Illustrated Handbook of Architecture Being a Concise and Popular Account of the Different Styles of Architecture Prevailing in All Ages and All Countries by James Fergusson. J. Murray. 1859. p. 212.
  150. Fergusson, James; Burgess, James (1880). The cave temples of India. London : Allen. p. 120.
  151. M. Caygill, The British Museum A-Z companion (London, The British Museum Press, 1999)
  152. E. Slatter, Xanthus: travels and discovery (London, Rubicon Press, 1994)
  153. Smith, A. H. (Arthur Hamilton) (1892–1904). A catalogue of sculpture in the Department of Greek and Roman antiquities, British museum. London : Printed by order of the Trustees. pp. 46–64.
  154. According to David Napier, author of Masks, Transformation, and Paradox, "In the British Museum we find a Lycian building, the roof of which is clearly the descendant of an ancient South Asian style.", "For this is the so-called "Tomb of Payava" a Graeco-Indian Pallava if ever there was one." in "Masks and metaphysics in the ancient world: an anthropological view" in Malik, Subhash Chandra; Arts, Indira Gandhi National Centre for the (2001). Mind, Man, and Mask. Indira Gandhi National Centre for the Arts. p. 10. ISBN 9788173051920.
  155. Boardman (1998), 13
  156. Harle, 22, 24, quoted in turn
  157. A Comprehensive History Of Ancient India, Sterling Publishers Pvt. Ltd, 2003, p.87
  158. Buddhist Architecture, by Huu Phuoc Le, Grafikol, 2010 p.44
  159. 159.0 159.1 Marshall, John (2013). A Guide to Taxila. Cambridge University Press. p. 11. ISBN 9781107615441.
  160. Salomon, Richard (1998). Indian Epigraphy: A Guide to the Study of Inscriptions in Sanskrit, Prakrit, and the other Indo-Aryan Languages. Oxford University Press. pp. 73–76. ISBN 9780195356663.
  161. "The derivation of the Kharosstshī script from Aramaic, which was used throughout the Achaemenid realm, is relatively straightforward, but the development of Brāhmī as a chancellery script for writing Aśokan inscriptions may have also been related to an effort to emulate the royal inscriptions of Achaemenid or later Seleukid rulers." in Neelis, Jason (2011). Early Buddhist Transmission and Trade Networks: Mobility and Exchange within and beyond the Northwestern Borderlands of South Asia. Brill. p. 98. ISBN 9789004194588.
  162. Sagar, Krishna Chandra (1992). Foreign Influence on Ancient India. Northern Book Centre. p. 39. ISBN 9788172110284.
  163. "Ashoka" in Encyclopaedia Iranica
  164. Hultzsch, E. (1925). Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum v. 1: Inscriptions of Asoka. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. xlii.
  165. Sharma, R. S. (2006). India's Ancient Past. Oxford University Press. p. 163. ISBN 9780199087860.
  166. "The word dipi appears in the Old Persian inscription of Darius I at Behistan (Column IV. 39) having the meaning inscription or "written document" in Congress, Indian History (2007). Proceedings - Indian History Congress. p. 90.
  167. Voogt, Alexander J. de; Finkel, Irving L. (2010). The Idea of Writing: Play and Complexity. BRILL. p. 209. ISBN 978-9004174467.
  168. Dupree, L. (2014). Afghanistan. Princeton University Press. p. 286. ISBN 9781400858910. Retrieved 2016-11-27.
  169. Inscriptions of Asoka. New Edition by E. Hultzsch (in Sanskrit). 1925. p. 51.
  170. 170.0 170.1 170.2 170.3 Vishnu, Asha (1993). Material Life of Northern India: Based on an Archaeological Study, 3rd Century B.C. to 1st Century B.C. Mittal Publications. p. 141. ISBN 9788170994107.
  171. 171.0 171.1 Page 122: About the Masarh lion: "This particular example of a foreign model gets added support from the male heads of foreigners from Patna city and Sarnath since they also prove beyond doubt that a section of the elite in the Gangetic Basin was of foreign origin. However, as noted earlier, this is an example of the late Mauryan period since this is not the type adopted in any Ashoka pillar. We are, therefore, visualizing a historical situation in India in which the West Asian influence on Indian art was felt more in the late Mauryan than in the early Mauryan period. The term West Asia in this context stands for Iran and Afghanistan, where the Sakas and Pahlavas had their base-camps for eastward movement. The prelude to future inroads of the Indo-Bactrians in India had after all started in the second century B.C."... in Gupta, Swarajya Prakash (1980). The Roots of Indian Art: A Detailed Study of the Formative Period of Indian Art and Architecture, Third and Second Centuries B.C., Mauryan and Late Mauryan. B.R. Publishing Corporation. pp. 88, 122. ISBN 978-0-391-02172-3..
  172. 172.0 172.1 According to Gupta this is a non-Indian face of a foreigner with a conical hat: "If there are a few faces which are nonIndian, such as one head from Sarnath with conical cap ( Bachhofer, Vol . I, Pl . 13 ), they are due to the presence of the foreigners their costumes, tastes and liking for portrait art and not their art styles." in Gupta, Swarajya Prakash (1980). The Roots of Indian Art: A Detailed Study of the Formative Period of Indian Art and Architecture, Third and Second Centuries B.C., Mauryan and Late Mauryan. B.R. Publishing Corporation. p. 318. ISBN 978-0-391-02172-3.
  173. "The relatively high quality of terracotta sculptures recovered from Maurya strata at Mathura suggests some level of artistic activity prior to the second century BCE." Quintanilla, Sonya Rhie (2007). History of Early Stone Sculpture at Mathura: Ca. 150 BCE - 100 CE. BRILL. p. 35. ISBN 9789004155374.
  174. Kala, Satish Chandra (1980). Terracottas in the Allahabad Museum. Abhinav Publications. p. 5. ISBN 9780391022348.
  175. "The largest number of mother-goddess figurines has been found in western Uttar Pradesh in Mathura, which in the Mauryan period became an important terracotta making centre outside Magadh." in Sant, Urmila (1997). Terracotta Art of Rajasthan: From Pre-Harappan and Harappan Times to the Gupta Period. Aryan Books International. p. 136. ISBN 9788173051159.
  176. 176.0 176.1 "Iranian Heads From Mathura, some terracotta male-heads were recovered, which portray the Iranian people with whom the Indians came into closer contact during the fourth and third centuries B.C. Agrawala calls them the representatives of Iranian people because their facial features present foreign ethnic affinities." Srivastava, Surendra Kumar (1996). Terracotta art in northern India. Parimal Publications. p. 81.
  177. "Mathura has also yielded a special class of terracotta heads in which the facial features present foreign ethnic affinities." Dhavalikar, Madhukar Keshav (1977). Masterpieces of Indian Terracottas. Taraporevala. p. 23.
  178. "Soldier heads. During the Mauryan period, the military activity was more evidenced in the public life. Possibly, foreign soldiers frequently visited India and attracted Indian modellers with their ethnic features and uncommon uniform. From Mathura in Uttar Pradesh and Basarh in Bihar, some terracotta heads have been reported, which represent soldiers. Artistically, the Basarh terracotta soldier-heads are better, executed than those from Mathura." in Srivastava, Surendra Kumar (1996). Terracotta art in northern India. Parimal Publications. p. 82.
  179. Vishnu, Asha (1993). Material Life of Northern India: Based on an Archaeological Study, 3rd Century B.C. to 1st Century B.C. Mittal Publications. p. XV. ISBN 9788170994107.
  180. "The figure of a Persian youth (35.2556) wearing coat, scarf, trousers and turban is a rare item." Museum, Mathura Archaeological (1971). Mathura Museum Introduction: A Pictorial Guide Book. Archaeological Museum. p. 14.
  181. Sharma, Ramesh Chandra (1994). The Splendour of Mathurā Art and Museum. D.K. Printworld. p. 58.[permanent dead link]
  182. xxiii. 6 in Ammianus Marcellinus, Roman History. London: Bohn (1862) Book 23. pp.316-345.
  183. 183.0 183.1 183.2 James, Montague Rhodes (2007). The Lost Apocrypha of the Old Testament: their titles and fragments. Wipf and Stock Publishers. p. 93. ISBN 9781556352898.
  184. Ammianus Marcellinus, Roman History. London: Bohn (1862) Book 23. pp.316-345.
  185. 185.0 185.1 185.2 Beckwith, Christopher I. (2015). Greek Buddha: Pyrrho's Encounter with Early Buddhism in Central Asia. Princeton University Press. pp. 7–12. ISBN 9781400866328.
  186. Beckwith, Christopher I. (2015). Greek Buddha: Pyrrho's Encounter with Early Buddhism in Central Asia. Princeton University Press. pp. 132–133. ISBN 9781400866328.

Bibliography

change


List of Pakistani monarchs

change

The Pakistani monarchs were the rulers of Pakistan or the Greater Indus region throughout its Ancient, Medieval, Early Modern and Modern periods.[1][2][3] The earliest known monarchs are from the Ror dynasty (c. 450 BCE–489 CE) of Sindh with uncertain and contested historicity, followed by the Euthydemid dynasty (c. 230 BCE–10 CE) of the Indo-Greeks.[4][5][6] Pakistan is historically important as a central area for many empires and kingdoms. Recognized as one of the oldest continuously inhabited lands in the world, Pakistan is considered a diverse cradle of civilizations.[7] The Harappan civilization, one of the world’s earliest, had a complex society, but there is limited evidence about centralized rulers or governance. Three main theories about Harappan governance are: a unified state covering all communities, more than one rulers for major urban centers like Mohenjo-daro and Harappa, or a society without where everyone had equal status.[8]

Located at the crossroads of Asia, Pakistan has been ruled by various dynasties during different periods and in different regions. In ancient times, Pakistani monarchs included the Ror (c. 450 BCE–489 CE), Indo-Greek (c. 230 BCE–10 CE), Indo-Scythian (c. 90 BCE–10 CE), Indo-Parthian (c. 25 BCE–240 CE), Mauryan (c. 322–185 BCE), and Kushan (c. 30–375 CE) rulers.[9] The medieval period saw the rise of powerful dynasties such as the Ghaznavids (c. 971–1186 CE) and Ghurids (c. 1170–1215 CE), which played key roles in spreading Islam and forming Islamic states.[10] The Delhi Sultanate (c. 1206–1526 CE), including the Khalji (c. 1290–1320 CE) and Tughlaq (c. 1320–1413 CE) dynasties, greatly influenced the region’s political landscape. The Mughal Empire later unified much of the Indo-Pakistan subcontinent, bringing significant cultural and administrative advancements.[11] After the Mughal decline, regional monarchies and princely states, such as the Khanate of Kalat (c. 1666–1955 CE), the Katoor dynasty (c. 1340–1969 CE), the Ayasho dynasty (c. 874–1974 CE), the Abbasi Dynasty (c. 1748–1955 CE), the Talpur dynasty (c. 1783–1955) and the states of Nagar (c. 1354–1974 CE), Swat (c. 1000–1969 CE), Dir (c. 1540–1969 CE) and others, continued to rule the region even after Pakistan's independence in 1947.[12]

 
The last monarch of unified Pakistan, Elizabeth II. The Queen's coronation gown was embroidered with the three emblems of Pakistan: wheat, in oat-shaped diamante and fronds of golden crystal; cotton, made in silver with leaves of green silk; and jute, embroidered in green silk and golden thread.

In the early modern period, the Sikh Empire (c. 1799–1849 CE) ruled the Punjab region of Pakistan.[13] The British Raj (c. 1858–1947 CE) included the Princely states in its colonial framework, with the monarchy lasting until the formal abolition of the British crown in Pakistan in 1956. The last monarch to reign unified Pakistan was Queen Elizabeth II until 23 March 1956.[14]

For the purposes of the list, Pakistani monarchs are the monarchs of the empires and kingdoms that were centred in Pakistan or the Greater Indus region, the list may not include monarchs who ruled Pakistan when it was part of an larger empire centred outside of the Greater Indus region.

Royal titles and ranks

change
 
The Golden throne of Maharaja Ranjit Singh, the founder of the Sikh empire, from Lahore, Pakistan.

Pakistan has a rich history that spans thousands of years and includes numerous tribes, kingdoms, empires, cultures, languages, and religions. This diverse history has led to a variety of royal titles and aristocratic ranks, each with different meanings and uses depending on the region and culture. Monarchism has a long tradition in Pakistan and continued even after the country's independence, until 1974 when the last princely states joined Pakistan. Some of these royal titles are still used by descendants in modern Pakistan:

  • Padshah/Badshah: "Padshah" (بادشاہ) means "master king" and was used by many important rulers in Pakistan and Persia. It indicates high status and power, similar to the European title of Emperor. It can also be spelled "Padishah," "Padeshah," or "Badshah."
  • Maharaja: "Maharaja" (مہاراجہ) means "great king" or "great prince." It ranks below Padshah but above Raja. The term comes from the Sanskrit words "mahat" (great) and "rajan" (king). Notable Maharaja include Maharaja Ranjit Singh, founder and the ruler of the Sikh Empire in the late 18th and early 19th centuries.
  • Nawab: The title "Nawab" (نواب) was used for rulers below Emperors or Padshahs. It was often given to Muslim rulers in the Mughal Empire who governed their own regions but were loyal to the Mughal Emperor. During British rule, the title was given to people of importance or merit. The female equivalent is "Nawab Begum" or "Begum." Children of a Nawab are called Nawabzada (sons) and Nawabzadi (daughters).
  • Raja: A "Raja" (راجہ) is a ruler or king of a princely state. Sometimes, the title indicates noble status without real power. The term comes from "rājan," which means ruler. The wife of a Raja is called "Rani," and their children are called Rajkumar (sons) or Rajkumari (daughters). The area ruled by a Raja may be called a "Raj".
  • Thakur: "Thakur" (ٹھاڪر) is an ancient royal title used mainly in Sindh and parts of Punjab. It comes from the Sanskrit word "thākura," meaning idol, god, or lord. In the past, it was similar to the European title of Duke or Prince. The wife of a Thakur is called "Thakurani," and their children are called Kumar (sons) or Kumari (daughters). The area ruled by a Thakur is known as a "Thikana."[15]
     
    George Ali Murad Khan, the last monarch of the Talpur dynasty, sitting on throne, July 1947.
  • Mehtar: "Mehtar" or "Mitaar" (مطار) in Khowar, is the title of the king in the Chitral region of northwestern Pakistan, which was a independent kingdom until ruled by the Katoor dynasty until 1969.
  • Tham: "Tham" meaning king in the Burushaski language is the title used for the rulers of the states of Hunza and Nagar in northern Pakistan. The Queen is titled "Ghenish".[16]
  • Gyalpo: "Gyalpo" (རྒྱལ་པོ་) means "king" in the Tibetic languages. It is used for rulers in the Baltistan region of Pakistan. It also refers to the Four Heavenly Kings in Tibetan mythology and various spirits in both Buddhist and Bon traditions. This title was used by the Makpon, Yabgo and Amacha rulers of northeastern Pakistan.
  • Basileus: "Basileus" (βασιλεύς) is a Greek term meaning "king" or "emperor." It was used by early Indo-Greek rulers in Hellenistic Pakistan. The related term "basileia" refers to "sovereignty" or "kingdom." The feminine forms are "basileia" (queen) and "basilissa" (empress).
  • Shehenshah: "Shehenshah" (شہنشاہ) meaning "King of Kings" was a title was used by rulers of the Kushan and Mughal empires to show their high status and power.
Euthydemid dynasty of Pakistan
Name Portrait Birth Reign length Death Purported life details
Demetrius I

Δημήτριος Ἀνίκητος (Demetrius the unconquered)

  c. 222 BC c. 200 – c. 180 BC[17] c. 167 BC Expanded into northern Pakistan, establishing early Hellenistic influence and the Indo-Greek kingdom in the region of Gandhara.
Agathocles I Dicaeus

Ἀγαθοκλῆς Δικαῖος (Agathocles the just)

  Between c. 190 – c. 180 BC Ruler known for his efforts to consolidate the Indo-Greek control in northern Pakistan, particularly the region of Gandhara.
Pantaleon

Πανταλέων

  Between c. 190 – c. 180 BC c. 180 BCE He was a younger contemporary or successor of king Demetrius I, and is sometimes believed to have been his brother and/or subking.
Antimachus I

Ἀντίμαχος Α΄ ὁ Θεός (Antimachus the God)

  c. 171 – c. 160 BCE On his coinage, Antimachus called himself Theos, "The God", a first in the Hellenistic world. This indicates that Antimachus I might have been instrumental in creating a royal state cult.
Apollodotus I

Ἀπολλόδοτος Α΄ ὁ Σωτήρ (Apollodotus the Savior)

  c. 180 – c. 160 BC or between c. 174 – c. 165 BC c. 163 – c. 162 BC Apollodotus I ruled the western and southern parts of the Indo-Greek kingdom, from Taxila in the Punjab region to the areas of Sindh.
Demetrius II

Δημήτριος

  c. 175 – c. 170 BC or c. 140 BC An Indo-Greek king who ruled briefly during the 2nd century BC. Little is known about him and there are different views about how to date him. Earlier authors such as Tarn and Narain saw him as a son and sub-king of Demetrius I, but this view has now been abandoned.
Antimachus II

Ἀντίμαχος Β΄ ὁ Νικηφόρος (Antimachus the Victorious)

  c. 174 – c. 165 BCE Antimachus II Ruled a vast territory from the Hindu-Kush to the Punjab around 170 BCE. He was almost certainly the eponymous son of Antimachus I, who is known from a unique preserved tax receipt.
Eucratides I

Εὐκρατίδης (Eucratides the Great)

  c. 205 BC c. 171 – c. 145 BC c. 145 BC Eucratides I was one of the most important Indo-Greek kings. He conquered large parts of northern Pakistan by overthrowing the Euthydemid dynasty and minted a vast and prestigious coinage, suggesting a rule of considerable importance and prosperity.
Menander I

Μένανδρος Σωτήρ (Menander the Saviour)

  c. 180 BC c. 165/155 – c. 130 BC c. 130 BC
Zoilus I

Ζωΐλος Δίκαιος (Zoilus the just)

  c. 130 – c. 120 BCE

Ror dynasty

change

The Ror dynasty (روهڙا راڄ‎) was a prominent ruling dynasty in the region of Sindh, Pakistan, with its origins traced back to the early historical period. It was a Sindhi-Buddhist dynasty founded by Dhaj, also known as Ror Kumar in around 450 BC, the dynasty played a significant role in the historical and cultureal development of Sindh.[18] The Ror dynasty established its capital in Rori, which is now modern-day Rohri and Sukkur. This dynasty was known for its influence over the region and its succession of 42 kings, who governed until Raja Dadror, who was poisoned by his head priest (Dewaji), in 620 AD. The rulers of Ror dynasty are one of the earliest known monarchs of Pakistan. The following table lists the chronology of the Ror monarchs from its inception until the end of its reign in 489 AD.[19]

Rori, also known as Roruka, was the capital of the Ror dynasty. It was previously also the capital of the Sauvira Kingdom. Roruka is mentioned as an important trading center in early Buddhist literature.[20] Buddhist Jataka stories talk about exchanges of gifts between King Rudrayan of Roruka and King Bimbisara of Magadha.[21] Divyavadana, the Buddhist chronicle has said that Ror historically competed with Pataliputra in terms of political influence.[22] The scholar T.W. Rhys Davids has mentioned Roruka as one of the most important cities of the subcontinent in the 7th century BCE.[23]

Shortly after the reign of Rudrayan, in the times of his son Shikhandi, Roruka got wiped out in a major sand storm.[24] This event is recorded in both Buddhist (Bhallatiya Jataka) and Jain annals.[25] It was then that the legendary Dhaj (Rai Diyach in Sindhi folklore) built Rori Shankar, Rohri and Sukkur in Pakistan in the year 450 BC.

Ror Dynasty (450 BC – 489 AD)[26]
Monarch Sindhi
Dhaj (Ror Kumar) (ڌج (رور ڪمار
Kunak ڪنڪ
Rurak رورڪ
Harak هارڪ
Devanik ڏيوانڪ
Ahinak احينڪ
Paripat پاريپٽ
Bal Shah بال شاهه
Vijay Bhan وجيڀن
Khangar خانگر
Brihadrath (Raja Ror) (برهدرٿ (راجا رور
Har Ansh هر انش
Brihad-datt برهدر دت
Ishman اشمن
Sridhar شريدھر
Mohri موهري
Prasann Ket پرسن ڪيٽ
Amirvan اميرون
Mahasen ماحسن
Brihad-dhaul برهدر ڌول
Harikeert هرڪيئرٽ
Som سوم
Mitravan مترون
Pushyapata پوشي پٽا
Sudaav سوداو
Bideerakh بيدرک
Nahakman ناحڪمن
Mangalmitra منگلميترا
Surat سورٽ
Pushkar Ket پوشڪر ڪيٽ
Antar Ket انتڙ ڪيٽ
Sutjaya ستجيا
Brihad-dhwaj برهدر ڌواج
Bahuk باهڪ
Kampjayi ڪمپجئي
Kagnish ڪگنيش
Kapish ڪپش
Sumantra سومنتر
Ling-laav لنگ لاو
Manasjit مانس جيت
Sunder Ket سندر ڪيٽ
Dadror دادرور

Indo-Greek monarchs

change
 
The story of the Trojan horse was depicted in the art of Gandhara. (British Museum).

Today 36 Indo-Greek kings are known. Several of them are also recorded in Western and Indian historical sources, but the majority are known through numismatic evidence only. The exact chronology and sequencing of their rule is still a matter of scholarly inquiry, with adjustments regular being made with new analysis and coin finds (overstrikes of one king over another's coins being the most critical element in establishing chronological sequences).

There is an important evolution of coin shape (round to square) and material (from gold to silver to brass) across the territories and the periods, and from Greek type to Indian type over a period of nearly 3 centuries. Also, the quality of coinage illustration decreases down to the 1st century AD. Coinage evolution is an important point of Indo-Greek history, and actually one of the most important since most of these kings are only known by their coins, and their chronology is mainly established by the evolution of the coin types.

The system used here is adapted from Osmund Bopearachchi, supplemented by the views of R C Senior and occasionally other authorities.[27]

Greco-Bactrian and Indo-Greek kings, their coins, territories and chronology

Based on Bopearachchi (1991)[28]

Greco-Bactrian kings Indo-Greek kings
Territories/

dates

West Bactria East Bactria Paropamisade Arachosia Gandhara Western Punjab Eastern Punjab Mathura[29]
326–325 BC Campaigns of Alexander the Great in India 
312 BC Creation of the Seleucid Empire
305 BC Seleucid Empire after Mauryan war
280 BC Foundation of Ai-Khanoum
255–239 BC Independence of the

Greco-Bactrian kingdom Diodotus I 

239–223 BC Diodotus II 
230–200 BC Euthydemus I 
200–190 BC Demetrius I 
190–185 BC Euthydemus IIFile:EuthydemusIICoin.jpg
190–180 BC Agathocles  Pantaleon 
185–170 BC Antimachus I 
180–160 BC Apollodotus I 
175–170 BC Demetrius II 
160–155 BC Antimachus II 
170–145 BC Eucratides 
155–130 BC Yuezhi occupation,

loss of Ai-Khanoum

Eucratides II 

Plato  Heliocles I 

Menander I 
130–120 BC Yuezhi occupation Zoilos IFile:ZoilosI-525.jpg Agathokleia   

Yavanarajya inscription

120–110 BC LysiasFile:Lysias-150.jpg Strato I 
110–100 BC Antialcidas  Heliokles II 
100 BC Polyxenos  Demetrius IIIFile:Demetrius Aniketou.jpg
100–95 BC Philoxenus 
95–90 BC Diomedes  Amyntas  Epander 
90 BC TheophilosFile:Theophilos-634.jpg Peukolaos  Thraso 
90–85 BC Nicias  Menander II  Artemidoros 
90–70 BC Hermaeus  Archebius 
Yuezhi occupation Maues (Indo-Scythian)
75–70 BC Telephos  Apollodotus II 
65–55 BC Hippostratos  Dionysios 
55–35 BC Azes I (Indo-Scythian) Zoilos II 
55–35 BC Apollophanes 
25 BC – AD 10 Strato II and Strato III 
Zoilos III/ Bhadayasa 
Rajuvula (Indo-Scythian)

Indo-Scythian dynasties and rulers

change

Satraps dynasty of Gandhara (c. 85 BCE – 50 CE)

change

This branch of Indo-Scythian ruled over regions of Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa, Eastern Afghanistan and Gandhara region.

List of rulers–

Northern Satraps dynasty (c. 60 BCE – 130 CE)

change
 
Territory of Northern Satraps
List of rulers–

Apracha dynasty (c. 15 BCE – 50 CE)

change
 
Territory of Apracharajas
Family tree–
Apracharajas
Vijayamitra
(1)
r. c. 1st Century
Indravasu
(2)
r. c. 1st Century
Vispavarma
(3)
r. c. 1st Century
Indravarma
(4)
r. c. 1st Century
Aspavarma
(5)
r. c. 1st Century
Child of
Indravarma
Sasa
(6)
r. c. 1st Century
List of rulers–

Western Satraps dynasty (c. 50 BCE – 415 CE)

change
 
Territory of Western Satraps
Family tree–
 
Genealogical table of the Western Satraps

Kshaharata dynasty (c. 1st century BCE to 1st century CE)

change

This branch of Indo-Scythian ruled over regions of Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa, Punjab and beyond.

List of rulers–

Kardamaka (Bhadramukhas) dynasty

change
List of rulers–

(main founder of the Western Satraps)

Rudrasimha II dynasty (c. 304 – 415 CE)

change
List of rulers–

Minor local rulers

change

Indo-Parthian rulers

change
 
Coins of the Indo-Parthian king Abdagases, in which his clothing is clearly apparent. He wears baggy trousers, rather typical of Parthian clothing.
 
Coins of the Indo-Parthian king Abdagases, in which his clothing is clearly apparent. He wears baggy trousers and a crossover jacket.

Kushan rulers

change

One of the most recent list of rulers with dates is as follows:[32]

  • Heraios (c. 1 – 30), first king to call himself "Kushan" on his coinage  
"Great Kushans";
"Little Kushans";

Main Kushano-Sassanid rulers

change

The following Kushanshahs were:[34]

History of Pakistan

change

The history of Pakistan goes back thousands of years in a large area called the Greater Indus region. Modern humans first came to Pakistan between 73,000 and 55,000 years ago. Stone tools that are about 2.1 million years old, used by early human ancestors, have been found in the Soan Valley of Pakistan. The oldest known human bones in Pakistan are from 5000 BCE to 3000 BCE. People started living in one place in Pakistan around 7000 BCE. This led to the creation of Mehrgarh, one of the oldest cities in human history. By 4500 BCE, settled life had spread and slowly turned into the Indus Valley Civilization, which thrived between 2500 BCE and 1900 BCE along the Indus River. Ancient Pakistan is one of the six places where human civilization began. In the early second millennium BCE, long droughts caused the people of the Indus Valley to leave large cities and move to villages. Indo-Aryan tribes came into the Punjab region from Central Asia in several groups, starting the Vedic period. The Vedic period in Pakistan, from about 1500 to 500 BCE, is known for the creation of many hymns called Vedas in the Punjab region, also known as Sapta-Sindhu. The Indo-Aryans, who were herders and travelers, spread from Punjab, Pakistan into the Gangetic plains of India. At the same time, the Gandhara civilization grew in northwestern Pakistan. It was located at the crossroads of South Asia, Central Asia, and the Middle East, connecting trade routes and taking in cultural ideas from different civilizations. Around 600 BCE, a new culture that connected different regions began to appear. Small groups, known as Janapadas, joined to form larger states called Mahajanapadas. This led to a second period of urban growth in South Asia, along with new religious movements and ideas. During this time, Jainism and Buddhism began and spread into the Gandhara region of Pakistan. The Mahayana and Vajrayana forms of Buddhism developed here. Buddhist monks from Gandhara helped spread Buddhism to Central Asia and East Asia along the Silk Road. The Vedic religion mixed with older religious traditions in the region, leading to the development of modern Hinduism.

After the Achaemenid Empire conquered the Indus Valley, local governors, known as satraps, were set up in Ancient Pakistan. The region was divided into five provinces: Hindush, Sattagydia, Arachosia, Gedrosia, and Gandara. Around 300 BCE, Alexander the Great conquered much of the Indus Valley, marking the start of the Hellenic period in Pakistan. Later, Chandragupta Maurya defeated the Nanda Empire and started the Mauryan Empire in Magadha. The Mauryan king Ashoka, who was once the governor of Gandhara, is well-known for adopting Buddhism and trying to spread nonviolence and peace throughout his empire. The Mauryan Empire fell in 185 BCE when the emperor Brihadratha was killed by his general, Pushyamitra Shunga. After this, the Greco-Bactrian Kingdom expanded into northwest Pakistan and established the Indo-Greek Kingdom. Over time, different parts of Pakistan were ruled by many dynasties, including the Mauryans, Kidarites, White Huns, and the Rai from the 4th to the 6th centuries CE. Later, the Indo-Parthians, Indo-Scythians, Kushans, and Indo-Sassanids ruled much of Pakistan. These Pakistani civilizations spread their ways of government, culture, and religion to Central and East Asia, helping Buddhism reach China, Korea, and Japan. The first statues of the Buddha were made in the Gandhara region of northwestern Pakistan. The Mahayana Buddhist texts from Gandhara were brought to China and translated, spreading throughout East Asia. In the early medieval period, mathematics from the region of modern Pakistan had an impact on the development of math and astronomy in the Arab world. This included the creation of the Hindu-Arabic numeral system.

Islamic conquests began to enter the Sindh region of Pakistan as early as the 8th century, starting with the arrival of Muslim armies. Later, Mahmud of Ghazni invaded the region. In 1206, the Delhi Sultanate was founded by Central Asian Turks who later adopted the local culture. The Sultanate ruled a large part of the northern subcontinent in the early 14th century. Different dynasties, including the Tughlaq and Khalji dynasties, controlled the Sultanate. However, the Sultanate began to decline in the late 14th century after the invasions of Timur. During the medieval period, various dynasties ruled different parts of Pakistan. These included the Ghurids, Alchon Huns, Nezak Huns, and the Kalhora dynasty, which ruled over much of Pakistan. In the Sindh region, dynasties like the Habbarids, Soomras, and the Chach ruled. In the northern and northeastern areas, other dynasties such as the Makpon, Katoor, Patola Shahis, and Yabgo held power.

The early modern period started in the 16th century when the Mughal Empire took over most of the Indo-Pakistan subcontinent. This period saw the start of early industrial development, making the Mughal Empire one of the biggest economies and manufacturing powers in the world. However, the Mughal Empire began to weaken in the early 18th century. This was mainly due to the rise of the Sikhs, the Marathas, and the East India Company, which took control of large areas of the subcontinent. The East India Company acted on behalf of the British government and gradually gained control over vast regions between the mid-18th and mid-19th centuries. The way the company ruled led to the Indian Rebellion of 1857. After the rebellion, the British Crown took direct control, leading to the period known as the British Raj. After World War I, a movement for independence began across the subcontinent, led by the Indian National Congress and figures like Mahatma Gandhi and Muhammad Ali Jinnah. Later, the All-India Muslim League called for a separate nation for the Muslim-majority regions in the northwest and east, believing they were different from the rest of South Asia. In August 1947, the British Indian Empire was divided into two independent countries: the Dominion of Pakistan and the Dominion of India. Since then, Pakistan has experienced both periods of democratic civilian rule and military rule. The country has seen times of economic and military growth as well as periods of instability. A significant event during this time was the separation of East Pakistan, which became the new country of Bangladesh.

Complex English (Raw)

change

The history of Pakistan spans several millennia across a wide geographical area known as the Greater Indus region. Anatomically modern humans first arrived in Pakistan between 73,000 and 55,000 years ago. Stone tools as old as 2.1 million years old used by the early hominids have been found in the Soan Valley of Pakistan. The earliest known human remains in Pakistan date to 5000 BCE to 3000 BCE. Sedentariness began in Pakistan around 7000 BCE giving rise to some of the oldest urban centres in human history, Mehrgarh; by 4500 BCE, settled life had spread, and gradually evolved into the Indus Valley Civilisation, which flourished between 2500 BCE and 1900 BCE around the Indus River. Ancient Pakistan is one of the six cradles of civilizations in the world and one of the earliest civilizational states. Early in the second millennium BCE, persistent drought caused the population of the Indus Valley to scatter from large urban centres to villages. Indo-Aryan tribes moved into the Punjab from Central Asia in several waves of migration and started the Vedic period. Vedic Period in Pakistan (1500–500 BCE) was marked by the composition of their extensive collections of hymns (Vedas) in the Punjab (Sapta-Sindhu) region. The pastoral and nomadic Indo-Aryans spread from the Punjab region of Pakistan into the Gangetic plains of India. Alongside the Vedic civilization, the Gandhara civilization flourished at the crossroads of South Asia, Central Asia, and the Middle East in northwestern Pakistan, connecting trade routes and absorbing cultural influences from diverse civilizations. Around 600 BCE, a new, interregional culture arose; then, small chieftaincies (janapadas) were consolidated into larger states (mahajanapadas). Second urbanization took place in South Asia, which came with the rise of new ascetic movements and religious concepts, including the rise of Jainism and Buddhism and spread into the Gandhara region of Pakistan. The Mahayana and Vajrayana branches of Buddhism developed here. The Gandharan monks spread Buddhism to Central and East Asia through the Silk route. The Vedic religion synthesized with the preexisting religious cultures of the subcontinent, giving rise to modern-Hinduism.

After the Achaemenid conquests of the Indus Valley, local satraps were established in Ancient Pakistan and the region became divided in five satrapies; Hindush, Sattagydia, Arachosia, Gedrosia and Gandara. In around 300 BCE, Alexander the great conquered much of the Indus Valley and this led to the start of the Hellenic period in Pakistan. Chandragupta Maurya overthrew the Nanda Empire and established the Mauryan empire in Magadha. Mauryan king Ashoka, initially a governor of Gandhara, is widely recognised for his historical acceptance of Buddhism and his attempts to spread nonviolence and peace across his empire. The Maurya Empire would collapse in 185 BCE, on the assassination of the then-emperor Brihadratha by his general Pushyamitra Shunga. Greco-Bactrian Kingdom expanded into north-west Pakistan and founded the Indo-Greek Kingdom. Various parts of Pakistan were ruled by numerous dynasties, including the Mauryan, Kidarite, White Huns and the Rai in the 4th to 6th centuries CE. Much of Pakistan was later ruled by the Indo-Parthians, Indo-Scythians, Kushans and the Indo-Sassanids. Aspects of these Pakistani civilisations, administration, culture, and religion spread to much of Central and East Asia, which led to the spread of Buddhism in China, Korea and Japan. The first statues of the Buddha in human form were made in the Gandhara region of northwestern Pakistan and the Gandharan Mahayana sutras were brought and translated in China and rest of East Asia. In the early medieval period, mathematics from the region of modern-Pakistan influenced the development of mathematics and astronomy in the Arab world, including the creation of the Hindu-Arabic numeral system.

Islamic conquests made limited inroads into Sindh region of Pakistan as early as the 8th century, followed by the invasions of Mahmud Ghazni. The Delhi Sultanate was founded in 1206 by Central Asian Turks who later adopted to the local culture. They ruled a major part of the northern subcontinent in the early 14th century. It was ruled by multiple dynasties, Including the Tughlaq Dynasty and Khalji dynasty, but declined in the late 14th century following the invasions of Timur. Medieval Pakistan was ruled by various dynasties, including the Ghurids, Alchon Huns, Nezak Huns and Kalhora that ruled much of Pakistan, Habbarids, Soomra, Chach in Sindh and Makpon, Katoor, Patola Shahis, and Yabgo in the north and northeast.

The early modern period began in the 16th century, when the Mughal Empire conquered most of the Indo-Pakistan subcontinent, signaling the proto-industrialisation, becoming the biggest global economy and manufacturing power. The Mughals suffered a gradual decline in the early 18th century, largely due to the rising power of the Sikhs, Marathas, and East India company, who took control of extensive regions of the subcontinent. The East India Company, acting as a sovereign force on behalf of the British government, gradually acquired control of huge areas between the middle of the 18th and the middle of the 19th centuries. Policies of company rule in India led to the Indian Rebellion of 1857. The subcontinent was afterwards ruled directly by the British Crown, in the British Raj. After World War I, a nationwide struggle for independence was launched by the Indian National Congress, led by Mahatma Gandhi and Muhammad Ali Jinnah. Later, the All-India Muslim League would advocate for a separatation of northwestern and eastern muslim majority-regions, who they believed were a distinct nation compared tthe rest of South Asia. The British Indian Empire was partitioned in August 1947 into the Dominion of Pakistan and Dominion of India, each gaining its independence. Since then, the country has experienced both civilian-democratic and military rule, resulting in periods of significant economic and military growth as well as those of instability; significant during the latter, was the secession of East Pakistan as the new nation of Bangladesh.

Abbasi dynasty

change

The Abbasid Dynasty of Bahawalpur traces its descent to the sixth Abbasid Caliph of Egypt who In the second half of the 14th century migrated to Sindh.[35]

Located on the other side of the Radcliffe Line from Bikaner and Jaisalmer, Bahawalpur was a seventeen-gun-salute state. It joined the ranks of the princely states under British paramountcy in 1833 after seeking the East India Company's protection against Ranjit Singh, the Sikh ruler of Punjab. Its sovereign in 1947 was Nawab Sadiq Muhammad Khan V, sixtieth in a line of descent that traced its origins to Al Abbas Ibn Abdul al Muttalib, an uncle of the Prophet Muhammad, through the Abbasid caliphs of Cairo and Baghdad. Bahawalpur was founded by Nawab Mohammad Bahawal Khan II in 1802 after the fall of the Durrani dynasty of Afghanistan that had occupied the region. Once stretching as far north as the Sutlej and Indus rivers, Bahawalpur had strategic importance and had been used as a base by the British for their campaigns in Baluchistan, Sind and Afghanistan.

Credit for turning a feudal backwater into a modern state with grand public buildings, canals, railways, and an efficient administration goes to Sadiq Muhammad Khan IV, who ascended the gaddi at the age of four and was invested with full powers at the age of eighteen in 1879. Unlike his traditionally dressed father, Sadiq Muhammad V belonged to the 'breeches and boots and flannels for cricket' school of ruler and prided himself on his European tastes, though he was also fanatical about his ancestry and wore a fez to emphasize his Abbasid roots.[36]

References

change
  1. Ahmed, Mukhtar (2014-10-15). Ancient Pakistan - An Archaeological History: Volume II: A Prelude to Civilization. Amazon. p. 16. ISBN 978-1-4959-4130-6. ...archaeologists often call the whole area the Greater Indus Region or the Greater Indus Valley. Thus, Ancient Pakistan is essentially the Greater Indus Valley; it is more a cultural and geographic unit than a political one.
  2. Possehl, Gregory L. (2002). The Indus Civilization: A Contemporary Perspective. Rowman Altamira. ISBN 978-0-7591-0172-2. The Greater Indus region is the easternmost portion of a large cultural and natural area of antiquity, stretching from the Mediterranean Sea to the Thar Desert ...
  3. Wheeler, R. E. M. (1950). Five thousand years of Pakistan. London. ISBN 9789694071282.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  4. सिंह, राज पाल. "रोड़ इतिहास की झलक = Glimpses of Ror history". 東京外国語大学附属図書館OPAC (in Japanese). Retrieved 2024-08-17.
  5. Samad, Rafi U. (2002). The Greeks in Ancient Pakistan. Indus Publications. ISBN 978-969-529-001-9.
  6. Simonin, Antoine (2011). "Euthydemid". World History Encyclopaedia. Retrieved 17 August 2024.
  7. Gordon, D. H. (1950). "FIVE THOUSAND YEARS OF PAKISTAN. By R. E. M. Wheeler. pp. 150, Royal India and Pakistan Society, London. 1950. 31s 6d". Antiquity. 24 (96): 219–220. doi:10.1017/S0003598X0002353X. ISSN 0003-598X.
  8. "The Indus River Valley Civilizations | World Civilizations I (HIS101) – Biel". courses.lumenlearning.com. Retrieved 2024-08-17. Over time, three major theories have developed concerning Harappan governance or system of rule. The first is that there was a single state encompassing all the communities of the civilization, given the similarity in artifacts, the evidence of planned settlements, the standardized ratio of brick size, and the apparent establishment of settlements near sources of raw material. The second theory posits that there was no single ruler, but a number of them representing each of the urban centers, including Mohenjo-daro, Harappa, and other communities. Finally, experts have theorized that the Indus Valley Civilization had no rulers as we understand them, with everyone enjoying equal status.
  9. Ahsan, Aitzaz (2013). The Indus saga and the making of Pakistan (First Jumhoori Publications Print ed.). Lahore, Pakistan: Jumhoori Publications. ISBN 978-969-9739-70-5.
  10. Kazimi, Muhammad Reza (2006). "The Ghaznavids: An Overview". Pakistan Perspectives. 11.
  11. Awan, Muhammad Tariq (1991). History of India and Pakistan: Great Mughals. Ferozsons. ISBN 978-969-0-10035-1.
  12. Bangash, Yaqoob Khan (2015). A Princely Affair: The Accession and Integration of the Princely States of Pakistan, 1947-1955. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-906649-0.
  13. Singh, Amarinder (2010). The Last Sunset: The Rise & Fall of the Lahore Durbar. Lotus Collection. ISBN 978-81-7436-779-2.
  14. "George VI (1895–1952), king of Great Britain, Ireland, and the British dominions beyond the seas, and sometime emperor of India". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/9780198614128.001.0001/odnb-9780198614128-e-33370. Retrieved 2024-08-17. India and Pakistan remained among the king's dominions but both were set on republican courses, becoming republics within the Commonwealth in 1950 and 1956 respectively.
  15. Roussillon, Alexandre (2020-11-05). "Indian Royal Titles & Aristocratic Ranks | Nobility Titles - Genuine Titles Of Nobility For Sale". Nobility Titles. Retrieved 2024-08-08.
  16. "Language Log » On the etymology of the title Tham of Burusho kings". Retrieved 2024-08-11.
  17. Phang, Sara; Iain, Spence; Kelly, Douglas; Londey, Londey (2016). Conflict in Ancient Greece and Rome: The Definitive Political, Social, and Military Encyclopedia [3 volumes]: The Definitive Political, Social, and Military Encyclopedia. ABC-CLIO. p. 239. ISBN 978-1-61069-020-1.
  18. Lari, Suhail Zaheer (1994). A History of Sindh. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-577501-3.
  19. Siṃha, Rāja Pāla (1987). रोड़ इतिहास की झलक = Glimpses of Ror history. Pal Publications. pp. 89–92.
  20. MacLean, Derryl N. (1989). Religion and Society in Arab Sind. BRILL. p. 63. ISBN 978-90-04-08551-0.
  21. "The Story of Rudrayana and the Bhallatiya Jakata". web.archive.org. 2013-06-03. Retrieved 2024-08-18.
  22. "The Divyavadana (Tibetan version) reports: 'The Buddha is in Rajgriha. At this time there were two great cities in Jambudvipa: Pataliputra and Roruka. When Roruka rises, Pataliputra declines; when Pataliputra rises, Roruka declines.' Here was Roruka of Sindh competing with the capital of the Magadha empire." Chapter 'Sindhu is divine', The Sindh Story, by K. R. Malkani from Karachi, Publisher: Sindhi Academy (1997), ISBN 81-87096-01-2
  23. Page 317, Lord Mahavira and His Times, by Kailash Chand Jain, Published 1992 by Motilal Banarsidass Publications, ISBN 81-208-0805-3
  24. Page 174, Alexander's campaigns in Sind and Baluchistan and the siege of the Brahmin town of Harmatelia, Volume 3 of Orientalia Lovaniensia analecta, by Pierre Herman Leonard Eggermont, Peeters Publishers, 1975, ISBN 90-6186-037-7, 978-90-6186-037-2.
  25. Story of Udayan and the town of Vitabhaya
  26. Siṃha, Rāja Pāla (1987). रोड़ इतिहास की झलक = Glimpses of Ror history. Pal Publications. pp. 89–92.
  27. Under each king, information from Bopearachchi is taken from Monnaies Gréco-Bactriennes et Indo-Grecques, Catalogue Raisonné (1991) or occasionally SNG9 (1998). Senior's chronology is from The Indo-Greek and Indo-Scythian king sequences in the second and first centuries BC, ONS179 Supplement (2004), whereas the comments (down to the time of Hippostratos) are from The decline of the Indo-Greeks (1998).
  28. O. Bopearachchi, "Monnaies gréco-bactriennes et indo-grecques, Catalogue raisonné", Bibliothèque Nationale, Paris, 1991, p. 453
  29. History of Early Stone Sculpture at Mathura: Ca. 150 BCE – 100 CE, Sonya Rhie Quintanilla, BRILL, 2007, p. 9 [4]
  30. Hartel, Herbert (2007). On The Cusp Of An Era Art In The Pre Kuṣāṇa World. BRILL. p. 324.
  31. Dating and locating Mujatria and the two Kharahostes, Joe Cribb, p.29
  32. Jongeward, David; Cribb, Joe (2014). Kushan, Kushano-Sasanian, and Kidarite Coins A Catalogue of Coins From the American Numismatic Society by David Jongeward and Joe Cribb with Peter Donovan. p. 4.
  33. 33.0 33.1 33.2 The Glorious History of Kushana Empire, Adesh Katariya, 2012, p.69
  34. Rezakhani 2017b, p. 78.
  35. Jafri, Saiyid Zaheer Husain; Reifeld, Helmut (2006). The Islamic Path: Sufism, Society, and Politics in India. Rainbow Publishers. ISBN 978-81-86962-85-5.
  36. Zubrzycki, John (2024-02). Dethroned: The Downfall of India's Princely States. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-1-80526-053-0. {{cite book}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)

List of Pakistani deities

change

Pakistani deities refers to the many gods and goddesses worshipped in different religions that started in the area of Pakistan or the Greater Indus region. This includes the many gods from ancient civilizations, local beliefs, and modern religions that have shaped the spiritual and cultural life of the area. The land of Pakistan is important because it is the starting place of several major religions. The Vedic religion, which helped start Hinduism, began in this area, and its gods have had a lasting effect on the spiritual world.[1][2] Also, the Indus Valley Civilization, one of the world's first city cultures, had early gods (Proto-deities) shown by discoveries made by archaeologists.[3]

The historic regions of Gandhara and Oddiyana in northern Pakistan played a big part in the development and spread of Mahayana Buddhism to Central and East Asia.[4] During this time, the first human images of Buddha and a unigue set Buddhist gods appeared.[5] The Vajrayana branch of Buddhism also started in this area, with Padmasambhava, an important figure in Vajrayana, thought to have come from the Oddiyana area of ancient Pakistan.[6] The land of Pakistan is also important in Zoroastrianism, seen as part of the "Good Lands" (created by Ahura Mazda himself) in Zoroastrian cosmology.[7]

The Hellenic period (300 BC–10 CE) brought Greek influence to Pakistan, mixing Greek and local traditions and creating syncretic (mixed) gods.[8] This mix shows the region's historical role as a meeting place of cultures. In the early modern period, Sikhism, a monotheistic religion started in the Punjab region of Pakistan, introducing a distinct set of revered figures.[9] The Pagan Kalash community, living in the northern parts of Pakistan, has its own gods and spiritual practices.[10]

The following list shows the main gods and goddesses from different religions that started in Pakistan, including syncretic (mixed) gods. The list may not include gods of religions that are influential in the country but started elsewhere.

Early Gods of the Indus Civilization

change
Harappan Proto-Deities
This seal from Mohenjo-Daro shows a seated figure, possibly ithyphallic, surrounded by animals.
Indus Valley Civilization seal, with man fighting two tigers (2500-1500 BCE).[11][12]
Female figure, possibly a fertility goddess from the Indus Valley, Harappan Phase, c. 2500-1900 BC.
Man with horns, hooves and tail, fighting a beast. He has been compared to the Mesopotamian bull-man Enkidu.[13][14][15] Indus Valley civilization seal.

The Indus Valley Civilization (c. 3300–1300 BCE) of Ancient Pakistan gives interesting clues about early religious beliefs through its archaeological findings. While there is little direct evidence of specific gods, several key things suggest the presence of early forms of gods (Proto-Deities) and spiritual ideas.[16]

1. Mother Goddess Figurines: Clay figurines, often called "Mother Goddesses," are common in Indus Valley archaeological sites. Historians think these figurines, with clear female features, likely focus on fertility and motherhood. Their wide use suggests that fertility and farming success were important to the spiritual life of the Indus Valley people.[17]

2. Master of Animals: A important artifact is a seal showing a seated figure surrounded by animals. This has been understood in different ways. Some think it might connect to later gods, but this figure could represent early forms of spiritual or symbolic links to nature or animals.[18] The image of the figure with animals suggests a link to natural forces or an early form of worship related to animals.[19]

3. Animal Worship: Animals often appear in Indus Valley seals and sculptures, showing a form of animal worship. The humped bull, for example, is a key symbol, possibly representing strength, fertility, or farming success. Other animals shown include elephants, the Indus unicorn, and rhinoceroses, suggesting that these animals had special or spiritual meanings. The regular depiction of animals in religious contexts shows that animals were thought to have sacred or spiritual qualities.[16]

Hellenic period

change

From 300 BCE to 10 AD, the Hellenic period in ancient Pakistan saw a strong mix of Greek and South Asian cultures. After Alexander the Great’s conquest, Greek influence spread through cities built by the Greeks in Pakistan, like Alexandria on the Indus, Sirkap, Bajaur, Peshawar, Charsadda and Taxila. The Seleucid, Kushan, Greco-Bactrian, and Indo-Greek kingdoms continued this cultural blend, mixing Greek customs with local traditions in art, architecture, and religion. This mix led to the creation of Gandharan art, which combined Greek and Buddhist styles.[20][21]

Kushan and Indo-Greek deities

change

The Kushan and Indo-Greek gods are very varied, as shown by their coins made of gold, silver, and copper. These coins feature more than thirty different gods from Iranian,[note 1] Greek, and South Asian beliefs.[22] Kushan coins show Kushan kings, Buddha, and gods from Indo-Aryan and Iranian beliefs. Early coins also have Greek gods with Greek names. These empires and kingdoms were centred around the Gandhara region in Ancient Pakistan, which played a big role in the syncretism (mixing) of different beliefs and deities (gods).[23] Following is a list of the Kushan or Hellenistic deities of Pakistan:[24][25][26]

The Iranian entities depicted on coinage include:

  • Ardoxsho (Αρδοχþο): Ashi Vanghuhi  
  • Ashaeixsho (Aþαειχþo, "Best righteousness"): Asha Vahishta  
  • Athsho (Αθþο, "The Royal fire"): Atar[24]  
  • Pharro (Φαρρο, "Royal splendour"): Khwarenah  
  • Lrooaspa (Λροοασπο): Drvaspa  
  • Manaobago (Μαναοβαγο): Vohu Manah[27]  
  • Mao (Μαο, the Lunar deity): Mah  
  • Mithro and variants (Μιθρο, Μιιρο, Μιορο, Μιυρο): Mithra  
  • Mozdooano (Μοζδοοανο, "Mazda the victorious?"): Mazda *vana[24][28]  
  • Nana (Νανα, Ναναια, Ναναϸαο): variations of pan-Asiatic Nana, Sogdian Nny, Anahita[24]  
  • Oado (Οαδο): Vata  
  • Oaxsho (Oαxþo): "Oxus"
  • Ooromozdo (Οορομοζδο): Ahura Mazda  
  • Ořlagno (Οραλαγνο): Verethragna, the Iranian god of war  
  • Rishti (Ριϸτι, "Uprightness"): Arshtat[24]  
  • Shaoreoro (Ϸαορηορο, "Best royal power", Archetypal ruler): Khshathra Vairya[24]  
  • Tiero (Τιερο): Tir

Representation of entities from Greek mythology and Hellenistic syncretism are:

 
Hercules and the Nemean lion wrestling, from Gandhara, Pakistan, 1st century.
  • Zaoou (Ζαοου):[29] Zeus  
  • Ēlios (Ηλιος): Helios  
  • Ēphaēstos (Ηφαηστος): Hephaistos
  • Oa nēndo (Οα νηνδο): Nike  
  • Salēnē (Ϲαληνη):[30][31][32][33] Selene  
  • Anēmos (Ανημος): Anemos  
  • Diónysus (Διόνυσος): Dionysos
  • Ērakilo (Ηρακιλο): Heracles  
  • Sarapo (Ϲαραπο): the Greco-Egyptian god Sarapis  

The South asian entities represented on coinage include:[34]

Rigvedic Deities

change

Rigveda is the oldest of the four sacred Veda texts, composed in an ancient form of Sanskrit in about 1500 BCE, in the Punjab (Sapta-Sindhu) region of Ancient Pakistan. It is also the oldest religious text of Hinduism.[44] It consists of a collection of 1,028 poems grouped into 10 “circles” (mandalas).[45] Following is the list of deities mentioned in the Rigveda:[46]

  • Agni (Agni): The fire god, central to Vedic rituals and sacrifices.
     
    Copper sculpture of the Rigvedic deity Indra, the Chief of the Gods, from Nepal.
  • Indra (Indra): The king of the gods, god of thunder and rain.
  • Varuna (Varuṇa): The god of cosmic order and the waters.
  • Mitra (Mitra): The god of friendship and contracts.
  • Surya (Sūrya): The sun god.
  • Ashvins (Aśvinau): The twin gods of medicine and health.
  • Brihaspati (Bṛhaspati): The god of wisdom and eloquence.
  • Tvastr (Tvaṣṭṛ): The divine carpenter and craftsman.
  • Prajaapati (Prajāpati): The lord of creatures and creation.
  • Aditi (Aditi): The mother of the gods and goddess of infinity.
  • Dyaus Pitar (Dyauṣ Pitṛ): The sky god, akin to the Greek Zeus.
  • Ushas (Uṣas): The goddess of dawn.
  • Pusha (Puṣa): The god of prosperity and nourishment.
  • Savitri (Sāvitrī): The deity associated with the sun and solar energy.
  • Bhaga (Bhāga): The god of fortune and prosperity.
  • Dakshina (Dakṣiṇā): The goddess of the South and offerings.
  • Aranyani (Araṇyānī): The goddess of the forests and wilderness.
  • Chandra (Candra): The moon deity, also known as the god of the night.
  • Ishvara (Īśvara): A deity associated with control and lordship.
  • Soma (Soma): The god of the sacred drink and the moon.
  • Yama (Yama): The god of death and justice.
  • Vayu (Vāyu): The god of wind.
     
    Four-armed statue of the goddess Sharada, the kashmiri name for Sarasvati, from Kashmir, c. late 9th century AD.
  • Sarasvati (Sarasvatī): The goddess of learning, music, and wisdom.
  • Rudra (Rudra): A fierce form of Shiva, associated with storms and hunting.
  • Maruts (Māruṭ): The storm deities, often associated with Indra.
  • Rbhus (Ṛbhus): The divine artisans, associated with various creative tasks.
  • Apris (Aprīs): A lesser-known deity.
  • Dadhikra (Dadhikṛ): A deity associated with the dawn.
  • Parjanya (Parjanya): The god of rain and thunderstorms.
  • Vac (Vāc): A form of the goddess Sarasvati, associated with speech and knowledge.
  • Vastospati (Vāstospati): The god of the house and home.
  • Vishvakarman (Viśvakarman): The architect of the gods and the divine carpenter.
  • Manyu (Mānyu): The god of wrath and fury.
  • Chitragupta (Citragupta): A son of Brahma and Sarasvati, associated with recording deeds.
  • Manas (Manas): A deity mentioned in Rigveda 10.58.
  • Purusha (Purūṣa): The cosmic being, central to the Purusha Sukta hymn.
  • Ratri (Rātri): The goddess of night.
  • Shachi (Śācī): The goddess of power and wife of Indra. Also called Indrani.
  • Vasukra (Vāsukra): A lesser-known deity.
  • Atri (Ātri): A sage, often associated with the divine.
  • Apam Napat (Āpām Napat): The son of the waters, associated with creation and fertility.
  • Kshetrapati (Kṣetrapati): The lord of the field, associated with agriculture.
  • Ghṛta (Ghṛta): Associated with the sacred clarified butter used in rituals.
  • Nirrti (Nirrti): The goddess of dissolution and chaos.
  • Asamati (Asamati): A lesser-known deity.
  • Urvasi (Urvaśī): An Apsara, or celestial nymph.
  • Pururavas (Purūravas): A mythological king, often associated with Urvasi.
  • Vena (Vena): A king mentioned in the Puranas, sometimes associated with the Vedic deities.
  • Mayabheda (Māyābheda): A lesser-known deity.
  • Tarksya (Tārkṣya): A lesser-known deity.
  • Prithvi (Pṛthvī): The goddess of the earth.
  • Adityas (Ādityas): A group of deities associated with the sun.
  • Sanjna (Saṃjñā): The goddess of clouds and dusk.

Gandharan Deities

change
Head of Bodhisattva
Head of a bodhisattva from Gandhara, Ancient Pakistan. Around 4th century, terracotta, 85 cm in height, Asian Civilisations Museum.

The historical region of Gandhara in ancient Pakistan is considered "The holy land of Buddhism".[47] Both the Mahayana and Vajrayana branches of Buddhism have their origins in the Gandhara and Oddiyana regions of Pakistan.[4] Many important Buddhist deities are linked to these areas. Gandharan monks were the first to spread Buddhism to Central and East Asia, and many Buddhist traditions in Japan, Korea, and China today trace their roots back to ancient Pakistan.[21] The Gandhāran Buddhist texts are the oldest Buddhist manuscripts yet discovered (circa 1st century CE). Mahāyāna Pure Land sūtras were brought from the Gandhāra to China as early as AD 147, by the Gandharan monk Lokakṣema who translated the important Mahayana sutras. Following are some major deities and Bodhisattvas associated with the region of Pakistan, including both Mahayana and Vajrayana deities:

Mahayana

change
  • Amitabha Buddha (Amitābha): Amitabha Buddha is the Buddha of Infinite Light, associated with his Western Paradise, Sukhavati. He embodies boundless compassion and wisdom. The origin of Amitabha Buddha is Gandhara, Pakistan.[48]
  • Avalokiteshvara (Avalokiteśvara): Avalokiteshvara is the Gandharan Bodhisattva of Compassion, often depicted with many arms and eyes to aid all beings in need. He is one of the most popular Bodhisattvas in the region.[49]
  • Manjushri (Mañjuśrī): Manjushri is the Gandharan Bodhisattva of Wisdom, symbolizing the enlightened wisdom of the Buddha. He is commonly shown holding a sword and a book.[50]
  • Maitreya (Maitreyā): Maitreya is the Gandharan Bodhisattva of the Future, who is expected to come to earth to renew the Dharma. He is depicted in a relaxed posture, indicating his future role as a Buddha.[51]
    Bodhisattva Maitreya
    Statue of of Bodhisattva Maitreya, the Buddha of the Future, from Gandhara, Ancient Pakistan.
  • Ksitigarbha (Kṣitigarbha): Ksitigarbha is the Bodhisattva who vows to help beings in hell realms and protect travelers. He is often shown holding a staff and a jewel.[52]
  • Tara (Tārā): Tarā is a female Bodhisattva known for her role in guiding and protecting devotees. She is often depicted standing or seated with a serene expression.
  • Dharmachakra Buddha (Dharmacakra): Dharmachakra Buddha represents the Buddha’s first sermon and the turning of the wheel of Dharma. This form is associated with the teaching of the Dharma.[53]
  • Padmapani (Padmapāṇi): Padmapani, or the “Lotus-Bearer,” is a Gandharan Bodhisattva associated with compassion and wisdom, often depicted holding a lotus flower.
  • Vajrapani (Vajrapāṇi): Vajrapani is the Bodhisattva of Power and the Protector of the Buddha. He is depicted holding a vajra (thunderbolt), symbolizing his strength and ability to remove obstacles.
  • Buddha Shakyamuni (Śākyamuni): Buddha Shakyamuni, the historical Buddha, is often depicted in various poses representing his enlightenment and teachings.
  • Bodhisattva Avalokiteshvara (Avalokiteśvara): Avalokiteshvara, as a Bodhisattva of Compassion, is frequently shown with multiple arms and eyes to assist all beings.
  • Naga Deities (Nāga): Nāga deities are serpent-like beings associated with water and fertility, appearing in various forms in Gandharan art.
  • Mahakasyapa (Mahākāśyapa): Mahakasyapa was a principal disciple of Buddha Shakyamuni, known for his role in the first Buddhist council. He is depicted as an elder monk with a solemn demeanor.
  • Kumarajiva (Kumārajīva): Kumarajiva was a renowned translator and scholar whose work significantly influenced the dissemination of Buddhism in Gandhara.
  • Vajrasattva (Vajrasattva): Vajrasattva represents the embodiment of the enlightened mind and the purifying power of the vajra (thunderbolt), often depicted with a vajra and bell.
  • Lokeshvara (Lokeśvara): Lokeshvara is a manifestation of Avalokiteshvara, depicted in a regal form with multiple arms and adorned with jewels, symbolizing world protection.
  • Prajnaparamita (Prajñāpāramitā): Prajnaparamita personifies the perfection of wisdom, often depicted holding a book or scroll, representing ultimate insight into the nature of reality.
  • Hariti (Hārītī): Hariti is both a revered goddess and demon, depending on the Buddhist tradition. She is one of the Twenty-Four Protective Deities of Mahayana Buddhism. The iconography of Hārītī shows similarities to the Greek goddess Tyche and was transmitted to East Asia from Gandhara, Pakistan. She is known as Guǐzǐmǔ(shén) in Chinese and Kishimojin in Japanese.
Hariti statues from Pakistan
Hariti with children (front). 1st century BCE, Gandhara.
Hariti with children (back). 1st century BCE, Gandhara.
Rondel with the Goddess Hariti, 1st century CE.
Standing Hariti (Gandhara).

Vajrayana

change
  • Vajrapani (Vajrapāṇi): Vajrapani is a prominent Vajrayana deity symbolizing the power and protection of the Buddha. He is often depicted wielding a vajra (thunderbolt) and a bell. MET DP297457
  • Padmasambhava (Padmasambhava): Padmasambhava, known as Guru Rinpoche, is a central figure in Vajrayana Buddhism. He is credited with bringing Buddhism to Tibet from Pakistan and is often depicted in various forms, including as a tantric deity.
    Padmasambhava
    Statue of Padmasambhava from Western Tibet.
  • Tara (Tārā): Tara is a female Bodhisattva and is also a key figure in Vajrayana Buddhism. She is associated with protection and compassion and is often depicted in multiple forms, including Green Tara and White Tara.
  • Avalokiteshvara (Avalokiteśvara): Avalokiteshvara, a Bodhisattva of Compassion, is also a significant figure in Vajrayana, often depicted with multiple arms and eyes, symbolizing his ability to aid all sentient beings.
  • Hevajra (Hevajra): Hevajra is a central deity in Vajrayana Tantra, particularly in the Kālacakra and other tantric traditions. He is depicted in a complex form with multiple heads and arms, often surrounded by consorts.
  • Yamantaka (Yamāntaka): Yamantaka is a fierce deity known for overcoming death and ignorance. He is depicted with multiple heads and arms, often standing on a corpse or in a fierce posture.
  • Vajrasattva (Vajrasattva): Vajrasattva is the embodiment of the enlightened mind and the purifying power of the vajra. He is depicted holding a vajra and bell, representing the purification of negativities.
  • Kalachakra (Kālacakra): Kalachakra is a deity associated with the concept of time and cycles. He is central to the Kalachakra Tantra and is often depicted with multiple faces and limbs.
  • Jnana Dakini (Jñāna Dākinī): Jnana Dakini is a female deity representing wisdom and knowledge. She is often depicted in a dynamic and protective posture, embodying the feminine aspect of enlightenment.
  • Vajravarahi (Vajravārāhī): Vajravārāhī is a fierce, wrathful deity embodying the power of transformation and protection. She is depicted with a pig's head and a variety of symbols representing her power.
  • Nairatmya (Nairātmyā): Nairatmya is a female deity representing the absence of self and the wisdom of emptiness. She is depicted in a wrathful form, often holding ritual implements.
  • Mahakala (Mahākāla): Mahākāla is a protector deity in Vajrayana, associated with the destruction of obstacles and negativities. He is often depicted in a fearsome form with multiple heads and limbs.
  • Kalarupa (Kalarūpa): Kalarupa is a wrathful deity representing the transformation of negative forces into positive energy. He is depicted in a fierce, dynamic posture.
  • Samantabhadra (Samantabhadra): Samantabhadra is a primordial Buddha representing the essence of enlightenment. He is often depicted in a serene, meditative posture.
  • Akshobya (Akṣobhya): Akshobhya is one of the five Transcendent Buddhas of Esoteric Buddhism. He sits on a tasseled throne supported by three crowned elephants, his traditional mounts. He is venerated in both Mahayana and Vajrayana.
  • Dvarapala (Dvārapāla): Dvarapala or the Door Guardian is a non-Buddhist protective deity that were found flanking on doorways of Buddhist monasteries at the Gandharan site of Thareli.

Hindu Deities

change
 
5th century statue of the Brahma from Sindh, Pakistan. It is the earliest known metallic image of Brahma, and the only known representative of the school it represents. It has been described as "an immense artistic creation" of its time. National Museum of Pakistan, Karachi.

Hinduism evolved from a blend of Vedic religion and other South Asian religious beliefs in the Greater Indus region (Ancient Pakistan),[54] and later in the Ganges Valley as well. The following are the major Hindu gods associated with Pakistan, the list does not include the Rigvedic deities:

  • Karttikeya (Kārttikeya): The god of war and victory, known for his role as the commander of the divine army.
  • Brahma (Brahmā): The creator god in the Hindu Trimurti, known for his role in the creation of the universe.
  • Jhulelal (Jhulelal): A folk deity revered in Sindh, known as the protector of the Sindhi people and the patron of water and rivers.
  • Shiva (Śiva): One of the principal deities of Hinduism, known as the destroyer and transformer within the Trimurti.
  • Parvati (Pārvatī): The goddess of love, fertility, and devotion, and the consort of Shiva.
  • Ganesh (Gaṇeśa): The elephant-headed god of beginnings, wisdom, and remover of obstacles.
  • Durga (Durgā): A fierce and protective goddess associated with strength and the destruction of evil.
  • Kali (Kālī): A fierce goddess associated with death, time, and the destruction of evil forces.
  • Lakshmi (Lakṣmī): The goddess of wealth, prosperity, and fortune.
  • Vishnu (Viṣṇu): One of the principal deities of Hinduism, known as the preserver and protector of the universe.
  • Krishna (Kṛṣṇa): An avatar of Vishnu, revered for his role in the Mahabharata and the Bhagavad Gita.
  • Rama (Rāma): The hero of the Ramayana and a symbol of virtue and dharma.
  • Kubera (Kubera): The god of wealth and the keeper of treasures.
  • Hanuman (Hanumān): The monkey god and devoted servant of Rama, known for his strength and loyalty.

Kalasha Deities

change
 
Wooden Statues representing the Kalasha ancestors in the Valley of Bumburet, Chitral northwestern Pakistan.

The Kalasha religion is an indigenous religion followed by the Kalash people of Northern Pakistan. It is an ancient polytheistic religion that shares similarities with the Pre-Zoroastrian, Vedic and Hellenic and other Indo-European religious traditions. Following are some major Kalasha deities:[55][56]

  • Dezau (ḍezáw): The supreme creator deity in Kalasha religion, similar to Zeus. Dezau is associated with creation and the formation of all other gods and goddesses. The term "Dezau" is derived from the Indo-European word *dheig'h, meaning 'to form' or 'to create.'
  • Dizane (Disane): The great Mother Goddess of the Kalasha people, also known as Disani or Dezalik (The sister of Dezau). She is associated with the hearth, life force, protection of children and women during childbirth, and the wheat crop. The Giché festival is dedicated to her.
  • Balumain (Bal’ima’n’in): A deity associated with protection and guidance in Kalasha traditions.
  • Sajigor (Sajigor): A deity linked with natural elements and local traditions.
  • Krumai (Krumai): A goddess residing on the sacred mountain Tirich Mir, associated with fairies and natural landscapes. She is known for a myth involving her transformation and interaction with other deities.
  • Mahandeo (Mahandeo): A deity associated with the sun and solar energy, playing a key role in Kalasha rituals and festivals.
  • Saranji (Saranji): A lesser-known deity linked with agricultural fertility and seasonal changes.
  • Nirmali (Nirmali): A goddess similar to Lucina from Ancient Rome, responsible for the protection of women and children, particularly during childbirth. She is associated with the roots of the Sacred Tree.
  • Jestak (Jes’t’ak): A deity associated with health and well-being in the Kalasha pantheon.
    Temple of Jestak
    The temple of Jestak in the Bamburet valley of, Chitral, Pakistan.
  • Munjem Malek (Munjem Malék): A deity with specific cultural and religious significance in Kalasha beliefs.
  • Suchi (Suchi): A deity associated with purity and sacredness.
  • Warin (warin): A lesser-known deity from the Biriu Valley.
  • Varoti (Varōti): A deity linked with local traditions and natural elements.
  • Jach (Jach): A lesser-known deity in the Kalasha pantheon with specific regional importance.
  • Praba (Braba): A lesser-known clan deity, worshipped only in specific villages of Kalash.

Nuristani Deities

change

The Nuristani people of northern Pakistan and Afghanistan followed a polytheistic religion, similar to the Kalash, before their converstion to Islam in 1895-96. Following is the list of Pre-Islamic Nuristani deities:[57]

  • Mara (Mara): The principal creator deity in Nuristani belief, often associated with creation and cosmic order. Also, known as Imra.
  • Mandi (Mandi): Local deities and spirits, collectively known as Mandi or Moni, associated with various aspects of life and nature.
  • Wushum (Wushum): A deity associated with fertility and agriculture.
  • Shomde (Shomde): A lesser-known deity with regional significance.
  • Gish (Gish): A deity linked with natural elements and local traditions.
  • Giwish (Giwish): A lesser-known deity in Nuristani beliefs.
  • Bagisht (Bagisht): A deity associated with protection and guidance.
  • Indr (Indr): A deity often associated with rain and storms.
  • Zuzum (Züzum): A deity with specific local significance.
  • Disani (Disani): A mountain deity, known in Kalasha religion as Dizane, associated with local traditions and natural elements.
  • Kshumai (Kshumai): A lesser-known deity in Nuristani pantheon.
  • Kime (Kime): Another deity with specific regional importance.
  • Yush (Yush): A deity associated with protection and nature.

In Sikhism

change

Sikhism is a monotheistic religion founded in the 15th century in the Punjab region of Pakistan by Guru Nanak Dev Ji. The core belief of Sikhism is in the oneness of God, who is beyond human understanding and transcends all forms and attributes. The religion was shaped by the teachings of ten successive Sikh Gurus, who are highly revered but not considered deities. In Sikhism, God is singular and does not take on human form.[9]

 
Ik Onkār (), a Sikh symbol meaning "There is only one God". It is a central tenet of Sikh religious philosophy.
  • Waheguru (ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂ, vāhigurū): The term for God in Sikhism, meaning "Wonderful Lord" or "Great Guru". Waheguru is the singular, all-encompassing, and formless God who is the creator, sustainer, and destroyer of the universe. Waheguru is beyond human comprehension and is the focus of Sikh devotion and meditation.
change
  1. Iranian here means Bactrian, Arachosian, etc,. Iranian here does not mean "Persian", which is western Iranian.

References

change
  1. Heesterman, Jan (2005). "Vedism and Brahmanism". In Jones, Lindsay (ed.). The Encyclopedia of Religion. Vol. 14 (2nd ed.). Macmillan Reference. pp. 9552–9553. ISBN 0-02-865733-0.
  2. Ahmed, Mukhtar (2014-10-25). Ancient Pakistan - An Archaeological History: Volume V: The End of the Harappan Civilization, and the Aftermath. Amazon. ISBN 978-1-4997-0982-7.
  3. Marshall, John (1996). Mohenjo-Daro and the Indus Civilization: Being an Official Account of Archaeological Excavations at Mohenjo-Daro Carried Out by the Government of India Between the Years 1922 and 1927. Asian Educational Services. ISBN 978-81-206-1179-5.
  4. 4.0 4.1 Allon, Mark; Salomon, Richard (2010). "New Evidence for Mahayana in Early Gandhāra". The Eastern Buddhist. 41 (1): 1–22. ISSN 0012-8708.
  5. Raza, M. Hanif (1995). Glorious Gandhara: Buddha's Story in Stone. Colorpix.
  6. "Padmasambhava | Tibetan Buddhism, Guru Rinpoche, 8th Century | Britannica". www.britannica.com. Retrieved 2024-07-30.
  7. Varandyan, Emmanuel P. (1961). "Milton's Paradise Lost and Zoroaster's Zenda Vesta". Comparative Literature. 13 (3): 208–220. doi:10.2307/1768998. ISSN 0010-4124.
  8. Dani, Ahmad Hasan; Harmatta, János (1999). History of Civilizations of Central Asia. Motilal Banarsidass Publ. ISBN 978-81-208-1408-0.
  9. 9.0 9.1 Shāh, Ṣafdar ʻAlī (2012). The Sikh Heritage of Pakistan. Constellation Plus. ISBN 978-969-9532-01-6.
  10. Masson, Charles (1944-09-07). Kalash Siaposh Kafirs History and Customs. Ishi Press International. ISBN 978-4-87187-377-2.
  11. Possehl 2002, p. 146.
  12. Littleton, C. Scott (2005). Gods, Goddesses, and Mythology. Marshall Cavendish. p. 732. ISBN 9780761475651.
  13. Marshall, John (1996). Mohenjo-Daro and the Indus Civilization: Being an Official Account of Archaeological Excavations at Mohenjo-Daro Carried Out by the Government of India Between the Years 1922 and 1927. Asian Educational Services. p. 389. ISBN 9788120611795.
  14. Singh. The Pearson Indian History Manual for the UPSC Civil Services Preliminary Examination. Pearson Education India. p. 35. ISBN 9788131717530.
  15. 16.0 16.1 Marshall Sir John (1931). Mohenjo Daro and the Indus Civilization Vol-i (1931). pp. 48–78.
  16. Ratnagar, Shereen (2016). "A critical view of Marshall's Mother Goddess at Mohenjo-Daro". Studies in People's History. 3 (2): 113–127. doi:10.1177/2348448916665714. ISSN 2348-4489.
  17. Clark, Sharri R.; Kenoyer, Jonathan Mark (2017-06-06). "South Asia—Indus Civilization". Oxford Handbooks Online. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199675616.013.024.
  18. Counts, Derek B.; Arnold, Bettina (2010). The Master of Animals in Old World Iconography. Archaeolingua. ISBN 978-963-9911-14-7.
  19. Samad, Rafi U. (2002). The Greeks in Ancient Pakistan. Indus Publications. ISBN 978-969-529-001-9.
  20. 21.0 21.1 Samad, Rafi U. (2011). The Grandeur of Gandhara: The Ancient Buddhist Civilization of the Swat, Peshawar, Kabul and Indus Valleys. Algora Publishing. ISBN 978-0-87586-859-2.
  21. Liu 2010, p. 47.
  22. Moore, Albert C. (1977). Iconography of Religions: An Introduction. Chris Robertson. ISBN 978-0-8006-0488-2.
  23. 24.0 24.1 24.2 24.3 24.4 24.5 Harmatta 1999, pp. 327–328
  24. Boyce, Mary (2001). Zoroastrians: Their Religious Beliefs and Practices. Psychology Press. p. 83. ISBN 978-0-415-23902-8.
  25. Kubica, Olga (2023-04-14). Greco-Buddhist Relations in the Hellenistic Far East: Sources and Contexts. Taylor & Francis. ISBN 978-1-000-86852-4.
  26. Harmatta 1999, p. 324.
  27. Jongeward, David; Cribb, Joe (2014). Kushan, Kushano-Sasanian, and Kidarite Coins A Catalogue of Coins From the American Numismatic Society (PDF). New York: THE AMERICAN NUMISMATIC SOCIETY. p. Front page illustration. Archived from the original (PDF) on 17 August 2021. Retrieved 7 March 2021.
  28. "Kujula Kadphises coin". The British Museum.
  29. Dani, A. H.; Asimov, M. S.; Litvinsky, B. A.; Zhang, Guang-da; Samghabadi, R. Shabani; Bosworth, C. E. (1 January 1994). History of Civilizations of Central Asia: The Development of Sedentary and Nomadic Civilizations, 700 B. C. to A. UNESCO. p. 321. ISBN 978-92-3-102846-5.
  30. The Cambridge Shorter History of India. CUP Archive. p. 77.
  31. Sen, Sailendra Nath (1999). Ancient Indian History and Civilization. New Age International. p. 199. ISBN 978-81-224-1198-0.
  32. Singh, Upinder (2008). A History of Ancient and Early Medieval India: From the Stone Age to the 12th Century. Pearson Education India. p. 377. ISBN 978-81-317-1120-0.
  33. 34.0 34.1 34.2 Harmatta 1999, p. 326. "Also omitted is the ancient Iranian war god Orlagno, whose place and function are occupied by a group of Indian war gods, Skando (Old Indian Skanda), Komaro (Old Indian Kumara), Maaseno (Old Indian Mahāsena), Bizago (Old Indian Viśākha), and even Ommo (Old Indian Umā), the consort of Siva. Their use as reverse types of Huvishka I is clear evidence for the new trends in religious policy of the Kushan king, which was possibly influenced by enlisting Indian warriors into the Kushan army during the campaign against Pataliputra."
  34. Sivaramamurti 1976, p. 56-59.
  35. 36.0 36.1 Loeschner, Hans (July 2012). "The Stūpa of the Kushan Emperor Kanishka the Great" (PDF). Sino-Platonic Papers. 227: 11.
  36. 37.0 37.1 Bopearachchi 2007, pp. 41–53.
  37. Sims-Williams, Nicolas. "Bactrian Language". Encyclopaedia Iranica. Vol. 3. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  38. Bopearachchi 2003. Cites H. Humbach, 1975, p.402-408. K.Tanabe, 1997, p.277, M.Carter, 1995, p.152. J.Cribb, 1997, p.40.
  39. Fleet, J.F. (1908). "The Introduction of the Greek Uncial and Cursive Characters into India". The Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland. 1908: 179, note 1. JSTOR 25210545. The reading of the name of the deity on this coin is very much uncertain and disputed (Riom, Riddhi, Rishthi, Rise....)
  40. Shrava, Satya (1985). The Kushāṇa Numismatics. Pranava Prakashan. p. 29. The name Riom as read by Gardner, was read by Cunningham as Ride, who equated it with Riddhi, the Indian goddess of fortune. F.W. Thomas has read the name as Rhea
  41. Perkins, J. (2007). Three-headed Śiva on the Reverse of Vima Kadphises's Copper Coinage. South Asian Studies, 23(1), 31–37
  42. Fitzwilliam Museum (1992). Errington, Elizabeth (ed.). The Crossroads of Asia: transformation in image and symbol in the art of ancient Afghanistan and Pakistan. Ancient India and Iran Trust. p. 87. ISBN 9780951839911.
  43. Staal, Frits (2008). Discovering the Vedas: Origins, Mantras, Rituals, Insights. Penguin Books India. ISBN 978-0-14-309986-4. There is some justification for that usage in cultural contexts, though it is odd in terms of modern boundaries since much of the area of the Indus Civilization and where the Rigveda was composed overlap with Pakistan.
  44. "Rigveda | Definition & Facts | Britannica". www.britannica.com. Retrieved 2024-07-31.
  45. Griffith, Ralph T. H. (1920). The Hymns Of The Rigveda Vol-i.
  46. "Buddhist Heritage of Gandhara, Pakistan – INEB". Retrieved 2024-08-01.
  47. Tanabe, Katsumi (2016–2017). "Gandharan Origin Of The Amida Buddha Image" (PDF). Ancient Punjab. 4 – via University of Punjab.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: date format (link)
  48. himalayanbuddhistart (2016-10-05). "Gandhara culture, Avalokiteshvara". Himalayan Buddhist Art - Art Bouddhiste de l'Himalaya. Retrieved 2024-07-31.
  49. Luczanits, Christian. "Buddhism in a Cosmopolitan Environment: The Art of Gandhara" (PDF). Gandhara.
  50. N.Y.), Metropolitan Museum of Art (New York; Behrendt, Kurt A. (2007). The Art of Gandhara in the Metropolitan Museum of Art. Metropolitan Museum of Art. ISBN 978-1-58839-224-4.
  51. Khan, Muhammad Ashraf; Lone, Abdul Ghafoor (2004). Gandhara: Geography, Antiquity, Art & Personalities, Illustrious Heritage of Pakistan. Ashiq Hussain Chaudry. ISBN 978-969-8832-00-1.
  52. Samad, Rafi U. (2011). The Grandeur of Gandhara: The Ancient Buddhist Civilization of the Swat, Peshawar, Kabul and Indus Valleys. Algora Publishing. ISBN 978-0-87586-859-2.
  53. Parpola, Asko (2015). The Roots of Hinduism: The Early Aryans and the Indus Civilization. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-022692-3.
  54. "::Ka'l'as'(Kalasha) ::". ::..The Kalasha Times..::. 2006-03-10. Retrieved 2024-08-02.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link)
  55. Gov.pk. "RELIGION OF THE KALASH" (PDF). Pakistan Research Repository. Higher Education Commission.
  56. Allen, Nicholas Justin (1991). "Some gods of Pre-Islamic Nuristan". Revue de l'histoire des religions. 208 (2): 141–168. doi:10.3406/rhr.1991.1679.